Leaving Islam




Jihadists unwittingly aid Red Chinese Nuclear World Conquest

by Yongo


Islamic supremacists at war with the world are threatening to send humanity into a hell we cannot imagine. The stage has been set. Western progressive countries have stopped growing and poverty-ridden societies are spreading rapidly. The only large militarily strong and economically growing society in the world today is the People’s Republic of China .

Stupidity, thy name is jihad
Self-centered jihadists seem to not realize that defeating the United States , most likely by bankrupting its economy or with a smuggled nuclear device, would be the worst thing they could possibly do to themselves. Without a United States to protect them, the jihadists would be fully exposed. A militant, totalitarian China would be the only superpower left in the world. It is inconceivable that China wouldn’t take great advantage of this position. For starters, poorly defended, oil-rich Arab countries would be easy prey for oil-hungry China . Small-time terror-funding sheiks wouldn’t even know what hit them.

China : Looking for "lebensraum"
Officially atheist China has quietly become an aggressive and belligerent country convinced of its own supremacy and centrality in the world. Suicidal Muslim psychotics pose little threat to a robust China . China has 1.3 billion people, or one fifth of the world’s population,—more than enough to conquer a fractured world. The Chinese rulers are as ruthless as Hitler—but with 20 times his population at hand. China has an aggressive eugenics program and now has one of the highest IQ averages in the world, as well as a large population of educated and indoctrinated citizens. Even suicidal jihadists are afraid of China , evidenced by how little they support beleaguered Muslim Uighurs in Western China . With such a large energetic population, it takes little imagination to see why China covets vast foreign territory and would halt at nothing to take it, given the chance.

Holocaust Redux
Still communist, Red China has revamped the “total war” concept, meaning nothing is off limits. The Geneva Conventions are but silly rules to China . Total liquidation of non-Chinese populations is not improbable from the Chinese government. With a world thrown in to chaos by crude Islamic fascists, combined with the killing power of today’s weapons, the world could be remade in China ’s image very soon.
China is building its military at an unprecedented rate. Although China has said it is not averse to absorbing a nuclear retaliation, it is also working on technologies such as electromagnet- pulse bombs and nanotechnology that could knock out America ’s last defense of nuclear weapons before they could even launch.
Once in command, the secretive technocrat Han-supremacists that rule China —far more efficient than Muslim supremacists—would not hesitate to rewrite world history and airbrush everyone but Hans out.

The example of Eisenhower
It must be stressed: stating that Red China is acting as a serious threat to the rest of humanity is in no way an indictment of Chinese culture and all its grandeur. No person of Chinese descent should feel threatened by the assertion that China is dangerous any more than General Eisenhower should have felt that loathing Nazis was directed at his German heritage. Obviously, he saw through such a false relation and so can every Chinese. Not incidentally, China would inevitably kill many “overseas Chinese,” including Westerners of Chinese heritage, by conquest using indiscriminate methods of destruction. Such a scenario parallels on a larger scale the deaths of Muslims killed by jihadists during “martyrdom operations.” For both jihadists and Chinese dictators, it’s all about conquest.  

The individual’s life matters not.
We can only hope that the saner jihadists will begin to recognize the futility of the bizarre hate triangle they have created between themselves, China and the West and curtail their operations, at least for another century.  

Jihadists: World's number one evil
As the world’s leading free society, the United States has been targeted by the powers of the Arab/Muslim world for destruction. We can either ignore them and boil slowly like the frogs of Europe , ere long “Eurabia,” joining the Persians, Turks, Indonesians, Pakistanis and other peoples transmogrified by Arab imperialism, or we can fight them and survive, culture intact.
The West has plainly pleaded with the Muslim community to show us that Islam is not a violent supremacist faith. We looked inward and asked if it is we who needed to change. At the very least, we waited for a sign of reform, to assure us that the many disturbing verses in the Koran petitioning violence against Jews, Christians and “pagans” were no longer to be taken literally. All along, Indian Hindus, Nigerian, Egyptian, Indonesian and Lebanese Christians, Thai Buddhists, and even secular Arabs, et al, snickered at our naiveté of Islam, knowing first hand the brutality of jihadism.

By and large, our pleas have been answered only by more bombs and hate speech. Osama bin Laden is still openly celebrated in many Muslim states, and others only pretend not to idolize him, especially when dealing with Westerners. Four years after 9/11 and still no major cleric has issued a fatwa against bin Laden. A rally of Muslims against terrorism in Washington DC drew only 50 people.

The vast majority of wars today are instigated by Muslims. It is not a stretch to say the world would be at peace but for Islam. While not all Muslims are terrorists, by far most terrorists are Muslim. Today, the world is threatened by nuclear annihilation and unspeakable suffering due to the tension created by Islam. We cannot afford to pretend that Islam is not what its most knowledgeable believers, the jihadists, say it is. We do not have the luxury of waiting hundreds of years to hope for reform. The Muslim “powers that be” have thrown down the gauntlet. Islam is what it is, and reforming it, strictly forbidden by Mohammad himself, would lead to a religion other than Islam—an impossibility for jihadists.


      2  |  5   next >  






Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles in this site only if you provide a link to the original page.