MUHAMMAD IS CONDEMNED FOR HAVING A 6 YEAR OLD BRIDE, BUT SHE WAS OLD COMPARED TO JEWISH TALMUDIC BRIDES:

Three Year Old Brides
When Jesus accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law. (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

The Pharisees Endorsed Child Sex
The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.

Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” (3)

In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia: “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” (4)

Out of Babylon
It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar (‘sin’) was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]

As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.

But with expulsion of the Jews [‘Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim’] in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.

Sex with a “Minor” Permitted
What exactly did these sages say?
The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” (See, “Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell”) Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)

A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

Sex at Three Years and One Day
In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the ‘precursors’ of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]
R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanh. 55b)
“A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)
A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)
[The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)

The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”

The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”

No Rights for Child Victims
The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” (10)

The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)

In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

Pedophilia Widespread
Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism . This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
“There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.”

The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” (12)

These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”

In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” (13) This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”

The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

A Fascination with Sex
Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known [!!!]. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.
Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:

“There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against the Pharisees, who represented the finest traditions of their people and of human morals.” (14)

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.” (Matthew 23:27, 28.)

Endnotes:
1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
3 Sanhedrin 76a.
4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
5 Sanhedrin 69b.
6 Sanhedrin 55a.
7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
8 Sanhedrin 55b.
9 Sanhedrin 55a.
10 Kethuboth 11a.
11 Kethuboth 11b.
12 Yebamoth 60b.
13 Sanhedrin 76b.
14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.

===========================================================
===========================================================

THIS IS HOW CHRISTIANISM STARTED:

‘Genesis and Character of Christianity

Some historians in the West have serious doubts about the very
existence of a man called “Jesus Christ”.

And, almost all historians agree that, if he existed at all, nothing
can be known about his person or teaching(s) because all contemporary
sources — Christian and non-Christian — are either silent or
unreliable regarding the subject.

Thus, all we have is the “Jesus of the Gospels”, which are now
regarded as theological statements rather than a record of true
historical events.

And “Jesus of the Gospels” is a questionable character!

He makes tall claims about himself, and curses all those who do not
accept those claims.

He denounces his own people as sons of the Devil and killers of prophets.

In due course, Christian theology came to proclaim:

— that Jesus was the only-begotten son of the only true “God the Father”;

— that the only-begotten son of “God the Father”, namely Jesus, had
been sent down in order to wash with his own blood the sins of mankind
by mounting the Cross;

— that Jesus had risen from the dead on the third day and appeared to
his apostles in flesh and bones;

— that Jesus was the same as his “God the Father” whose divinity he
shared in full;

— that those who accepted Jesus as the only savior had all their sins
washed by Jesus’s blood;

— that Jesus had entered his apostles as the “Holy Ghost” and
entrusted them with the mission of saving all mankind from eternal
hell-fire;

— that the Christian Church founded by the apostles and joined by the
converts was Jesus’s body and bride; and

— that the whole world had been mandated to the Christian Church by
the “Father” and the “Son” and the “Holy Ghost”.

What one finds most striking about these ridiculous and absolutely
laughable statements is that none of them can stand the test of human
reason or experience.

The Christian Church declares them to be mysteries beyond the reach of
human understanding!

The apostles had tried to sell these “mysteries” to the Jews in Jerusalem.

The only response the apostles met was dismissal with contempt from the Jews.

Next, the apostles tried these “mysteries” on Jewish communities
settled in Syria, Asia Minor, and Greece.

The apostles had some small success, but most of the time the apostles
met with considerable resistance.

Finally, the apostles took this “merchandise” to the metropolitan mart
at Rome where their business found some firm footing for the first
time!

It was in Rome that the methods of Christian missionary salesmanship
(i.e., repeating lies and half-truths constantly) were matured over a
period of time.

The structure of the Roman Empire provided a model for the structure
of the Christian Church.

The Christian missionaries got busy building a state within the state!

In the next two centuries, the Christian Church became a rich and
powerful organization with members in many leading families of Rome.

It found many adherents among politicians who wielded power, among
military commanders who were superstitious or in need of political
support, and among merchants who had money, but no brains for
philosophical questions.

The mother of Emperor Severus (222-235 AD) became a Christian.

So did Emperor Philip the Arabian (244-249 AD).

Helena, the mother of Emperor Constantine, was also a Christian convert.

Now the Christian Church extended the “Divine Right” to rule as a
despot to anyone who was prepared to declare Christianity as the sole
state-religion and suppress all Pagan religions.

Emperor Constantine who wanted to secure a dynastic succession for his
family — a practice unknown to Roman politics so far — saw his
opportunity in this new doctrine, and proclaimed in favor of the
Christian Church.

The common people in Rome resisted this royal renegade.

So, Emperor Constantine removed his capital from Rome to Byzantium
which was renamed “Constantinople”!

The precedent set by Emperor Constantine in consolidating a dynastic
despotism with the help of the Church was copied by many crowned heads
all over Europe in subsequent centuries.

The king in Pagan societies was only the first among equals.

The Church enabled him to become an unbridled autocrat who derived his
authority not from the community over which he ruled, but from “God
the Father”.

The conflicts which developed between these autocrats and the powerful
Christian Church — with a Pope at its head — came much later, after
the common people all over Europe had been enslaved and deprived of
their traditional institutions which safeguarded their fundamental
freedoms.

For quite some time, the Christian Church cooperated with the kings to
convert the common people everywhere into hewers of wood and drawers
of water!

This was just one part of the Christian history.

Another part was a large-scale destruction of ancient Pagan religions
all over Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa where the Christian
Church spread its tentacles with the help of despotic rulers.

All Pagan schools were closed, all Pagan temples were demolished or
converted into Christian churches, and all Pagan images and statues
were publicly defiled and destroyed.

Pagan books were burned and Pagan priests were killed, mostly by
Christian monks who led Christian mobs after lecturing them into
fevered frenzy!

That is how Christianity triumphed over Pagan religions and Pagan
societies — not by the power of its moral or spiritual superiority or
the logic of its doctrines, but by the power of the sword wielded by
despicable Christian despots.’

===========================================================
===========================================================

THIS IS HOW ISLAM STARTED

‘Genesis and Character of Islam:

Muhammad the Arabian followed in the footsteps of Jesus in making the
same sort of claims for himself, cursing his own people in the
choicest language of so-called “Mono-Theism”, and threatening them
with slaughter.

Muhammad, however, did not have to struggle against a centralized
state when he found that his “Prophethood” had no attraction for the
Pagan people of Mecca.

Muhammad migrated to Yathrib — was later renamed “Medina” from
Madinat al’Nabi — which was more receptive to so-called “Mono-Theism”
because of a large presence of Jews in that town (i.e., Yathrib), and
Muhammad emerged as a powerful potentate.

Muhammad, however, ended by exiling or brutally killing en masse the
Jewish “Mono-Theist” populations of Yathrib, which resisted him as
soon as Muhammad came out in his true colors!

Meanwhile, Muhammad had amassed much wealth by plundering merchant
caravans and scattered Pagan Arab settlements.

Muhammad created the nucleus of a standing army out of the toughs and
desperados who flocked to him in increasing numbers for committing
crimes against non-believers and sharing the loot.

In short, Muhammad built the apparatus of a military state in “Medina”
and used it for imposing his closed creed on the tribal settlements of
Pagan Arabia by means of armed-force.

The doctrines of Islam were tailored to the needs of this galloping
tyranny, and sold with the help of the sword.

And the sword was stamped with the name of a fictitious one and only
almighty “Allah” (i.e., Jehovah) in whose service the ancient religion
and culture of Arabia were destroyed root and branch.’

===========================================================
===========================================================

William Benjamin Smith, “Ecce Deus: Studies of Primitive
Christianity”, London, England, 1912

William James Durant & Ariel Kaufman Durant, “The Story of
Civilization (Volumes I to XI)”, Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York,
USA, 1935

Louis Gordon Rylands, “Did Jesus Ever Live?”, Watts & Co., London,
England, Second Edition, 1936

Ramesh Chandra Majumder, “The History and Culture of the Indian People
(Volumes I to XI)”, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Educational Trust, Mumbai,
India, 1951

Damodar P. Singhal, “India and World Civilization”, University of
Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1969

Morton Smith, “Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark”,
English, Greek and Latin Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, USA, 1973

John Van Seters, “Abraham in History and Tradition”, Yale University
Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 1975

Paul Johnson, “A History of Christianity”, Penguin Books, London, England, 1978

Michael Thomas Walter Arnheim, “Is Christianity True?”, London, England, 1984

George Albert Wells, “Did Jesus Exist?”, London, England, Second Edition, 1986

Pierre Chuvin, “A Chronicle of the Last Pagans (Revealing Antiquity)”,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1990

Ram Gopal Misra, “Indian Resistance to Early Muslim Invaders Up To 1206
A.D.”, Anu Books, Meerut City, India, Reprint 1992

Koenraad Elst, “Psychology of Prophetism: A Secular Look at the
Bible”, New Delhi, India, 1993

Ishwar Sharan, “The Myth of Saint Thomas and the Mylapore Shiva
Temple”, South Asia Books, Columbia, Missouri, USA, Revised Edition,
1995

Charles Bradley Templeton, “Farewell to God: My Reasons for Rejecting
the Christian Faith”, McClelland & Stewart, Inc., Toronto, Ontario,
Canada, 1996

Earl J. Doherty, “The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a
Mythical Christ?”, Canadian Humanist Publications, Ottawa, Canada,
1999

Carl Jacob Christoph Burckhardt, “Judgments on History and
Historians”, Liberty Fund, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, Second
Edition, 1999

Ram Swarup Agarwal, “The Word as Revelation: Names of Gods”, New
Delhi, India, Reprint 2001

Daniel Edwin Barker, “Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to
Atheist”, Fourth Printing, Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2003

Pranati Ghoshal, “Lifestyle of the Vedic People (Reconstructing Indian
History and Culture), D.K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India,
2005

Robert Louis Wilken, “The Myth of Christian Beginnings”, Wipf & Stock
Publishers, Oregon, USA, Reprint 2009

Sita Ram Goel, “History of Hindu-Christian Encounters (AD 304 to
1996)”, New Delhi, India, Second Edition, 2010

Edward Gibbon, “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volumes I to
VI)”, Everyman’s Library, New York, USA, Reprint 2010

Thomas L. Thompson, “The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives:
The Quest for the Historical Abraham”, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin,
Germany, Reprint 2016

Kishori Saran Lal, “Muslim Slave System in Medieval India”, South Asia
Books, Columbia, Missouri, USA, Reprint 2016

James Joseph O’Donnell, “Pagans: The End of Traditional Religion and
the Rise of Christianity”, Ecco Press, New York, USA, Reprint 2016

Michael Shermer, “Heavens on Earth: The Scientific Search for the
Afterlife, Immortality, and Utopia”, Henry Holt and Co., New York,
USA, 2018

===========================================================
===========================================================

LINK

http://www.kyroot.com/

LINK

http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/

LINK

https://infidels.org/library/modern/paul_carlson/nt_contradictions.html

LINK

http://infidels.org/library/modern/keith_parsons/whynotchristian.html

LINK

http://markhumphrys.com/christianity.killings.html

LINK

http://ideonexus.com/2012/02/12/101-reasons-why-evolution-is-true/

LINK

http://www.drabruzzi.com/ZINDLER-JESUS.PDF

LINK

https://orphicplatonism.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/jesus-christ-an-artifice-for-aggression-by-sita-ram-goel.pdf

LINK

http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/

LINK

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/did-jesus-exist/

LINK

http://www.dawnhorsepress.com/images/products/sample/SecretGospelAppendix.pdf

LINK

http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/burckhardt-judgments-on-history-and-historians

LINK

http://www.evilbible.com/

LINK

http://www.usbible.com/author/moral_minority.htm

LINK

http://marvinhmills.com/writings/The_Temple_Mount_and_Crustal_Displacement_Marvin_Mills_1.pdf

LINK

http://marvinhmills.com/writings/phoenicianoriginsofthemosqueofcordobamadinaazaharaandthealhambra.pdf

LINK

https://www.stephen-knapp.com/an_architect_looks_at_the_taj_mahal_legend.htm

LINK

https://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm

LINK

http://asccramanandnagar.org/Ebooks/Godbole%20book%20on%20Taj.pdf

LINK

https://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2363&context=etd_hon_theses

LINK

http://www.muhammadanism.org/Margoliouth/mohammed_rise_islam/mohammed_rise_islam.pdf

LINK

https://www.hindustanbooks.com/pdfs/6493883-Heroic-Hindu-Resistance-to-Muslim-Invaders.pdf

===========================================================
===========================================================

MOSES A PROPHET LIKE MUHAMMAD

Numbers 31:13-18 (KJV)
13 And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp.

14 And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.

15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?

16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.

17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.

18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

JESUS ENDORSED TORAH [Matthew 15:1-20; Matthew 23:1-39]
Jesus condemned the Pharisees for putting the ORAL TRADITION above the TORAH.

JESUS ENDORSED MOSES
Moses as Lawgiver
Purification, Law of Moses (Luke 2:22)
Cleansing of lepers (Matthew 8:4 ; Mark 1:44; Luke 5:14)
Divorce (Matthew 19:7-8; Mark 10:3-5; Luke 20:28)
To Pharisees who cheated widows: Mark 7:10)
Sadducees on Levirate marriage (Matthew 22:24; Mark 12:19)
Parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16:29, 31)
Moses is accuser of Pharisees (John 5:45-46)
Law of Moses to be observed (John 7:23)
Moses commanded adulteress be stoned (John 8:5)*********************************
Disciples of Moses (John 9:28-29)
Stephen accused of blasphemy against Moses (Acts 6:11, 14)
Stephen relates history of Moses (Acts 7:20-44)
Circumcision taught by Moses (Acts 15:1, 5)********************************
Paul accused of turning people from Moses (Acts 21:21)

REGARDING 911

Get the book: Isis Is Us: The Shocking Truth Behind the Army of Terror

Did the “Islamic State” spring full-blown into spontaneous being as the fanatical scourge of the Middle East, or was it helped along by state sponsors?

There are uncanny parallels with Iran-Contra. In the 1980s, the Reagan team wanted to topple the government of Nicaragua, using mercenaries, or death squads, based in Honduras. But Congress passed a law against it. So they went around by financing the Contras via Iran.

Thirty years later, the hawks in Washington wanted to topple the elected governments of Libya and Syria, crush the popular resistance in Iraq, and split up those countries on ethnic lines. Once again, they wanted to do this using death squads. So they got around Congress by having Qatar and the Saudis finance it.

To set up the Sunni and Shiite death squads to fight each other in Iraq, they sent John Negroponte as ambassador to Baghdad in 2004. The same guy they sent to Honduras as ambassador from 1981 to 1985. Then in 2011 they sent some of those killers from Iraq to Libya to overthrow Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, with NATO air cover. From Libya, they were sent to Syria to start the killing there.

The U.S.embedded media perversely pinned these killings on Libyan leader Bashar al-Assad, following the script for another NATO invasion. Only Russia’s UN veto spared Syria. So the sheikhs kept financing the “rebels” – and the U.S. pretended to fight them – until they grew into the ISIS terror army. They and their backers have still not quit.

Even Fox News is saying the U.S. coalition against ISIS is a myth.

911 was a MOSSAD/CIA/FBI/JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF & BUSH operation

THE PIED PIPER AND THE MUSLIMS
Everyone is reacting to the influx of Muslims into Europe; but no one is asking why is it being allowed?
Read on:

There is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 6.5 Billion people to 500 million. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.

The Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used to refer to the 13 bloodline families (and their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this controlling elite. Most members of the Illuminati are also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive and occult societies which in many cases extend straight back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis) Illuminati structural pyramid include planning committees and organizations that the public has little or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati pyramid include secretive committees with names such as: the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the Council of 7, the Council of 9, the Council of 13, the Council of 33, the Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300 (also called the “Olympians”) and the Committee of 500 among others.

In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows:
“A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.”

NEW WORLD ORDER (NWO)

By Ken Adachi, Editor
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/index.shtml

How about the question “What is your mentality level ? ” Sometimes a man or woman will show a rather high and intelligent mentality level by his or her non-violent peaceful ways and by speaking ways that have idea’s that are based on reason and logic.. In sad contrast , there are men who do expose their own low intelligence level by their violent behavior as well as the foul language they use , which often includes name calling.
This following essay serves as an example of this.

About that brutal and hate –filled attack by Muslim migrants in the nation of Germany who repeatedly and viciously punch a Jewish all while during their Islamic violence was going they were also spewing out anti-Semitic insults . Of the later ,being the anti-Jewish insults , keyboarding as some who is no longer a young and has thus seen many thing though the years , I can testify that those who resort to name have no reason based augments to uphold their position . So instead of using logic to uphold their emotion based feeling they just call names. Be they in Germany or in America or in any other nation.
As for the ruthless violence when those ten Muslims ganged up on that one man. They have, by their actions, proven a number of things. First, they have shown themselves to be cowards to going after one person in a group. Second, they have exposed their low intelligence level as well as savage and primitive mentally by their malice –filled violence. They have by their behavior they have exposed that in this “War of Ideas” that they have no valid based ideas only malicious emotional Islamic hate.
As shown in the 1979 movie TIME AFTER TIME in which the hero of the movie said “The first man to raise his fist is the man who has run out of ideas.”
Therefore In this “War of Idea’s “ those violent Muslims who made fists and repeatedly punched that Jewish man are Muslim men who “have run out of Idea”