The Islamic Kingdom of
group of people signing as “Academics” from
wrote to me about a new law being proposed that prohibits the criticism
of Islam. The proposal of this law is insane but what is more disturbing
is that these academics hide their identities fearing reprisal against
their lives and their families. This is
we are talking about not Iran or Pakistan. These academics are Brits,
yet they are afraid to speak out their minds in their own homeland. The
following is our correspondence:
A group of researchers and academics have been working for some
considerable time on producing an important document (in excess
of 100 pages of well researched and carefully referenced
information), concerning Islam.
The aim has been to produce a document so powerful that this
document will stand up in any international court of law as
overwhelming, undeniable and incontrovertible evidence that
Islam represents a clear threat to the future peace and security
of our society.
This document is headed "Intelligence Information" and
will be dispatched as printed hard copies, to a large number of
politicians and security services, on the same day, including
all the political leaders of the Western world.
Each copy of the document will include a full list of all who
have received a copy, as this will help ensure that this
document is taken seriously by all who receive it. The intention
is to force a complete change of attitude at the highest level,
internationally, leaving politicians no alternative but to face
up to the truth that Islam is a dangerous cult which threatens
Some 800 hours have gone into the preparation of this document,
and it is now nearing completion. We would like to ask firstly
if you would be interested in reviewing this document for
publication at your site, and secondly, we'd like to ask if you
might be interested in helping us with our campaign.
After reviewing the document, if you agree that the document
truly represents a "knockout blow" to Islam, and is
strong enough to stand up in court, would you be prepared to
consider inviting your visitors to participate in the campaign,
through asking them to download the document from your site then
print the document and distribute hard copies anonymously to
national newspaper editors, television news studios,
politicians, chief of police, women's rights groups, gay rights
groups, church leaders, universities, etc., across the world?
With your help, we could jointly run a campaign which could have
a very powerful impact, and change perceptions. If you are able
to recruit sufficient visitors at your site to participate in
this campaign, and if the campaign is planned so that everyone
participating posts their printed copies of the document on
exactly the same day, this document could have a massive impact,
all across the world.
We look forward to your reply.
course I would be glad to review your document and participate
in your campaign of exposing Islam. You can count on my complete
support. The eradication of Islam must begin by awakening the
non-Muslims. A campaign like what you propose is very much
Many thanks for your positive reply. We will forward our
document to you for review within the next couple of weeks, as
by then it should be completed. We will welcome your comments,
feedback, and support. We'd like to say that your site is
excellent, and provides good information.
We are concerned that authorities scan emails for various
keywords and might therefore intercept transmission of our
document to you. Whilst we have nothing to fear from a legal
point of view, we would prefer to remain anonymous, for reasons
of personal safety. Do you have a PO Box address where we could
mail a disc, or do you have any other suggestions as to how we
could send the electronic document to you?
Looking forward to your reply,
do not understand your concern about the “authorities
intercepting the transmission of your files to me”. My site is
probably the most anti Islamic site and I do not see any reason
to be concerned about the “authorities”. Which authorities
are you talking about? If you are living in the West you do not
have to fear any authority. I am personally in touch with a few
high ranking authorities and have their complete support.
a matter of fact you do not have to hide your identity to
express your views. In fact I suggest all of you sign the
document and stand behind your own words. Your concerns about
your safety are unfounded.
We will be sending the document from the
government is currently introducing legislation to prevent
"religious hatred" in direct response to pressure from
Islamic groups, to prevent any criticism of Islam. National
newspapers have attacked the government's plans, claiming that
the new legislation will restrict freedom of speech and make
criminals out of those who speak the truth, but the government
appears to be pressing ahead regardless, such is the wisdom of
our present government. It will become an impressionable offence
in this country to speak out against Islam, if this legislation
THE MAIL ON SUNDAY (National UK Newspaper) 11th July 2004
I'LL SAY IT WHILE THEY STILL LET ME: ISLAM IS A THREAT TO US
ALL (by Peter Hitchens)
(Someone later posted the article on this message board)
"Soon it will be illegal to say this, so I had better do it
now. Islam - yes, even 'moderate' Islam threatens our freedom
and civilisation. If we do not work out soon how to counter it
in open debate, we will find that its influence has gone too
deep for us to challenge or resist." [Peter Hitchens is one
's most respected journalists. This article took up virtually a
whole page of the Mail on Sunday - I have an actual copy of the
THE GUARDIAN (National UK Newspaper) 7th July 2004
Blunkett to outlaw religious hatred (by Alan Travis)
fresh attempt is to be made to make incitement to religious
hatred a criminal offence, the home secretary, David Blunkett,
will announce today. The move, long demanded by Muslim
, was twice voted down by the House of Lords in December
2001, when Mr Blunkett tried to incorporate it into his
emergency anti-terrorism legislation in the immediate aftermath
of September 11. Mr Blunkett was then faced with the choice of
dropping the clause or losing his entire anti-terrorism bill. At
the time Liberal Democrat and Conservative peers said they had
only opposed the measure because it was ill-suited to emergency
anti-terror legislation and that they would have supported it if
it had greater and separate parliamentary scrutiny. Mr Blunkett
will be hoping that they stand by that position when he
resubmits the measure this autumn. The effect will be to extend
the law of incitement to racial hatred to those attacked because
of their religion. Muslims, in particular, have long felt that
the race hatred laws do not give them the protection they need.
"This will help tackle extremists who use religion to stir
up hatred in our society, including religious extremists who
preach hate against other religions," Mr Blunkett is
expected to tell a seminar organised by the Institute for Public
Policy Research today. However, his decision to try again will
infuriate advocates of free speech, including the National
Secular Society, who fear that such a law will be used to muzzle
those who simply criticise religion.
As regards our knowledge of Islam, we believe our document will
speak for itself. It is fully referenced to reliable sources of
information throughout (many hundreds of references), and has
been designed to stand up in court as incontrovertible evidence
proving beyond any reasonable doubt that Muhammad was a
terrorist and a criminal by any definition of the word. We will
look forward to any comments or criticisms you may have of it.
If you are entirely happy with our document, and agree that it
will stand up as evidence in court, sufficient to persuade a
jury, would you consider approaching some of your influential
contacts with a view to obtaining their endorsement of the
document? We are also happy for others to add their own material
to the final document, providing that their material is
relevant, appropriate and to the same standard. In this way it
would be possible to add a list of names to the document, but
due to current government plans in the
, we feel unable to add our own names. We simply cannot take the
We look forward to your reply.
With kind regards,
What is going on in
is deplorable. Religion is a belief. It is foolish to pass laws
in order to protect beliefs. We all fully support laws against
racial discrimination and racial incitement to hate. But you
can’t equate a belief to race. We have no choice over our race
and there is no solid proof that any race is superior or
inferior to others. So criticizing a race is darn stupid and
laws are required to stop it. But we choose what to
believe and some beliefs are false and very dangerous. Making
the criticism of religion an offence is insane. There are
religions who believe in the creation, to them evolution is
blasphemy. Those who teach evolution clearly oppose creationism
and such beliefs. Does that mean that the evolutionists would be
incriminated under this proposed law?
genocide. This is a historic fact stated in the very Islamic
books. Would one be liable to imprisonment if he quotes these
Islamic books and say Muhammad was a mass murderer? Would one
become a criminal by quoting verses of the Quran that say kill
the idolaters, crucify them, chop their fingers, limbs and necks
and disagree with them? Shouldn’t those who uphold these
teachings be incriminated instead? David Blunkett
is insane. This law is absurd. So according to this proposed
law, Muslims who uphold the Quran that says kill people for
their religious views are respected citizens and those who say
this is wrong become criminals? This is ludicrous! What is
happening to us? It seems that fools are running our world and
the sane ones are afraid of speaking out. Where are we heading?
This is nuts!
Are all religions going
to be protected by this proposed law or just Islam? How about
the religion of Jim Jones, the People’s
who committed mass suicide? How about the religion of Heaven’s
Gate, or the Japanese religion Supreme Truth of Shoko Asahara?
Does it mean that no one would be allowed to criticize any
dangerous and stupid belief because someone holds that belief
dear and will be offended if his faith is criticized?
Truth does not need
protection. If an idea is true it can withstand the onslaught of
all criticisms. It is falsehood that is vulnerable to criticism
and needs protection.
This is a stupid law
that must be denounced and rejected by any intelligent people.
You can’t let this crazy idea pass as a law.
Please do send your
document ASAP. I can’t promise that any politician would
endorse it. But I’ll try to reach my journalist friends and
request the readers of faithfreedom.org to join the campaign and
reach as many politicians as they can. Fall is now. We do not
have much time. So please, send whatever you have even in draft
What is happening to us? How we
came to this that intellectuals and academics are afraid to speak out
their minds in their own countries? They are not just afraid of Islamic
goons but also of their own government. Where is England heading? This
is absurd! Just think about it. The British intellectuals are afraid of
the authorities and their own government for speaking the truth about
Islam. They are not afraid of being prosecuted. They are prepared to
defend their views in any court of law. They are afraid of being
eliminated mysteriously! This is the kind of fear the Iranian
intellectuals have of their own thuggish Islamic government. But this is
England we are talking about! It is the British intellectuals who are
afraid of the "authorities" in their own government.
If Mr. Blunkett
has his way and criticizing Islam in England becomes an offence then
these intellectuals would be also criminals?
Is England becoming the Islamic Kingdom of
It seems that the world is
overtaken and run by idiots. It is inconceivable that anyone would
propose a law to protect ignorance. Mr.
Blunkett must be blind. If Islam (or any religion) is true, it can
defend itself and come victorious in any rational confrontation and if
it is a lie then why would he want to protect it with a law that would
incriminate the intellectuals? It is unbelievable
that any sane person suggest introducing the Islamic blasphemy law, the
same law that imprisons intellectuals in Pakistan, Iran and other
barbaric Islamic countries in England. Where does Mr. Blunkett is trying
to take England? The
insanity has taken over indeed.
am waiting for the document prepared by the British academics and will
post it on this site. At the same time I request all the readers
sympathetic to our cause, who are concerned of Islamic expansionism and
the inevitable loss of freedom that accompanies it to join this campaign,
copy that document and send it to as many politicians as they can
Remember that all it takes for evil to triumph is for good
people to do nothing.
Problems With The
's New Religious Hate Law