The New World Disorder

The New World Disorder
Jacob Thomas

   What was hailed as the “Arab Spring” in 2011, has turned five years later, into a horrific nightmare impacting the Middle East, and Western Europe. Scholarly books and essays have been published seeking to explain the failure of the rise of democratic regimes replacing authoritarian governments that had plagued Mideastern countries since the end of WWII.

   The New Yorker Magazine published on 3 January, 2017, “All Roads Lead to Aleppo” by Jon Lee Anderson. It’s one of the best essays that I’ve read about the Syrian “Intifada” that began spontaneously in March, 2011, at Der’a, a city south of Damascus.

   Mr. Anderson summed up the “Fall of Aleppo” in the opening paragraph:
“With the evacuation of the last of its armed rebels and their families, last month, the Syrian city of Aleppo is once again in the hands of the Assad government. Aleppo had a prewar population of more than two million people; it was not only Syria’s largest city and its industrial powerhouse but had an iconic place as one of the world’s oldest continuously inhabited cities, with a history dating back some eight thousand years. Before the war, Aleppo’s wealth of ancient buildings and its cosmopolitan mix of sects and peoples—Sunni Arabs, Shiites, Kurds, Turkmen, Alawites, Circassians, Chechens, Greeks, Assyrian and Armenian Christians, and even a few Jews—made it a matchless place in the modern Middle East. It remains to be seen what, of all that, has survived.”

   I’ve known Aleppo for a long time. Living in Alexandretta, in northwest Syria, in my early days, I remember how well-to-do Aleppo families used to spend their summers at our resorts in the province.

   I can add a few details about Aleppo. Syrians claim that Abraham stopped in Aleppo, on his way from Ur of the Chaldees, to Palestine! Besides being a commercial and industrial city, Aleppo was known for its educational institutions. One was “Aleppo College,” an American institution that served as a preparatory school for Syrians who eventually completed their education, at the AUB (American University of Beirut).

   The Jewish presence in Aleppo was the largest in Syria. Most of the Jews ran businesses that supplied Syrian merchants with needed goods imported from Europe and the USA. After the birth of the State of Israel in May, 1948, most of the Syrian Jews left Aleppo.

   I applaud Mr. Anderson as a reporter who braved many dangers to give us eye-witness accounts of the battles. His description of the savagery of some of the combatants, is blood-curdling.

   Much as I appreciated the essay, I was greatly disappointed with the last paragraph:
“Indeed, partly because of the Syrian conflict and its ongoing fallout, the future of the European Union itself is now in question. With the mass influx of refugees has come an upsurge in anti-immigrant sentiment in Europe that mirrors that of the American alt-right in its bigotry and sectarian hatred, especially toward Muslims. The killing of civilians—in Europe and elsewhere (Tunisia, Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey)—by Islamist terrorists has, at the same time, become a terrifyingly frequent occurrence. Throughout the West, a mood of ugly xenophobia is spreading. Thus far, it has given us Brexit and Trump. In the upcoming French elections, will Marine Le Pen be the victor? Will the next terrorist outrage in Germany be the end of Angela Merkel and usher in a mood of social intolerance?”

   I’m mystified by Mr. Anderson’s outbursts and strong critique of “Europeans and Americans and their anti-immigrant sentiments, their bigotry and hatred for Muslims.”

   Indeed, Europeans and Americans are scared for their lives. Air travel has become a burdensome adventure since 9/11! Do I have to make a catalogue of all the Jihadist attacks in France, Belgium, Germany and the USA? As to, “Hatred for Muslims?” Where have Muslims been attacked in Europe or the Americas? It’s not “hatred,” it’s a genuine concern for one’s life and safety!

   Ever since the end of WWII, when large Islamic communities have settled in the West, there is an indisputable proof that Muslims, far from assimilating, make demands on the societies that had welcomed them; demands if accepted, would alter the very Western traditions of tolerance and pluralism that have marked Western civilization.

   A liberal Kuwaiti columnist wrote on 9 July, 2010 (months before the Arab Spring) a very frank and thought-provoking article about the Muslim communities of Western Europe. He exhibited a sympathetic understanding of the Europeans’ concerns that Muslims show no interest to assimilate. Rather, they form alternative communities that replicate the culture of the lands they had fled from! Here are excerpts from the article: “Muslim Migrants in the West & Their Refusal to Assimilate”.

   The author defended the Europeans’ right to be concerned about the growing numbers of Muslim migrants, and their negative impact on society. “Not only they refuse to assimilate, but their loyalty remains with political Islam, rather than to the lands that had welcomed them!”

   The article published in the daily newspaper, al-Qabas, was entitled, “The Islamization of Europe.” It criticized those Europeans who defended the rights of the Muslim communities to live in harmony with their own traditions; even though Muslim countries do not accord religious minorities these same rights.

   He continued, “some call Europe the ‘Aged Continent;’ however, Europe is the mother of modern civilization, the center of its culture, and its living conscience. Europe has always been willing to welcome refugees, and political dissidents who can no longer live freely in their homelands. On the other hand, why should we criticize Europeans, if at the same time, they seek to maintain their democratic identity and their freedoms by protecting themselves against the inroads of the Islamic mind that seeks to alter their identity, their way of life, and the very core of their religious beliefs?!

   “We need a sense of impartiality and balance to understand the reason for the reaction of Westerners vis-à-vis the growing number of Muslims who have settled among them. It has become a veritable Islamic cultural and demographic invasion. Furthermore, they find themselves unable to deal with this situation, in in a proper and democratic manner.

   “The number of ‘Islamic Ghettos’ is increasing around European capitals; in some historic cities, these ghettos occupy around one fourth of the area, such as in Amsterdam, Marseille, and Malmo [Sweden]! The Hijab (head covering) and the Niqab (complete body covering) have become familiar sites. Mosques grow as mushroom on every corner; with the number of their attendees exceeding those attending churches! The unemployed in the Muslim areas, keep increasing; contributing nothing positive to the country’s economy; while at the same time, becoming a burden on the social services!

   “I’m not writing these lines against anyone specifically; I’m simply expressing my protest aimed at those who defend the rights of Muslims in Europe to live in according with their convictions; while at the same time, we don’t grant minorities among us, especially the Europeans, who are expected to live in a manner that we have chosen for them!”

   How I wish that the closing paragraph of “All Roads Lead to Aleppo” manifested more balance, and that the author had consulted some reformist/liberal Arab sources, so that he would not have made those wholesale accusations against Westerners. They do have legitimate reasons for their apprehensions vis-à-vis the growing numbers of Muslim communities in the West.

   To be concerned about one’s own life, is not to be equated with xenophobia. Of course, not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists tend to be Muslims. Daily they murder fellow-Muslims in Syria, Iraq, Yemen. As I finish this article on the 7th of January, the Associated Press reported:” At least 43 people were killed Saturday when a car bomb went off in a busy market in a rebel-held Syrian town along the Turkish border, activists and rescue workers said.”

   In the final analysis, John Lee Anderson could have delved into Islamic history. From its very beginnings, when Muhammad came to Medina, in 622 A.D., Islam changed from a religious faith, into a political regime that claimed its governing principles were divine. That gave license for the Prophet’s raid on the Meccan caravans, and ultimately his victorious entry into Mecca in 630, two years before his death. The Caliphates in Medina, Damascus, Baghdad, and Istanbul, were marked with world conquests, intrigues and violence. Sacred texts from the Qur’an, glorify “Death in the Cause of Allah!” This ingrained motif, or impetus motivates Jihadists in their senseless attacks against innocent Muslims and non-Muslims. To omit these facts, doesn’t help our world to respond to this “New World Disorder.”

   The URL for the Kuwaiti article: http://aafaq.org/news.aspx?id_news=8549#

Jacob Thomas

Consultant on Middle Eastern affair/ Columnist

55 Responses

  1. continuum says:

    Face_The_Truth,

    You are absolutely right. From now on Ron needs a different treatment. The loose filthy mouthed loser worshiper of a corpse needs to be treated like a dip shit he is….

  2. Face_The_Truth says:

    @ Continuum

    He wrote the same lies before and I wrote a lengthy reply.

    But, it’s utterly useless in wasting time by replying to his same posts that he posts again and again.

    He needs as well as deserves a very different kind of treatment at this point.

  3. continuum says:

    Ron Says:
    =============================
    If you follow Krishna’s teachings and life to the core then you will be compelled to kill your relatives for war over real estate, engage in petty theft, marry multiple wives in thousands, use deceit, engage in voyeurism, don’t forgive or have limits on forgiveness, engage in penis and vagina worship, worship idols, be bisexual and occasionally do homosexual acts and get pregnant, get jealous on your own children, practice caste discrimination etc.
    =============================

    IT IS CLEAR that Ron is a low class, low IQ filthy mouthed worshiper of a corpse….

    ONLY AN IDIOTIC NINCOMPOOP WILL COME TO THIS CONCLUSION. I will leave this loose mouthed loser here..

  4. Ron says:

    Dear Truth Seeker,
    Islamists are a threat to world peace. They are a global threat.
    Hindu fanatics are not a threat to world peace but are a local threat only to minorities and other lower castes Hindus locally in South Asia.

    Muslims are victims of Islam. If you follow Mohammed teachings and life to the core then you will be compelled to kill, do highway robbery, tell lies under certain circumstances, use deceit, rape, marry multiple times, marry 9 yr. old girls, help Muslims only, kill unbelievers wherever you meet them etc. (Good points being give 2.5% of your income for helping fellow Muslims in need).

    If you follow Krishna’s teachings and life to the core then you will be compelled to kill your relatives for war over real estate, engage in petty theft, marry multiple wives in thousands, use deceit, engage in voyeurism, don’t forgive or have limits on forgiveness, engage in penis and vagina worship, worship idols, be bisexual and occasionally do homosexual acts and get pregnant, get jealous on your own children, practice caste discrimination etc.

    If you follow Buddha’s teachings and life to the core then you will be compelled to abandon your wife and kids, go naked, search for enlightenment and escape from this life so that you don’t need to have rebirth, forget about others as well as yourself. You may involve yourself in any type of sex and with anybody (man, woman or animal) if you do with consent and without hurt. (Good points being belief in non-violence)

    If you follow Jesus’ teachings and life to the core then you will be compelled to forgive others, even when they hurt you, bless others, even they curse you, forgive others unconditionally without any limits, have compassion and take care of any humans whether they are Christian or non-Christian especially those who are sick, old, hungry, destitute, orphans, widows even if it means putting yourself in trouble. Marriage is only between man and wife and both should love and respect each other. (No bad points in Jesus life. Very high moral standards. Certainly divine )

  5. Face_The_Truth says:

    Ron_the_Christian_Moth**F**ker says: “This is nothing compared to the British empire or even the Spanish empire where they say the Sun never set.”

    SO, WHERE IS YOUR CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS’ CHRISTIAN BRITISH EMPIRE NOW???

    WHY DID YOUR CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS’ CHRISTIAN BRITISH EMPIRE NEED AMERICAN GOVT. TO SALVAGE IT DURING WORLD WAR II???

    WHY COULDN’T YOUR CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS’ CHRISTIAN BRITISH EMPIRE — WHERE SUN NEVER SET — SALVAGE ITSELF FROM NAZI CHRISTIAN BOMBINGS DURING WORLD WAR II???

    “HINDU” MAURYA EMPIRE AT ITS PEAK HAD THE LARGEST LANDMASS; BUT, THE SUBSEQUENT BUDDHIST POLITICAL INFLUENCES — DURING EMPEROR ASOKA MAURYA — LED “HINDU” MAURYA EMPIRE TO GIVE UP ARMS AND ALLOW SMALL INDEPENDENT SMALL KINGDOMS RULED BY LOCALS INDEPENDENTLY INSTEAD OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT RULE FROM KINGDOM MAGADHA.

    THAT MEANS, “HINDUS” MAURYAS GAVE UP ARMS FOR PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE WHEREAS YOUR CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS’ CHRISTIAN BRITISH EMPIRE WANTED TO CONTINUE LOOTING MONEY FROM POVERTY-STRICKEN NATIVE PEOPLE OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT AS WELL AS MURDERING NON-BELIEVERS OF YOUR JESUS F**KING CHRIST TO THE LAST DAY.

    SO, THERE IS A STARK DIFFERENCE.

    LINK

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire#/media/File:Maurya_Empire,_c.250_BCE_2.png

    ELSEWHERE I EXPLAINED THAT, BY THE TIME YOUR CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS’ CHRISTIAN BRITISH EMPIRE WAS ESTABLISHED IN INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE OF GUNS AND BULLETS SUCCESSFULLY REPLACED ALL PREVIOUS BATTLE-TOOLS.

    A GUN-MAN CAN KILL MORE VICTIMS IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME THAN ANYONE WITH SWORD, SPEAR, KNIFE, BAMBOO-STICK, BOW AND ARROW CAN.

    SO, LET’S WALK IN THE PATH OF EVOLUTION OF WAR-FIGHTING.

    AT THE PEAK, “HINDU” MAURYAS USED SWORDS, SPEARS, AND ARCHERY.

    BY THE END OF EMPEROR ASOKA MAURYA, “HINDUS” GAVE UP SPEARS TO AVOID VIOLENCE AND CARRIED LONG STICKS ONLY.

    “HINDU” MAURYA EMPIRE SUBSEQUENTLY DIVIDED INTO SMALL INDEPENDENT KINGDOMS.

    THEN LATER, MUSLIMS CAME TO INDIA WITH HORSES AND SWORDS WHILE UTILIZING WIDESPREAD ARSON TO INTIMIDATE AND PERMANENTLY DESTROY EVERYTHING OF NON-BELIEVERS OF MUHAMMAD THE ARABIAN BASTARD.

    THEN, BRITISH CHRISTIAN MOTH**F**KERS CAME WITH GUNS AND BULLETS, WHICH OVERCAME SWORDS AND HORSES.

    SO, ONE TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WAS REPLACING AS WELL AS MAKING OBSOLETE ALL PREVIOUS WEAPONS OF WAR-FIGHTING.

    NOW, TODAY, “HINDUS” NOT ONLY HAVE THEIR FOREFATHERS’ LONG STICKS, BUT ALSO HAVE GUNS AND BULLETS.

    SO, QUESTION COMES TO MY MIND, IF SITUATION DEMANDS SHOULDN’T INDIAN “HINDUS” USE ALL LONG STICKS, SWORDS, GUNS AND BULLETS ON ALL CHRISTIANS CURRENTLY LIVING AND THRIVING IN INDEPENDENT INDIA IN ORDER TO MAKE INDEPENDENT INDIA FREE FROM THE BESTIAL WORSHIP OF ANY REPLICA OF JESUS F**KING CHRIST HANGING ON THE GALLOWS???

  6. continuum says:

    Ron,

    Everyone knows that you are a LIAR, FRAUD and DECEITFUL SCOUNDREL… 🙂 Quoting lies as response to my logical rebuttal of christianity is NOT going to help you Ron….

    NOWW EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU ARE A LIAR AND SCOUNDREL WORSHIPER OF A man-god born through adultery of a whoring woman called Mary…

  7. Truth Seeker says:

    @Ron

    How Hinduism greatest threat to world than Islam ?

  8. Ali Sina says:

    Please comment only on the article posted and if you want to discuss other matters use the forum of the site. I do not wish to censor people but I may have to if this request is ignored.

    Thank you for your cooperation.

  9. Vijay says:

    Ron,

    On mauryan empire- No Hindu thinks Mauryan empire was the largest by area . But 1/3rd of humanity was living under it. i.e 50 million out of 150 million that was the world population back then. Ofcourse British empire was largest in history covering 1/3rd of total surface area of land on earth.

    Shiva did marry Vishnu, but not Vishnu. it was infact Mohni , a feminine avatar of Lord Vishnu. So this is not homo-relationship. To then Lord Shastha (ayyappa) was born.

    Anasuya gave birth to Dattatreya. Dattatreya is the avatar of all three trinity, Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva. But your story full of sexual thought is not correct with respect to this purana.

    More and more lies from you? I know it will hurt you if some one abuse christiantiy or if some one misinterpret bible , but this is not the way to respond.

    I searched the link you provided:-
    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gUJ6112aGZQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

    It only deals with kamasutra book which is not a scripture of Hindus. any book written in ancient india in Sanskrit cannot be Hindu book

    You said incest is described in Puranas. On the contrary incest / lust is described as some thing very bad which prevents one from attaining salvation. it is a powerful felling for all beings but only those who control it can attain salvation . Do not comment without reading any Hindu scriptures.

  10. Ron says:

    Origins of evil (Hindu gods doing gangrape)
    “One day the sage Atri (Brahma’s son) was performing tapas with his wife Anasuya. Brahma, Visnu, and Siva came and offered him a boon, but Atri remained silent, meditating. Then the three gods went to Anasuya. Siva had his linga (cock) in his hand, Visnu was full of erotic feeling, and Brahma was beside himself with desire, saying to Anasuya, ‘Make love with me or I will die.’ When she heard this coarse speech, Anasuya made no reply, for, although she feared the anger of the gods, she was true to her husband. But they were overcome with delusion, and they raped her by force.” — Bhavisya Purana 3:4:17:67-78.

    Additional Sources: O’Flaherty The Origins of Evil in Hindu Mythology. Pub.: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-04098-8. pp.302-303

  11. Ron says:

    Hindu male god (Vishnu) got pregnant after having anal sex with another male god (Shiva)
    TRANSGENDERISM/HOMOSEXUALITY IN VEDAS

    Do Hindus have any evidence that condemns homosexuality in Hinduism? Hindu scholars fail to furnish any reference which condemns homosexuality but still some Hindu scholars try to term homosexuality as irreligious act.
    Fortunately there are some Hindu scholars like Shri Shri Ravishankar who honestly accept such facts.
    Here Ravi Shankar acknowledges that Shiva screwed Vishnu and produced a supergod.
    How can you get pregnant after having anal sex is big question???

    https://twitter.com/srisri/status/410810667176697856?lang=en

  12. Ron says:

    To the brainwashed Hindus who were taught that Maurya empire was the biggest in the world.

    http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Maurya_Empire

    This is nothing compared to the British empire or even the Spanish empire where they say the Sun never set.

  13. Face_The_Truth says:

    “But why do you think Ron prefers to read translations of Hindu haters?”

    Because, screen-name “Ron” is a cock$ucker Christian m*****f*****.

    Because, world’s Christians are congenital liars who believe that, if a lie is always repeated, the lie becomes Christian truth.

  14. A.H. says:

    “You prefer to read some Hindu haters whose transations are completely out of meaning”

    As you know each scripture can be twisted in someone`s view. But why do you think Ron prefers to read translations of Hindu haters?

  15. Vijay says:

    Ron,

    Don’t fill these columns with lies. Any proof you are able to present against Hindu puranas/Vedas ?

    Read http://www.narayaneeyam-firststep.org/. I know you wont bother to read actual Hindu scriptures with Sanskrit moola and translation with meanings of each words.You prefer to read some Hindu haters whose transations are completely out of meaning

  16. Ron says:

    This Hindu shows you the evil in Hinduism and the truth in Chris

  17. Ron says:

    Immorality and sex, incest by hindu gods mentioned in Hindu scriptures and vedas

    Kautbik sex (incest) is mentioned in Hindu ancient texts. It is mentioned ‘Harivansh’ that the daughter of sage Vasishta, Shatrupa believed him to be her husband and therefore used to have sex with him. In the same grantha it is mentioned that Daksha gave her daughter to his father, Brahmadev and Narada was born.

    As mentioned in Haribhavishya, Indra dev had sex with his great grandson’s (Janmejay) wife Vapushtma.
    • Mahabharta mentiones in Adiparva that having sex with any women is not bad and is a normal behavior. Relationships are names given to know people.
    • In the tenth mandal of Rig Veda, the sexual conversation between Yam and Yami is mentioned. Here, Yami expresses her desire to have sex with her own brother. When Yam refuses to do so, she insists and says that a sister remaining unsatisfied despite her brother being around, so what is her brother’s use?

    This clearly signifies the sexual relationship between brothers and sisters in ancient times.
    http://daily.bhaskar.com/news/JM-MYTH-shocking-ancient-sex-culture-in-mahabharat-rig-vedas-and-religious-scriptures-4931484-PHO.html?seq=5

  18. Ron says:

    Hindu god Krishna has sex with Narada and Narada got pregnant

    (man to man sex and pregnancy in Hindu Puranas )

    Narada again disguised himself as a beautiful woman. Krishna saw him and went out of control, had sex with him and they had 60 children though he knew it was Narada under the saree, but Narada didn’t ejaculate to maintain his Bramhacharya or celibacy. He knew whom he was having sex with. Many might wonder as how could a man and a man can give birth to a kid, which is possible even according to latest scientific technology, by taking chromosomes of the same sex partners either gays or lesbians, resulting in embryos composed genetically from both men or both women. This has been done in the puranic period, just to say how advanced were their technology.

    Stop believing in animal headed gods.

    Jesus is the only sinless person in whole of history.
    Jesus is the way, the truth and life

  19. continuum says:

    Ron Says:
    ===============================
    Why India has less problems than Nepal (Because British Christian influence did away with temple prostitution, banned slavery throughout the empire, banned Sati, banned child sacrifices (sometimes still happens in Hinduism) , allowed widow remarriage, banned Thuggery (Hindu religious banditry), gave democracy (which was absent in India).
    ===============================

    Making one lying accusations after another does NOT make falsehood true Ron…

    Christian British empire is one of the worst empires that practiced slavery, discrimination, forced prostitution on the colonies and destroyed democracies…

    What kind of idiotic nincompoop moron will make a claim that the conqueror of another nation gave democracy to conquered nation, except a corpse worshiping christian moron? If democracy was given by British, they should have left India instead of CONQUERING AND looting the country you bastard worshiper..

    THE SCOUNDREL RON THINKS BRITAIN ABOLISHED SLAVERY IN INDIA, WHILE QUITE THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE..

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833

    The Slavery Abolition Act 1833 (citation 3 & 4 Will. IV c. 73) was an 1833 Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom abolishing slavery throughout the British Empire (with the exceptions “of the Territories in the Possession of the East India Company”, Ceylon, now Sri Lanka, and Saint Helena; the exceptions were eliminated in 1843).

    CLEARLY BRITISH PRACTICED SLAVERY, ESPECIALLY IN INDIA FOR MORE TIME THAN ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. HOW A FUCKING SLAVER OWNER AND CONQUEROR IS CALLED AS THE ABOLISHER IS BEYOND ME…THE BRITISH CREATED THE PROBLEM OF SLAVERY, OTHERWISE WHY BAN IT. AND THEM BANNING LATER IS BECAUSE OF ASSOCIATION WITH MORE CIVILIZED INDIANS..THE BRITISH PRACTICED SLAVERY BECAUSE OF DEMONIC BARBARIC BIBLE TEACHINGS, NOT BECAUSE OF HINDUISM.

    Ron Says:
    ===============================
    Why Nepal has more problems than India (It’s a no-brainer because they stuck to Hinduism where they worship Hindu gods who are rapists, criminals, murderers, thieves, corrupt, deformed having animal heads and human torso, and unfortunately had no Christian influence to correct them).
    ===============================

    Who told you you bastard corpse worshiper that Nepal or India had more problem….You are making accusations without any evidence. First prove there was a problem..

    IT IS CORPSE WORSHIPING RELIGION OF BIBLE WHICH TEACHES LOOTING, RAPING, PEDOPHILIA, SEXUAL SLAVERY (NUMBERS 31:17-18) ETC. YOU CORPSE WORSHIPER…

    Ron Says:
    ===============================
    These Hindus are brainwashed into believing they had ancient advanced technology in bows and arrows, maces and tridents. Muslims invaded and conquered them. The British conquered Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Burma, India (An area more than any Indian empire could ever control at any time in history)

    No army in the whole world even 10 centuries back used maces and tridents as they are considered inferior weapons when compared to a lance, sword. Trident is a mythological weapon used by greek mythological god Poseidon and is basically a fork used for frying or turning meat or spearing fish.
    ================================

    STUPID RON, have you heard of any country invading India before the time of Alexander. You nicompoops do not know that Indian King Ashoka, Vikramaditya etc. ruled half of the world from middle east to all the way upto Combodia. You have no idea of history bastard corpse worshiper before your bastard god was born. Time reduces everybody to nothing. The british empire is no more than a mere island now….The byzantine empire reduced to nothing but ashes where demonic bastard worshipers lost land from North Africa to Europe…

    The corpse worshipers all over middle east are dying like flies, your whoring christian women being raped by mooslimes left and right…What happened to your filthy christian men when your corpse worshiping whore women in middle east are getting raped? If you think that your christian nations are so powerful, what are you idiots doing when mooslimes rape your little whore girls all over England, Sweden, France, Germany etc….What difference it makes when your race itself is race of whores and prostitutes?

    Where is your corpse god born through adultery when his whore women from a whoring race are raped? What use is your technology, your guns, your technology when mooslimes enter your city and violate your whore women Ron?

    Ron Says:
    ===============================
    This mythological naked rapist god Shiva uses this inferior weapon. Stop believing in animal headed gods. They just can’t be gods.
    ===============================

    What evidence you have THAT Lord Shiva raped anybody you bastard corpse worshiper?

    IT IS BETTER TO BELIEVE IN GODS WITH ANIMAL HEADS WHO TEACH MORALITY THAN WORSHIP THE STINKING CORPSE OF A BASTARD BORN THROUGH ADULTERY OF A WHORING WOMAN CALLED MARY or a demon bible god who teaches looting, raping and genocide…who could not save himself, much less others….Did worshiping son of a whore help any of the raped women all across Europe?

  20. continuum says:

    Ron Says:
    =======================================
    Why is India poor and has problems of rape, casteism, robbery, corruption, temple prostitution, child marriages, slavery and bonded labour, illiteracy, superstition, idolatry, religious discrimination etc.?

    Hindu fanatic’s answer: Because the British and the Muslims conquered Hindu India and gave us the above problems.
    =========================================

    Poverty in present day India is due to corrupt anti-Hindy forces in government. Modi is changing all this presently and India will shine in near future.

    Second, India was one of richest countries and most educated country until British invasion. It is during British colonization that India sank to lowly nation.

    Hostory proves that the British plunderers created artificial famines and estroyed India’s prosperous industries…This is also history…

    As for your other accusations, like rape, India has the least number of rapes as compared to USA or European countries..USA and Europe, all christian countries and continent has the highest rape rate in the world. This was also proven…

    Rest of your accusations are unproven babble of a frustrated corpse worshiper..

    Ron Says:
    =======================================
    Why did Nepal which was longer time Hindu (5000 years), never conquered by British, never conquered by the Muslims also have the same but in fact worse problems of rape, casteism, robbery, corruption, temple prostitution, child marriages, slavery and bonded labour, illiteracy, superstition idolatry, religious discrimination etc.?
    ========================================

    Nepal had been the centre of learning and was a prosperous kingdom for a long time. The very fact that British were NOT abe to conquer this Kingdom with all modern weapons shows the superiority of Hinduism.

    Again, all the accusations you make against Nepal are unproven allegations from a bigoted worshiper of a corpse of a bastard born to a Jewish whore….Why should we take your accusations seriously when you worship a bastard as god?

  21. Vijay says:

    @Ron,
    I asked you few questions in another post. Btw your other Abrahamic/semitic co-brothers muslims accuse Christians of doing idolatry. What were your advanced lances and swords and full armoured knights doing when Saracen sword reached up to Tours and great bombard of Turks after denting the walls of Constantinople reached central Europe-Hungary?

    That Saracen sword and Turks bombards still lingering over Christendom and you are busy abusing harmless Hindus and Hinduism ?

    I am reposting my questions

    We believe that soul has no birth and death. Anything which has beginning should end. if there is no end then it should not have beginning. You believe in soul being created but will live eternally in heaven or hell which sounds illogical and blind faith to me.

    As I said the Vedanta(end part of vedas) mention Brahmam (GOD) attribute less , beyond senses and imagination. So for people to worship there should be some form. If God can take a human form, he can take a animal form too.

    Dayanand Saraswati is a modern Guru. He may not know everything about Hinduism. Why are you so obsessed with idol worship? The very idea of attributing a form to God is idolizing. You believe in Jesus as a form of God didn’t you?

    What makes you think if a Hindu offer water, sandal water, tulsi leaves to Lord Krishna’s statue it is idol worship and a Christian placing a rose, kissing or lighting a candle in front of a statue/picture of Jesus not idol worship?

    If God can assume one form, he can assume many. If God assumes a form it is as good as idol. Because idol is also a form of God.

    Regarding Jesus, what was he doing till he was 30? Your bible only talks about good things of Jesus that too from 30 till his death (32 age?)
    Our puranas deal whole history. the stories have symbolic meanings as well. You first read genuine purana with English translation then argue. Read http://www.narayaneeyam-firststep.org/

    Many incarnations of Godess Durga are as virgin. Only Godess Sree Parvathy, Lakshmi etc are as married consorts of Lord. Lord Rama and Krishna were born as Kings, So they kill bad people. One of avatara intention is to destroy bad and make devotees happy

  22. Ron says:

    Why is India poor and has problems of rape, casteism, robbery, corruption, temple prostitution, child marriages, slavery and bonded labour, illiteracy, superstition, idolatry, religious discrimination etc.?

    Hindu fanatic’s answer: Because the British and the Muslims conquered Hindu India and gave us the above problems.

    Why did Nepal which was longer time Hindu (5000 years), never conquered by British, never conquered by the Muslims also have the same but in fact worse problems of rape, casteism, robbery, corruption, temple prostitution, child marriages, slavery and bonded labour, illiteracy, superstition idolatry, religious discrimination etc.?

    Answer Common factor in both equations (Hinduism)

    Why India has less problems than Nepal (Because British Christian influence did away with temple prostitution, banned slavery throughout the empire, banned Sati, banned child sacrifices (sometimes still happens in Hinduism) , allowed widow remarriage, banned Thuggery (Hindu religious banditry), gave democracy (which was absent in India).

    Why Nepal has more problems than India (It’s a no-brainer because they stuck to Hinduism where they worship Hindu gods who are rapists, criminals, murderers, thieves, corrupt, deformed having animal heads and human torso, and unfortunately had no Christian influence to correct them).

    These Hindus are brainwashed into believing they had ancient advanced technology in bows and arrows, maces and tridents. Muslims invaded and conquered them. The British conquered Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Burma, India (An area more than any Indian empire could ever control at any time in history)

    No army in the whole world even 10 centuries back used maces and tridents as they are considered inferior weapons when compared to a lance, sword. Trident is a mythological weapon used by greek mythological god Poseidon and is basically a fork used for frying or turning meat or spearing fish.

    This mythological naked rapist god Shiva uses this inferior weapon. Stop believing in animal headed gods. They just can’t be gods.

  23. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for screen-name Continuum:

    Christian arguments with regards to Indian “Hindus” is very simple; so, I write them below as those Christian arguments appear!

    Please do not laugh while reading the following questions and answers.

    ======================================================================================

    Why there are dirt-poor “Hindus” in distant or unknown villages in India or Nepal?

    Because, those dirt-poor or destitute “Hindus” believe in “Hinduism”.

    Then, why — at the same time — there are so many rich “Hindus” as well all over the world — including India and Nepal — if just having belief in “Hinduism” is the root cause of poverty?

    Because, those so many rich “Hindus” got their money by association with or through the influence by either Muslims or Christians.

    And, what is the best solution to extreme poverty of those dirt-poor or destitute “Hindus”?

    Conversion to Christianism.

    Will conversion to Christianism make those dirt-poor or destitute “Hindus” rich or wealthy as well as pull them into very high socio-economic status?

    After conversion to Christianism, those dirt-poor or destitute “Hindus” will have to FIGHT for their “rights” and divide India again into many small Christian “states” where Christians and Christianity will rule.

    Why would well-to-do and educated Indian “Hindus” allow another (or many more) “Partition(s)” of their over 10,000 years old motherland with outstanding history?

    Because, “Hindus” are evil-worshipers; because, “Hindus” are demon-worshipers; because, “Hinduism” must disappear from earth in order to make rooms for Islamism and Christianism!

    Why would “Hinduism” make rooms for Islamism and Christianism?

    Because, Islamism and Christianism are true “monotheism”.

    What is this true “MONOTHEISM”?

    True “monotheism” means and requires a human being to worship either Muhammad the Arabian bastard as messenger of only God, Allah, or Jesus F**king Christ as the only “begotten son” of only one true God, Jehovah!

    So, what will happen if a human decides not believe in either of the above?

    The non-believer will suffer POVERTY, DISEASE and DEATH as punishments on earth and will endure eternal burning hell-fire during after-life.

    Then, what must the non-believer do in order to avoid POVERTY, DISEASE and DEATH as punishments on earth?

    The non-believer must convert to either Islamism or Christianism.

    Why are there only 2 options available to a non-believer?

    Because, Islamism and Christianism are 2 sides of the same coin.

    ======================================================================================

  24. continuum says:

    Ron Says:
    ===================================
    History always shows that primitive and gods with animal-head believing cultures have always been ruled by Monotheistic advanced cultures specially Christian cultures.
    ===================================

    Advanced culture???? A culture that believes a man born through adultery to a whoring woman called Mary is advanced….

    It is possible that due to advanced technology one country may fall. It is also possible that an advanced nation can fall to bunch of barbarians. History is evidence to this.

    In 476 C.E. Romulus, the last of the Roman emperors in the west, was overthrown by the Germanic leader Odoacer, who became the first Barbarian to rule in Rome. The order that the Roman Empire had brought to western Europe for 1000 years was no more.

    So, an advanced culture can fall for bunch of barbarians when there is cultural decline. India, an advanced culture compared to the corpse worshiping bastard christian britishers, were overcome due to collapse and degradation of Indian Hindu empires caused by over 1000 years of Islamic onslaught. The British scoundrels employed cunning policies to cause rule of India. It is not because of their advanced culture. The dirty British did not even have a concept of taking bath daily. They had to learn that from Indians. So much for your advanced culture.

    Ron Says:
    ===================================
    Bands of Hindus left mainland India and settled in Andaman and Nicobar Islands and some settled in Australia (aboriginals) and New Zealand (Maoris), They had 100 percent Hindu influence.
    ===================================

    Who told you this stupid? It was forbidden for Hindus to go to Andaman and anybody who went there and mixed with tribals were excommunicated for pollution. The tribals were regarded as lowest among lowest among Hindus.

    Ron Says:
    ===================================
    These primitive cultures were easily defeated by the superior technology and military prowess of the advanced British cultures which you yourself has admitted.
    ==================================

    Stupid fellow…advanced technology or military prowess need not mean advanced culture. For example, history shows that much of North Africa, Egypt and other Asian parts were largely Christian, Byzantine empire. Muhammad with his barbaric army destroyed every christian culture all over middle east, North Africa and destroyed Byzantine empire completely. By your argument, Islamic culture must be more advanced than barbaric primitive corpse worshiping christian culture. You can shoot your own foot or your head with your own arguments stupid.

    Ron Says:
    ===================================
    The bows, arrows and swords of the primitive cultures (Hindus and other aboriginal tribes in other Islands) who believed in false animal gods were never a match for the communication, planning, technology of the British who always prayed to the real God of the Bible before commencement of hostilities.
    ===================================

    Your stupid christian army was fightiing with bows and arrows for over 2000 years until Science invented modern weapons. It is NOT christianity that invented weapons, but scientific development lead to this. Despite your so called advanced technology, today Islam is over-running Europe, which will become Islamic states shortly. God will punish the arrogant christian scoundrels and teach them a lesson. The stupid corpse worshiping religion of christianity will be overthrown and put in the dustbin of barbaric civilizations soon.

    Ron Says:
    ===================================
    Har Har Mado (prayer to false god) not only lost to Alahu Akbar (prayer to satan)
    but
    Alahu Akbar and Har Har Mado lost to God (of the Bible) Save the Queen
    ===================================

    Yet, India is still Hindu and will stay as Hindu land, while the demonic barbaric christian Europe will soon change into another barbaric islamic state soon.

    Despite 1000 years of Islamic rule and 200 years of christian british rule, none of these idiots could destroy the eternal religion of Hinduism from India. The Byzantines, Buddhists of Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. all disappeared due to Islamic onslaught and christian onslaught….however, the eternal religion still remains in India.

    Soon the demonic christian religion will be removed from the face of the Earth by God.

  25. Ron says:

    History always shows that primitive and gods with animal-head believing cultures have always been ruled by Monotheistic advanced cultures specially Christian cultures.

    Bands of Hindus left mainland India and settled in Andaman and Nicobar Islands and some settled in Australia (aboriginals) and New Zealand (Maoris), They had 100 percent Hindu influence.

    These primitive cultures were easily defeated by the superior technology and military prowess of the advanced British cultures which you yourself has admitted.

    The bows, arrows and swords of the primitive cultures (Hindus and other aboriginal tribes in other Islands) who believed in false animal gods were never a match for the communication, planning, technology of the British who always prayed to the real God of the Bible before commencement of hostilities.

    Har Har Mado (prayer to false god) not only lost to Alahu Akbar (prayer to satan)
    but
    Alahu Akbar and Har Har Mado lost to God (of the Bible) Save the Queen

  26. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    DO NOT TWIST WHAT I WROTE, YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F*****.

    IF “HINDUISM” IS THE PROBLEM, THEN ALL “HINDUS” EVERYWHERE WILL SUFFER SIMILAR ILL FATE DUE TO HAVING SIMILAR BELIEFS.

    IF ALL CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S AS WELL AS ALL MUSLIM BASTARDS LEAVE INDIA TODAY, INDIAN “HINDUS” WILL NOT BE WORSE OFF.

  27. Face_The_Truth says:

    Christian missionaries never mention that British Christian imperialists looted on average or in excess of ₤100,000,000 EVERY YEAR for 150 years from “Hindus” of Indian subcontinent when Christian missionaries routinely shed crocodile-tears for Indian financially poor “Hindus”.

  28. Ron says:

    Face the truth says

    NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF THE PROVINCE OF MAHA-RASHTRA HAVE A BETTER SOCIO-ECONOMIC LIVES THAN THE NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF ANY UNKNOWN VILLAGE IN NEPAL DO.

    this is easily explainable that the people in the province of MAHA-RASHTRA which is in India had the good effects of British (christian) influence for 200 years and which ended till about 70 years back.

    The people of Nepal had undiluted and total Hindu influence for 5000 years and so Nepal is in a bad shape.

    Total Hindu influence has produced problems of temple prostitution, child labour, casteism, poverty, corruption, rape culture, idolatry, etc.

  29. continuum says:

    To Stupid corpse worshiper Ron,

    THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW PROVES THAT REAL VEDIC HINDUISM LEADS TO MUCH WEALTH, HEALTH AND ALL GOOD, PROVING YOUR ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HINDUISM ARE PURE LIES AND PROPAGANDA OF HINDU HATING SCOUNDREL CRISTIAN MISSIONARIES.

    THESE OBSERVATIONS ARE FROM EUROPEANS WHO WERE EYE WITNESSES TO HINDU KINGDOM

    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijayanagara_Empire

    The Vijayanagara empire was an Indian empire. From 1336 and afterwards, it was in the Deccan, in the peninsula and in southern India. It was founded by Harihara (Hakka) and his brother Bukka Raya. The empire is named after its capital city Vijayanagara, now Hampi in modern Karnataka, India. It began in 1336 and ended in 1660, though in its last century it began losing its power. Stories of the empire’s creation and history are not certain, though tales of the empire’s wealth and power were described by European travellers such as the Portuguese travelers Domingo Paes and Nuniz, and the Venetian traveler Niccolò Da Conti.

    http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Vijayanagara_Empire

    ↑ From the notes of Portuguese traveler Domingo Paes about Krishnadevaraya: “A king who was perfect in all things”. (Hampi, A Travel Guide 2003, 31)

    ↑ The notes of Portuguese Barbosa during the time of Krishnadevaraya confirms a very rich and well provided Vijayanagara city. (Kamath, 2001, 186)

    In civil life, by virtue of the caste system, Brahmins enjoyed a high level of respect. With the exception of a few who took to military careers, most Brahmins concentrated on religious and literary matters. **Their separation from material wealth and power** made them ideal arbiters in local judicial matters, and their presence in every town and village had been a calculated investment made by the nobility and aristocracy to maintain order. (↑ According to Sir Charles Elliot, the intellectual superiority of Brahmins justified their high position in society, (Nilakanta Sastri, 1955, 289)) [NOTICE HOW BRAHMINS ARE DESCRIBED AS PEOPLE WITHOUT ATTACHMENT TO WEALTH AND POWER]

    HERE ARE THE VIEWS OF DOMINGO PAES (A CHRISTIAN EUROPEAN) ABOUT HINDU VIJAYANAGAR KINGDOM. THIS DISPROVES THE LIAR FRAUD RON… (https://archive.org/details/aforgottenempir00paesgoog)

    http://www.hampionline.com/history/domingo.php

    Of all the foreign travellers to the Vijayanagara Empire, Domingo Paes’ recordings are of unique values as they provide first hand vivid and graphic account of his personal experiences. He was at the Hindu capital at the period of its highest grandeur and magnificence. Paes visited the capital under the rule of Krishna Deva Raya, the most powerful king Vijayanagara Empire ever had. He witnessed not just the wealth of Vijayanagara but also the most gallantly fought battles in the history of Vijayanagara – The Battle of Raichur between the grand army of Krishna Deva Raya consisting of about a million and Adil Shah of Bijapur.

    About the ports under the rule of Vijayanagara, Paes writes: “The said kingdom has many places on the coast of India; they are seaports with which we are at peace, and in some of them we have factories, namely, Amcola, Mirgeo, Honor, Batecalla, Mamgalor, Bracalor, and Bacanor.”

    Writing about the irrigation, “The land has plenty of rice and Indian-corn, grains, beans, and other kind of crops which are not sown in our parts; also an infinity of cotton. Of the grains there is a great quantity, because, besides being used as food for men, it is also used for horses, since there is no other kind of barley; and this country has also much wheat, and that good. This country wants water because it is very great and has few streams; they make lakes in which water collects when it rains, and thereby they maintain themselves.”

    About the marketplace, he writes “Going forward, you have a broad and beautiful street, full of rows of fine houses and streets of the sort I have described, and it is to be understood that the houses belong to men rich enough to afford such. In this street live many merchants, and there you will find all sorts of rubies, and diamonds, and emeralds, and pearls, and seed-pearls, and cloths, and every other sort of thing there is on earth and that you may wish to buy. Then you have there every evening a fair where they sell many common horses and nags, and also many citrons, and limes, and oranges, and grapes, and every other kind of garden stuff, and wood; you have all in this street.”

    About the city “The size of this city I do not write here, because it cannot all be seen from any one spot, but I climbed a hill whence I could see a great part of it; I could not see it all because it lies between several ranges of hills. What I saw from thence seemed to me as large as Rome, and very beautiful to the sight; there are many groves of trees within it, in the gardens of the houses, and many conduits of water which flow into the midst of it, and in places there are lakes; and the king has close to his palace a palm-grove and other rich-bearing fruit-trees.”

    “This is the best provided city in the world, and is stocked with provisions such as rice, wheat, grains, Indian-corn, and a certain amount of barley and beans, MOONG, pulses, horse-gram, and many other seeds which grow in this country which are the food of the people, and there is large store of these and very cheap; but wheat is not so common as the other grains, since no one eats it except the Moors.”

  30. continuum says:

    Ron Says:
    ================================
    I gave you an example of an virtually untouched and unconquered (by British or Muslims) Hindu territory place i.e. Nepal

    You can see for yourself the economy, literacy, corruption, casteism, poverty, superstition and backwardness of this place (Nepal) which has been for say 5000 years or more existed as a Hindu kingdom until it changed now in 2015 to a secular democracy.
    ================================

    Stupid corpse worshiper ron,

    Have you done research on the economy of Nepal for last 5000 years? Do you have evidence that poverty existed in Nepal for last 5000 years?

    Stupid corpse worshiper, you made similar claims against India, while I showed how rich was a purely Hindu Kingdom of Vijayanagar for over 300 years with evidence. Stop spreading pure pious bull shit lies you corpse worshiping scoundrel.

    http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/rarebooks/downloads/History_Ancient_Medieval_Nepal.pdf

    Nepal seems to have flourished socially economically and religiously under the Kiranti rule. This was during the period immediately after Mahabharatha time (for over 300 years).

    In addition, Nepal was the go-by between China and India trades. All trades were made with Nepal as the intermediary. Nepal had flourished economically during many of these periods. Stupid corpse worshiper, do not blabber without knowing history of world properly.

    Ron Says:
    ================================
    You must blame Hinduism and idolatry specially that brand of Hinduism which consists of worship of idols, animals, trees, sun, moon, river, mountain, rain, thunder, penis, vagina, false gods with animal heads, false gods who committed bestiality, serial rape, gang-rape, murder, homosexuality and illicit sex with other gods and with own devotees (Krishna aka Vishnu, Rama, Shiva, Brahma, Indra, Agni, Kali, Hanuman).
    ================================

    If Hinduism is responsible for poverty, then India could not have flourished during Vijayanagar Kingdom. The Spanish made much wealth out of trade with Vijayanagar kingdom and they have even noted the wealth of Hindu Kingdom. You stupid liar, repeating same lies cannot make untruth truth you corpse worshiping bastard.

    Your impious, blashemous LIES about Vedic God(s) has also been disproved. You have no evidence for your claims.

    Your hatred for TRUTH of HINDUISM and your blind attachment to the demonic adultery born sinful dirty mamzer jeebus is making you mad.

    NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU LIE, THE TRUTH ABOUT YOUR man-god MAMZER JEEBUS BORN THROUGH ADULTERY OF HIS WHORE MOTHER MARY IS NOT GONG TO CHANGE.

  31. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    I’VE ALREADY GIVEN YOU PLENTY OF EXAMPLES IN MY PREVIOUS REPLIES IN AFRICAN AND OTHER PLACES WHERE CHRISTIANISM TOUCHED EVERY ASPECT OF LIVES OF THE NATIVE PEOPLE, BUT THE NATIVE INHABITANTS’ LIVES IN TERMS OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY HAS NOT AT ALL IMPROVED.

    IF “HINDUISM” ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ILLS OF ALL NATIVE PEOPLE, THEN THE NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF THE PROVINCE OF MAHA-RASHTRA (INDIA) AND THE NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF ANY UNKNOWN VILLAGE IN NEPAL WOULD HAVE HAD THE SAME AND SIMILAR LIVES IN TERMS OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY.

    BUT, THAT’S NOT THE CASE IN REALITY.

    NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF THE PROVINCE OF MAHA-RASHTRA HAVE A BETTER SOCIO-ECONOMIC LIVES THAN THE NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF ANY UNKNOWN VILLAGE IN NEPAL DO.

    SO, THE REAL ISSUE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH “HINDUISM”.

    IF ALL LOWER SOCIO-ECONOMIC PEOPLE OF INDIA, NEPAL, BANGLADESH AND PAKISTAN CONVERT TO CHRISTIANISM OVERNIGHT, I VERY MUCH DOUBT THAT THEY WILL ALL BECOME OF VERY HIGH SOCIO-ECONOMIC PEOPLE FINANCIALLY.

    A WOMAN WHO SELLS HER BODY TO BUY FOOD FOR HER FAMILY WILL PROBABLY NOT SELL HERSELF IF SHE IS PROVIDED WITH A DECENT SELF-SUSTAINING JOB.

    SO, WHAT WORLD’S ALL FINANCIALLY POOR PEOPLE NEED ARE JOBS, NOT CHRISTIANITY.

    WHAT ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY HAVE GIVEN TO WORLD’S POOR MEN AMD WOMEN WAS AMPLY DESCRIBED BY MADAN LAL PAHWA:

    “…We walked night and day.

    There were men and women of all ages and all conditions.

    Many could not stand the strain.

    They-mostly women and children-were left on the road.

    I reached a place called Fazilka, in Indian territory, and discovered that another refugee column in which my father and other relatives had set out had fared much worse!

    They had been attacked by Muslim mobs on their way: Only 40 or 50 had survived out of 400 or 500 and even these were in hospitals.

    My aunt had been killed, more than a hundred girls were abducted, and my father rescued from a heap of the dead.

    …While in Fazilka, we saw other refugee columns coming in; one of them he says was ‘forty miles long’, and in another marched ” five hundred women who had been stripped naked…

    …I saw women with their breasts, noses, ears and cheeks cut…

    …one of them told me how her child was roasted and she was asked to partake of the same…

    …another was ravished in the presence of her husband who was kept tied to a tree.”

    – STATED UNDER OATH BY MADAN LAL PAHWA DURING “HINDU” TRAITOR M.K. GANDHI ASSASSINATION TRIAL

  32. Ron says:

    I gave you an example of an virtually untouched and unconquered (by British or Muslims) Hindu territory place i.e. Nepal

    You can see for yourself the economy, literacy, corruption, casteism, poverty, superstition and backwardness of this place (Nepal) which has been for say 5000 years or more existed as a Hindu kingdom until it changed now in 2015 to a secular democracy.

    You cannot blame Christians or Muslims for its ills of illiteracy, casteism, diseases, poverty, superstition, feudalism, leprosy, child labour, corruption, bonded labour, and slavery, temple-prostitution, drug consumption in temples etc.

    You must blame Hinduism and idolatry specially that brand of Hinduism which consists of worship of idols, animals, trees, sun, moon, river, mountain, rain, thunder, penis, vagina, false gods with animal heads, false gods who committed bestiality, serial rape, gang-rape, murder, homosexuality and illicit sex with other gods and with own devotees (Krishna aka Vishnu, Rama, Shiva, Brahma, Indra, Agni, Kali, Hanuman).

  33. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [China has the fastest growing Christian population in the world. Like South Korean which is an economic powerhouse and majority Christian, China will also be majority Christian before 2050.]

    KEEP DREAMING, YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F*****, KEEP DREAMING!

    [Zimbabwe under the whites was very prosperous. Under dictator Mugabe who was a all the farms were taken away from whites and given to black ZANU supporters by his hate driven government which hated whites.]

    YOUR STATEMENT MAKES NOT MUCH SENSE.

    REALLY, I MEAN.

    BASED ON YOUR TYPICAL CHRISTIAN FALSEHOODS, ONE MAY ASSUME THAT WHEN EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN WHITES WERE THE OWNERS OF ALL FARMLANDS, ZIMBABWE WAS PROSPEROUS; BUT, WHEN NATIVE BLACK PEOPLE BECAME OWNERS OF THEIR FARMLANDS, ZIMBABWE BECAME POVERTY-STRICKEN!

    THIS IS BEYOND RIDICULOUS!!!

    [Just like your present Hindu government which hates minorities.]

    AN ABSOLUTELY AND LITERALLY FALSE STATEMENT.

    [When its economy/free trade was boycotted and closet sanctions were applied it failed and inflation has jumped exponentially.]

    AND, WHO BOYCOTTED AND SANCTIONED ZIMBABWE???

    ANSWER:

    WESTERN CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S.

    [Largest economy has not benefitted the poor and the enslaved in India. It has increased the gap between the rich and poor in India.]

    BECAUSE, CAPITALISM DOESN’T ALWAYS BENEFIT ALL PEOPLE IN EVERY TIME.

    LINK

    http://www.teaparty.org/shock-report-8-men-control-amount-wealth-half-world-6-support-democrats-213096/

    [Nepal became a secular country two years back and enforced the secularization in spite of the present Hindu Taliban government in India…]

    “HINDUS” ARE NOT ISLAMIC.

    SO, “HINDUS” ARE NOT TALIBANS.

    […which grossly interfered…]

    FALSE STATEMENT.

    CURRENT INDIAN GOVT. DID NOT INTERFERE TO PREVENT ANYTHING BETWEEN NEPAL AND THE P.R.C.

    IF NEPALESE RECEIVE FINANCIAL BENEFITS WITH BILATERAL TRADE & COMMERCE WITH THE CHINESE, THAT WILL NOT BE BAD FOR INDIAN ECONOMY.

    PLUS, INDIAN ECONOMY IS CONSUMER-ECONOMY WHEREAS THE CHINESE ECONOMY HAS ALWAYS BEEN AN EXPORT-ECONOMY.

    FOR BEING CONSUMER-BASED, INDIAN ECONOMY CAN NEVER BE GREATER THAN THE CHINESE ECONOMY IN ANY FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

    […but eventually lost most of its fuel (oil and gas) and other infrastructure and commodities business in Nepal to China.]

    FALSE STATEMENT AGAIN.

    INDIA DOES NOT HAVE A LOT OF OIL AND GAS TO TRADE WITH NEPAL OR WITH BANGLADESH.

    INDIA IMPORTS OIL FROM MIDDLE EAST FOR ITS OWN SURVIVAL.

  34. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [China defeated India and held on to some territories (if India were a Hindu government in 1962 instead of a secular Nehru government then you can be sure that China would have grabbed more territory).]

    YOU ARE A COCK$UCKER CHRISTIAN.

    YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN M*****F*****.

    YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F***** CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW WHAT A “HINDU” GOVT. COULD HAVE DONE OR COULDN’T HAVE DONE; BECAUSE, THE FIRST 50 YEARS OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE WAS RULED BY TRAITOR M.K. GANDHI’S FOLLOWERS AND INDIAN “HINDUS” PATRIOTS WERE MARGINALIZED BY INDIAN CHRISTIANS AND INDIAN MUSLIMS.

    [Several Hindu governments have come and gone but none have been able to get an inch of territory back from China. You can be sure that even this present Hindu government will only talk nationalism and Hinduism to get votes but will not get any territory back from China or from Pakistan.]

    SEVERAL “HINDU” GOVERNMENTS HAVE COME AND HAVE GONE AFTER 1990’S, NOT BEFORE 1990’S.

    NOW, AFTER 1990’S, IT IS NOT THE TIME — AND IS NOT IN INDIAN NATIONAL INTEREST(S) — TO GO TO WARS WITH THE NEIGHBORS FOR OBTAINING OR REGAINING LOST TERRITORIES.

    LONG TIME HAS GONE BY.

    FOR EXAMPLE, IN 1940’S INDIAN “HINDUS” COULD HAVE KILLED A SIZABLE MUSLIM POPULATION TO PREVENT THE CREATION OF “PAKISTANS”.

    BUT, THE EXISTING BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALIST RULERS AS WELL AS M.K. GANDHI AND HIS FOLLOWERS IN 1940’S WOULD HAVE MILITARILY PREVENTED INDIAN “HINDUS” FROM DOING SO.

    NOW, TODAY, INDIAN “HINDUS” NEEDN’T ATTACK PAKISTANIAN TERRITORIES IN ORDER TO GET BACK AKHANDA BHARAT RASHTRA; BECAUSE, SUCH IMBECILIC ACTION WOULD BRING MORE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES FOR INDIAN “HINDUS” AS INDIA CANNOT ABSORB 200 MILLION PAKISTANIAN MUSLIM BASTARDS INTO INDIAN ECONOMY.

    SIMILARLY, TO GO TO WAR WITH THE P.R.C. FOR OBTAINING LOST TERRITORIES — WHICH BY THE WAY AMERICAN AND BRITISH GOVERNMENTS TODAY WANT INDIAN GOVT. TO DO — WILL BE SELF-DESTRUCTIVE FOR INDIAN ECONOMY.

    WHEN WEST PAKISTAN WAS CREATED BY BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS, PAKISTANIAN MUSLIMS MURDERED ALL “HINDUS” THEN LIVING AND WERE RESIDENTS OF WEST PAKISTAN.

    INDIAN CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S DO NEVER CRY FOR MURDERED “HINDUS” ANYWHERE!

    THOSE MURDERED “HINDUS” OF WEST PAKISTAN WILL NOT COME BACK TO LIFE AGAIN EVEN IF CURRENT INDIAN “HINDU” GOVT. GOES TO WAR WITH PAKISTAN TODAY.

    TIME AND TIME AGAIN, BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS ALLOWED MUSLIM BASTARDS TO MERCILESSLY SLAUGHTER “HINDUS” AS WELL AS WAITED UNTIL ALL “HINDUS” WERE NEUTRALIZED.

    THOSE DEAD “HINDUS” WILL NEVER COME BACK TO RECLAIM THEIR FOREFATHERS’ LAND FROM PAKISTANIAN MUSLIM BASTARDS TODAY.

    SO, EVEN IF “HINDUS” ARE ABLE TO CONTROL INDIAN GOVT. FROM NOW ON, MODERN DAY INDIA WILL MOST LIKELY NEVER BECOME AN AKHANDA BHARAT RASHTRA AGAIN.

    WHATEVER DAMAGES M.K. GANDHI AND HIS FOLLOWERS HAVE DONE SO FAR WILL REMAIN PERMANENT WITHOUT ANY FUTURE RECOURSE.

    INDIAN GOVT. THUS HAS NO GEO-POLITICAL PURPOSE IN INITIATING WARS WITH EITHER PAKISTAN OR THE P.R.C.

    INDIA CURRENTLY HAS NEARLY 300 MILLION MUSLIMS AND A SIZABLE CHRISTIAN POPULATION WHO WANT TO DESTROY “HINDU” BHARAT RASHTRA FROM WITHIN.

    BEING DESTROYED BY ENEMIES FROM WITHIN IS WORSE THAN GAINING ANY LOST LAND BY WAGING NEW WARS!

    I CAN ONLY PRAY THAT INDIAN “HINDUS” DO NOT FORGET THE PAST CRIMES OF CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM TRAITORS.

    AFTER ALL, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, INDIA WILL NOT BE A WORSE PLACE ON EARTH WITHOUT CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S AND MUSLIM BASTARDS IN IT.

  35. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [India can expect to lose more territory but not gain more territory…]

    IF INDIAN “HINDUS” ALLOW MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN POPULATIONS TO GROW, THEN INDIA WILL ONLY LOSE MORE TERRITORIES.

    THERE’S NO DOUBT IN MY MIND.

    […if it deviates away from secularism.]

    IN REALITY, INDIA NEVER HAD SECULARISM.

    SECULARISM MEANS, NO RELIGION.

    WHAT M.K. GANDHI AND HIS FOLLOWERS HAVE DONE SINCE INDEPENDENCE IS PROMOTING ISLAMISM AND CHRISTIANISM AT THE EXPENSE OF “HINDUISM” AS WELL AS INDIAN “HINDUS”.

    FOR EXAMPLE, INDIAN “HINDUS” DO NOT GET GOVT. JOBS, BECAUSE GOVT, JOBS MUST BE RESERVED FOR MUSLIM BASTARDS AND CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S.

    WHAT M.K. GANDHI AND HIS FOLLOWERS HAVE SUPERBLY DONE SO FAR IS SAVING MUSLIM BASTARDS AND CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S WHILE KILLING INDIAN “HINDUS”.

  36. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [India can never annex Nepal.]

    INDIA CAN.

    BUT, INDIA WON’T AND ABOVE I ALREADY EXPLAINED WHY.

    [It is more possible for India to lose Kashmir and/or Punjab…]

    KEEP DREAMING, YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F*****, KEEP DREAMING!

    […and maybe the Eastern states to extremism and then secession and consequently independence…]

    ON THIS ONE, YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F***** IS 100% CORRECT.

    WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING FOR THE PAST 35 YEARS IS BANGLADESHI MUSLIMS ARE ILLEGALLY MIGRATING AND SETTLING IN WEST BENGAL AND OTHER EASTERN PROVINCES WHILE INDIAN REGIONAL CONGRESS PARTY AND THE SO-CALLED COMMUNIST PARTY POLITICIANS ARE WILLINGLY ALLOWING ILLEGAL MUSLIMS FROM BANGLADESH TO SETTLE FOR MORE VOTES.

    […than to gain any territory from neighbouring countries if it proceeds on a path of Hinduism, totalitarianism disguised as nationalism.]

    FALSE STATEMENT AGAIN.

    I’VE ALREADY EXPLAINED ABOVE WHY INDIAN GOVT. HAS NOT BEEN TRYING TO GAIN ANY TERRITORY FROM NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES.

    AND, SANATANA DHARMA IS NEVER TOTALITARIANISM.

    BUT, INDIAN “HINDUS” SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE HISTORIC CRIMES MUSLIM BASTARDS AND CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S SYSTEMATICALLY COMMITTED ON INDIAN “HINDUS”.

  37. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [Learn from history of Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Sudan, Indonesia, Lebanon, Congo, Soviet Union etc.]

    YOU, CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S, SHOULD LEARN FROM THOSE COUNTRIES.

    INDIAN “HINDUS” HAVE NOTHING TO LEARN FROM THOSE COUNTRIES.

    INDIAN “HINDUS” DID NOT PLUNDER AND PILLAGE MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN COUNTRIES; MUSLIM BASTARDS AND CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S DID.

    SO, I PRAY THAT THERE SHOULD BE A MOMENT IN HISTORY WHEN MUSLIM BASTARDS AND CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S WILL PAY DEARLY FOR THE PAST CRIMES AGAINST ENTIRE HUMANITY.

    [India’s greatest assets are its foundations in secularism, democracy, non-violence and tolerance under MK Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar.]

    OF COURSE, CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S LIKE YOURSELF WILL ALWAYS PRAISE THE WORLD-FAMOUS INDIAN TRAITORS WHO TRADED THEIR MOTHERLAND TO FOREIGN MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN INVADERS.

  38. Truth Seeker says:

    @Ron/Ali Sina

    Why Britishers and Muslims could not win India (Hindus) before 1000 C.E.. Muslims ruled on Hindus after 1000 C.E. and Christians ruled after 1700 C.E.

  39. Truth Seeker says:

    @Ron

    Can one be christian if he does not believe in Christ? When Christianity started? Can we sayChristians to the people born before Christ? How? World biggest and greatest epic Mahabharta written before 3000 years before Christ? Lacs of people died during war of Mahabharta. How can we assume these people were Muslims, Christians or Hindu?

  40. Truth Seeker says:

    @Ali Sina

    According to Sankhya Darshna no soul is part of God. Trinity of God, Soul and primordial matter is eternal and everlasting. Theory of parts works where God is limited to some space and not have omnipresent existence.

  41. Truth Seeker says:

    @Ron

    Billions of people died without any clue about Jesus. If they enter in heaven Jesus arrival was futile for them?

  42. Ron says:

    China has the fastest growing Christian population in the world.
    Like South Korean which is a economic powerhouse and majority Christian, China will also be majority Christian before 2050.

    //JUST LOOK AT BRITISH CHRISTIAN RHODESIA (I.E., ZIMBABWE), WHICH IS AN ECONOMIC BASKET-CASE TODAY SIMILAR TO BRITISH ISLAMIC PAKISTAN, WHEREAS THE INDEPENDENT “HINDU” INDIA TODAY IS WORLD’S 6TH LARGEST ECONOMY.
    //
    Zimbabwe under the whites was very prosperous. Under dictator Mugabe who was a all the farms were taken away from whites and given to black ZANU supporters by his hate driven government which hated whites. (Just like your present Hindu government which hates minorities). When its economy/free trade was boycotted and closet sanctions were applied it failed and inflation has jumped exponentially.

    Largest economy has not benefitted the poor and the enslaved in India. It has increased the gap between the rich and poor in India.

  43. Ron says:

    Nepal became a secular country two years back and enforced the secularization in spite of the present Hindu Taliban government in India which grossly interfered but eventually lost most of its fuel (oil and gas) and other infrastructure and commodities business in Nepal to China.

    China defeated India and held on to some territories (if India were a Hindu government in 1962 instead of a secular Nehru government then you can be sure that China would have grabbed more territory)

    Several Hindu governments have come and gone but none have been able to get an inch of territory back from China. You can be sure that even this present Hindu government will only talk nationalism and Hinduism to get votes but will not get any territory back from China or from Pakistan.

    India can expect to lose more territory but not gain more territory if it deviates away from secularism. India can never annex Nepal. It is more possible for India to lose Kashmir and/or Punjab and maybe the Eastern states to extremism and then secession and consequently independence than to gain any territory from neighbouring countries if it proceeds on a path of Hinduism, totalitarianism disguised as nationalism.

    Learn from history of Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Sudan, Indonesia, Lebanon, Congo, Soviet Union etc.

    India’s greatest assets are its foundations in secularism, democracy, non-violence and tolerance under MK Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar.

    As Obama said, take these away and India will splinter.

  44. Face_The_Truth says:

    I do not exactly know how much ₤100,000,000 in year 1800 A.D. will be worth today in year 2017 A.D.

  45. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [To all those who think that Hindu India was most advanced in pre-British era. For all those who have grown up indoctrinated that India was a paradise or utopia in the pre-British and even in pre-Islam periods should somehow look at Hindu Nepal.]

    YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F***** HAVE POSTED THESE SAME UNTRUTHS AND HALF-TRUTHS BEFORE AND YOU CHRISTIAN M*****F***** WILL POST THESE SAME CHRISTIAN LIES AND HALF-TRUTHS AGAIN AND AGAIN.

    EVEN WHEN “HINDU” MAURYA EMPIRE WAS AT ITS SUMMIT, NO ONE CLAIMED THAT “HINDU” BHARAT RASHTRA HAD EVER BEEN A UTOPIA, LET ALONE A PARADISE.

    YOUR ABOVE TYPICAL CHRISTIAN STATEMENTS — WHICH HAVE ALWAYS BEEN MADE TO JUSTIFY ISLAMIC AND BRITISH INVASIONS OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT — ARE UNTRUE AND FALSE AT THE CORE WHEN RECORDED HISTORY IS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.

    LINK

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_Empire#/media/File:Maurya_Empire,_c.250_BCE_2.png

    [Nepal was never conquered by non-Hindus and not even by the Chinese.]

    THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA COULD HAVE DECIMATED NEWLY INDEPENDENT INDIA IF IT WANTED TO DURING THE SINO-INDIAN WAR OF 1962 DUE TO GROSS INCOMPETENCE OF M.K. GANDHI’S MUSLIM DISCIPLE J.L. NEHRU.

    J.L. NEHRU WAS SO INCOMPETENT THAT IT WILL TAKE ME TO WRITE MORE THAN 200 WORDS TO DESCRIBE HIM AND HIS ISLAMIC FAILURES.

    J.L. NEHRU ACTED FOR “HINDI-CHINI BHAI BHAI” WHEN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA NEVER CONSIDERED ANY SUCH FOOLISH BILATERAL FRATERNAL RELATIONSHIP WITH INDIAN GOVERNMENT AFTER J.L. NEHRU GRANTED ASYLUM TO DALAI LAMA, WHICH WAS CONSTRUED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT AS DIRECT INDIAN SUPPORT FOR TIBETAN BUDDHIST UPRISING AGAINST THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

    BUT, THROUGHOUT OUR KNOWN HISTORY, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA SHOWED RETICENCE FOR INVADING EITHER NEPAL OR INDIAN HEARTLAND FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS.

    HOWEVER, THIS POST IS NOT SUITABLE FOR FURTHER LENGTHY DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THOSE HISTORICAL CHINESE REASONS.

  46. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [Nepal was defeated by the British during the Anglo-Gurkha war during which it ceded Sikkim and Garhwal region and the lower Terai region to the British and paid war reparations and tribute.]

    BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM SUCCEEDED BECAUSE OF THE INVENTION AND PROPER UTILIZATION OF GUNS AND BULLETS.

    WHEN ONE BRINGS GUNS TO SWORD-FIGHT OR SPEAR-FIGHT OR KNIFE-FIGHT OR ARROW-FIGHT, IT IS EXPECTED THAT GUN-OWNER WILL BE VICTORIOUS!

    SO, WORLD’S TECHNOLOGY CHANGED WHEN BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS CAME TO INDIAN SUBCONTINENT.

    FOR FURTHER ELABORATION, 20 YEARS AGO IT WAS INCONCEIVABLE TO COMMUNICATE THE WAY WE — ORDINARY PEOPLE — ARE COMMUNICATING TODAY VIA INTERNET.

    WHEN MUSLIMS INVADED INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, INDIAN “HINDU” KINGS WERE ACCUSTOMED TO FIGHTING BATTLES WITHOUT INVOLVING MASS-CASUALTY TO NON-COMBATANTS AS WELL AS WITHOUT ARSONING HUMAN HABITATS AND HOUSES OF WORSHIP OF NON-COMBATANTS.

    BUT, ISLAMIC AND CHRISTIAN WAR AGAINST NON-BELIEVERS INVOLVED MILITARY, ECONOMIC, AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATIONS OF NON-BELIEVERS OF ALL AGES AS WELL AS TOTAL DEFACEMENT OF EXISTING PRIMORDIAL CULTURE WITH ISLAMIC OR CHRISTIAN ALIEN CULTURES.

    DURING 150 YEARS OF BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM IN INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S TOOK AWAY IN EXCESS OF ₤100,000,000 EVERY YEAR FROM INDIAN SUBCONTINENT.

  47. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [But the British never made it a protectorate.]

    BECAUSE, IT WAS NOT NECESSARY WHEN COST-BENEFIT RATIO WAS CONCERNED.

    [As such Nepal in the present territory it now holds was always Hindu and remained Hindu Nation until a few years back when it became secular.]

    WITH 57,000 SQUARE MILES AREA AND 26 MILLION POPULATION, THE LAND-LOCKED NEPAL IS ALWAYS DEPENDENT ON INDIAN GOVERNMENT.

    IF NEW DELHI DECIDES TO ANNEX NEPAL, IT WOULD NOT REQUIRE ANY EXTRA-ORDINARY INDIAN MILITARY EFFORT.

    IF NEW DELHI WANTED TO STATION INDIAN TROOPS FOR EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME IN ORDER TO SAFEGUARD “HINDUS” OF EAST PAKISTAN (I.E., EAST BENGAL) — FROM ISLAMIC GENOCIDE OF “HINDUS” DURING 1971 CIVIL-WAR BETWEEN TWO PAKISTANS — NEW DELHI COULD EASILY HAVE DONE THAT.

    SO, ANYONE CAN SAY TODAY THAT NEW DELHI NEVER MADE EAST PAKISTAN (I.E., EAST BENGAL) A PROTECTORATE BY NOT STATIONING INDIAN TROOPS THERE.

    BUT, THAT TYPE OF STATEMENT — EVEN FOR ARGUMENT’S PURPOSE — IS USELESS AT BEST.

    [In the pre-British period the Muslim forces never tried to invade and rule Nepal because the governance of the mountainous kingdom was difficult.]

    NO, MUSLIM SWORDSMEN WERE NEVER A MATCH FOR NEPALESE “HINDU” WARRIORS SUCH AS GURKHAS.

    PLUS, DURING MEDIEVAL TIME MUSLIM INVADERS WERE NEVER AT PEACE IN THEIR OCCUPATION OF VARIOUS PARTS OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT.

    MUSLIM INVADERS WERE INVOLVED WITH FIGHTING WARS AMONGST OTHER COMPETITOR MUSLIM INVADERS AS WELL AS WERE SUFFERING DEFEATS AFTER DEFEATS FROM OUR “HINDU” FOREFATHERS SUCH AS MARATHAS IN CONSTANT GUERRILLA-WARFARE.

    APPROXIMATELY 750 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS ISLAMIC RULES OF VARIOUS PARTS OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, MUSLIM INVADERS WERE NEVER AT TOTAL PEACE AND WERE NEVER AT TOTAL COMFORT.

    I REPEATEDLY WRITE “VARIOUS PARTS OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT”, BECAUSE MUSLIM INVADERS DID NEVER RULE THE ENTIRE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT IN ANY SPECIFIC GIVEN TIME-PERIOD LIKE THE “HINDU” MAURYA EMPIRE USED TO RULE THE ENTIRE LAND-MASS FOR CENTURIES.

    [So, if you want to know how life is in Hindu country, you must visit Nepal.]

    NO, IF I WANT TO KNOW THE LIFE OF A “HINDU” COUNTRY, I WOULD PREFER TO VISIT THE PRESIDENTIAL PALACE OF NEW DELHI.

    [In some places, it seems that time has stood still. People still use animals for harnessing transportation and for farming purposes. Horses, donkeys, cow ploughing, goats and yaks are frequently used.]

    SAME IS THE CONDITION WHEREVER CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS WENT.

    JUST LOOK AT THE AFRICAN CONTINENT.

    JUST LOOK AT BRITISH CHRISTIAN RHODESIA (I.E., ZIMBABWE), WHICH IS AN ECONOMIC BASKET-CASE TODAY SIMILAR TO BRITISH ISLAMIC PAKISTAN, WHEREAS THE INDEPENDENT “HINDU” INDIA TODAY IS WORLD’S 6TH LARGEST ECONOMY.

    THE ECONOMY OF NON-BELIEVERS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA WILL SUPERSEDE THE $17 TRILLION U.S. CHRISTIAN ECONOMY SOMEDAY SOON.

    CHINESE ECONOMY IS SUPERIOR TO INDIAN ECONOMY; BECAUSE, CHINESE GOVERNMENT ROUTINELY SLAUGHTERS CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM TRAITORS, BUT INDIAN GOVERNMENT DOESN’T SLAUGHTER CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM TRAITORS LIVING INSIDE INDEPENDENT INDIA!

  48. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [There are temples dotted over the whole country. Leprosy, malaria, poverty is rampant. Illiteracy is very high. There are a lot of gurukuls where Brahmins study religion and then prey upon the unsuspecting public. Superstition is high. Corruption, Prostitution, Drugs are very high.]

    BECAUSE, BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S DID NOT DO ANYTHING GOOD TO NON-BELIEVERS OF NEPAL, RATHER LOOTED NON-BELIEVERS’ EVERYTHING TO MAKE BRITISH CHRISTIAN INVADERS FILTHY RICH.

    [Tourists can get opium based drugs (inhalable and injectable), and drinks are easily available around the holiest of Hindu temples like Pashupatinath.]

    TOURISTS CAN BUY DRUGS IN ROME, ITALY, TOO.

    [If you go to the country side in Nepal (not the Kathmandu valley) you will get a taste of above minus the modern technology and you are pure Hindu nation which is abundant in idol worship of animal-headed, multi-armed gods (read demons), snake, monkey, animal, penis and vagina worship, Superstition, corruption, illiteracy, poverty, prostitution, drugs for consumption etc.]

    IF YOU PREFER TO VISIT ITALIAN CITIES, YOU WILL FIND PROSTITUTES THERE TOO.

    [They have festivals when they worship dogs, snake festivals, bull slaughter festival, monkey worship festival etc.]

    AT LEAST, THEY DO NOT WORSHIP A REPLICA OF A DEAD SON OF A JEWISH WHORE HANGING ON THE GALLOWS 2000 YEARS AGO.

    [If you want to imagine how would India be, if the British and the Muslims had not conquered it then you must see Nepal.]

    YOU RON_THE_CHRISTIAN_M*****F***** IS MAKING EXACTLY THE SAME ARGUMENT(S) THAT PROFESSOR AMARTYA SEN OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY, U.S.A., MAKES.

    MY COUNTER ARGUMENT TO THE LIKES OF HARVARD PROF. SEN IS:

    INSTEAD OF LOOTING — HAND OVER FIST — FROM FINANCIALLY DESTITUTE INDIAN “HINDUS” FOR 150 YEARS, ONLY IF BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S HAD SPENT OVER ₤100,000,000 A YEAR EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFITS OF NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT, I WOULD HAVE HAD ANY RESPECT FOR THE LIKES OF HARVARD PROF. AMARTYA SEN.

    [India was just like that but worse before the British started cleaning it up of Sati, thugs, Pindharis, temple child prostitution, child marriages, marriages to animals, polygamy, polyandry, child sacrifices etc.]

    INDIAN “HINDUS” SUCH AS ISHWAR CHANDRA VIDYASAGAR AND RAJA RAMMOHAN ROY ACTUALLY DID THE “CLEANING UP”.

    BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S PASSED LEGISLATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE “HINDU” SOCIAL REFORMERS SUCH AS ISHWAR CHANDRA VIDYASAGAR AND RAJA RAMMOHAN ROY.

  49. Face_The_Truth says:

    This message is for Ron_the_Christian_M*****F*****:

    [The British gave India discipline,…]

    UNFORTUNATELY, YOUR BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S COULD NOT DISCIPLINE THEMSELVES FROM LOOTING OVER ₤100,000,000 A YEAR FROM INDIAN NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE FOR THE SOLID 150 YEARS!

    […a strong educational system,…]

    INDEED, IT WAS A CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM DESIGNED TO CONVERT NON-BELIEVERS INTO THE FALSEHOODS OF CHRISTIANISM AS WELL AS TO TEACH NON-BELIEVERS HOW TO DENIGRATE THEIR FOREFATHERS’ FAITH, THEIR FOREFATHERS’ CULTURES, AND EVERYTHING THAT THEIR FOREFATHERS’ LAND STOOD FOR!

    […justice system,…]

    FOR 150 YEARS, PUNISHING NON-BELIEVERS OF CHRISTIANITY BY GIVING DEATH SENTENCES — BY HANGING UNTIL DEATH OCCURS — WHENEVER NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PREVENT ANY MASS-REVOLT AGAINST BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM WAS THE KIND OF JUSTICE YOU RON_THE_CHRISTIAN_M*****F***** DESERVE FOR YOUR CRIME(S) AGAINST “HINDU” BHARAT RASHTRA TODAY.

    […railways, roads and a transportation infrastructure etc.]

    IN ORDER TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON INDIAN NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE AND, ALSO, IN ORDER TO ECONOMICALLY EXPLOIT INDIAN NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE, BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM NEEDED THE TOOLS AND THE MEANS SUCH AS RAILWAYS AND ROADS.

    [The British replaced a dead language of Sanskrit with the most widely used language for Business and advancement i.e. English.]

    BRITISH CHRISTIAN M*****F*****S WERE ABLE TO RULE THE ENTIRE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT FOR ONLY 50 YEARS OUT OF APPROXIMATELY 150 YEARS OF TOTAL BRITISH RULE.

    IF I RULE THE ENTIRE LAND, I CAN IMPOSE MY LANGUAGE ON ALL PEOPLE LIVING ON MY LAND.

    MUSLIM INVADERS COULD NEVER RULE THE ENTIRE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT IN ANY SPECIFIC GIVEN TIME AND, AS A RESULT, NEITHER FARSI NOR ARABIC EVER BECAME A COMMON LANGUAGE OF ALL INDIAN NATIVE “HINDU” PEOPLE.

  50. Ron says:

    The House of Saud had to align themselves with the British before the first and second world wars and then to align themselves with the Americans post world war 2 to stay in power and ward off from anti-Salafists and Iranian forces.

    The Kaaba has been desecrated and partially destroyed by many forces prior to the House of Saud installing them as its custodians.

    Even when it was under custodian ship of the House of Saud, we had Shiites taking it over, blood shedding in the two mosques, construction cranes falling on it, stampedes happening around it and various other natural, and unnatural disasters.

    If it was what God had really built, then it would be immune and safe from any disaster.

    Muslims are victims of Islam which is Satanic in origin. Allah is Satan. Allah is never described as Love in the 99 names he is supposed to have and one of which is “the Great Deceiver”.

    The Bible clearly tells that Satan is called the “Great Deceiver”. Satan is the father of lies. Jesus also said that in the future there will be false prophets (read Muhammad) who will lead you astray. You will think they are showing you the right way but these false prophets will make you sin (e.g. have 4 wives, kill others for the sake of Allah, commit suicide, temporary marriage, tell lies for the cause of Allah, idol worship, help only Muslims but not other humans etc.).

    Muhammad never did any miracles, he had 10-12 wives, he committed pedophilia (sex with a 9 yr old girl also called statutory rape in 150 countries of the world), abrogated verses, married his daughter in law, massacred people, robbed caravans, died by wife’s poisoning.

    Muhammad cannot be called prophet of God. Yes, he is messenger of Allah who is Satan.

  51. Muhammad says:

    @Ron

    Islam is only true religion and prophet Muhammad is last messenger. British or Christians never succeed to rule Saudi Arabia. Saudi does not allow to build Christians any church. Saudi are worshipping true God in true way that is why they were never ruled by Christians.

  52. Ron says:

    To all those who think that Hindu India was most advanced in pre-British era.

    For all those who have grown up indoctrinated that India was a paradise or utopia in the pre-British and even in pre-Islam periods should somehow look at Hindu Nepal.

    Nepal was never conquered by non-Hindus and not even by the Chinese. Nepal was defeated by the British during the Anglo-Gurkha war during which it ceded Sikkim and Garhwal region and the lower Terai region to the British and paid war reparations and tribute. But the British never made it a protectorate. As such Nepal in the present territory it now holds was always Hindu and remained Hindu Nation until a few years back when it became secular.

    In the pre-British period the Muslim forces never tried to invade and rule Nepal because the governance of the mountainous kingdom was difficult.

    So, if you want to know how life is in Hindu country, you must visit Nepal. In some places, it seems that time has stood still. People still use animals for harnessing transportation and for farming purposes. Horses, donkeys, cow ploughing, goats and yaks are frequently used. There are temples dotted over the whole country. Leprosy, malaria, poverty is rampant. Illiteracy is very high. There are a lot of gurukuls where Brahmins study religion and then prey upon the unsuspecting public. Superstition is high. Corruption, Prostitution, Drugs are very high.

    Tourists can get opium based drugs (inhalable and injectable), and drinks are easily available around the holiest of Hindu temples like Pashupatinath.

    If you go to the country side in Nepal (not the Kathmandu valley) you will get a taste of above minus the modern technology and you are pure Hindu nation which is abundant in idol worship of animal-headed, multi-armed gods (read demons), snake, monkey, animal, penis and vagina worship, Superstition, corruption, illiteracy, poverty, prostitution, drugs for consumption etc.

    They have festivals when they worship dogs, snake festivals, bull slaughter festival, monkey worship festival etc.
    If you want to imagine how would India be, if the British and the Muslims had not conquered it then you must see Nepal.

    India was just like that but worse before the British started cleaning it up of Sati, thugs, Pindharis, temple child prostitution, child marriages, marriages to animals, polygamy, polyandry, child sacrifices etc.

    The British gave India discipline, a strong educational system, justice system, railways, roads and a transportation infrastructure etc. The British replaced a dead language of Sanskrit with the most widely used language for Business and advancement i.e. English.

  53. Face_The_Truth says:

    And, who created the crisis in Syria from the beginning?

    In 2008 A.D. and in 2012 A.D., American Christian voters elected and re-elected a Muslim man named Baraq Hussein Obama, Jr., to occupy the White House.

    President Baraq Hussein Obama, Jr., is a Muslim by birth.

    And, this Muslim man in the White House instituted one foreign policy after another to accommodate Islam in every walk of American life when American Christian law-makers in Washington, D.C., happily agreed.

    For example, even today Senator John McCain and Senator Lindsay Graham want NO restriction on never-ending foreign-Muslim-migration to American heartland while American Christian voters re-elect Senator John McCain and Senator Lindsay Graham again and again.

    President Baraq Hussein Obama, Jr., brought in power Islamist people in Egypt and Libya and, later on, ventured into Syria for similar régime-change operations!

    In 2012 A.D., in Benghazi, Libya, 4 American WAR-CRIMINALS — who were supplying illegal arms to Islamist al’Qaeda rebels in Syria — got killed by Islamist Jihadists as a form of BLOWBACK.

    Yet, many American Christian voters cheered for the Muslim president in the White House!

    American government of Christian President Ronald Wilson Reagan toppled the non-Islamist government of Nazib’Allah in Afghanistan in 1980’s in order to bring Islamist al’Qaeda based régime in Afghanistan.

    And, within 12 years American Christian voters saw the burning-buildings — on September 11, 2001 — in American cities as a result of BLOWBACK from American Christian President Ronald Wilson Reagan’s instituted Islamist al’Qaeda régime in Afghanistan!

    American Christian government of D.D. Eisenhower in 1953 A.D. toppled the non-Islamist government of Muhammad Mosaddegh of Iran, which ultimately paved the way for Iranian Muslims to allow Shi’ite Islamists to take hold of Tehran in 1979 A.D.

    American Christian government of George Warmonger Bush in 2003 A.D. toppled the non-Islamist government of Saddam Hussein al’Tikriti in Iraq in order to make the Wahhabi House of Saud in Middle East very happy!

    So, history is telling us that Christianism has a fetish for war after war all over the world in order to fulfill insatiable Christian greed, Christian perversions, and Christian debauchery.

  54. Walter Sieruk says:

    There are Muslim mind control places where Muslim males are thoroughly indoctrinated into the strong but blind and unquestioning faith in Koran with all non-watered down; hard core Islam with its militant jihad. Those places, “schools,” are called madrasas. In those Islamic mind programming centers young Muslim male are ingrain in the mindset Koranic dogma of the use of violence and killing for the advancement of Islam. As the Koran instructs. As in, for example, in 2:191. 9:5, 123. 47:4. Many of those who of such center are so much damaged that they are literally dangerous to self and others. As seen many times in jihad suicide, homicide bombing/attacks. For the Koran instructs in 9:111. “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed.” Furthermore, those mind programming places also ingrain the outlandish absurd Koranic doctrine of a sex-filled paradise with many virgins, houris, in it for the Muslim male who dies fighting for the cause of Islam in the jihad. Such a strange doctrine of a houris filled- place in found in the Koran in 44:54. 55:56. 78:31. Moreover, such Islamic mind programming centers are further explained about by the scholar Don Richardson in his book SECRETS OF THE KORAN which on pages 69,70. Informs the reader that “The world needs to be warned. At least forty million Muslim youth in the Muslim worlds’ religious schools, called madrasa, are avidly memorizing the entire Koran … These schools become breeding grounds for potential terrorists. When male students, isolated from family and friends in madrasa, reach puberty and their hormones are active, there are no girls to date. Instead, Muslim clerics easily shift to focusing the male student’s attention on Koranic verse that promises sex in heaven with dark-eyed houris. Students can only fantasize about martyrdom followed by the sexual release Muhammad promised. This is an unspeakably cruel brainwashing technique, and the Koran is its perfect guidebook.”

  55. Walter Sieruk says:

    As for jihad suicide/homicide bombing attacks this should be made known that this the outcome of the Islamic doctrine from the Qu‘’ran [the Koran] of a sexual paradise with many virgins, houris , in it for the male Muslim /jihadist who dies fighting in the jihad for the cause of Islam is found in the “holy book” of Islam, the Koran, in Sura 44:54. 55: 56. 78:31. Also there is the Koranic instruction of Sura 9:111 which teaches “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed.” Getting back to the origin doctrine of Islam from the Koran of a sex –filled paradise with many houris for the use only by the male jihadist who dies fight for the advancement of Islam. All this started when the founder and prophet of Islam, Muhammad manufactured Islam he put , had stolen, some of sex doctrine of Zoroastrian mythology and a yet smaller bit of Hindu mythological sex teachings along with as well as mixture pagan Arabian folklore and myth plus a heavy dose of Judaism and Christianity . Also some of it apostate “Christianity” For the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, couldn’t discern the difference between genuine Bible based Christianity and bogus “Christianity.” Those words and teaching Muhammad gathered from many sources, including the virgins /sex place mythology. , and taught as “Divine Truth” were written down on many things then later compiled and then went into the composition of the Koran. So the hoax of the Koran is actually a mixture and fusion Judaism Christianity and mythology of other religions and now the Muslim clerics with the Koranic brainwashing of young Muslims who are thoroughly mind programmed into believing this Islamic/Koranic virgins myth. This deception of false doctrine /myth into the thoughts of some people was predicted in the Bible along with the false teachers who engage in the indoctrination of such a myth /doctrine into the minds and hearts other people . For it is written “For the time will come when they will not stand wholesome teaching, but will follow their own fancy and gather a crown of teachers to tickle their ears. They will stop their ears to the truth and turn to mythology.” Second Timothy 4:3,4. [N.E.B.]

%d bloggers like this: