Page 1 || Page 2 ||
More on Sex with Slave-girls and
By Abul Kasem
a number of posts on the sexual use of slave-girls and captive women in
Islam. It is quite amusing to note the desperation of a few ‘Islam
lovers’ to save Islam from the stigma of abysmal sexual exploitation of
slave-women and women-captives caught in a war. Here is what the ‘real
Islam’ says about having sex with slave-girls and captives (women, of
course). These passages are extracted from my detailed essays: ‘Sex and
Sexuality in Islam’ and ‘Root of Terrorism—Islamic Style.’
My question is: Who knows Islam best?—the Imams, the
impeccably qualified (Islamically, of course), Mullahs, the Pirs, Tabari,
Ghazali, Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Sa’d, Sahih Hadith, Hedaya (Hanafi Laws of
Islam, vetted by the Inns of Law, London to be the most authentic), Umdat
al-Salik (the most authentic Shafi Laws, authenticated by the Al-Azhar
Islamic University) or the western educated, western-settled Muslims who
claim they have discovered a new brand of Islam—Islam sans politics, and
of late, Islam sans those obnoxious ahadith?
When we point out from those impeccable Islamic
sources the true and unadulterated Islam preached and practiced by
Muhammad, these New Islamic Scholars would quote from personalities such
as: Gandhi, Carlyle, Barnard Shaw, John Esposito……..to demonstrate the
‘beautiful’ face of Islam. It is as if these kaffirs know Islam
more/better than Muhammad did!
This gets very funny indeed! How
about those despicable verses in the Qur’an which unmistakably
demonstrate the utter sexual perversions, vis-à-vis slave-girls and
captive women? Are these new Islamically educated, western-inclined
Islamic scholars ready to discard those Qu’ranic verses as well? I would
like to hear from them. This will really be very interesting, no doubt.
Any way, here are those ‘real Islamic’ excerpts.
Excerpts from ‘Sex and Sexuality in Islam’:
From an Islamic Q & A site:
What is the meaning of
right hand possession and what was the purpose of having them. Some
think it is okay to have right hand possessions now in the
hand possessions (Malak-ul-Yameen) means slaves and maids, those came in
possession of Muslims through war or purchase. After having the possession
of slave maid it is lawful and correct to have sexual relation with them.
Even today if Muslims get possession over infidel country, this condition
is possible, lawful and correct.’
Please peruse the above statement
once again. What is the implication of this Mullah’s opinion?
I must appreciate the Mullah for his utter honesty with respect to
‘real Islam.’ He did not
beat around the bushes. He has given a straight-forward, unadulterated,
pure and unambiguous answer that clearly conforms to the rules of Qur’an
May I ask the Islamic apologists to say a few words about this
honest reply from this Mullah?
You might still think this to be
impossible. But, wait! The
Pakistani Islamic army did just that in
in 1971. They killed about 3 million Bangalees, terming them as not so
good Muslims, took 250,000 Bengali women as concubines and raped
them—many of them repeatedly, and not very far off from their near and
dear ones. In recent times, we have heard many such reports from the
. These disturbing acts may enrage a lot of people including many Muslims.
Think again. Have the Islamic soldiers committed any crime/sin as far as
Islam is concerned. The answer is a simple “NO.”
Therefore, doesn’t it make sense to realise that it is Islam
itself which is the motivating factor for the rape of the captive women?
, a woman charged with adultery/blasphemy/apostasy, which carry death
penalty, become a captive of the Islamic state. Therefore, an Islamic
guard is appointed to have sex with her repeatedly before she is executed.
This, the Islamists laud is a beautiful and “humane” treatment of
infidel women prisoners in Islam!
one is also a hot topic worthy of discussion.
So far, we learnt the truth about the sexual exploitation of women
taken in a war. This is not
the only means by which unlimited sexual gratification is possible in a
’halal’ way. Buying
and selling of women as sex slaves is fully permitted in Islam. It is a
perfectly a legitimate way to acquire as many sex-slaves as possible.
Sky is not the limit, though. The
only limitation is the affordability. One may say that this type of flesh
trading is no more practiced today. This
is true. However, nothing can prevent the Islamists from re-introducing
the slave markets as per Qur’an and Sunnah when their ‘Jihad’
against the infidels is successful. Sexual slavery is absolutely
legitimate in Islam. If Islam conquered the world, slavery could have
never been eradicated, because Islamic laws are written on granite stone
and are absolutely unchangeable. So,
if Islam conquers the infidel countries there is nothing that could
prevent the Islamic zealots from re-introducing the slavery system and the
slave markets around the globe for trading in female bodies of infidel
women. If the Islamists can re-introduce the amputation of hands and feet
for theft, stoning to death for adultery, beheading for
apostasy and many
other barbaric Sha’ria rules, what will prevent them from
re-introducing Islamic slavery? Please
do think about this.
himself had a Coptic slave that was presented to him by the ruler of
. When the delegate from Muhammad visited this Coptic head of
(Muaqaqis) with an invitation for him to convert to Islam he politely
refused to do so, but knowing the taste of Muhammad, he presented Muhammad
with two beautiful and sexy slave-girls who were sisters.
Muhammad took for himself Mariya, the most beautiful one and gave
her sister, Sirin, to his poet friend, Hassan ibn Thabit for him to enjoy
her. Please note that neither Muhammad nor Hasan b. Thabit married these
slave-girls. Mariya gave birth to Ibrahim, Muhammad’s last child who
died in infancy. Sirin bore a
son named Abdul Rahman to Hassan, the poet (ref. 10, p. 498-499). All
these historical records are absolute proof that enjoying a female slave
is totally ‘halal’ in Islam.
Page 1 || Page 2 ||