Home

 Articles

 Op-ed

 Authors

 FAQ

 Leaving Islam
 Library
 Gallery
 Comments
 Debates
  Links
 Forum

 

 

 

 The Danish Cartoons and faithfreedom.org


 By Rajesh
2006/03/05

Recently, the world witnessed another emotional tantrum of the Muslims. An obscure newspaper in an out of the way country called Denmark published a few innocuous cartoons of the Muslim prophet Mohammed. The cartoons themselves were hardly offensive, considering how insulting political cartoons can be.  

How did the faithful members of this religion of peace respond? By the only way they know: violence.  

There were murders of innocent and Christians absolutely unrelated to the cartoons in countries as far as Nigeria , Indonesia , India , Pakistan , and many countries in the Middle East . As usual, the American flags were trampled, effigies of Uncle Sam and Bush were burnt, cars and shops were ransacked, American embassies were attacked...  

Of course the poor Danes face a global boycott from Muslims of their products. The more 'moderate' amongst this peaceful cult flooded the media with demands of unconditional apology from Denmark .  

Despite the numerous apologies from Denmark, the USA, the European Union; the bending backwards of the entire western world in trying to calm down the Muslims in their 'just and rightful' display of anger, the violent and often murderous protests continues unabated.  

A few stupid cartoons of their beloved prophet is sufficient provocation for Muslims to go on a murderous rampage.  

The purpose of this article is not to discuss the right or wrong behind this outburst. Instead of asking why Muslims do not protest 9/11 or the beheadings that their jihadi brothers commit. We must ask why Muslims are not protesting www.faithfreedom.org which is far more offensive than those cartoons.  

In front of these ambiguous cartoons, Sina's no-holds-barred description of the prophet as

paedophile, lecher, highway robber, terrorist, mass murderer, congenital liar, etc is downright murder. If blasphemies ever existed, Ali Sina's web-site is the biggest blasphemy of all.  

Why does the Muslim world never take on the name of Ali Sina or his blasphemous web-site? Why don't the Muslims come out on the street with placards and black flags saying "Kill Ali Sina"? Why are there no murders of Iranians anywhere because of Ali Sina? Why are there no million dollar fatwas proclaimed on Sina's head?  

If a few mild cartoons can make Muslims so angry, Sina's web-site deserves an atom bomb. But why is the Muslim world so uncharacteristically silent? Faithfreedom.org is read by more people than those cartoons were originally seen in Denmak.  

Of course, Sina receives the threatening e-mails, 'football invitations', the occasional web-site DOS attacks, but these are all weak protests, not the traditional Muslim way that we are so familiar with.  

Is this silence because.....  

  • Muslims do not know who is Ali Sina?
  • Property on the internet cannot be destructed or regulated?
  • Muslim world does not have access to Internet?
  • Ali Sina has a Muslim name?

The reasons give an insight into the very nature of Islam itself. Muslims are not silent because they do not know how to find Ali Sina. I'm sure 99 % of the Muslim world still does not know which newspaper in Denmark published those cartoons, and many of them have not seen the cartoonists. Muslims do not seek to know the actual culprit. They are at liberty to murder the entire fellow country men of that culprit. When the supposed enemy cannot be brought to book, even those remotely related are ordained to be killed.  

This is self-evident from 9/11 or the regular bomb blasts and suicide attacks in Iraq and elsewhere. To voice their protest, Muslims kill their own brothers and sisters. If you cannot kill the infidel Americans, you can blast the ice-cream parlour or beer bar he once visited. That's how Islamic justice and punishment for blasphemy work.  

But you can rest assured; no Muslim will ever publicly voice his dissent regarding Ali Sina. No mullah will ever declare in his Friday sermon - Ali Sina is devil incarnate.  

Ali Sina is an apostate, an ex-Muslim. It is preferable to deny the existence of such breed. If his existence was made public or his web-site denounced openly in the Muslim world, the entire Muslim world stands to collapse almost instantaneously. For the average 'faithful' Muslim, the option of leaving Islam never enters his or her head. Popularising Ali Sina, even through assassination, will do just that. It will make Muslims notice that people are leaving Islam and some of them may read the site and start thinking. This is a risk no mullah can afford to take.  

For the first time in the bloody 1400 years history of Islam, the hooliganism, the shameless taqia has found its match. www.faithfreedom.org is the Achilles heel of Islam. No Muslim will ever expose this Achilles heel to anyone - Muslim or non-Muslim.  

Uncle Sam - this multi-trillion dollar war against the hydra headed evil monster called Islam can be won with this ubiquitous web-site. Just popularise it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge
 

    copyright You may translate and publish the articles in this site only if you provide a link to the original page.