Mountains Stabilize the Earth
Dr. William Campbell
spent maximum time on Embryology’… about half his talk - quite a lot
on Geology - and touched
on other six topics - I’ve noted down. In the field of Geology, we have
come to know today - the Geologists, they tell us, that the radius of the
Earth is approximately 3750 miles, and the deeper layers, they are hot and
fluid, and cannot sustain life. And the superficial part of the Earth’s
crust, which we live on, it is very thin - Hardly 1 to 30 miles. Some
portions are thicker, but majority one to 30 miles. And there are high
possibility that this superficial layer, the Earth’s crust - it will
shake. It is due to the ‘Folding phenomenon’, which gives rise to
mountain ranges, which gives stability to this Earth. And Qur’an
says in Surah Nabaa, Ch. No. 78, Verse No. 6 and 7…‘We have made the
Earth as an expanse…. (Arabic) ….and the mountains as stakes.’ The Qur’an
does not say, mountains were thrown up as stakes… mountain as stakes.
Arabic word ‘Autaad’ means ‘stakes’… meaning ‘tent
peg’. And today we have come to know in the study of modern Geology,
that mountain has got deep roots. This was known in the second half of the
19th century. And the superficial part that we see of the
mountain is a very small percentage. The deeper part is within - Exactly
like a stake how it is driven in the ground. You can only see a small part
on top - the majority is down in the ground - or like a tip of the ice
berg…you can see the tip on the top and about 90% is beneath water.
says in Surah Gashiya, Ch. 88, Verse No. 19, and Surah Naziat, Ch. No. 79,
Verse No. 32 ….. (Arabic) …. And We have made the mountains standing
firm on the Earth’. Today
after modern Geology has advanced, and Dr. William Campbell said that…
‘By the theory of Plate tectonics - It was propounded in 1960, which
gives rise to mountain ranges.’ The Geologists today do say that the
mountains give stability to the Earth - Not all Geologists, but many do
Sina) Dr. Campbell already explained how mountains
are formed in a scientific language. Everything Dr. Naik says is just
absurdity. He says “not all geologists" but many of them say mountains give stability to the Earth.
He thinks science is like Islamic jurisprudence that each mullah can have
his interpretation. Will he give us a
few names so we can verify what exactly these "geologists" say and
check their credentials? I hope they are not graduates from Al Azhar
The Earth's surface is made
up of a series of large plates (like pieces of a giant jigsaw puzzle).
These plates are in constant motion traveling at a few centimeters per
year. This motion is called continental drift. The edges of these plates,
where they move against each other, are sites of intense geologic
activity, such as earthquakes, volcanoes, and mountain building.
beneath the plates move the plates in different directions. The source
of heat driving the convection currents is radioactive decay which is
happening deep in the Earth
two tectonic plates
collide they press against each other until the land is lifted and folded over itself.
often causes one
plate to push on top of another one.
As one plate slides
downward into the earth, it begins to melt pushing the other plate upwards
forming mountain ranges.
some places continents collide, in other placed they drift. Continental
plates break when a
plume of hot magma rises from deep within the mantle pushing up the crust
and causing pressure forcing the continent to break and separate. Lava
flows and earthquakes would be seen. In the diagram below you can see that
the continental crust is beginning to separate creating a diverging plate
boundary. When a divergence occurs within a continent it is called
rifting. A plume of hot magma rises from deep within the mantle pushing up
the crust and causing pressure forcing the continent to break and
separate. Lava flows and earthquakes would be seen. http://www.moorlandschool.co.uk/earth/tectonic.htm
ocean floors are continually moving, spreading from the center and sinking
at the edges.
continental plates collide the melted rock rushes upward
along cracks and weak spots, bursting out as fiery volcanoes.
are several kinds of mountains:
are formed when melted rock pushes its way up
are formed when faults or cracks in the
earth's crust force some materials or blocks of rock up and others down.
Fold Mountains are formed
as layers of the earth react to forces pushing in on either side, much as
a piece of paper folds when pushed together.
are formed from by hardened lava after
spurting out of a volcano.
are mountains that are really plateaus that
have worn down from erosion.
Cross-section of the French Alps: from University of Leeds.
No sign of roots!
Satellite view of Pennsylvania
Appalachians is an example of fault block mountains.
View north over termination of Rundle
Thrust Sheet, Rocky Mountains.
What happens if
push the tablecloth from its edge sliding it across the table? It wrinkles. That is more or less how
mountains are formed. They are wrinkles caused in the crust of the
Ironically without these devastating earthquakes life on Earth could
not have evolved. The
movement of continents allows carbon dioxide to be released to the atmosphere.
This is essential for the photosynthesis of plants and it also keeps the temperature
of the Earth constant which is necessary for
life to evolve .
you have Quicktime installed, you can click on these animations and see
how mountains are formed.
should suffice as proof that the Quran is wrong and mountains are not like
pegs to keep the earth from shaking. Remember
that Dr. Naik repeated several times, "All we need is one error to
prove it is not from God". Later I will explain where the idea of mountains being like pegs and
holding the earth beneath us from shaking with us has come from.
I have not come
across a single Geological book, and I challenge Dr. William Campbell to
produce a single Geological book - Not his personal correspondence with
the Geologist. That does not carry weight. His personal correspondence
with Dr. Keith Moore …. Documented proof. And if you read the book
‘The Earth’ which is referred by almost all the universities, in the
field of Geology, one of its authors by the name of Dr
Frank Press, who was the advisor to the former president of USA, Jimmy
Carter, and was the president of the Academy of Science of USA. He writes
in his book that…‘The mountains are wedge shaped - It has deep
roots within. And he says that…‘The function of the mountain is to
stabilize the earth.’ And the Qur’an says in Surah Ambiya,
Ch. No 21, Verse No. 31, in Surah Luqman, Ch. No. 31 Verse No.10, as well as
in Surah Nahl, Ch. No. 16, Verse No. 15, that…‘We have made the
mountains standing firm on the Earth, lest it would shake with them and
Frank Press, in his book The
"The thickness of the crust varies from about 35 kilometer to 10
kilometer in a section extended from continent to ocean. Under a
high mountain the crust thickens to as much as 65 kilometer. The following
Figure suggests that the continental crust floats on the denser mantle
like an iceberg on the ocean. Icebergs float because they are less dense
than sea water. Flotation comes from a large volume of ice that lies below the sea surface. When Archimides’ principle of buoyancy is
applied to the flotation of continents and mountains, it becomes the
principle of isostasy, which holds that relatively light continents float
on a more dense mangle; most of a continent's volume lies below the sea
floor for the same reason that most of an iceberg lies below the ocean
surface. Nature has contrived that large topographic loads like mountains
and continents are compensated – that is supported primarily by buoyancy
rather than by the strength of the crust." (page 663-664)
The lithosphere is topped by a relatively lightweight crust.
Seismology reveals that the crust varies in thickness; it is thin
under oceans, thicker under continent, and thicker under high
mountains. In the above picture
the horizontal distance is much larger.
Now let us see what the
the mountains, how they are firmly fixed, (Q.
the mountains are as pegs (Q.78.7)
These are not scientific
statements. Every illiterate person living in the 7th century knew that
the mountains are fixed. Also mountains do not resemble pegs.
The function of the
mountain in the Qur’an, is given to prevent the Earth from
shaking. Nowhere does the Qur’an say that the mountain prevents
Sina) What could
possibly "preventing earth from shaking" mean except earthquake?
Dr. William Campbell said - He writes in his book, and even the talk,
that… ‘You find in the mountains regions, there are various
earthquakes, and mountains cause earthquake.’ Point to be noted -
Nowhere does the Qur’an say that mountains prevent earthquake.
The Arabic word for ‘earthquake’ as Dr. William Campbell knows Arabic, is ‘zilzaal’ or ‘zalzala’-
But the words used in these three Verses I quoted, it is ‘Tamida.’
‘Tamida’ means ‘to shake’, ‘to ‘sway’, ‘to
swing.’ And Qur’an says in Surah Luqman, Ch. 31, Verse No. 10,
as well as Surah Nahl, Ch. No. 16 Verse No. 15…‘We have put on the
earth mountains standing firm, lest it would shake with you. It is ‘tamide
bikum’…‘Shake with you’, Indicating, if the mountains were not
there, if you would have walked, if you would have moved, even the earth
would have moved with you - If you would have swayed, even the earth would
have swayed with you. And we know normally when we walk on the Earth, the
Earth does not shake, and the reason for this is, according to Dr. Frank
Press and Dr. Najjat who is from
Saudi Arabia, and he wrote a full book on the Geological concepts in the Qur’an,
answering almost every thing what Dr. William Campbell has said - in
Sina) High mountains are formed through collision of
tectonic plates. In planets where tectonic plates do not exist or do not migrate, there
are no continental collisions, earthquakes do not
take place and mountains do not form. As the result life does not evolve.
are nearly 70 planets and moons in our solar system. None has mountain
ranges like those on Earth, suggesting tectonic plates are not moving.
Yet it is absurd to say that one cannot walk on the surface of these
planets and moons without making the ground beneath them shake. Can anyone
say anything stupider than this
fact the reverse is true. In planets where high mountains don't exist, the
ground is very stable.
And Dr. William
Campbell in his book, he writes that…‘If mountains prevent the shaking
of the earth, then how come you find earthquakes in the mountains
regions.’ I said, No where does the Qur’an say, mountains
prevent earthquake. Earthquake is ‘zilzaal’ - and if you see
the definition in the
dictionary, it says… Earthquake is due to convulsion of the superficial
crust of the Earth, due to relief of compressed Seismic waves, due to
crack in the rock, or due to volcanic reaction. The Qur’an speaks
about ‘zalzala’ in Surah
99 - But here it speaks about ‘tamida bikum’- ‘to prevent the
earth from shaking with you.’
Sina) Note that
this shaking, according to Dr. Naik is not caused by the volcanic eruptions
or tectonic movement. It is not the kind of earthquake we know. It is
something else. This shaking is the result of people waking.
But as everyone knows, the earth does not shake when we walk on it. The
reason? It's thanks to the mountains that prevent this shaking. How can even one
suggest that tiny beings like humans can make a continent
shake by simply walking on it?
This goes beyond absurdity. It's
And in reply to the
statement…‘That if mountains prevent earthquakes, how come you find
earthquakes in mountainous regions?’ The reply is, that - If I say that
medical doctors, they prevent the sickness and disease in a human being,
and if someone argues…‘If doctors prevent the sickness and diseases in
a human being, how come you find more sick people in the hospitals, where
there are more doctors than at home - where there are no doctors.’
Sina) What a
ridiculous analogy! Patients go to hospitals AFTER they get sick because
they are living and thinking beings and that is where they can get medical
attention and get better. They do not become sick in hospitals (unless the
hospital is in an
Islamic country with Islamic hygiene). Is Dr. Naik trying to
compare earthquake, a natural phenomenon, to humans? Do the
earthquakes happen first elsewhere and then decide to conglomerate in mountains? This analogy is utterly ridiculous; yet Dr.
Naik’s Muslim audience became so elated that they
spontaneously cheered and applauded. One black guy was almost falling off
his chair of excessive laughing. What these people were laughing at? At
their own stupidity? Now the world can see them and laugh at them. It’s as if the more stupid is a
statement, the more Muslims enjoy it. This reveals the deplorable
intellectual bankruptcy of the wretched Umma.
me, absurd thinking is the trait of Muslims. Sometime ago I read an essay about a Muslim child asking his religious
teacher that the Quran says Jinns will be sent to hell to be punished but
the the Quran also says that Jinns are made of fire, so how fire can be hurt
The teacher slapped the child and asked him if it hurts? The poor lad
responded yes, with tears in his eyes. "Like that!", responded the
teacher. "My hand is flesh and your face is flesh but it still
hurts". Foolish Muslims think this is such a great reasoning. This is the fallacy of wrong analogy. But the Muslim brain is not equipped with
enough rationality to think deep. He WANTS to believe and any nonsense
will do. There are several sites that have written against me. I receive numerous emails from Muslims who have neither read my articles
nor those written by Muslims trying to refute me. And yet these people
tell me that I have already been refuted and give me links to the same
silly sites. They WANT to believe that I am refuted. They will believe
anyone who claims he has refuted me without searching the truth of that claim. The Muslim mind works in bizarre ways.
Here Dr. Naik is trying
to explain with this harebrained example why most of the earthquakes happen in
mountainous regions. But didn't he say that the Quran is not speaking of
earthquake and that tamida is not zilzala? If the Quran is
not talking about earthquake at all, why he tries to justify this verse
with this silly example? If he is satisfied with his answer that tamida
is the result people walking on earth, why talk about earthquake? Why
cause more confusion? It's because the more confused is your
audience the better you can fool them. Dr. Naik is smart enough to
‘tamida bikum’ or ‘to prevent the
earth from shaking with you’, is a bit too stupid to be swallowed even
by Muslims who would generally gobble any nonsense eagerly, so he amuses
his audience by telling them that it is okay that earthquakes mostly
happen in mountainous regions, despite the fact that the Quran says
mountains are like pegs that prevent earth from shaking with a ridiculous
example of patients and doctors.
of the Quran,
In the field of Oceanology,
the Glorious Qur’an says, in Surah Furqan, Ch. No. 25, Verse No.
53, that…‘It is Allah who has let free two bodies of following water -
One sweet and palatable, the other salt and bitter. Though they meet, they
do not mix. Between them there is a barrier which is forbidden to be
trespassed. Qur’an says in Surah Rahman, Ch. 55 Verse No. 19 and
20……. (Arabic) ……‘It is Allah who has
let free two bodies of flowing water. Though they meet, they do not mix.
Between them there is barrier, which is forbidden to be trespassed.’
Previously the commentators of the Qur’an wondered…‘What does
the Qur’an mean? We know about sweet and salt water - But between
them there is a barrier - though they meet do not mix. Today after
advancement of Oceanology, we have come to know, that whenever one type of
water flows into the other type of water, it looses its constituents, and
gets homogenized into the water it flows. There is a slanting homogenizing
area, which the Qur’an refers to as ‘Barzak’
‘unseen barrier’ And this has been agreed upon by several Scientists,
, by the name of Dr. Hay - he is an Oceanologist.
And Dr. William
Campbell writes in his book that…‘It is an observable phenomena. The
fisherman of that time knew there were two types of water… salt and
sweet So Prophet Mohammed during an expedition to
, he may have gone in the sea, or he might have spoken to these
Sweet and salt water
is an observable phenomenon, I agree - But people did not know that there
was an unseen barrier, until recently. The Scientific point to be noted
here is the ‘Barzak’ - not the sweet and the salt water.
Sina) If the separation of sweet and salt waters is an observable
phenomenon, as it seems that everyone agrees, then how could no one know
about it until "the advancement of oceanology" made its
knowledge possible? What Muhammad is
referring to is precisely that and nothing more. There is no “invisible
barrier” between two waters, which is “forbidden to be
trespassed”. There is no barrier of any kind - no barzakh at
all between waters. Waters don’t mix immediately because of different temperature and
density but they eventually do, just like when you pour cream in a cup
of coffee. It takes time to mix; that is why you stir it. Those who saw
this phenomenon must have relayed their
observation to others using figurative speech saying waters
don’t mix AS IF there is an invisible barrier between them. Our ignorant Muhammad
took this literally and claimed there is an “invisible barrier” between
them, which is “forbidden to be trespassed”. Nothing can be further
from the truth. All waters mix and there is no barrier, invisible or
otherwise between them. When two rivers, carrying sediments of different
colors meet, or when sweet water
coming from rivers flows into the blue salty water of the sea, one can see
the line of demarcation sometimes stretching for miles until they
gradually blend. Where the waters merge, i.e. what Dr. Naik refers to as
the “slanting homogenizing area”, is not a “barrier”. It is the
opposite of it. There the waters are not forbidden to trespass but
amazing that Muslims emphasize on the flagrant errors of the Quran as its miracles. Who would buy this nonsense except a totally ignorant person?
In the field of Embryology,
Dr. William Campbell spent approximately half of his talk on that. Time
will not permit me to reply to every small thing which are illogical.
I’ll just give a brief reply, which will be satisfactory InshaAllah. And
for more details, you can refer to my Video cassette – ‘Qur’an
and Modern Science’, and my other cassettes on… ‘Qur’an and
There were a group
of Arabs who collected the data dealing in the Qur’an about
‘Embryology’ and the Hadith dealing with Embryology. And they
presented it to Professor Keith
Moore, who was the chairman and the head of the department of
‘Anatomy’, in the
- And at present he is one of the leading scientists in the field of
‘Embryology.’ After reading the various translations of the Qur’an,
he was asked to comment, and he said… ‘Most of the Verses of the Qur’an
and the Hadith are in perfect conformity with Modern Embryology. But there
are a few Verses which I cannot say that they are right neither can I say
that they are wrong, because I myself don’t know about it. And two such
Verses were the first two Verses of the Qur’an to be revealed,
from Surah Iqra or Surah Alaq , Ch. 96 Verses No. 1 and 2 which
says…(Arabic)… ‘Read, recite or proclaim in
the name of thy Lord, Who created, Who created the human beings from
something which clings - a leech like substance’. Regarding Dr.
William Campbell’s statement that…‘To analyse the meaning of a word,
we have to see what was the meaning at that time when it was
revealed’-At that time when the book was written. And he rightly said
that to analyze the meaning, we have to analyze the meaning at the time it
was revealed, and to the people whom it was meant for.
Islam for All Mankind?
As far as this
statement of his is concerned, regarding the Bible, I do agree with
it totally - Because the Bible was only meant for the children of
, for that time. It is mentioned in the Gospel of Mathew, Ch. No. 10,
Verse No. 5 and 6, Jesus Christ peace be upon him tells his disciples…
‘Go ye not in the way of the Gentiles.’ Who are the Gentiles? The
Non-Jews, the Hindus, the Muslims. ‘But rather go to the lost sheep of
the house of
.’ Jesus Christ peace be upon him said in the Gospel of Mathew, Ch. No.
15, Verse No. 24… ‘I am not sent, but to the lost sheep of the
.’ So Jesus Christ and the Bible were only meant for the children
of Isreal. Since it was meant for them, to analyze the Bible, you
have to use the meaning of the word, which was utilized at that time. But
the Qur’an was not meant only for the Arabs of that time. Qur’an
is not meant only for the Muslims. The Qur’an is meant for the
whole of humanity, and it is meant to be for eternity.
Sina) Here again the Muslim
audience broke in applause and the sign of joy was visible from their
To them it was victory after victory. However, had Dr. Naik
told them that the Quran says that Muhammad has come only for the Meccans alone and
the people around it they would not have rejoiced that much.
this is a Book which We have sent down, bringing blessings, and confirming
(the revelations) which came before it: that thou mayest warn the mother
of cities and all around her.
The mother of cities, Umul
is Mecca. The same thing is confirmed in verse:
have We sent by inspiration to thee an Arabic Qur’an: that thou mayest
warn the Mother of Cities and all around her.
In other places Allah
says to Muhammad that he has come for the people who did not receive
guidance yet bringing to them a book in Arabic so they can understand. The
implication is that the Quran is not for non-Arabs. The Quran further
032.003 “Nay, it is the Truth from thy
Lord, that thou mayest admonish a people to whom no warner has come before
thee: in order that they may receive guidance.”
order that thou mayest admonish a people, whose fathers had received no
admonition, and who therefore remain heedless (of the Signs of Allah).
The people of the Book,
i.e. the Jews, the Christians and perhaps the Zoroastrians had their own
messengers and their guidance. The only people who had not received
guidance were the Arabs, specifically the Arabs of Mecca and
its surrounding. So, it is clear that
Muhammad claimed that he had come only for the Quraish and not for the
people of the Book and the rest of mankind. Of course, as he became
powerful, his ambitions grew and he changed his mind later. Few Muslims
know about these verses. What do they say about them? If they truly
believe that the Quran is the word of God, they should stop their da'wa
and Jihad. The people of Mecca and its surrounding have already converted
to Islam. If Muslims believe that the Quran is the word of God, how do
they dare to disobey Him and make da'wa elsewhere. Even if Muhammad said
they should attack other countries and convert others into Islam, they
should not listen to him but do what the Quran says. Whose word is more
important? That of Allah or that of Muhammad? These verses should
also convince the non-Arab Muslims, including the Egyptians, the Syrians,
the Iraqis and all others now known as Arabs that Islam is not
for them. Islam is only for the Meccans and its surrounding. They must
leave Islam, if they truly believe that the Quran is the word of
says in Surah Ibrahim, Ch. 14, Verse. 52, in Surah Baqarah Ch. No. 2,
Verse 185, and Surah Zumar
39, Verses. 41, that the Qur’an is meant for the whole of human
kind. And Prophet Mohammed, may peace be upon him, was not sent only for
the Muslims or the Arabs. Allah says in the Qur’an in Surah
Ambiya Ch. No. 21, Verse No. 107------(Arabic)----That
We have send thee as a mercy, as a guidance, to the whole of humankind.’
14:52 says “Hatha
balaghun lilnnasi”. Nas is
people – any number of people. It could be people gathered in a room. It could refer to the inhabitants of
a village, a town, a country and not necessarily
ALL Mankind. For example nas is
used in verse 7.116 when talking about the magic performed by the
magicians of Pharaoh who bewitched the eyes of the people ‘nas’.
Are we supposed to understand that all mankind were bewitched? The same word
is used in 2:185, 39:4 and 21:107. In all these verses Nas means "people" and not
all mankind. If we assume that the word 'nas' used in these verses
means all mankind then we have to admit that there is flagrant
contradiction in the Quran for the verses 6:92, 42:7, 32:3 and 36:6
clearly state that the Quran is for the people of Mecca and its
However, Muhammad also claimed to
have been sent to "creatures of both worlds". lilAAalameen.
means everything in both worlds. (That includes dogs and pigs.) That is because he was a megalomaniac
narcissist and narcissists talk big. He even claimed to have come
as guidance for Jinns, which are mythical beings.
Narcissists have grandiose ideas about
themselves. In a Hadith Muhammad makes his Allah say to him: “Were it not for you, I would not have created the universe.” 
ibn Ali has narrated that Muhammad said:
"Among all the people of the
world God chose the Arabs; from among the Arabs he chose the Kinana; from
Kinana he chose the Quraish; from the Quraish he chose Bani Hashim; from
Bani Hashim he chose Me.
[Tabaqat V. 1 p. 2]
This man was full of himself - a true narcissist.
So much for the alleged equality in Islam. Arabs are the chosen race. Arabs have known that always and
they treat non Arab Muslims with disdain. If you are a non-Arab Muslim,
you are accepting to be inferior.
(Dr. Naik) So as far as the Qur’an
is concerned, you cannot limit the meaning only for that time, because it
is meant for eternity. So one of the meaning of ‘Alaqa’… is
‘leech like substance’ or ‘something which clings.’ So Professor
Keith Moore said… ‘I did not know whether the early stage of the
embryo looks like a leech’ And he went into his laboratory and he
analyzed the early stage of an embryo under a microscope and compared it
with the photograph of a leech, and he was astonished at the striking
resemblance. This is a photograph of a leech, and human embryo.
Sina) Are we
supposed to believe that Dr. Keith
Moore, who was the chairman and the head of the department of Anatomy, of a major university did not know how human embryo
looks? The truth is that Dr. Moore and Dr.
Bucaille fooled Muslims by telling them what they wanted to hear and in
this way they ingratiated the Saudi King who in
turn lavished them with a lot of petrodollars. For a detailed story of the
deception of these two charlatans see Abul Kasem’s article. “How the Westerners
$cience in the Quran.)
truth about embryology is already explained by Dr. Campbell. He
demonstrated the pictures showing that scientifically speaking, there is no resemblance between the
human embryo and leech. Furthermore he explained in detail where Muhammad
got his erroneous idea about embryo being a congealed clot of blood, like leech and
chewed meat. He got it from ancient Greek philosophers. These ideas were
popular among the ordinary Arabs at the time of Muhammad. They were wrong
and so was Muhammad.
Alaqa, Dr. Campbell also proved that in Arabic, it means clot and not
something that clings as Dr. Bucaille has suggested.
showed that all stages of the growth of the embryo described in the Quran
are wrong. He demonstrated this with pictures. No one can prove something
different than what the X rays reveal.
(Dr. Naik) What Dr. William
Campbell showed you is the other perspective of it. If I show this book -
it looks like a rectangle - If I show you like that, it is a different
perspective. That diagram is given in the book - The diagram which you saw
on the slide is even there - And I’ll deal with it InshaAllah.
again the gullible audience became euphoric and clapped without
realizing that Dr. Naik is engaging in the fallacy of suppressing the
evidence. Dr. Campbell showed the picture of the embryo from the front and
from the side. Dr. Naik wants to convince his audience that they should look at it from one angle only – the angle that it most resembles a
leech. Of course
one who is determined to be fooled would be willing to
look at things by standing on his head, if that helps him to see them
from the exact angle that would reconfirm his unreasoned faith. That is why
Muslims are unable to see the truth. Their tunnel vision does not allow
them to see things from all angles. If only they changed their perspective
a little, they would see that Islam is nothing but a big lie.
 www.oso.tamucc.edu/~ianmacd/3351/quakes renew the planet.htm
(d.650) said, this hadith is "maudu
(fabricated)" ['al-Ahaadeeth al-Mawdoo'aat' of as-Saghaanee
(pg. 7)] and likewise al-Albaanee ['Silsilah ad-Da'eefah' (1/450 no.282)]
ash-Shaykh Mulla Alee Qaaree (d.1014) said, "maudu,
but it's meaning is correct."