Home

Op-ed

Authors

FAQ

Leaving Islam

Library

Gallery

Comments

Debates

Forum

The reason that Green calls Noachidism a "inferior religious system" is that she assumes that since it only consists of seven laws, than Judaism must naturally consider it less worthy than the Sinai (Jewish) covenant of 613. But again that is a claim she is making without even understanding Noachidism and Judaism in the first place. The reason Jews have much more commandments is because most of them are ritual laws, such as don't eat pork and sacrifice at this time and blah blah blah.... because Jews are supposed to be "priests" and a "light to the nations". Noachidism underscores the Jewish belief in religious pluralism. Most religions contain the Noachide laws, but then since different people have different cultures or beliefs, they are each allowed to present this basic morality in different forms, hence different religions. For the Jewish people, their manifestation includes many ritual laws. But Judaism never believed that Noachidism is "inferior" to Judaism. On the contrary, the Babylonian Talmud speaks of a Noachide commandment observer as if he/she were a High Priest (Sanhedrin 59A).

"and would bet my life that 99% of Gentiles haven't."

This shows again how Green doesn't understand Noachidism, and yet she attacks it anyway. It doesn't matter if one never heard of Noachidism because it is not a requirement of belief but rather basic morality that is readily discernible by rational thought. Noachidism is Judaism's version of "natural law". Despite Maimonides opinion that one must recognize the Torah in order to qualify as a righteous Gentile (in addition to obeying these commandments), a majority of rabbinical authorities believe that no such distinction exists, or in other words, obeying the commandments without knowing about them (which is possible because of their rational basis) is still simply obeying them and is worthy of reward.

Green states "By the standard of the Noahide system that we made up, Mother Theresa does not have such a place because she was an idolator." But this is not true. We must remember that with "every two Jews, you get three opinions" and therefore there is not a rabbinical concensus on many issues. However, if we were to go by majority opinion (of rabbis), Christianity is not idolatry, despite Trinatirianism. While it would be idolatry for Jews, who are forbidden from worshipping anything except the One G-d (as a pure Unity), variations and manifestations of monotheism, and even systems such as Hinduism (in which differents gods are different manifestations of one God or supreme source) are acceptable to Gentiles. I would invite Green to read more rabbinical literature before giving misinformed statements such as these. Much of my points are underscored previously in Ivan Lang's rebuttal.

The next statement is not only not true but if seen by someone without knowledge of its context, it would be easily seen as anti-Semitic. "Genetic holiness, an extra part to the soul, or innate superiority over others, in spite of one's personal behavior toward his fellow man". I'm sorry, Eleanor, but genetic holiness is not part of Judaism or the beliefs of the Jews, and despite what you say,
"one's personal behavior toward his fellow man" is actually the most important thing in Judaism. Were the Jews you hung out with really "Orthodox", or even Jews at all?, because I'm beginning to doubt it. No offense.

"If we can see that dying for the sins of another accomplishes nothing, and merit must be earned through good deeds, why do we then make a mockery of logic and insist that all Jews have a place in the World to Come by a virtue that is similarly unmerited, unjustified, and unjust?"

Jews don't insist that. Sorry.

Green again says that Jews practice "deluding oneself into thinking he/she is genetically superior to another.", but Jews don't believe in genetic "superiority". It is usually anti-Semites who make such incorrect claims about Jewish thought, but since Green says that Jews are "her people" I'm just going to have to assume that she is incredibly misinformed.

She claims that "secular Jews have accomplished so much, while ultra-Orthodox ones have accomplished so little good in this world for the betterment of universal mankind.", but as Ivan Lang comprehsively points out, those secular Jews were rabbis and Orthodox Jews until the Enlightenment, and that the reason they were seperated was geography (Jews were more assimilated in Germany, but isolated in Poland and Russia).

In conclusion, Green's commentary is based not on what Judaism is or believes that rather what she wants or thinks it believes or is.

For resources, I suggest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahide_Laws

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_of_religious_pluralism

Again, I 100% respect the choice to abandon organized religion. It just makes sense to me that one should try to justify it with accurate facts and not ridiculously made-up ones.