Schwartz extols the
ecumenism and tolerance of Sufi Islam. Sufism was derivative from
Hinduism, in addition to strains of mysticism borrowed from Judaism and
Christianity. However, Sufi Islam as practiced in the Indian subcontinent
was quite intolerant of Hinduism, as documented by the Indian scholar K.
S. Lal (The Legacy of Muslim Rule in India [1992], p. 237):
The Muslim
Mushaikh [Sufi spiritual leaders] were as keen on conversions as the
Ulama, and contrary to general belief, in place of being kind to the
Hindus as saints would, they too wished the Hindus to be accorded a
second class citizenship if they were not converted. Only one instance,
that of Shaikh Abdul Quddus Gangoh, need be cited because he belonged to
the Chishtia Silsila considered to be the most tolerant of all Sufi
groups. He wrote letters to the Sultan Sikandar Lodi, Babur, and Humayun
to re-invigorate the Shariat [Sharia] and reduce the Hindus to payers of
land tax and jizya. To Babur he wrote, "Extend utmost patronage and
protection to theologians and mystics... that they should be maintained
and subsidized by the state... No non-Muslim should be given any office
or employment in the Diwan of Islam... Furthermore, in conformity with
the principles of the Shariat they should be subjected to all types of
indignities and humiliations. They should be made to pay the jizya...They
should be disallowed from donning the dress of the Muslims and should be
forced to keep their Kufr [infidelity] concealed and not to perform the
ceremonies of their Kufr openly and freely… They should not be allowed
to consider themselves the equal to the Muslims."
Sadly, both
Schwartz's recent NRO contributions and his book reflect two persistent
currents widespread among the Muslim intelligentsia: historical
negationism and silent hypocrisy. To these two trends, Schwartz adds a
third: misleading reductionism. If we would only neutralize
"Wahhabism," he claims — presumably by some combination of
military means, promoting the "true Islam," and perhaps having
the world switch to a hydrogen-based fuel economy — all Islamic terror
and injustice will disappear. But the reality is that, for nearly 1,400
years, across three continents, from Portugal to India, non-Muslims have
experienced the horrors of the institutionalized jihad war ideology and
its ugly corollary institution, dhimmitude. Post hoc, internal disputes
among Muslim scholars, including Sufi scholars, about the theological
"correctness" of "lesser" versus "greater"
jihad are meaningless to the millions of non-Muslim victims of countless
jihad wars: Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and Buddhists. What is
important is that after well over a millennium, Muslims finally
acknowledge the suffering of these millions of victims of jihad wars, as
well as the oppressive governance imposed on non-Muslims by the laws of
dhimmitude. Thus far this brutal history has been completely denied, and
even celebrated, as "enlightened" conquest and rule.
Moreover, it is
critical to understand that there were never organized, mass progressive
efforts within Islam comparable to the philo-Semitic movement by European
Christendom that lead to the emancipation of European Jewry, or the
European Judeo-Christian movement that led to the abolition of slavery.
Indeed, it took European military (primarily naval) power to force Islamic
governments, including the Ottoman Empire, to end slavery at the end of
the 19th century. Beginning in the mid-19th century, treaties imposed by
the European powers on the weakened Ottoman Empire also included
provisions for the so-called Tanzimat reforms. These reforms were designed
to end the discriminatory laws of dhimmitude for Christians and Jews
living under Muslim Ottoman governance. European consuls endeavored to
maintain compliance with at least two cardinal principles: respect for the
life and property of non-Muslims, and the right for Christians and Jews to
provide evidence in Islamic courts when a Muslim was a party.
Unfortunately, the effort to end the belief in Muslim superiority over
"infidels," and to establish equal rights, failed. Indeed,
throughout the Ottoman Empire, particularly within the Balkans,
emancipation of the dhimmi peoples provoked violent, bloody responses
against any "infidels" daring to claim equality with local
Muslims. Enforced abrogation of the laws of dhimmitude required the
dismantling of the Ottoman Empire. This finally happened only after the
Balkan Wars of independence, and in the European Mandate period after
World War I.
Today, the Muslim
intelligentsia focus almost exclusively on debatable "human-rights
violations" in the disputed territories of Gaza, Judea, and Samaria,
while ignoring the blatant and indisputable atrocities committed by
Muslims against non-Muslims throughout the world. The most egregious
examples include: the genocidal slaughter, starvation, and enslavement of
south Sudanese Christians and animists by the Islamist Khartoum government
forces; the mass murder of Indonesian Christians by Muslim jihadists, with
minimal preventive intervention by the official Muslim Indonesian
government; the imposition of sharia-sanctioned discrimination and
punishments, including mutilation, against non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia,
Iran, Sudan, and northern Nigeria; the brutal murders of Copts during
pogroms by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists, as well as official
Egyptian government-mandated social and political discrimination against
the Copts; murderous terrorist attacks and the return of such heinous
institutions as bonded labor, and punishment for "blasphemy,"
directed against Pakistani Christians by Pakistani Muslims.
There is a dire
need for some courageous, meaningful movement within Islam that would
completely renounce both dhimmitude and jihad against non-Muslims, openly
acknowledging the horrific devastation they have wrought for nearly 1,400
years. Nothing short of an Islamic Reformation and Enlightenment may be
required, to acknowledge non-Muslims as fully equal human beings, and not
"infidels" or "dhimmis." It is absurd and disingenuous
for Schwartz to pretend that Islam's problems are centered solely within
Wahhabism.
—
Andrew Bostom, M.D., an associate professor of Medicine at Brown
University Medical School, has spent the past 15 months researching the
history of jihad and dhimmitude. He has written for NRO previously, coauthor
of a piece with dhimmi historian Bat Yeor.
<< back
|