leadership considers the U.S. Fatwa
a victory for the
in the ideas aspect of the world war. Notably, the President
can rely on U.S. Muslims. They would be bound by the
Fatwa. U.S. Muslims would thus join U.S. Christians and Jews
in defending against any criminal Muslims who attack American civilians
with future terrorism and extremism. Circumstances of the U.S.
Fatwa peace effort frame the two parallel universes.
2005 -- JOINING HANDS FOR DEFENSE OF
7, 2005, was the genesis of the U.S. Fatwa. The present war’s WIFront
commandoes then achieved a great and bloody victory against British
enemies just 21 days before birth of the U.S. Fatwa. It had
been the destructive Germans 67 years earlier. After Prime
Minister Chamberlain’s optimism had then been dashed by reality,
was bombed. Muslim terrorists were the first to re-bomb
in the new world war. The bombers were home-grown
WIFront commandoes. They slaughtered scores of enemy
civilians on trains and a bus. 
The British promptly cracked down. New laws and
regulations restricted Muslims. The
’s Islamic brotherhood were then seen as facilitating radical World
Islamic Front aggression against the
’s Christians and other non-Muslims.
15, 2005, found U.S. Muslims properly deciding to distance
themselves from the
slaughter. They took notice of the oppressive new
British policing of Muslims. U.S. Muslim leadership were prudent.
They decided to announce opposition to such extremist Muslim
terrorists as the subway and bus-attack commandoes. The U.S. Fatwa
announcement would be one prompted by the WIFront’s dramatic
. The world war was four years old. U.S. Muslim leadership had
not, since the dramatic
defeat on September 11, 2001, issued any fatwa against WIFront
aggression. They and everyone now know that such opposition to
Muslim terrorists is dangerous. U.S. Muslim leaders yet decided to
be prudent and patriotic as well. They would disclaim Islamic
’s bloody attacks.
28, 2005, was publication date. The U.S. Muslims’
courageous Fiqh Council of
thus went public. They published to television network-level
news coverage their U.S. Fatwa Against Terrorism. Fatwas
against terrorism and extremism can provoke retaliation from the
terrorists. Unbeknownst to the pro-peace Muslim leaders, however,
the WIFront literalists curiously would not harm them for their
ideas-war support to the
Muslim Fiqh Council could not have known this. Hence, the Fiqh
Council must be considered courageous. Fortunately, no agents of the
radical WIFront have reportedly killed any of the forthright U.S.
2, 2005, was the day of the U.S. President’s first publicized
involvement with the U.S Fatwa. The prominent
Islamic Council of North America (the ICNA) soon convened. Their
site was in the
. The ICNA’s Muslims “had invited [U.S. President] Bush to
attend its national convention,” but he had “sent
Hughes…recently confirmed [by the U.S. Senate] as [
] undersecretary [of State].” 
2nd was 37 days after the President had received and analyzed the U.S.
Fatwa. At just one page, the U.S. Fatwa in English is easy to read.
The President and his envoy to the ICNA had their own copies in
English of the Qur’an. Muslim booksellers have flooded the
with English translations. 
the President’s personal envoy in
, Karen Hughes thus spoke for the President. She faced
the gathering’s assembled newspaper and radio-television reporters.
She publicly spoke to the courageous, pro-peace U.S. Muslim
leadership. Mrs. Hughes for the President soon proclaimed to
confused non-Muslim Americans. The U.S. Fatwa, she announced,
“says there is no justification in Islam for terrorism.” She
properly praised ICNA leaders. She lauded them as “credible
voices…of Muslims.” Ambassador Hughes also made a promise.
She would “help amplify” the U.S. Islamic Council. A voice
against terrorism is what she justly called the ICNA. Print, radio
and television news of her September 2nd statements were transmitted to
Americans and to the world at war. Such as Sheik Bin Laden surely
received the news with great interest.
9, 2005, is when the U.S. Ambassador to Islam was formally sworn.
On September 9th, President Bush swore in his “friend and
confidante” Karen Hughes.  She became “Undersecretary
for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs and Ambassador.” Her
audience was to be the Islamic brotherhood. She was to convince the
world’s 1.2 billion Muslims, or some of them, not to become terrorists
and Islamic extremists. The President restated his confidence in his
friend and confidante. New Ambassador Hughes, he assured Americans,
is a woman with a “brilliant mind.” Were quiet
smiles on faces and muted laughter in the air? News of the
political and Muslim diplomatic achievement was received by WIFront
cadres. They were and remain in
cells and scattered world-wide. Despite this pro-peace U.S. Fatwa,
the WIFront and other radical, extremist terrorists since (a) have
not obeyed the U.S. Fatwa, instead continuing to be terroristic and to be
extremist, and (b) they would have discredited the 2005 Fatwa and
perverted the pro-peace objectives of
U.S. Fatwa had yet drawn the U.S. President and his envoy into
reading the Qur’an. Their sight was and remains
inattentive. There is the Muslim Saudi Arabian obligation.
President must not read their Qur’an literally. Does
oil and Muslim money demand this? Important meanings, in this war,
were missed in the readings by the President and his personal envoy.
Below, these meanings are recalled.
these times, one may write of differing mindsets. Parallel universes
are another concept. Such a frame of reference is wireless.
Parallel universes are familiar, even to non-intellectual television
devotees. Even older fans are well trained to recognize parallel
universes. They have studied televised lessons from Twilight
Zone and the Outer Limits. Two parallel, different
universes are seen in this case of the U.S. Fatwa.
U.S. Fiqh Council, and the radical World Islamic Front, are in different
parallel universes. However, the WIFront are engaged in lethal
warfare in their universe. The U.S. President, in the case of the
U.S. Fatwa, is shown to be in the parallel universe occupied by the U.S.
Muslims’ Fiqh Council. The President and his Ambassador to the
Islamic brotherhood do not think as do the leaders, foot-soldiers
and homicide martyrs in the WIFront universe.
disconnection between the two universes is shown, dramatically, in the
remainder of this chapter.
leadership believes the Qur’an eschews terrorism and extremism.
The President joins hands with the U.S. Muslims to believe this crucial
fact. Through his envoy, the President instructed
citizens, as Ambassador Hughes put it on September 2, 2005, that “there
is no justification in Islam for terrorism.” This is the U.S.
President’s belief. The foot-soldiers and homicide martyrs of the
WIFront are in the other universe. They read the same Qur’an
that the President can read. However, they read the literal
meanings of the words in the sacred text. The U.S. President does
not believe the literal words. Sheik Bin Laden, a literalist as to
the Qur’an and a terrorist and extremist, would advise Americans
to believe him, not the President or the scholarly and patriotic Muslims
who wrote the 2005 Fatwa. Osama would argue that misinformation is
at work. Independent analysts agree with Sheik Bin Laden.
WORLD ISLAMIC FRONT
literate non-Muslim world can know exactly how Islam’s bellicose Prophet
Muhammad reasoned. His words are recorded in English translations in
the Ahadith. These are various books containing Muhammad’s
laws and guidance to Muslims. Muslim leaders actively discourage
non-Muslims reading of the Ahadith and of the Qur’an.
just as a non-Muslim can read the Ahadith, a non-Muslim can
understand Sheik Bin Laden’s reasoning as to the Qur’an. Osama’s
writings and reasoning are availed Internet-free and are in books.
leaders are literal readers of the Qur’an. 
They are very different
from such as pro-peace U.S. Muslims, as Irshad Manji has stated.
“…Literalism is a commitment to strict
exactness of words or meanings in reading or interpretation. Every
religion has its share of literalists. But
the difference is that only in Islam, today, literalism is
Muslims, even here in the West, believe that because the
Koran comes after the Torah and the Bible, it is therefore the final and
perfect manifesto of God's will. Even moderate Muslims will say to one
another that the Koran is not like any other holy book.
“It’s like a God 3.0 and there shall
be nothing after it. It’s a dangerous supremacy complex, because when
abuse happens under the banner of religion most Muslims, included
those with University degrees, have no clue how to challenge Islam. They
don't have to think and critical thinking skills need not apply. We were
never able to question the Koran.”
propagandists, as literalists, would particularly direct their propaganda
to a billion Muslims in the Islamic brotherhood who do not speak English.
Sheik Bin Laden and other leaders of the WIFront are skilled in
cutting-edge Internet communication. The
concludes as follows on this point.
constantly point out on their PR-oriented websites…their efforts…to
] from the business of stabilization [in
] and test public confidence in… the ‘will of the people,’
whether in the
the Internet, they would communicate to the Islamic brotherhood.
They would convince the brotherhood that the U.S. Fatwa shows that
leadership is usefully misinformed. Sheik Bin Laden’s reasoning
would follow the steps below.