|
< back
1 | 2
| 3
It
appears that this council of “wise men” has already a plan of action for the
future king of
England
to Islamize the country. Discussing the role of Islam in the United Kingdom, in a speech at the Foreign Office Conference Centre at
Wilton
Park
in
Sussex
on December 13, 1996, Charles called on Islamic pedagogy
and philosophy to help young Britons develop a “healthier view of the
world”. Praising Islamic culture in its traditional form for trying to
preserve an "integrated, spiritual view of the world in a way we have not
seen fit to do in recent generations in the West," he went on to say:
There is much we can learn from that Islamic world view in
this respect. There are many ways in which mutual understanding and appreciation
can be built. Perhaps, for instance, we could begin by having more Muslim
teachers in British schools, or by encouraging exchanges of teachers. Everywhere
in the world people want to learn English. But in the West, in turn, we need to
be taught by Islamic teachers how to learn with our hearts, as well as our heads.
According
to the Prince, all that Muslims need to learn from the West is English,
while the “spiritually bankrupt” Westerners are in dire need of learning
Islamic philosophy and values.
What
philosophy? What values? Tell me what Islam has that Christianity doesn't and I
will tell you a million things that the Western culture has that Islam doesn't. First and foremost is freedom of thought and respect for human dignity. In the
West people are people. In Islam they are slaves and like animals their thoughts
do not count. If they dare to express a thought contrary to Islam, they will be
executed.
Why like all Muslims you compare the unbelieving decadent 'Christians' with the
'ideal Islam'? Why don't you compare Christians with Muslims, fundamentalist
Christians with fundamentalist Muslims and Christianity
with Islam? When you stop this logical fallacy of comparing apples to oranges,
you will see that Christianity is a thousand time superior to Islam and
Christians are a thousand time better than Muslims. Fundamentalist Christians
are just nutcases. All you have to do is ignore them. Fundamentalist Muslims are
terrorists. You can't ignore them. And there is no comparison between Jesus
and Muhammad. The former was a super saint, the latter was a thug.
While
criticizing the Western civilization Charles added:
During
the past three centuries, in the Western world at least, a dangerous division
has occurred in the way we perceive the world around us. Science has tried to
assume a monopoly even a tyranny over our understanding. Religion
and
science have become separated, so that now, as Wordsworth said, "Little we
see in nature that is ours". Science has attempted to take over the natural
world from God; it has fragmented the cosmos and relegated the sacred to a
separate and secondary compartment of our understanding, divorced from
practical, day to day existence. 3
Science
does not pretend to have answers to all human questions. Science has its own modus operandi
and does not concern itself with things that are not verifiable through
scientific means. It is not up to science to speculate on supernatural and
spirituality. But science per se, is not tyrannical. Scientists may not agree
with your views but they will never jail you, torture you or behead you for
believing in what they regard scientific heresies. In the midst of the most
scientific societies, you are allowed to believe in, and even preach,
hocus-pocus and do not have to fear for your life. It is Islam that claims
monopoly of the truth, jails its dissidents, tortures them and beheads them.
What would befall to a Muslim scientist if he dares to say Jinns are fairytale, Muhammad did not split the moon and
Mi'raj (the alleged ascension of
Muhammad to heaven riding on a winged horsy) is ridiculous?
What
part of the Quran is scientific? This book is an insult to human intelligence.
What has been the contribution of Islam to science? Nothing! Islam has been a
hindrance to science. The few scientists who were born in Islamic countries and
gave birth to what now Muslims claim to be "Islamic science", were
all apostates and unbelievers. Some of them, like Razi, ridiculed religions
and called the prophets, "billy goats" and "charlatans". The
quartets of Khayyam, the great poet/mathematician, is full of ridicules of the
Quran and its epistemology. Others, like Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd were denounced as heretics and often were on
the move to escape persecution. Whatever these scientists planted with their
"heads" was nipped in
the bud by true Muslims like Al Ghazali and Rumi who followed their
"hearts". Islam put an end to science
and scientific quest. Rather than investigating the causes of the natural phenomena,
everything was explained as the "will of God" and the researchers were
mocked. What harmony of science and religion Charles sees in Islam? Why he does
not enlighten us?
As
is to be expected, Charles has reached a hero status among Muslims.
CAIRO,
June 21 (IslamOnline.net)
– Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei will award Prince Charles, the heir to the
British crown, an international prize for his contribution to understanding
Islam in the West during a London ceremony on Thursday, June 24.
The
Prince of Wales was unanimously chosen by an international jury set up by the
Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS) for his earnest efforts to promote
dialogue between the Islamic and Western civilizations, 4
John
Casey of
Cambridge
University, warns that the British public lacks a clear understanding of Charles's
standing in the Muslim world:
The
extent to which the Prince is admired by Muslims-even to the point of
hero-worship-has not yet sunk into the consciousness of the British public. When
it does, that public may or may not be pleased.
As
it is clear, Charles likes to think with his heart rather than with his head.
Heart is for feelings. To find one's way one must use his head. Impressionable
people like Charles can easily be coned. He, obviously is being used by Muslims
with whose help
they hope to penetrate England
and indoctrinate the Britons with Islam. Gordon and Stillman write: “At a
private dinner with Prince Charles in May 1997, Prince Bandar bin Sultan of
Saudi Arabia announced a donation by King Fahd of $33 million to
Oxford
University
to construct a new Centre for Islamic Studies at Oxford, a gift designed "to establish Islamic studies at the heart of the British
education system."
Centre
for Islamic Studies is just a fancy name for madrassah. Thousands of mosques,
madrassahs and Islamic centers have been sprouted all over UK. Islam is gradually penetrating in that country, destabilizing its democratic
foundation and fomenting terrorism among its Muslim population. Muslims’
'generosity' does not come with no-strings-attached. Wherever they invest their
money, whether it is in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia,
UK or
USA, the objective is to advance Islamic imperialism. Soon terrorism will follow
and the country will become a war zone.
The
Britons should know that the first allegiance of a Muslim is to Islam. Every
Muslim, whether he is a pauper or a prince has the duty to advance the cause of
Islam and make it dominant.
Muslims,
function as the fifth column, in favor of Islam, wherever they reside. The
Britons must realize that Islam is not just another faith. Islam
is a fascistic doctrine that uses religion to advance its political agenda. If
the king of England has sympathies towards Islam, whether he is a convert or just a 'useful idiot',
this should be a matter of concern to everyone. His sympathy to
Islam will boost Islamic zealotry and will feed Islamic terrorism.
 With
so much scandals oozing out of the House of Windsor, Charles flirting with Islam
and his son Harry wearing a swastika armband, maybe it is time that the Britons
see whether they really have any need for the archaic institution of monarchy.
Apart from providing fodder for the tabloid industry what other useful function
does monarchy have?
Instead
of coming to America and lecturing to Americans about a faith of which he knows
nothing but some lies and clichés that he has been told, I challenge the Prince
of Wales to urge his panel of "wise men" to confront me and prove that
my charges against Muhammad are false. Will he at
least ask them to do that? If he really cares about the truth, this is the least
he should do.
Is
Prince Harry also a Muslim in closet?
This
article should be read by the President of the United States before listening to
Prince Charles's charade about Islam. Please forward it to him, to the Secretary
of State, to all the members of the Congress, to your governor and to your
mayor. Send it to your local newspaper and ask them to publish it. Don't
assume that truth will always win. This is a childish belief. It happens only in
fairytales. History shows that only those who are determined win. If you are not
determined the Isamists will win and mankind will lose.
Permission
is granted to publish this
article and I encourage you to promote it as
much as you can until it reaches the Prince and millions of others who like him
are fed with lies about Islam. Being a 'useful idiot'
is just as dangerous as being the enemy itself, or perhaps more.
Related
subject:
A letter to HRM Queen Elizabeth
II
Defender
of the Faith
1- http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch24.htm
2-
[Quoted in Giles Milton, The Riddle and the Knight: In Search of
Sir John Mandeville (London: Allison & Busby, 1996), p. 78.]
3-
http://salam.muslimsonline.com/~ig/islam/abbas/prince.htm
4-
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2004-06/22/article03.shtml
Source
of unspecified Quotes in this article is: Prince Charles of
Arabia
by Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman SEPTEMBER
1997 • VOLUME IV: NUMBER 3 http://www.meforum.org/article/356
< back
1 | 2
| 3
|
