Let me go back and make a few specific
comments on the lady’s article.
The first thing that struck me about her
words is the fact that in Saudi Arabia, as well as in most Arab countries where
schools are government-run, the authorities seem to be incapable of enforcing
the rule of law. When this mother went time and again to the principal with the
plea that teachers should not be indoctrinating their young students, she got
nowhere. Was the principal oblivious of the fact that a certain teacher at his
school was spreading radical views with impunity? Why did he not take steps to
warn him to cease and desist from his illicit activities?
Another revelation from the article was
her charge that the notorious Al-Jazeera television station was being used as a
vehicle for the spread of Islamic radicalism. I understand from some reports
that this station is available via satellite, for Arab viewers in the
United States
Furthermore, the incident of the teacher
who became indignant upon hearing that a student was going to
America
for his studies was an alarming phenomenon. This radical teacher, who was
blinded by his searing hatred of
America
, ignored the American role in the emergence of present-day
Saudi Arabia
. Was he really unaware that it was American petroleum engineers who discovered
oil in the peninsula during the 1930s? Did he know what ARAMCO, stood for? This
acronym, used both in Arabic and in English stands for the Arabian American
Company. It was American ingenuity and resourcefulness that became a vehicle for
the sudden riches that descended upon
Saudi Arabia
after WWII. This teacher must have never heard of the celebrations that took
place in
Lebanon
, when the TAPLINE (Trans Arabian Pipeline) project was completed. This great
engineering feat that brought crude oil from Eastern Arabia to the Lebanese
coast on the Mediterranean just south of
Sidon
was planned by American engineers.
Another disturbing fact that was
revealed in the lady’s article was the sudden withdrawal of a book that
advocated tolerance in relations with non-Muslims? I have already written about
the National Dialogue Initiative Project in
Saudi Arabia
that calls for a fresh outlook regarding non-Muslims. This “Initiative” was
meant to involve various sections of Saudi society in helping them to re-define
those regarded traditionally as Infidels. A new, down-to-earth word was being
suggested: Al-Akhar, the Other. If that was the
intention of some leaders in
Saudi Arabia
, what was then the reason to withdraw a book that championed this enlightened
outlook?
The article referred to the existence of
radical Imams occupying leadership in certain Saudi mosques. Are not all mosques
under the supervision of the Ministry of Religious Affairs? It is true that the
majorities of mosques are under the control of the government. But some rich
Saudis seeking to “earn” extra credit with Allah by doing good deeds build
local masjids (mosques) and invite non-supervised Imams. Such independent
mosques attract Du’aat, propagandists for radical Islam. These
“houses of worship” become the breeding ground for recruiting Irhabis.
We should never forget that the infamous Muhammad Atta, the leader of the 19
highjackers who attacked us on
9/11/2001
became a “born-again” Islamist while attending “Al-Qods Mosque”
in
Hamburg
,
Germany
. It was there that he imbibed the ideology that gave birth to his dream of
reaching
Paradise
instantly by killing untold numbers of Infidels.
Finally, the article of this brave
mother was both helpful and at the same time, extremely disturbing. The fact
that it was first published in Al- Riyad newspaper, and then was
made available on the web site of Al-Sharq al-Awsat, is
heartening. Thousands of people in Saudia Arabia, and elsewhere read the
article. It means that at least some Saudi women are not afraid to reveal their
disgust with the behavior of the Islamists, and condemn them publicly.
On the other hand, the article revealed
that things are out of control, and that Irhabis are able to
attack, kill, and destroy in the very heart of the Islamic world. We rejoiced
that a national initiative that aims at using a non-pejorative word to describe
the non-Muslim is being suggested and discussed. But no sooner we read about
this positive step being taken among Saudis, than we heard about a backward
step. A book that was destined for use among teachers advocating a new vision of
the non-Muslim had to be withdrawn. Someone in a position of power and authority
caved in to the pressure from some ultras, and decided that the book should not
be distributed.
The title of the article keeps ringing
in my ears: “Mudarris ibni Irahabi.” My son’s teacher is (or was) a
Terrorist! What a shocking, terrible, and horrific revelation!
< back
|