I have read the Debate of Mr Ali
Sina with Mr Hamza. I would like to comment that it is common among the
Muslims that they claim about the Quran things that in reality do not
Mr Hamza claimed that the Quran is
inimitable and has unique linguistic features.
It is important to note that no
where in the Quran itself is there a claim for it, to be a unique example
of Arabic literature.
Generally, it is believed that the
Quran is the example of all linguistic structure of Arabic. If you
carefully read the passages of the Quran you will find inconsistencies and
will note it is not in compliance with the Arabic grammar
For example in Sura.2:177.wa
assabireena should be assabiruna. In Sura,5:69,sabiuna should be
sabiina.Other examples occur in Sura,7:160-20:63-
-49:9 and 63:10.The Quran also has incomplete sentences and phrases that
have been omitted. This obscures the meaning. Ali Dashti a Muslim scholar
writes that the Quran contains sentences that are incomplete and not fully
intelligible without the aid of the commentaries.
The Quran also contain foreign
words, unfamiliar Arabic words, and words used with other than the normal
meaning, adjectives and verbs inflected without observance of the concords
of gender and number. Imam Suyuti in his Itqan discusses this matter.
If the text of the Quran had been
so unique, obviously there would have been no need for witnesses, and the
text would have been self authenticating. In fact we learn that there was
quite a big disagreement between the companions of Mohd about several
parts of the Quran.
Ibn Masood, a prominent companion
of the prophet did not accept the first and the last two Suras as being
the part of the Quran.So if the Quran had been unique in terms of its
inimitability, Ibn Masood would not have had such reservations. On the
other hand, Ubay b Kab included two extra Suras namly, Al-Hafd and Al-Khal.A
version of these Suras though not part of the present Quran is still
recited in the late evening prayer, ISHA.
If the Quran is unique then why do
some sects of the Islam have doubts about part of the Quran? Islamists
often rant about the uniqueness and inimitability of the Quran.
The Quran is the only book on the
face of the Earth that you cannot understand without the help of the
Tafsir (Commentary). The Tafsir is the opinion of the Muffasir (The
Commentator). A Muffasir cannot claim that only his Taffsir is authentic.
Often Muslims claims that the best
of Arab poets, rhetoricians, linguists of the time failed in reproducing
an equivalent Quran. These are deliberate attempts to undermine the famous
Arab poets. There were so many Arab poets who rejected the Quran on the
base of linguistic features. One of them was Abdulah-bin-Zubery. He was
one of the best poets in Mohd’s time.
This man was qualified critic of
the Quran that the Ordinary Arabs were thinking that he had made Mohd
speechless .His poetry was more realistic in Arabic grammar. People
clapped their hands on his poetry. We find the reference in the Quran and
the full detail in the commentary. For example in (Sura Ornaments of gold
V: 57, to 58,) states and when the son of Mary is quoted as an example,
“Behold! the folk laugh out, and say, are our Gods better, or is he?
They raise not the objection save for argument. Nay! But they are
In the history of Ibn Hasham, the
reason of revelation of the above verse has given this that in the Sura
(the prophets,) verse 98, stated, “Lo! Ye (Idolaters) and that which ye
worship beside Allah are fuel of hell. There unto ye will come”. When
Mohd recited this verse in the presence of idolaters, among them Walied
ibn Mugharah was present there.
When Zubary came to this Majjles -
gathering, Mugharah mentioned to him that Mohd had said such thing about
our Idols .Zubary said, “I swear to Allah, if he had said such thing in
front of me, I would have shut his mouth. But you go and ask Mohd “Is it
true that every thing which has been worshiped apart from Allah will be
the fuel of hell?” We worship the Angel’s and Jews worship Ezra
(Isaiah) and Christians worship Jesus the son of Mary.
All the people that were sitting
in the meeting were very pleased and clapped their hands on his answer and
said (subhan Allah) praise Allah, Zubry has defeated Mohd in his logic.
When people took this message to Mohd, the prophet of Islam, he was
completely stunned and puzzled and starts waiting for the new revelation
but the revelation did not come until he died. Mohd and his Allah didn’t
and couldn’t provide answers to Zubry. I’m sure the Mullahs of this
age could give answer to this question, because they are stupid enough!
From the above incident we can
imagine that the Arab poets were very intelligent and they were able to
reproduce a lot better linguistic literature then the Quran and they did.
As Mohd gained the political and military power in the Arab world, the
Muslims started destroying the Pre-Islamic linguistic literature. Arabs
were well advanced in every aspect of life before the advent of Islam.
Muslims intentionally have given the name JHILIYYAH (Ignorance) to
The blind faith and love of Quran
forced the Muslims not to leave behind the Pre-Islamic linguistic
literature. The fear was prevailing over the minds of the Muslims that if
the Pre-Islamic literature appeared and then people would compare this
with the Quran and truth would come out. It would have disgraced the
Quran. The Quran is not compatible to Pre-Islamic literature. Pieces of
materials that escaped from the hands of Muslims are not the only
treasures of Pre-Islamic literature.
Muslims often deny that they
destroyed the Pre-Islamic literature. What Muslims can tell us about the
Christian scholar Warqa Ibn Nufal’s book, 1.Al Katab Al Arby)
2.Hakmit-e-Luqman- The Scripture. 3. The Scripture of Nazar Ibn Harat. 4.
Book of Musalma and 5. The Book of Mutnbey- the King of Arab poets, which
was containing 114(Abrah) Sura and many other poets.
We know from the distorted history
of Islam that those people did not give any importance to the Quran in
their lives in Mohd’s time, but as soon the verse of sword was revealed,
Those people were very qualified
in Arabic language and were intelligent but they were Kafirs.This is
understandable why Muslims have destroyed the literature of those Arabs.
Even Muslims did not forgive and spare the Mushaafs (Manuscripts) of the
Quran, which were different copies of the Quran and they belong to many
Suhabas, the companions of Mohd. Muslims had burned them all, e.g.
Ibn Masood,-Ibn Kaab, and some Kafir intellectuals- Masalama
Hanfi,-Aswad-e-Aansi. Muslims believe that the Quran is inimitable and
eloquence and they cannot see the absurdities and rudeness in Suras like
(Sura the Cow)Verse, 166:167.These
verses are meaningless but Muslims find great wisdom in them .The love for
the Quran has made them brainless zombies! The Quran is a curse upon
mankind and is an abomination that will destroy every decent western
achievement of human civilization. And in this destruction, the western
gullible politically correct persons will help them.
Muslims praise democracy and
interfaith multiculturalism in the west, because it suits them for the
time being, but they deny and do not want to put into practice the same
system in their Muslim lands. Muslims are playing TAQIYYAH (meaning you
can lie to non-Muslims for the benefit of Islam) with Kafirs according to
their belief, and they do not feel any guilt or shame in it. Is this not
the hypocrisy and deception?
Muslims have learnt about the
human rights in the west, the truth is this that pure Islam does not
recognize any sort of human rights. In fact, human rights do not exist in
Islam. This is the reason why the religious communities in the Muslim
countries are suffering serious religious discrimination. When ever
religious communities demand of human rights, the Muslim Governments offer
them Islamic rights that are inhuman.
Sooner or later the Americans and
the Europeans will become dhimmies (second class citizens) in their own
countries unless a large number of Muslim immigrants are not expelled or
. People of
should note that their coming generations would become Dhimmies and
history will hold them responsible for this destruction and would
eventually lead to killing of their own generations.
Everywhere Muslims went, they
committed horrendous acts of barbarity. They raped and slaughtered
innocent people according to sunah (tradition) of their unholy prophet,
this evil (Islam) must be destroyed in all of its manifestations
throughout the world, including mosques and Islamic centres in
. This is only the solution to save the future generations.