The Faith of Hate

11 Responses

  1. Pawan says:

    Islam will never succeed because it does not believe in borders, it believes in the superiority of Arabs and that too from Saudi Arabia. Young muslims who after watching TV and their hate against US and Israel hastingly join the war waged by ISIS but on reaching there, these very youths see a very disrespecting role for them i.e. cleaning toilets of Arabs and in such a situation, then want Indian govt to help them.

    The poet Iqbal prior to 1947 wrote Saare jahan se achha hindustan hamara, national anthem of India took a U turn and in Pakistan wrote a different national anthem for Pakistan, Cheen-O-Arab hamara, saara jahan hamara. Basically, Quran teaches hate and prescribe killing of kafirs, and its followers therefore do not like to debate their holy book. They can’t justify as to how a 9 year old girl is wife of their supreme lord, Mohammed (PBUH).

  2. Lizzie says:

    So Western culture is vulgar and unacceptable to Islam!
    And yet every muslim country uses cars,moblle phones,washing machines,ovens,and thousands of things produced in Western countries to maintain their everyday lives.
    Without help from the West backward muslim countries would be living with goats in a tent or stone built shack. No lighting,no running water and disease and hardship.
    Medicine from the West is in use and their hospitals copy western standards. Islam is the snake tongued hippocrite,greedily filling its hands whilst condemning the giver.
    There are NO excuses for the barbaric murders and repressions in the death cult of Islam. San Bernadino is yet another example of the gross evil in the hearts and minds of muslims.

  3. Ron says:

    This is a great speech

  4. hindu speaks says:

    Islam is a noxious virus that can grow to its full devastating form even from its tiny fragment. This virus is also self-healing and self replicating. Even if a trace of Islam is alive anywhere, it is likely that Islam would rebuild (from its small trace) itself and grow to its dangerous form. So, one must reject Islam as a whole, not just its certain radical aspects –otherwise, Islam would emerge very powerful and destroy everything other good values, practices, culture, etc India had been under Muslim dominance for nearly one thousand years, and under direct Muslim rule for nearly 600 years. We feel and has been proved beyond doubt that rich and educated Muslims are far more dangerous than poor and less educated Muslims because of being more intelligent and resourceful.

  5. hindu speaks says:

    I don’t believe the Islamist would ever honor a border–it’s not in their nature to restrain from attempting to conquer it all. I see a gloomy future for the whole of non Muslim world. We stand around worried about being nice and not offending anyone while millions plot to dominate us by any means. I wouldn’t call what will transpire a civil war but rather an overt war of aggression by greater Islam. The timing of the overt phase will be decided by the attackers. For the past 35 years, the Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabi movements have been spreading and inspiring others toward a global Caliphate. While the various Islamic movements around the world may not be tightly coordinated, they inspire and encourage each toward greater Jihad. Radical sects and political/social Muslim groups everywhere are becoming more active and more insistent on imposing Sharia.

  6. Walter Sieruk says:

    The “holy book ” of Islam, the Koran instructs in 9:123. “O you how believe ! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to let ,and let them find harshness in you…” Therefore, the brutal cruel actions of the jihadists who compose ISIS is indeed Koranic based. For the ISIS jihadists in their ruthless malice- filled ,malicious and murderous behavior toward anyone they consider an unbeliever is very harsh .That is harsh to the extreme. So as stated before ,in spite of the denials of some people. ISIS is based on the Koran and is thus Islamic. Likewise those harsh jihadists of ISIS are ,indeed, real Muslims . So the people who claim that ISIS is not Islamic need to wake up and have a reality check and wake up to the truth.

  7. Walter Sieruk says:

    Those cruel brutal and murderous members and supporters of ISIS, be they engaging in murders and destruction in the countries of Iraq and Syria or be they committing vicious deadly violence in cities of the West. Such as in Paris and San Bernardino. All those ISIS jihadists and allies of ISIS in their malicious and murderous jihad for Islam along with all the destruction and chaos they create Those terrorists are so very violent and deadly that they are similar, in character, to the heinous villains described in the Bible. Which reads “Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are their ways, and the way of peace they have not known.” Romans 3:15-17. [K.J.V]

  8. Walter Sieruk says:

    With all news in the world today about all vicious ,malicious murderous evils committed the jihadist thugs who compose the brutal and deadly jihad entity ISIS. As with all the hideously evil actions the fiendish villains of ISIS so heinously engage in, it is then fitting to reiterate that those violence and deadly jihadists of ISIS are actually putting into practice the violence and killing is that is part of the teaching of the “holy book” of Islam ,the Koran.To give only a few of many example of this from the Koran are 9:5,111. 47:4. So don’t let the apologists for Islam fool you. ISIS is an actual Islamic organization and likewise the jihadist of ISIS are real Muslims. Nevertheless, there are some who might,understandably, wonder and then ask “How can those members of ISIS then, being so very religious ,also be so malice -filled, ruthless unfeeling and murdering ?” The answer to that question is found in the Bible. For the Bible teaches that there are some people who are so very heartless, cruel ,callous and dangerous is because they have had “their conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2. [K.J.V.] The “hot iron” in this case is Islam.

  9. Massoud Levy says:

    This article sounds like Islam was a good thing 1400 years ago, but with the change of time, does not fit the noem anymore. Islam was the same filt 1400 years ago. Where in Islam invites it followers to work and create? or learn anything? All Islam has been saying from day one has been, Kill, Kill, and more Kill, rape and plunder wealth that belongs to others. This is not acceptable now or 1400 years ago, the same cow-dung.

  10. Assta B. Gettu says:

    You cannot disassociate Islam from terrorism and terrorism from Islam, and any Muslim who believes in Islam is a terrorist and the follower of the false prophet Muhammad, the number one terrorist prophet.

    There are no peaceful Muslims in the entire world: all Muslims are terrorists because all Muslims believe their model for excellence is Muhammad the terrorist. When you hear some Muslims condemn the terrorist actions of other Muslims, they are not condemning them from the bottom of their hearts. Their condemnation is purely a lie and a deception. Such deception is acceptable in Islam. Any Muslim is allowed to deceive the non-Muslim at anytime and anywhere.

    Obama has been saying he is a Christian; is he really? You have seen him defending Islam and ridiculing Christianity in many occasions. You have seen him glorifying the false Prophet Muhammad and denigrating Jesus Christ, and the same thing is true with Mrs. Clinton.

    It is time to rise up to defend Christianity, to defend our constitution, and to deport all Muslims from the United States and send them to the Middle East. America does not belong to Islam. Islam is a satanic religion that has empowered some of our political leaders to deny our freedom to criticize Islam and the imposter prophet Muhammad.

  11. Jon MC says:

    “As the motive behind San Bernardino shooting unfolds, the reactions mould into the typical mode. A small faction directs their wrath to Muslim communities and threats, intimidation, and attacks on mosques…”

    I’m sure the Author does not intend this, but consider the difference between the language used when describing the actions of Muslims and non-muslims in the first two sentences:

    “shooting”. What or who was shot? The term is vague and unemotional, (I used to go shooting most Saturdays, but the only thing ‘hurt’ was a paper target pinned to a straw disc, annoyingly I seldom shot gold!)
    whereas the event being described was mass-murder and maiming.

    “…wrath to Muslim communities and threats, intimidation, and attacks on mosques…” Here the language is much more threatening and emotional in nature, we have wrath, threats, intimidation and attacks. Shock! Horror!!

    The emotional impact is that the response of the non-Muslims is somehow more aggressive than the actions of the San Bernardino mass-murdering Muslims (MmMs).
    In simple terms such language choices makes victims out of Muslims.

    The reality is quite contrary of course: the MmMs killed 14 and 21 others injured.
    The non-Muslim responses (to date) have been nasty words and a few cases of what in U.K. terms are “common assault” plus the odd arson attack in which no-one was hurt.
    The two hardly bear comparison: 35 lives destroyed/damaged versus a few cuts and bruises and some damaged property.

    These sorts of language choices are often made by apologists for Islam and others (including Adil in this case) can easily fall into the same trap of using language that grossly underplays the harm inflicted on non-Muslims by MmMs whilst simultaneously grossly over-stating the (retaliatory) harm inflicted on Muslims.
    The intention of such language as used by CAIR et al is to hype “Islamophobia” and bolster the narrative that “Muslims are the real victims” of each and every Islamic terror atrocity.

    The underlying point here is that LANGUAGE MATTERS.
    Language shapes the nature of debate and opinion and all writers, commentators and pundits need to think about HOW they express things.
    CAIR et al think about such things carefully in the, often successful, attempt to shape public opinion, those that are opposed to the on-going Jihad to Islamise the world (a la Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR etc.) need to take as much care in their use of language also.