Home

 Articles

 Op-ed

 Authors

 FAQ

 Leaving Islam
 Library
 Gallery
 Comments
 Debates
 Forum

 

 

  

Inès Wouters   of  Belgian  'Afschrift' Law Firm: 
The defender of Islam and the enemy of free speech  

The following is a letter send by  the webmaster of www.laughingatislam.com

On May 28th 1940, Belgium capitulated to the Nazis. During the next four and a half years the vast majority of decent Belgians did everything in their power to regain their freedom and self-respect despite the vile actions of a few self-serving Belgian collaborators and their Nazi masters. 

On Saturday August 19th 2007 A Belgian law firm announced its intentions to carry out, without question, the orders of 21st century Nazis when it attempted to silence the exposing of Islam by Allah's favourite prophet. Yes I know, it's unbelievable. 'Why me?...' I asked, '...what have I ever done to upset anyone?' 

In early July, an email received by my webhost provider threatened legal action if my site was not closed down immediately. After several weeks of more threats (it is the Islamic way), my provider decided to take the easy option and asked me to find a new provider. Instead of simply terminating my contract they wrote an extremely apologetic email and gave me as much time as I needed to find a new host. They were even decent enough to suggest a couple of alternative companies that they considered suitable. 

The law firm in question is 'Afschrift' and the lawyer serving her Muslim masters is called Inès Wouters ([email protected]). Ms Wouters (pictured left after her appointment to Afschrift) may look like a rather inoffensive young lady but since selling her soul to the devil a colleague (who wished to remain anonymous) stated that she is already compiling a list of people who prefer to eat Danish bacon sandwiches rather than pray 5 times a day.

 

Ms Wouters ([email protected]) is actually acting on the direct orders of top Belgian Islamonazi Mr fouad el koreichi ( [email protected]). According to my anonymous source Mr Koreichi ([email protected]) is responsible for the installation of Shariah law into Northern Europe by 'any means available'. 

My webhost provider was kind enough to supply a copy of Ms Wouters' ([email protected]) threats so, in the interest of freedom of speech, I have decided to publish a couple of her emails below...

It would have been nice of Ms Wouters ([email protected]) to contact me directly and explain to me her client's, Mr Koreichi ([email protected]), concerns. Alas, civilised dialogue does not appear to be in the armoury of Muslims and their Dhimmi followers. 

Attacks, such as this, on freedom of speech will serve only to strengthen the resolve of its protectors. Thanks to the kind generosity of many of my supporters I have been able to transfer the hosting of Allah's favourite website to a lovely place where it will be very happy. 

Ms Wouters ([email protected]) and Mr Koreichi ([email protected]) should remember that death threats and law suits from book-burning bullies will always be treated with the contempt they deserve and that their actions have helped keep the website they want to ban on view for all to enjoy. 

Well i'm off for a bite to eat and a quick pint with Allah. 

Cheers, 

Mo (PBUM) 

"Above all else, the Devil cannot stand to be mocked." - C. S. Lewis

 

 

dated July 10 

Dear Madam, 

I am the attorney of Mr Koreichi in Belgium who draw my attention to the existence of a site that you host since very recently named www.prophetmohammed.co.uk. his site was previsouly hosted by Bluehost. After we contacted this provider the site changed of provider as we probably convinced the previous provider of the illegality of the content of this site  

As you may not be aware, this site is particularly insulting and defamatory about the religion of Islam, its practitioners, the Muslims and the Prophet Muhammad. The name of the site is particularly misleading as it is called "Prophet Muhammed" but in fact is a systematic criticism of Islam, Muslims and Prophet Muhammad  

As you know freedom of opinion and expression in democratic countries have some limitations, as it does not allow to insult and propagate racist and discriminatory views. In this particular case, the content this site is way beyond what is normally  acceptable by general standards in a democratic state  

As hosting provider you are certainly not responsible of the content of the sites you hosts since you did not provide the content and might not be aware of it and that you do not have any power to change their content. But under (Communication Decency Act/ (sect. 230)). "No provider (...) of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider (...) considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected".  

The question here is not about religious belief, which is for sure open to freedom. The content of the site is not religious in itself but is grossly and strongly insulting the religion and beliefs of others, considering among others the Muslim and Arab world as "inferior"  civilization, incapable of being part of the civilized world, comparing among Mohammed to a Nazi  showing very gross images and making all possible to show Islam, Muslims and Mohammed as really inferior type of person, quoting some old writings "ISLAM AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE MUSULMAN" by ANDRE SERVIER in 1924  saying that "To sum up: the Arab has borrowed everything from other nations, literature, art, science, and even his religious ideas. He has passed it all through the sieve of his own narrow mind, and _being incapable of rising to high philosophic conceptions, he has distorted, mutilated and desiccated everything._ This destructive influence explains the decadence of Musulman nations and their powerlessness to break away from barbarism; it equally explains the difficulties that confront the French in Northern Africa . It is certainly our duty to respect the religious opinions of the natives; but it is mistaken policy for us to appear more Musulman than they themselves, and to bow down in a mystical spirit before a form of _civilization that is very much lower than our own and manifestly backward and retrograde_. The times are too serious for us to indulge any longer in the antics of dilettantism or of played-out impressionism." 

In other words they try to prove "scientifically"  that Arab culture and Muslim religions are in fact products and causes of a lower type of civilization. 

Another example : Can a Muslim be a good American*? *(If you live in the _civilised world_ just substitute your own country) 

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia .

Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256) Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran). Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Freedom of Religion and Tolerance...principles he believes to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever described as "loving" in The Quran. Therefore after much study and deliberation....perhaps _we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country._ _They obviously cannot be both "good" Muslims and good Americans. _ This kind of statements are openly really calling for racism and religious discrimination as it tries to establish that a Muslim cannot be a good citizen just by being a Muslim. Examples are countless  and I invite also you to check all the images. Some are rather offending especially about Aischa.  

 Please have also a look at "contact" to see a man using page of Koran as toilet paper 

 

Sincerely yours Inès Wouters ([email protected])

Afschrift law firm

Telfa Network

Belgium    

 

 

dated August 2 

Please find our mails.

We do require to have a personalised answer. Any delay can only increase your potential responsibility. If we do not have a reply with 12 hours we shall introduce a law suit.

Sincerly Ines Wouters

 

Ms. Inès Wouters  

I am the founder of faithfreedom.org the organ of the ex-Muslims that strives to a) unmask the evil cult of Islam and warn the non-Muslims of its inherent danger and b) help the benighted Muslims who are indoctrinated into this cult to leave it, put their hatred of humanity aside, learn to respect people of other beliefs, and embrace values of democracy and freedom that are alien to their ethos.  

I was informed that you acting as an attorney for your Muslim client Mr. Koreichi in Belgium threatened the company hosting the Islamocritic site laughingatislam.com and bullied them to deny service to this site.  

I must confess that prior to moving to the west I had no understanding of democracy and freedom of speech. This concept is alien to Islamic mindset and we had no clue what it means or how it operates.  I was both amazed and delighted of such freedoms when I came to learn about them for the first time after I immigrated to the West.  Since then I have decided to introduce these values to my native country, Iran.  However, after much study and research it became clear to me that the reason we do not have freedom and democracy is because we are Muslims. Furthermore it became also obvious that the reason my country and other Islamic countries are backward, barbaric and always in wars is because we are Muslims. Therefore I became very curious to find out what is in Islam that plunges its followers into misery and reduces them to savages.  My research brought me to a very disturbing conclusion that the founder of Islam was a terrorist, a pedophile, an assassin, a mass murderer, a plunderer, a lecher, a thief, a narcissist, a rapist, a liar, a misogynist and a psychopath.  Finding such truths was traumatic. If someone else had told me these things, I could blame him of being a bigot but not when I had come to such realization on my own and after reading the Quran and the biography of Muhammad written by devout early believers.  

 After a couple of years of fighting with myself, I decided that I am going to stand with the truth.  Now I must say that as a rule I give less importance to truth than to peace.  Each person has his or her own version of truth and it is difficult to make everyone agree.  So if each person decides to champion their own understanding of truth, no two people will ever agree. Peace is far more important than truth.    

However, to have peace there must be tolerance.  It does not matter that everyone agree but we must agree to disagree and not try to kill those who do not agree with our version of truth. In the case of Islam peace depends on truth.  Why?  It’s because Islam is intolerant and very dangerous, more dangerous than Nazism and like Nazism it is based on a big lie.  We could not co-exist with Nazism.  We had to fight it and eliminate it.  Not because we are intolerant but because Nazism was intolerant of us.   The same thing applies to Islam.  Islam is intolerant.  It is intolerant of our freedom of thought, of our democracy, of non-Muslims, of women and of everything that is not Islamic.     

You accused the site laughingatislam.com to be insulting and defamatory about the “religion” of Islam, its practitioners, the Muslims and Muhammad.  I disagree with you.  The most defamatory book written on Islam is the Quran.  Any sensible person reading this asinine book can see the violence and the stupidity of it. Furthermore this book is extremely insulting to everyone who disbelieve in Muhammad's sock puppet deity calling us filthy, fuel for hell, and orders our killing.     

Islam must be defeated or soon millions or even billions of people will perish in a nuclear holocaust.  One way to defeat Islam is through ridicule.  After the Muslim savagery over the Danish cartoons I wrote an article entitled Laugh at MuHamMad and suggested we ridicule Islam and its founder.  Laughing at Islam and Muhammad is a very important psychological component of our war against Islam.  

Not only I have suggested that we should ridicule and laugh at Islam and its founder, I have also said that we must single out their allies and supporters, ridicule them too and put them to shame. These people are traitors. They must be discredited and humiliated. Any ally of the enemy is an enemy.  

Ms. Inès Wouters: My objective in writing this article and publishing it is to tell you we are watching. Do not abuse the system to destroy it. Freedom of expression must be protected and not gagged.  Do not sell out this freedom for a few miserable petrodollars.  You are gambling the future of your own children.  Once the West sinks you will also lose.  What you are doing is foolish.  Do not cut the branch on which you are sitting.  Do not sell your soul to devil.  A prostitute sells her vagina you sell your soul, your freedom, your country, your dignity as a woman. Which is worse?  I would rather be a prostitute than a lawyer with no principles.  Muhammad said women are deficient in intelligence. Do you agree?  Do you want to defend such belief. Is this a "culture" that in your opinion deserves to be respected? 

You accuse the webmaster of laughingatislam.com  of  “considering Muslim and Arab world as inferior civilization, incapable of being part of the civilized world.  Is this not true?  How can a “culture” that treats its women like animals, honor kills them, prescribes beating them, persecutes the followers of other religions, instructs murdering those who do not subscribe to it and allows having sex with children be equated to a culture that has given birth to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Do you know that Muslims have their own version of Human Rights where Muslims are deemed to be superior? "Islamic culture" is an oxymoron while "Islamic terrorism" is redundancy. Multiculturalism is stupidity.  How can one equate the barbarity that is Islam to the enlightenment of the Western civilization?  If all cultures were equal then why Islamic counties are cesspools of the world?  Why people there live in such a misery? Far from it! Islam is insanity. All those who are infected by this insanity are sick and dangerous to the extent that they are infected.  

Criticism of Islam is not racism. Islam is a belief which is insidious and evil. Any sane person no matter what race or nationality must oppose it.  Equating Islam to race is sheer stupidity and deception.  Have you already forgotten Muriel Degauque, the Belgian woman who converted to Islam and became a terrorist suicide bomber?  We must stop this lie. Muslims can be dangerous thanks to their faith and not their race. Arabs and Pakistanis are not terrorists. Muslims are terrorists and they can be Arabs, Iranians, Pakistanis or Europeans and Americans.  As soon as they leave their evil cult they prove to be wonderful people.  Therefore it is clear that it is this evil doctrine that robs their humanity and reduces them into brainless killing zombies. Didn't you hear Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens, on public television say he wished to burn Salman Rushdie in a fire (instead of merely burning his effigy, which was what happened)? Mr. Islam does not see the irony of his foolish remarks and now is busy composing songs for Islam allegedly promoting "peace". One can only wonder what is this man's understanding of peace. We do not want to discriminate against Muslims.  We want to liberate them from their hate and the web of lies.

You disliked the cartoon showing the Quran used as toilet paper.  I tend to agree with you on this. A book as filthy as the Quran does not have any cleaning power.  

I am fighting against Islam to liberate my people from the claws of this evil cult. I am also trying to defend the democracy in the West. I love the western culture and I want to protect it.  This is the culture that opened my eyes and taught me humanism.  The West is the last bastion of hope for humanity.  I want to defend it against Islamic barbarity that is creeping into the Western countries and is corroding its foundation the way carpenter ants do to a wooden house.   

I give you the benefit of doubt and assume what you did was out of ignorance.  So I invite you to educate yourself about Islam.  Once you see the truth for yourself please write back and tell me what you think.  I will publish your response and recognition of your error so  you and your firm do not lose your potential clientele and are not discredited in the eyes of good Belgians and so your children do not have to suffer the humiliation of being told their mother is a traitor.  Islam will fall and you will be disgraced.  Many people read this site.  You will eventually gain the status of a “celebrity”, albeit in a very negative way.  Search your name with Google to see how you are doing. 

Evil triumphs when good people do nothing. That is why I could not remain silent letting you attack freedom of speech.  What you did was terrible.  Muslims try to use our own laws against us to bully us into silence. There are a few shameless lawyers who will do anything for money and will take their case.  It is time to fight back and defend our freedom.  We must become proactive and put to shame any lawyer who sells his or her soul to devil and attacks freedom of speech to appease their Muslim masters.  If these lawyers have no shame and will do anything for money, then we will do our best that they lose their reputation and also lose money. 

Laughingatislam.com   is still online and thanks to this episode they are going to get more traffic.  The losers are you and your client.  

 

Ali Sina

 

 

 

 

Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge
 

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles posted in this site ONLY if you provide a link to the original page and if it is not for financial gain.