When I said Muhammad brought savagery into
, obliterated compassion and established vengeance as the norm, Mr. al Zawadi
|In the Battle of Badr, the
Muslims captured 70 prisoners of war, of whom only 3 were put to death:
Uqba ibn Abi Maíit, An-Nadr ibn Al-Harith and Tu`aymah ibn `Udday.
If the Prophet was a psychopath he would have
ordered the execution of all the 70 prisoners. But he only ordered it for
The Prophet did not only punish them because they
insulted him. When the Prophet was in
, the people insulted and abused him and when he conquered
later on, he forgave them all. He had the power to kill them all but he
didn't. The reason for Nadr ibn Al Harith and Oqba is the same
reason for the order of the killing of Kab bin Ashraf. Their insults and
public dismay of the Prophet made people rise up and fight against the
Prophet. So their words caused a lot of damage.
See how Mr. al Zawadi contradicts himself? First he says that Muhammad
forgave those who insulted him and in the next sentence he says the reason he
killed these men was because of "their insults and public dismay of the
Prophet". This all makes perfect sense to him.
Muhammad was a psychopath. Being a psychopath does not mean acting
erratically. Psychopaths are often smart and calculating. Hitler was a
psychopath. But he was not a fool. Saddam Hussein is a psychopath, but as one
can see, he is very smart. Most psychopaths do not kill for no reason or just
for the fun of it as one can see in movies. Some do. Son of Sam or the Unibomber
are examples of that. Some psychopaths kill because this gives them the godlike
power of taking lives. But even they are smart. Most psychopaths look normal and
they are often more successful than the average people because they are
calculating and ruthless. They successfully deceive and embezzle others
and because they have thought of everything from the start, when no one had a
slightest idea that they will be stabbed in the back, they get away with their embezzlements.
Because they can play their cards extremely well, they often rise to power. In
countries where they can fool the masses they become dictators, where
dictatorship is not possible they become CEOs. They are smart and charming, but
ruthless and conniving.
When psychopath narcissists kill, they always have "legitimate"
reasons that to them make perfect sense. They kill those whom they think intervene
in their grandiose plans. They think of themselves so important and their ideas
so grand that those who stand in their way become dispensable and must be
eliminated. They feel perfectly justified to do that and are convinced of their
actions. Their cause is so important that the lives of millions of people become
insignificant in comparison.
What would Muhammad gain by killing wantonly all the captives of Badr? Many
of those captives were the relatives of his followers. One of them was Abul Aas,
husband of Zeinab, his own elder daughter. Muhammad asked the families of the
prisoners to pay ransom for their release or he would kill
them. He saved them out of greed, not
out of kindness of heart!
An interesting and perhaps tender story here is that Zeinab sent a gold
necklace that she had received from her mother Khadijah at her wedding to ransom
her husband. Muhammad upon seeing that necklace and recognizing it as once worn
by Khadijah, was moved and agreed to release Abul Aas without ransom provided
Zeinab abandon him and join him in
. He was incapable of giving anything up without demanding something in
exchange. Even his largesse was designed to impress people and win them
Why then he killed those three and did not ransom them? It is because they
had humiliated him. Once you humiliate a narcissist he will never forgive you.
He will not rest until he takes his sweet revenge.
I accused Muhammad for making Allah an accomplice to his crimes. For example
he ordered his followers to raid and loot innocent people asking them to bring
one fifth of everything to him saying "this is for Allah and his Messenger".
I asked why would Allah need those loots? My opponentís response was:
|When it says that the war booty is
for Allah and his Messenger, it simply means that it is for the cause of
Islam. It does not mean that Allah is going to consume the war booty.
Why the cause of Islam had to expand with the stolen property? This question
is important. Islam has advanced with loot and with blood of innocent people.
Why a religion of God should be built upon the death and misery of countless
This loot was only for Muhammad. Allah was just an excuse. If Allah is God,
he does not need to steal from people. This is blasphemy. Unless Allah is Satan,
he would never order people to kill their kind. To justify his own evil deeds
this shameless gangster made the maker of the universe his partner in crime.
I said that in the sixth year of Hijra Muhammad had promised victory to his
foolhardy followers over
and my opponent wrote:
|Not true, the Prophet promised his
followers that they would make Umrah (the lesser pilgrimage) not victory
over Makkah. Does that really show that their intention was to
fight? I do not think so. Read any Islamic history book and it would
tell you that their intention to go to
was a peaceful one.
My opponent is right. This is my mistake. The declared intention was just to
perform Umrah. As for Muhammad's real intention, it is anyone's guess. But why
go to pilgrimage with 1500 armed men?
Mr. al Zawadi wrote:
|When Ali Sina talks about looting, he
is making it seem like the Muslims went around and invaded villages and
people solely in order to gain their war booty. He is making it seem like
the Muslims were pirates wandering around and pillaging innocent people
and stealing their valuables. This is far from the truth. If the Muslims
ever waged war or invaded anyone, it was due to self defense or if there
was evidence that the other side would attack and the Muslims would attack
first for military advantage.
The lack of conscience in Muslims is mind boggling. Do the stories of the
raids of Muhammad that I quoted only in this article look like self defense? 65
out of 67 wars of Muhammad were raids and Muslims still have the cheek to say
they were all in self defense. The very history that they wrote is filled with
tales of horror that Muslims committed. At times reading those tales become
nauseating. Muhammad himself boasted that he became victorious with terror and
Muslims are so unabashed in lying that they still say Muhammadís wars were in
self defense. Were the raids on
also in self defense? Hadn't Muhammad sign a treaty with the Meccans? Why he
broke that and attacked them? He was not in any danger from them, or from any of
his victims for that matter. He attacked them because he was hungry for power.
He wanted to conquer the world just like Hitler, Genghis Khan, Napoleon or
Attila the Hun. Religion and Allah were pretexts. Excuses to rouse people and
make them commit murder, wage war without expecting any wages, be ready to kill
and even die at his behest. All he had to do was to give them an empty promises
- humongous checks to be cashed after they die - and in this, he was most
Now, technically it is not precise to say Muslims lie. Because when they say
these patent lies, they actually believe them to be true. They are so convinced
that the non-Muslims are the enemy that they feel it is completely legit to raid
them, butcher them and loot them and all that to them seems self-defense.
If you see a poisonous snake, you will kill it
even though the snake is not attacking you. You perfectly justify this killing
as self defense. Why? It is because you are convinced that the snake is your
enemy and if you don't kill it, it may kill you. This is how Muslims are brought
up to think of non-Muslims. In their mosques, madrassas, textbooks and in their
media, they are constantly told that the kafirs are the enemy. They see and
distrust you, the way you see and distrust a poisonous snake. In the same way
that you justify killing the snake, Muslims justify killing you. Please read this
sermon and see what Muslims think of you.
I just quote a few of the passages. But please read the entire sermon later.
His [the unbeliever's] heart is so full of envy that it shows itself
in his eyes. He is envious of the Muslims because of their blessings and
wishes that they could be taken away from them.
He is so shamelessly envious that he would strive to mislead you so that
you will be assembled with him in the Hell-Fire.
The Kaafir plots against the Muslims by night and betrays them in
the day. Enmity towards you is vividly shown in his face and his utterances.
He bites his fingertips in severe anger against the Muslims and his inner-self
is full of evil plans against them. He pretends to be trustworthy and good
mannered while he is actually pursuing his own interests. Allaah exposes them
when he says:
There are many statements like these, each backed by a verse from the Quran.
These hate teachings of the Quran, make those who are exposed to them distrust
the non-Muslims as if they were venomous snakes. They feel perfectly justified
to hate you and even rejoice when their jihadi brothers kill you and kill your
Don't blame them. They are victims of this poison. Blame yourself. You are
guilty too for letting them vitiate their minds with this venom. They can't help
it. But you can help them. Why don't you?
Take a look at what is going on in our own time. Muslims are massacring
innocent people all over the world with their terrorist acts and yet they claim
they are under attack and what they do is "self defense". This is how
the psychopathic minds of the Muslims work. You canít understand that unless
you have been a Muslim at least for a few years.
This is not a normal way of thinking and that is why our strategists and
political analysts are failing to address the problem. The problem of Islamic
terrorism is not political. It must be studied as psychopathology, not as a
political problem. The mind of a psychopath does not work in quite the same way
that healthy minds work.
Here what I am saying is that the followers of Muhammad are psychologically
and emotionally mangled. This statement is very much politically incorrect. This
sounds extreme and anyone saying that could be accused of racism. To hell with
political correctness. Political correctness means lying when telling the truth
is offensive. But a lie is lie. It is the lies of political correctness that is
killing us. Unless we see Islam as a sick cult and Muslims as sick people, we
can't address this problem and the Islamic terrorism will continue to claim more
The problem of Islamic terrorism, is not just political but also religious
and consequently emotional and psychological. We need experts in psychology,
precisely those who have experience in cults to understand the Muslim mind and
to pull us out of this muddle.
1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 next