to what these agenda driven writings present, Islam has the
strongest organized social justice component within its system,
compared not only to most other religions, but to most secular
systems as well. Not only does it suggest a community-style society
of humankind by pointing to the natural world as guide (Quran 6:38),
with humanity as trustee, not owner of resources (Quran 2:284, 57:7
etc.), it encourages the distribution of the surplus of every
individual (Quran 2:219) in the form of a social fund (Quran 9:60)
administered by those in charge of governance. It makes the
fulfillment of basic necessities of the needy a
"religious" duty, without which the ritual of prayer
itself is mocked, yes mocked by the Quran itself (Quran 107:1-7).
Such "socialistic" emphasis on social justice, organized
within a religious system is unheard of in the world of religion,
which according to Marx often served as the "opium of the
All one has to
do to see the absurdity of this claim is to look at the state of the
Muslims all over the world. Although Islamic countries are poor and will
remain poor because the “Islamic economy” (that is oxymoronic) is
based on the lunacy of an ignoramus and if it wasn’t for the oil,
they would be the poorest people of the world, even where they make money
by selling oil the social injustice in Islamic countries is the first
thing that comes to sight. Now one would think that oil should belong to
all the people in the country. No one has done anything to make it. It is
just there and they just dig it out. Nonetheless there is no welfare or
social safety net for the poor, the handicapped, the orphan or the elderly
in any Islamic country. If you are stricken by a disaster, such as an
accident and you can’t work, the only way for you to survive is to
become a beggar. If your husband divorces you or dies and you are not
young and pretty enough to find another husband, pan handling or suicide are
your only options. In the old days you could sew to raise your family,
like my blessed grandmother did. In these days probably you can work as a
maid. If you are poor, sometimes the mosque may give you
some handout, but not without a catch. The catch is that you join the
Jihad, become an Islamic revolutionary, help them in their political
agenda or become a suicide bomber so your
family can be supported for a while. That support is not forever. Claiming
that Islam has social justice is mockery of intelligence. In the secular
societies we have real safety nets and social justice. It provides you
enough to live with dignity. If you are young you will be trained to enter
workforce and if you are disabled or old, you will be sustained by the welfare. You do not have to become a beggar. Muslims who immigrate to
the Western kafirdoms are familiar with this system more
than anyone else. They take full advantage of it and even abuse it.
Nothing like that exists in any Islamic country. The quranic injunction to
give to the poor is nonsense. What poor people need is not the wanton and
humiliating handout of
the rich but a real welfare system. That is only possible where the
economy is robust and can never happen in any Islamic country.
The Muslim Asadi
emphasis on the sanctity of human life, comparing a single one to
all of humanity (Quran 5:32) is also unsurpassed in world
literature, and the common bond, the "human consciousness"
it intends to create based upon common origin (Quran 4:1) and one
creator God, who created all equally according to his nature (Quran
30:30) is equally unsurpassed as humanitarian doctrine and is
demonstrated as fact during the Hajj pilgrimage.
Let us talk about the
verse 5:32 that Muslims repeat at nauseam to make their murderous
prophet look "humanitarian".
This verse is
based on the silly tale of the sons of
Adams. In the previous verses Muhammad says that one son killed the other and
was filled with regret and shame. Then:
Then Allah sent a raven, who scratched the ground, to show him how to
hide the shame of his brother. "Woe is me!" said he;
"Was I not even able to be as this raven, and to hide the shame of
my brother?" then he became full of regrets-
On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one
slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the
land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved
a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then
although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even
after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.
This is part of the fable that Muhammad is
recounting and not
part of his teachings.
But before I explain this verse, note how this self proclaimed prophet
keeps forgetting that the Quran is supposed to be the words of Allah and
in the verse 5:31 he refers to Allah in third person, instead of first
There are too many of these Freudian slips of the tongue in the Quran to
count. Some of them are corrected later by adding the word “qul”
(say) in the beginning of the verse to give the impression that Allah is
ordering Muhammad to say these words. But in other cases adding qul
was not possible - like in this verse.
ridiculous point in this verse is the claim that Allah sent a raven, who
scratched the ground, to show this son of Adam how to hide the shame (nakedness) of
his brother. The Muslim brain is so naive that he does not realize
this is ludicrous. This tale is for children. How can grown ups
believe in such a gobbledygook? Ravens teachings humans how to bury their
dead? Do the ravens bury their own dead?
problem with this verse is however, the fact that it makes no sense. It is
a silly claptrap and in the absence of any humane verse in the Quran it enthuses
the Muslims who desperately try to find something humane in that book of
terror and hate. But it is a darn stupid verse. Killing one person is
certainly not like killing two persons and definitely not the same as
killing all mankind. What kind of stupid mind could come up with this
biggest problem with this verse is that Muhammad killed thousands of
people and instructed his followers to do the same. The entire Quran is
full of exhortations to kill and murder the mushrikun. How can we
reconcile 5:32 with 8:12, 9:5, 9:14 or 47:4 if indeed it is an injunction
for not killing? How can Muslims do Jiahd if they are not supposed to kill
and why the Islamic world is so filled with violence and the more
religious Muslims become the gorier becomes their acts?
verse 5:32 talks about the sanctity of life, then Muhammad can be accused
of being a despicable person who despite saying such thing went on
massacring thousands of people and slitting the throats of his prisoners,
including boys whose only fault was to have pubic hair.
According to Confucius the person whose words
and actions do not coincide is the lowest of the creatures.
|All systems have
been abused and misused for political/economic motives and Islam is
no exception, but condemning it as an inherently anti-human ideology
is dishonest and unjust.
Islam is abused is cop out. All one has to do is read the Quran to see
that all the evil perpetrated by Muslims stem from this book of terror.
Islam is inherently anti human. Read this sermon: http://www.alminbar.com/khutbaheng/1819.htm
Compare it to the hate speeches of Hitler. Hitler comes out like a saint.
And every paragraph of this sermon is backed by a verse from the Quran. It
is dishonest, hypocritical and shameful to claim that Islam is a humane
distorted, reactionary version of Islam has been implanted from
"outside" as was the case of the proxy Cold-War that the
U.S. was fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan: here you had
the CIA, most of whom were non-believers in Islam, promising the
Afghans a sure ticket to heaven if they died fighting the Soviets,
Stinger missiles were an added bonus; supporting Zia’s “Saudi
Islamization” of Pakistan etc.)
Imagine the hypocrisy of this
Muslim. He wants us to believe that Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar and the
Taliban were peaceful persons who were mislead by CIA into believing that
by killing the Soviets they will go to heaven. What shameless creatures
are these Muslims? If the CIA had so much power that could define Islam
for Muslims, why they are not making them love and serve America? Indeed
when I say Muslims are brain dead, it is no exaggeration. You can hear
from them things you can never find in any dollar store.