and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Egypt, Palestine,
. He brutally killed the opponents whatever country was invaded by his
, the famous river “Red canal” (Canal filled with human bloods) was
created by him when his force killed 30,000 Iranian in a single day. That
canal was filled with human’s bloods; hence named the “red canal”.
He also killed 100,000 Iranian in
in another war.
People during Prophet Muhammad’s rule or after his
death were utterly poor. During the period of four Caliphs (Khula-faye-Rashedins)
people were desperately poor, there was no food available, famous story of
boiling stone in the empty pot instead of food was the story during Hazrat
Umar (ra). This ‘stone boiling’
story was the testament of precarious economic condition of then Arab
land. Could you tell us what good about that period?
Khan said: “An
Islamic judicial system is supposed to stop all kinds of killing, and even
prevent such crimes before they can occur in Muslim territories. But in
reality, we find that Muslims are killing Muslims everywhere, and Muslim
governments are the main culprits behind all kinds of massacre,
atrocities, and genocide.”
Islamic judicial system is supposed to stop killing? Where did you
learn that, or where did you see that happen?
Who gave you this impossible idea? Islamic judicial system (Shariaat
or Hudud laws) is loaded with cruelty, barbaric, uncivilized and
draconian punishment for even simple crime like stealing an apple to eat,
listening songs or music, shaving beards or not putting hijab for women.
Quran emphatically orders Muslim ruler to chop hands and feet for
simple stealing of some meager amounts of foods!
This is the only reason we have seen so much draconian punishments
in Islamic Afghanistan,
. You are right here that all Muslims are killing Muslims. Because,
cruelty and killings, beheadings, stoning death all are the hall mark of
Islamic judicial system. Please give us just one Islamic kingdom (from
present or past) in which peace and tranquility was prevailing because of
Islamic rule. Or, you give us some Quranic verses or Sahih g hadiths in
support of your assertions.
Khan said: “Most
Fuqaha (jurists) have created an Islamic consensus (ijma) that the Islamic
state is essentially a Welfare State intended to put the public interest above
all kinds of individual luxury, and that envisions a complete eradication
of poverty at all levels, if it is to be a truly Islamic state.”
Response: It does not sound true
to me. No Islamic state was ever a welfare state for human, rather it was
welfare or dedicated state for Allah only. Human freedom or human choices
were denied in every Islamic state. Caliph or the ruler was always
accountable to Allah only never to the people.
Please name one Islamic state (present or past) in which human
dignity got upper hand, or it was a welfare state to put public interest
above all. This is only your own imagination due to the childhood brain
washings by mullahs.
Page 1 ||
Page 2 || Page 3