The Rise of Racism in the West

A lady named Sima wrote expressing her concern that many movement against Islam are:

“mostly dominated by haters and racists, who hate not only Islam as an ideology but also immigrants and colored people. The rallies that are often being thrown have posters and pamphlets that represent Nazism and fascism in essence. This is obviously in opposite to the message that we want to send, that Islam is the representation of Nazism and fascism, not the other way around.”
“I think our sincere movement to help Muslims and the world to see the truth has been hijacked by the neo-Nazis and fascists, and now it is either them or the Muslims who will win this war, not us “the good guys”, as our message is being blurred.”

I understand that there is probably some fear that if we go against the haters and racists that appeared to be on our side, we might lose the hard gained supports and reduce our numbers. But I think you, Dr. Sina, of all people, should have realized that losing the support from these people will only be a temporary setback to our cause, because after we lose them, our message will become clearer, and we will stand a chance to convince more “good guys”, people who will have more influence, to join us. We need this, we need to make our message become a politically correct message to send, a message that every politician would be proud to deliver, instead of being ashamed as of today.

As you are well respected, I am hoping that you can redirect the direction of the war with your writings, to make it clear to your followers that we are not on the same side as the haters and racists, and shake these people off of our back.”

I replied clarifying that I am a Persian. Naturally I cannot be on the side of anyone who is racist against me. I have never supported racism and I don’t think the racists support me. Our fight is against Islam, an ideology and not against any people. There were more exchanges between Sima and I that made me realize I need to clarify my position once again.

Sima wrote,

“I beg you to please read this before we continue. It is your own article, and it is very clear that you had different views then:

“I still believe that we should be fighting to eradicate Islam as an ideology, not Muslims, the same as we should eradicate drug abuse, not the drug users.”

You yourself were an immigrant, a Muslim (while not a true one). And you were given the chance to be enlightened, not killed, sent home, or detained. I would imagine that some, if not most, of the Muslim immigrants (some from the Middle East are even not Muslims, they could be Yazidis or Christians) nowadays are probably similar to you. But I think you know this already, it is obvious that there is no point for me to explain further.

I believe in the sincere mission to eradicate Islam, because of its hatred ideology, and I want all Muslims to finally realize that and leave Islam because they are enlightened, not because of fear. We are not like them. We fight for the good cause. Muslims should be given the chance to be enlightened, just like you were. I know most of them are too ignorant, I know it is going to be extremely difficult, but it is exactly why we are fighting this war of words and knowledge. Obviously not all Muslims will be enlightened, but many are and many will be. But as our message is becoming more and more against Muslims instead of the ideology, I am afraid now we are losing the war.

The following is my reply:

Dear Sima,

My views on how to eradicate Islam have not changed. I still believe in what I wrote then. We have to make a distinction that the minorities among Muslims are very much victimized and protect them at any cost.

At the same time I was never so naïve to think we should sit back and turn the other cheek to Muslims who kill us. If you read my early writings you probably also heard me say, we should fight their ideology with truth and their violence with strength.

Islam grows stronger and Muslims become more resolute when they kill. With each life they take they grow bolder. Likewise, when they are defeated they withdraw and wait for another opportunity. They have the mentality of a psychopath which is very similar to that of a predator animal.

Dr. M. Khan the translator of Sahih Bukhari and the Quran into English writes:

“Allah revealed in Sura Bara’at (Repentance, IX) [the order to discard (all) obligations (covenants, etc), and commanded the Muslims to fight against all the Pagans as well as against the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) if they do not embrace Islam, till they pay the Jizia (a tax levied on the Jews and Christians) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued (as it is revealed in 9:29). So the Muslims were not permitted to abandon “the fighting” against them (Pagans, Jews and Christians) and to reconcile with them and to suspend hostilities against them for an unlimited period while they are STRONG and have the ability to fight against them. So at first “the fighting” was forbidden, then it was permitted, and after that it was made obligatory  “[Introduction to English translation of Sahih Bukhari, p.xxiv.]

Q 9:5 reads: “Slay the idolaters wherever you find them
So according to Dr. M. Khan in Q. 9:5 Allah ordered Mohammad to cancel all covenants and to fight the pagans, the Jews even the Christians.

Dr. Khan continues:

The “Mujahideen who fight against the enemies of Allah in order that the worship should be all for Allah (alone and not for any other deity) and that the word is Allah’s (ie. none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and His religion Islam) should be upper most.”

So first it was “There is no compulsion in religion” (Q. 2:265) and then

“O who believe! shall I direct you to a commerce that which will save you from a painful torment? That you believe in Allah and His Apostle (Mohammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That will be better for you, if you but knew. If you do so He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into gardens of Eternity – that is the great success” (Q. 61:10-12)

Dr. Sobhy as-Saleh, a contemporary academic, does not see in Q. 2:256 and Q. 9:73 a case of abrogation but a case of delaying or postponing the command to fight the infidels. To support his view he quoted Imam Suyuti the author of Itqan Fi ‘Ulum al- Qur’an who wrote:

“The command to fight the infidels was DELAYED UNTIL THE MUSLIMS BECOME STRONG, but when they were weak they were commanded to endure and be patient. [ Sobhy as_Saleh, Mabaheth Fi ‘Ulum al- Qur’an, Dar al-‘Ilm Lel-Malayeen, Beirut , 1983, p. 269.]

Dr. Sobhy, in a footnote, commends the opinion of a scholar named Zarkashi who said:

“Allah the most high and wise revealed to Mohammad in his weak condition what suited the situation, because of his mercy to him and his followers. For if He gave them the command to fight while they were weak it would have been embarrassing and most difficult, but when the most high made Islam victorious He commanded him with what suited the situation, that is asking the people of the Book to become Muslims or to pay the levied tax, and the infidels to become Muslims or face death. These two options, to fight or to have peace return according to the strength or the weakness of the Muslims.”[ibid p. 270]

So, it is clear why Muslims are continuing the jihad and killing innocent people every day. It is because they feel they are strong and the more they kill the stronger they become. They feel strong because the non-Muslims are weakened by a sickness, an immune deficiency syndrome, called political correctness. Muslims see that weakness and feel it is time for them to strike and win. Political correctness has paralyzed non-Muslims, rendering them unable to defend themselves.

By the same token Muslims will stop if they are defeated. If we smash them, and kill a large number of their jihadis they will see they are losing and then the obligation is to stop and enter into truce or hudnah.

No war is won through political correctness and sentimentalism. The first rule of war is to know your enemy. The above statements by prominent Muslim scholars clarify the Muslim mindset.

It is believed that the Thugs in India, otherwise known as Muslim noosers, killed about 40,000 people every year. Deceiving, strangulating and robing people were acts of devotion to their god. They reign of terror ended, not through converting them but through killing them. The Aztec religion of Huitzilopochtli and its human sacrifice ritual ended not because they were persuaded to stop it, but because they were defeated, and put to sword if they continued the practice. The followers of Charles Manson did not stop killing people because they were converted to Christianity but because they were caught and sent to jail to rot for the rest of their lives. We cannot win this war if we don’t kill the terrorists and if we don’t deal with Muslims harshly.

To stop Islam we must continue attacking its ideology. But it would be shortsighted to think that is enough. We must also show strength and demoralize Muslims through defeat after defeat. They must see Islam is losing. The best way to do that, apart from killing their terrorists and heroes, is to strip them from their citizenship. All those who sympathize with any terrorist group or adhere to any terrorist ideology must be sent back to where they came from. A poll in UK revealed that 27% of Muslims in that country support ISIS. I am sure there is also a great percentage that supports al Qaida. That question was not asked. An Aljazeera poll in Arabic showed that an alarming 81% of Arab speaking Muslims support ISIS. These people should be rounded up and deported in mass. There should be no tolerance of intolerance and intolerant people.

We must also continue our relentless attack on the Quran and Muhammad. Muslims must feel pressured. We must unveil their cover. Muhammad was a mass murderer, a pedophile, a rapist. Everybody must become aware of it and Muslims must be put under the spotlight. When the pressure is on, when they see there is nowhere to hide, that they are ridiculed, shunned and distrusted for following a psychopath, they will start leaving Islam in large numbers.

The liberal media is doing a disservice to Muslims by keeping them in their darkness and perpetuating their misery. The entire worldview of these people is based on lies, whether it is their materialistic interpretation of history or it is climate change.

Islam cannot be won, unless we attack it ideologically and show strength to its belligerence. To think that we can persuade all Muslims to leave Islam by showing them kindness is acme of naiveté. Truth worked on me, but my conscience was still intact. It is foolish to rely on the conscience of Muslims when many have lost it completely. Cultists don’t have a conscience.

Gandhi won the independence of India (which in the hindsight proved to be a bad idea) through Satyagraha campaign of peaceful protests and strikes. It worked because his opponents were the British, a democratic people with high morality and conscience.

If however, all the British people were like Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, a ruthless man bereft of conscience that had no qualm in firing into the unarmed crowd of peaceful demonstrators and killing hundreds of sitting people, Gandhi would have had no chance.

You have to know your enemy. I don’t think Gandhi was extremely astute person. He was just lucky that his foes were people of conscience. He had less luck in dealing with Muslims because Satyagraha with Muslims results in defeat every time. If he was smart, he would have named India, Hindustan and would have made a requisite for Muslims to convert to Hinduism or leave for Pakistan. Because pacifism is a failed paradigm when dealing with Muslims, now India is having a major problem with her Muslim citizens whose hearts and minds are with Pakistan rather than the they country they live in. India is facing another partition as the result.

Let me be clear, as if I have not been so far. I do not believe pacifism is a panacea. You have to know your enemy. Pacifism works only if your enemy has conscience. For example, Palestinians can win their war against Israel through pacifism. They can have their country, their independence and prosper with the help of their Israeli neighbors, if they stopped their violence. But the Iranian people will never have their freedom through pacifism. They have to kill the mullahs to gain their freedom. When it comes to war one size does not suit all. You have to know your enemy and strategize accordingly.

To win the war against Muslims, we have to fight their ideology ideologically and their terrorism with brutal force. When they are peaceful we need to tell them the truth about their prophet, and when they become violent we have to eliminate them.

This works. Anything else doesn’t. Millions more will perish and at the end the world will come to see there is no other solution to this problem than the ones I delineated above.

I am not a Gandhian, even though at one time I considered myself as one. I am a Christian. When Jesus found people selling oxen and sheep and doves (used for divination) in the temple he made a scourge of cords and drove them all out of the temple and poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.

Remember that Jesus was not a man of power. He did not have the authority of the governor. No soldiers were behind him to protect him. His authority came from God and he feared none. Jesus showed strength when strength was needed.

Today the thought of retaliation against Muslims is a taboo. But that is inevitable. It is human nature. Once tens or hundreds of thousands of westerners are killed, the masses will rise up. Nothing can stop the backlash. Mosques will start burning, Muslims will be gunned down, and there will be mayhem. The governments will feel helpless and the coward leaders will even fear for their own lives. These things will happen not because I am prescribing them, but because I foresee them. If you think I am mistaken, see how the right wing parties are emerging and becoming stronger every year. They did not even exist a few years ago. One extreme leads to another extreme. That is not good for anyone. But we can’t stop it. This is the law of nature. When you pull the pendulum too much to one side, you energize it to go to the other extreme.

To avoid all that, my solution is to deal with Islam and Muslims now. Stop the Muslim invasion and shut down the mosques. All mosques teach the Quran and the problem is the Quran. And start deporting those Muslims who still want to cling to their religion.

The right wing extremists are misguided but their grievances are legitimate. Look at what is going on in America with the Black Lives Matter movement. Police in America is out of control. They beat people sometimes to death just to satisfy their sadistic pleasure to inflict pain. Every year over 1000 citizens are killed by the cops and they never pay for their crimes. Their colleagues, the justice system and the politicians are behind them. The police violence is not directed at blacks. They do it to everyone. This injustice is now being used by the black racists.  This is not going to go away. The more the politicians ignore the problem the more the police will become emboldened and violent. As the result the racist Black Lives Matter movement will become stronger. I am not supporting the Black movement. The police are just as violent towards the whites as they are towards the people of color. But we cannot blame or stop the Black Live Matters movement because their grievances are legitimate. Instead of blaming them, we have to deal with the problem. The answer is not “shut up and suck it up”. That will not work. We have to acknowledge that the police are out of control. They kill people for the fun of it and know that they will not face any consequence. It is not the question of a few bad apples. Watch some of the videos on Youtube under police brutality. It is the entire system that is rotten. These videos convinced me the cops are under the influence of Satan. No human can inflict so much pain on other humans and feel no remorse. And they back up each other and protect one another against people when they are paid to protect the people.

To those cops who have the urge to attack me and insult me as a few have, I suggest to please spare your breath. It does not work. If you are sincere address the problem and change your culture of violence. People’s lives matter. You are paid to serve and to protect, not to use citizen as games.

Likewise, instead of blaming racists and extremists, we have to make them see it is not about race, that we are also victims of Muslims, and we should work together and get rid of Islam. We cannot solve any problem by hiding our heads in the sand, deny its existence and blame its backlash.

To be fair, we have to read to Muslims the Quran and the history of their prophet. Many of them don’t have a clue and if they learn the truth they will leave Islam on their own. However, if after they learn the truth they still want to remain a Muslim, sent them back to where they or they parents came from.

We have to classify Islam as a political movement bent to destroy all governments and strip its religious status. The political Islam is inseparable from its religious aspect. Muhammad said Islam is religion and government. This is enough for us to make its practice illegal. Any person who wants to practice Islam should go to a Muslim country. The practice of Islam should be dealt with as treason.

Ali Sina

Ali Sina is the author of Understanding Muhammad and Muslims.

13 Responses

  1. Manuel Franco says:

    This “lady” simply made the very sin and err of thought of her supposed detractors and could no see it; ie, she confused the fact that most of the Arab world is Muslim, yet not every Muslim is an Arab. Which is the same to say that not every Arab is a Muslim. Affirmative logic 101; I mean, not even college stuff, but basic high school nowadays. Also because obv there exist a subset of moderate people that are obv not as extreme and fanatical in their point of view; doesn’t imply that the other group would not either attack us, or them, at any given moment. We should be prepared; and denouncing it. Not doing so is not only morally wrong; it’s eventual virtual suicide; and even more obv stupid. So not stating this basic truth in the sake of some public, dubious and bias “political correctness” is a no-nobrainer deal. In order to do so; I’d have to be aware that I’m either selling out my people, my system of belief, and my freedom; or be a very easy persuadable weaked minded fool. I obv chose neither… Her apologetic efforts inc a notch and her second reply is much better constructed; yet still flawed in many points. More noticeable to me are the fact that to her you were never a “true muslim”, and that you were obv somehow miraculously spared to send a senseless message of “love my slaying conqueror”. And just for the record; I think that drug control is a stupid policy that creates more harm that good; but that’s just me, IMHO. Just like the police brutality at the end, it’s more of an excuse for them to beat people up anyhow. It’s rather obv that you have to stand up to your aggressor or he will never stop pounding you. More basic life stuff and common sense. Groupal self defense if you’d like. Even assuming that she’s genuine going about it; kindness will seldomly work to turn someone like that around. If she’d actually try that IRL she’d get herself killed so fast that she’d never see the stones flying towards her. It’s commendable that she wants to try it in a positive way; but still, it’s her funeral… Again, statistical suicide. And finally about that, those Drs dudes sure sound like some real party mood killers to me. You should introduce them to Sima. I’m sure they’ll get along just fine; regardless of the outcome 😉 And of course your rebuttals are way better. Indeed, the err of PC is applying to the other persons an attribute you posses that they may not necessarily have. Hence confrontation is inevitable, specially if it’s being sent your way. The disease that is Islam could have been stopped relatively easily until recently. But now; this very day; there are protesters demanding that the US opens its border in lieu of some famous GOP candidate remarks (DT) People think that the cops, the government, or whatever, will protect them; but effectively they’ll turn against the very people they swore to protect. At the end of the day, you can only rely on yourself. And respect for the rest of another very good article… 😉

  2. Vijai Singh says:

    In search of the one true religion: save yourself first and then try to save others and the world.

  3. John says:

    Brilliantly and boldly written without the fear of backlash.

  4. ikba says:

    This Allah, a pagan god, is doing you no good.See this , any God who wants your help is weak in himself.Why is he not competent on an otherwise docile world and you you have your case determined by a human judge, i mean most of them are being locked up for following this cult would be movement, Leave en masse, so called religious fallacy and face up to the truth.i don’t have to be teaching my religion to you, its all glaring to you

  5. Walter Sieruk says:

    Many Muslims from the East may much talk about “the racism of the West. Nevertheless, they really have no room to talk about the subject of the evils of “racism.” This is because their “holy book” ,the Koran is very racists against the Jewish people. For example, the Koran teaches the Jews are decedents of “swine and apes.” As found in the Koran in 2:65.7:166;5:60. Likewise,many Muslims have from reading the words of the Koran a hateful spirit for the Jewish people. So if Muslims talk about the “racism of the West” they should and need to examine the racism of Islam .For Islam is full of anti-Jewish racism. Moreover ,to apply to this topic the ancient Greek philosopher ,Socrates, was reported to have said “An unexamined life in not worth living.” This same may apply to the subject of religion. Which would then be “An unexamined religion is not worth believing in.”

  6. Walter Sieruk says:

    As for the topic of “The rise of racism in the West.” As the title of the above article reads , it thus needs to be made clear the Islam is not, nor ever has it been a race. One of the many ways that Islam may be actually defined is that “Islam is a religious/ political system of tyrannical mind control that has total power over the thoughts and lives of millions of people around the world.” Which that stated ,it’s therefore very fitting to site the wisdom found in the words of Thomas Jefferson. For his words apply to this subject. For Mr. Jefferson had declared “I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the minds of men.”

  7. charlie says:

    Unfortunately, because of the illegal Iraqi war and the mess in Libya, we in the West are loathe to use full military strength in Syria. But how else do with destroy ISIS? Also, how do we destroy an enemy when our political wimps won’t even name the enemy?

  8. Alexi says:

    Ali, there is no place to comment on “peeling back the layers Taquiya”, so I’m putting it here. I think you are wrong about Maajid Nawaaz. You are also wrong about Judaism. There are plenty of Jews (Ultra-Orthodox) who believe fervently that the Bible is THE Word of God himself. Then there are the “moderates”; Conservative and Reform Jews, who take a more practical approach to their religion. I should know as I’m one of them. I do not believe the planet is a mere 5776 years old for example.

    You have stated (I believe) that Islam cannot be “reformed”. That ISIS itself is the essence of that “reformation”. I agree with you. But you have also stated that Muslims CAN be reformed; and I think that Maajid is a perfect example of just that. He puts his life on the line for apostasy every time he opens his mouth. That says much more than any letter he may write to you. That’s how I see it. And as much as I laud your blog it would be unseemly for me not to point out that the Maajids of this world are what will move us all forward to peace.

    Fight the ideologues with Truth. Fight the violence with Force. Amen.

  9. Assta B. Gettu says:

    I don’t want to read any article that preaches political correctness on this website. I believe political correctness has opened the gates of Christian Europe for the barbarian Muslims to invade the continent. Muslims never leave their religion and convert to another faith. We know Islam and Nazism are the same, and that is why Adolf Hitler made the following statements:
    “The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”

    Hitler is absolutely right! Islam is compatible with Nazism in maiming, gassing, and slaughtering human beings. And that is why thousands of Muslim refugees prefer to come to Germany to going to other countries.

  10. Richard says:

    We also need to acknowledge that for many muslims their religion is bound up with their cultural identity, It is not reasonable to expect them to discard all that at once. They cannot be expected to convert to a western version of Christianity (or atheism or agnosticism for that matter). We need to offer them a route through eastern versions of Christianity. That will not be such a big cultural jump.

  11. Ali Sina – I have such respect for you. Even on issues we see differently, I still admire how you put your opinion forward. You express yourself with such elegance and grace, without being even remotely soft in how willing you are to face Islam dead-on and call for it’s defeat. Thank you.

  12. Ra says:

    Dear Ali, Alleluia. It’s the first time you write that you’re a Christian. Before, you wrote that you’re not a Christian, only a follower of Jesus. Congratulation. Praise The Lord.

%d bloggers like this: