Leaving Islam




The Eradication of Islam: 
A Response to JihadWatch.com

By Ali Sina

I sent my article “Fighting Against a phantom” to Jihad Watch for publication. They declined. Mr. Hugh Fitzgerald, one of the directors of that site brought up two objections.  

He said: “'any Muslim' and 'overnight'? I think too much is claimed”.

He also said: I should remove the word “eradication”.  

I already responded to the first point in “How Much Islam is Responsible for Making Muslims Terrorists”.  I think this point is clear enough and does not require further elucidations.  

As for the second point I told them that my entire site is about eradication and asked whether they are telling me to shut down my site.  

Mr. Robert Spencer responded:  

Ali, most certainly not. Absolutely not. I think I can safely speak for Hugh and say that both of us greatly admire and support your work. The "eradication of Islam" is problematic in my view because to American ears it may sound genocidal. How can this eradication be affected?  

You have said that I am in a fantasy world to call for reformation in Islam, and I would agree with you if I thought that that reformation could actually happen in any significant way. I have called for reformation primarily to call attention to the sources of the problem, which Americans continue to ignore, and to call false "moderate Muslims" to account. Also I don't see eradication as in the slightest practical or possible. Neither choice, in sum, is realistic in important ways. The governments of the world are never going to recognize Islam as the problem and unite to stamp it out. And if they did, how would they do it? What penalties would be levied for possession of the Qur'an etc.? What punishments would be meted out? What prisons would hold the resulting malefactors? How is it that there would be "no bloodshed" when we see every day the fanatical attachment some Muslims have to Islam?  

These questions are meant only to explain why Hugh thought, and I agreed, that we should not put up that article at Jihad Watch. We have different audiences and different approaches; we both do what we can to meet this enormous challenge and to come to a viable solution, and I am grateful for your generosity -- unfortunately rare in this field -- in making room for approaches that may differ from your own in some ways. No, of course we don't want you to remove your site. We want your site to grow and prosper a thousandfold.  

All the best




Later Hugh wrote:  

“The word "eradicate" to most Americans would sound not like "pulling up from the roots" as is its etymological meaning, but to crush, destroy completely. It sounds much too sinister. And does one "eradicate" anything? Were the Nazis "eradicated"? Were the Communists? No. They continue, but they have been reduced, by constant vigilance, that must continue, to manageable proportions.”  


“Would not Ali Sina possibly allow those two very slight changes - which are only to omit one word ("eradicate") and instead of calling all Muslims capable overnight of becoming terrorists, simply phrase it differently, as I originally suggested.”


I thought I publish our exchanges since obviously there is a huge amount of misunderstandings that needs to be clarified. If people like Hugh and Robert who, as they say, are familiar with my site are so much confused about my goals and what the real message of FFI is, then there is certainly something seriously wrong in the way I have expressed myself.  

I have already clarified the role of Islam in making Muslims terrorists. I am not sure whether Hugh saw it. I don’t think there is need for further explanation as the point is clearly made. I am now going to clarify the question of eradication.  

We are talking about the eradication of a belief system. There is nothing wrong in the word eradication. We use this word for things such as eradication of poverty, eradication of illiteracy, eradication of violence, eradication of discrimination, or wars, etc. Islam represents all these things and needs to be eradicated.  

Although we can say eradication of communism” or “eradication of Nazism”, I never heard eradication being used for people such as eradicating communists or Nazis. It is always used for undesirable things such as cancer, crime, prostitution, etc. You can’t even use it for good things. For example you can’t say eradication of health, eradication of wealth, eradication of happiness. Have you ever heard these expressions? I don’t think I have.  

I suppose we are confusing the word eradication with extermination which is entirely a different diction.  

Here are some synonyms of eradication:

abolishment, abrogation, annulment, cancellation, destruction, dissolution, elimination, end, ending, extirpation, invalidation, negation, nullification, obliteration, overthrow, overturning, quashing, repeal, repudiation, rescinding, rescindment, rescission, revocation, subversion, suppression, termination, voiding, withdrawal  

Compare them to the synonyms of extermination:

blitz, blood, blood bath, bloodshed, butchering, butchery, crime, croaking,  gore, havoc, hecatomb, holocaust, homicide, internecion, killing, liquidation, manslaughter, mass murder, murder, offing, rapine, shambles, slaughter, slaying, warfare, wasting  

See the difference?  

The word eradication is the most appropriate word to use when dealing with a social ill especially a belief system and Islam is a social ill and a belief system. Note that we are not calling for the “eradication of Muslims”. Apart from being an error in syntax, this is not our call. Muslims are people and Islam is an ideology. We are talking about the eradication of an ideology not the extermination of a people.  

Americans speak English and the word eradication should not present any problem for them. If people who are less fluent in English have difficulty in interpreting this word, now, they too know the meaning of this word.  

1   2   >   Next





Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles posted in this site ONLY if you provide a link to the original page and if it is not for financial gain.