The Anglo Iranian Unholy
Why Britain set
free the mastermind of the Argentina Jewish Center bombing?
A while ago there seemed
to be a typo error in a BBC news item on the web, that Soleimanpour, the
ex Islamic Republic diplomat wanted by Argentine’s judiciary for his
role in the bombing of a Jewish Centre, was allowed to return to Iran.
Some of us were taken by
surprise, as we had not heard of Soleimanpour's return until then. The
BBC then seemed to alter the news item and remove the line which stated
Soleimanpour's return to Iran.
Today, what seemed like a
typo error is official news. David Blunkett has conveniently decided
that there is not enough evidence to extradite Soleimanpour to Argentina
to face trial for the bombing of the Jewish Centre. The Argentinian
judge is dismayed to say the least; for he is convinced that pages after
pages of the dossier he sent the British Home Secretary should have
warranted Soleimanpour's extradition to face trial. At the same time
another ex Islamic Republic agent in Germany, by the name of Mesbah, has
confirmed the role of Islamic Republic under the direct orders of the
Islamic regime's supreme leader, in blowing up the Jewish centre.
So why is Blunkett letting
the accused Islamic diplomat/agent to return to Iran? It does not take a
genius to answer the question. We all remember the European tour of trio
foreign ministers, from Germany, France and England. The pictures of
Jack Straw cuddling and laughing with Kharrazi and Ayatollah Hassan
Rowhani were worth more than a thousand words. In fact I can never
remember an Ayatollah laughing so generously ever before. Jack Straw is
not known for telling funny jokes or being a comedian of great wit. What
on earth could he have said to make Ayatollah Rowhani, the secretary of
the Islamic regime's national security council, the same man who
referred to the student protesters in 1999 as those "engaged in war
against Allah" to laugh so much and let an infidel like Straw to
cuddle up to him so affectionately?
It's the same old European
harlotry in foreign policy. All the fuss and pressure on the Islamic
Republic wasn't so much as to why the Islamic regime is developing
nuclear weapons but why is the Islamic regime purchasing the technology
from Russia instead of EU? Once the deal was
made, the cuddling, the tickling and the laughing ended and
Soleimanpour was let free.
What are the lessons?
Instead of writing letters and signing petitions to the likes of Jack
Straw and Blunkett and trying to awaken their non-existent conscience,
we need to concentrate on the ordinary people of the countries where we
live in. We need to explain to the people in the countries where we
currently reside in that the Islamic regime is a rogue state, and if
this rogue state becomes an imminent "45 minute threat" it
won't be the sons and daughters of Jack Staw and David Blunkett that
will have to go to war and die as a result of friendly and unfriendly
fire, it will be the sons and daughters of the ordinary citizens who
will be asked to make the sacrifice.
During the extradition of
General Pinochet saga, hundreds of British people were seen amongst the
pickets outside his hospital or the Home Secretary's office along with
the Chilean ex-pats. When Soleimanpour had to appear in court, all the
protesters were Iranian. Think about it, that's where we have gone wrong
and not done enough work.
Today the ordinary
citizens of the West are threatened by our common enemy, Islamic
fundamentalism. Lets make a global front against this global threat and
ask them to join our ranks.
'Evil Only Prevails
When the Good Stay Silent'