In the rebuttal part Dr. Campbell said:
"Well Dr. Naik has brought up some real problems - And there are also these
problems that he has said. I do not deny them, and I don’t have good
answers for them."
This admission made the Muslim audience extremely happy and they
clapped with joy.
Why would Dr. Campbell say such a thing? It is because Dr. Campbell is
an honest man. He does not have an answer to the errors that exist in the Bible and he is not going to twist the truth and lie. The Bible is
full of errors. But as I explained, those errors do not diminish the value
of its core message.
Then Dr. Naik took the microphone and triumphantly reminded his
audience that Dr. Campbell answered to only two of the 20 criticisms
that he brought against the Bible. "Dr.
William Campbell did not reply to my 20 points," boasted
Dr. Naik, "and he
started speaking about ‘Prophesy.’ What has ‘Prophesy’ to do with
‘Science in the Bible.’"?..."Dr. William Campbell cannot understand the
Qur’an - That does
not mean, Qur’an is wrong."
As I showed in this paper, the one who does not understand the Quran,
and has even a lesser understanding of science is Dr. Naik. Dr. Naik's
answers to the criticisms brought against the Quran are all
Both Dr. Campbell and Dr. Nail presented their arguments
with great erudition. Dr. Naik furthermore impressed his audience by
reading the Quranic verses from memory. But
his skill in memorizing verses of the Quran should not be mistaken as the
truth of his argument. As I said. Dr. Naik is a great magician and he is
good at what he does. But what he does is not true. He has mastered the
art of deception. Both speakers were right when they pointed out to
the errors and absurdities contained in the holy book of the other.
However, Dr. Campbell, in my view is the winner of this
debate. That is because Dr. Campbell proved to be an honest man, a true
scholar. He knows the difference between truth and falsehood. He is not
willing to falsify the truth just to win the debate. When he was shown the
errors of the Bible, he did not try to lie and present lame apologias or
twist the meaning of the words as Dr. Naik often did. He
simply said I don't have good answers for them. This quality has endeared
him to me and I have utmost respect for Dr. Campbell.
Unfortunately I can't say the same about Dr. Naik. Dr. Naik did not
come across as an honest person. He attacked the Bible for the same errors
that exists also in the Quran. This was like a pot calling a kettle black.
That is intellectual dishonesty.
Unlike his opponent, when the errors of the Quran were presented to
him, Dr. Naik denied the obvious. He even tried to give completely new meanings
to common words such as nur (light) which he said means "borrowed
light", wajada, (found) which he said means "appeared to
(follows its orbit), which he said
means rotating around its own axis, museoon (vast), which he said
means expanding, sama (sky/heaven), which he said means rain, etc.
I know Dr. Naik will not respond to this paper.
But if any Muslim can, I would be glad to hear from them.
By now, you should know why Islam has advanced so
far. It advanced through Jihad. i.e. terrorism and throw lies and
deceptions. You all know about Islamic terrorism. I hope after
reading this paper, you have also come to see the face of deception and
chicanery of Islam. Dr. Naik personifies that face.
Dr. Naik thinks every
Muslim should be a terrorist. Based on the information I have
received, it appears that he might have set up a
tainting camp for Islamic terrorism.
I urge all the good people of
the world and specially the Indians to expose this conman. Promote this
article and let Muslims and his fans know that he is a liar.
Dr. Naik thinks he
would win with deception. Let us prove that truth is
more powerful. Let truth shatter his lies and tier down his tower of