The aim of following Islam is to attain the Paradise and enjoy wine and women

2 Responses

  1. Face_The_Truth says:

    Judaism, Christianism and Islam have ZERO spirituality in them; because, Judaism, Christianism and Islam are rooted in looting non-believers’ lands, properties, and exploiting non-believing females as sex-slaves.

    Islam’s founder Muhammad the Arabian emulated both Jewish prophet Moses the Egyptian and Christian idol Jesus the Nazarene Jew.

    World’s Christians promote the 2000-year-old absolute falsehood that, Christian idol Jesus the Nazarene Jew was SINLESS.

    Similarly, world’s faithful Muslims believe that, Islam’s founder Muhammad the Arabian was the most PERFECT, JUST, and FLAWLESS man ever walked on earth, who routinely used to receive “messages” from one and only fictitious Islamic “Allah”.

    World’s Jews believe that, looting and occupying all non-believers’ lands and properties was a “Divine” attribute of Jewish prophet Moses the Egyptian!

    Similarly, world’s faithful Muslims believe that, Islam’s founder Muhammad the Arabian did the PERFECT job of either beheading or permanently exiling all Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula 1400 years ago.

    So, any conscientious human on earth will categorically renounce Judaism, Christianism and Islam with the sheer realization that, Judaism, Christianism and Islam have ZERO spirituality in them.

    Today we hear child-molestation in Christian churches; but, child-molestation and sexual exploitation of minors were part and parcel of Christianism since the end of the Pagan Roman Empire by 400 A.D.

    But, Christians keep lying to us (i.e., non-believers) ad infinitum in order hide the blood-soaked 2000-year-old history of Christianism.

    Muslims do not at least lie to us (i.e., non-believers) when Muslims come to realize the great importance in Islam of sexual-slavery of all non-Muslim females of all ages!

    Rather, world’s Muslims reconfirm their steadfast support for sexual slavery of all non-believing females of all ages to this day again and again.


    ‘The Qur’an allows for the owning of sex slaves by faithful Muslim men:

    If you fear that you will not act justly towards the orphans, marry
    such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if you fear you
    will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so
    it is likelier you will not be partial. (Qur’an 4:3)

    This verse is the basis for Islamic polygamy, allowing a man to take
    as many as four wives, as long as he believes he is able to “deal
    justly” with all of them. But justice in these circumstances is in the
    eye of the beholder. Ibn Kathir says this the requirement to deal
    justly with one’s wives is no big deal, since treating them justly
    isn’t the same as treating them equally: “it is not obligatory to
    treat them equally, rather it is recommended. So if one does so, that
    is good, and if not, there is no harm on him.”

    The verse goes on to say that if a man cannot deal justly with
    multiple wives, then he should marry only one, or resort to “what your
    right hands own” – that is, slave girls.

    Slave girls? Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this
    practice, and longs for the good old days:

    During Jihad (religious war), many men and women become war captives.
    The Amirul Mu’minin [leader of the believers, or caliph – an office
    now vacant] has the choice of distributing them amongst the Mujahidin
    [warriors of jihad], in which event they will become the property of
    these Mujahidin. This enslavement is the penalty for disbelief (kufr).
    He goes on to explain that this is not ancient history:

    None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been abrogated in
    the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not have slaves
    is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war). Their wars are
    fought by the instruction of the disbelievers (kuffar) and are halted
    by the same felons. The Muslim [sic] have been shackled by such
    treaties of the disbelievers (kuffar) whereby they cannot enslave
    anyone in the event of a war. Muslims have been denied a great boon
    whereby every home could have had a slave. May Allah grant the Muslims
    the ability to escape the tentacles of the enemy, remain steadfast
    upon the Din (religion) and engage in Jihad (religion war) according
    to the injunctions of Shari’ah. Amen!

    This is by no means an eccentric or unorthodox view in Islam. The
    Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are
    in the era of jihad,” and that as they waged jihad warfare against
    infidels, Muslims would take slaves. He clarified what he meant in a
    subsequent interview:

    …Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels….Spoils, slaves, and
    prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels.
    Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This
    is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from
    any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking
    spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among
    the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
    When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold
    slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk
    al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is
    a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been
    abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market,
    look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but)
    she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman,
    nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is
    no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I
    just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

    Right around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti activist
    and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the
    Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing
    that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of
    Islamic morality.

    …A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said
    he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort
    of thing. He was speaking the truth….I brought up (this man’s)
    situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question,
    since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was
    good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

    The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim
    nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the
    religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of

    “Is this forbidden by Islam?,” I asked.

    “Absolutely not. Sex slaves ARE NOT forbidden by Islam. On the
    contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman.
    The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and
    hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a
    lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage
    contract, the sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by
    her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than
    the free woman.”’

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: