Error: No CURL Found - Social Networks AutoPoster needs the CURL PHP extension. Please install it or contact your hosting company to install it.

Statistics Don’t Lie – Faithfreedom.org

Statistics Don’t Lie

16 Responses

  1. atf030 says:

    Lets Face The Truth All and follow the right religion

    Originated From Mummy App

  2. Steve says:

    Face the truth wrote “But, Christian churches demand Indian govt. to continue providing the same governmental assistance even after conversion to Christianity or to Islam” This is particularly strange since Christians (like Ron or “found the truth”) claim that the “love of Jesus” compels them to care for the most vulnerable and unfortunate people in society. Yet they still demand that a “pagan” infidel government provide for them – instead of Christ’s multi trillion dollar so called holy church.

    http://humansarefree.com/2012/03/christian-church-is-biggest-financial.html?m=0

  3. Face_The_Truth says:

    ‘FICTITIOUS CHRISTIAN “GOD THE FATHER” SUPPORTS SEX SLAVERY, ARRANGED MARRIAGES, AND POLYGAMY

    Christians often claim that, if we just return to the morality of the Christian Bible, all will be well.

    This is preposterous!!!

    Just one example is needed to show the folly of such a claim. Consider Exodus 21:7-11:

    “If a man sells his daughter as a slave, she SHALL NOT be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she DOES NOT please the man who bought her, then he shall let her be bought back again; but the man HAS NO POWER to sell her to foreigners, since the man has wronged her by no longer wanting her after marrying her. And if the man arranges an engagement between a Hebrew slave-girl and his son, then the man may NO LONGER treat her as a slave-girl, but must treat her as a ‘daughter’. If the man himself marries her AND THEN TAKES ANOTHER WIFE, the man MAY NOT reduce her food or clothing, or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If the man fails in any of these three things, then she may leave freely without any payment.”

    Here in the “Holy” Christian book allegedly inspired by Christian “God the Father”, we see that Christian “God the Father” supports the idea that women are the property of men, that a man can sell his daughter into sex-slavery, that the buyer can arrange a marriage for her, and that the man can take on additional wives!!!

    What do world’s faithful Christians say about this?

    Usually that, the Old Testament DOESN’T count.

    If that’s the case, then world’s faithful Christians should remove the Old Testament from their Bibles.

    But even given that, Christians should not be allowed to get away with this charade — the God of the Old Testament is the same “God the Father” that world’s faithful Christians worship.

    Christians are fond of saying that morality and what is right or wrong doesn’t change because “God the Father” doesn’t change.

    World’s faithful Christians broadcast the idea that, morality DOES NOT change over time and therefore claim, FOR EXAMPLE, that homosexuality cannot ever be accepted because it is clearly considered an abomination in the Christian “Holy” Bible.

    Given that, then we should still be able to sell our daughters into sex-slavery because Christian “God the Father” DOESN’T change, and selling our daughters into sex-slavery is STILL in the Christian “Holy” Bible.’

  4. Face_The_Truth says:

    “Lower social class” or “Upper social class” is meaningless in Sanatana Dharma; because, every individual has the same shot at attaining Godliness.

    Christian missionaries spend their resources to convert gullible, financially poor or destitute of India by hanging the carrots of both financial prosperity on Earth during lifetime and eternal pleasure in Christian heaven after death for sincerely believing in the utter falsehood that Jesus was “Son of God”.

    However, the harsh reality is, after conversion to Christianity the financial lot does not improve for most of the new converts!

    Since gaining independence from British Christian imperialism in the August of 1947, Indian govt. has been providing “Affirmative Action” for poverty-stricken, downtrodden Indian “Hindus” to access government-jobs and other governmental benefits.

    Once a poverty-stricken, downtrodden Indian “Hindu” converts to Christianity or Islam, s/he should not be allowed to entitle her/himself for the same “Affirmative Action” of Indian govt. in order to freely access same government-jobs and governmental benefits; because, conversion to Christianity or Islam should have completely ameliorated her/his financial woes on Earth while s/he is gradually being prepared to enter Christian heaven or Islamic paradise after death.

    But, Christian churches demand Indian govt. to continue providing the same governmental assistance even after conversion to Christianity or to Islam.

  5. Face_The_Truth says:

    Dear readers:

    I have posted many a time here at FaithFreedom.Org website after witnessing — for more than a year — the non-stop Christian propaganda machine perpetually oiled by Ali Muhammad Amir Abd’Allah Umar Salehi ibn Sina.

    Today, I would quote from a person who saved Indian “Hindus” from Christian debauchery and Islamic barbarism during the British Christian imperial rule of Indian subcontinent.

    I place my head on the lotus feet of Swami Dayananda Saraswati (1824-1883).

    ===============================================================
    ===============================================================

    ‘Swami Dayananda Saraswati did not know the English language, though he had tried to learn it at one time!

    He had to depend on Sanskrit and Hindi translations of the Bible done by some leading missionaries.

    Nor was he acquainted with the critique of Christianity which had, by his time, snowballed in the West.

    But, his handling of the two Testaments shows that these were no disadvantages for him.

    His sense of logical consistency was quite strong.

    So was his humane and universal ethics derived from Vedic exegesis.

    In his examination of the Old Testament, Dayananda Saraswati concentrated his attention on the character of Jehovah.

    He found that Jehovah was not only blood-thirsty, vindictive and unjust, but also extremely whimsical.

    Jehovah alone, said Dayananda Saraswati, could choose a monster like Moses as his prophet and reveal a barbarous book like the Pentateuch.

    Dayananda Saraswati summed up the character of Jehovah in a Sanskrit sloka which deserves to be quoted verbatim:

    kshaNe rushtaH kshaNe tushTaH,
    rushTatushTaH kshaNe kshaNe;
    avyavasthitachittasya prasAdo’pi bhayaNkaraH

    (He is displeased in this moment and pleased in the next. He takes no time in travelling from dissatisfaction to satisfaction. His mind is deranged. Even a favour from such a being is to be feared).

    Only a savage society, said Dayananda Saraswati, can project and worship such a being.

    Jehovah is no better than a tribal leader who sides with his own gang even if it is unjust and cruel and who reserves his wrath for every other people even if they are just and compassionate.

    Such a being should not be sold as the father of all mankind.

    Nor can Jehovah be entrusted with presiding over the world.

    Coming to Jesus, Dayananda Saraswati found him wanting even as a man, not to speak of as the son of God.

    One of the Ten Commandments required Jesus to serve his parents.

    But, instead of doing so himself, Jesus made others leave their parents in the lurch.

    It was quite fit that Jesus called himself and his disciples the “fishers of men”.

    They did ensnare ignorant people in the net of a creed they had invented to serve their own purpose!

    Their poor victims also left their homes.

    Jesus claimed that he had come with a sword and that his mission was to separate the son from the father, the daughter from the mother, the brother from the brother, and so on.

    The missionaries today are only following the example set by Jesus himself.

    They too entice ignorant people and separate them from their near and dear ones.

    The fraud, said Dayananda Saraswati, should be exposed and the innocent people saved.

    Coming to the miracles of Jesus, Dayanand Saraswati said that the missionaries should be sent to share the company of sorcerers if they really believe in those miracles!

    The least they could do is to stop decrying the far more wonderful miracles mentioned in other people’s books.

    Those who denounce other people’s faith as false and sell their own falsehoods as truths, deserve to be described as dolts.

    The apostles of Jesus, said Dayananda Saraswati, were no better.

    One of them sold his teacher Jesus for thirty pieces of silver, others ran away when the teacher Jesus was caught and hanged.

    Yet we are told that these apostles will sit with Jesus on the day of judgment!

    Who could expect justice from judges of this kind?

    The missionaries are revealing the Christian standard of justice when they say that those alone who believe in Jesus will be saved and the rest sent to hell to rot there for ever.

    We see the same standard of justice in the British Christian administration of this country.

    If a White man kills a black native, the murderer goes free!

    Moreover, is it not a mockery of justice that those who died soon after creation will have to wait to be judged in their graves for a long time while those who die close to the day of judgment will be judged very soon?

    All this proves that Christianity is the product of a primitive mind which lacks all sense of justice and fair play.

    Jesus had said that the pieces of bread he was distributing were his body and the wine with which he was filling his disciples’ cups was his blood.

    Can a civilized man speak this language?

    No one except an uncouth savage would command his disciples to eat his flesh and drink his blood.

    Yet Christians applaud the practice as the Lord’s Supper!

    Jesus was no lord.

    Jesus was only a trickster.

    Had Jesus had any spiritual powers, he would have saved himself from a shameful death.

    Nor was Jesus a man of honor.

    Had Jesus been one, he would have fought back and died a hero’s death.

    Yet we are told that Jesus was the “Only Son of God” and that nobody can reach God except by his recommendation.

    God is thus reduced to the status of a servant of Jesus.

    The only conclusion we can draw from such statements of Jesus is that he was an impostor.

    Jesus can be honored only in a savage society.

    Hindus have a saying that, even a castor plant can pass as a tree in a land devoid of real trees!

    Jesus can pass as God only among people who have never known what constitutes Godhood.

    Dayananda Saraswati was thus fully equipped when he met the Christian missionaries in a public debate at Moradabad in 1876.

    “When Christian missionaries said that Jesus Christ was the ‘Only Savior’ from eternal hell, Swami Dayananda Saraswati retorted that, Krishna and Shankaracharya were men of better caliber and that belief in salvation through the intercession of a mortal man dying on the Cross was worse than idolatry.”‘

    ===============================================================
    ===============================================================

  6. Found The Truth says:

    Oops the matrix did not display properly

  7. Face_The_Truth says:

    Dear readers:

    In Islamic countries, stoning females to death for having sexual intercourse outside marriage still persists today, although both Jews and Christians abandoned that deeply honorable “religious practice” long ago.

    “A Palestinian-American Muslim woman is on trial in Texas, United States, for stabbing to death her 25-year-old nephew …

    The nephew, Mohammed Abdelaziz, a law school graduate, referred to Andira as ‘daughter of a whore,’ according to text messages obtained by police.

    Andira testified that, she was physically intimidated by her nephew, who was 6ft 5in and weighed 213 pounds.

    On the morning of the fatal stabbing, Mohammed Abdelaziz came to her home and rang the doorbell constantly, Andira and her son both testified in court …

    Andira told the court that, Mohammed Abdelaziz was pounding on the windows — all in full view of her children.

    Mohammed Abdelaziz then came inside the house and beat his aunt, striking her in the face, stomach, and back with balled fists.

    Andira testified that, she did not call 911 because she wanted to calm him down.

    Andira also said, she was afraid that exposing the affair would have a negative impact on her children while also putting her in danger of falling victim to an Islamic ‘honor killing.’

    So-called Islamic ‘honor killings’ are acts of bloody revenge taken by male members of a Muslim family against female members of the family who have brought shame upon the family.”

    LINK

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5810997/Woman-trial-slaying-nephew-admitted-involved-years-long-secret-affair.html

  8. Anonymous says:

    This is not how you do the math. Really it isn’t.

  9. Tom Cheria says:

    “But bring here these enemies of mine, who did not want me to rule over them, and slaughter them in my presence.’”

    THIS IS A BIG LIE.. It was Sam Harris who was asking people to kill people.. LOL (I’m going to paste that linkto prove it was a LIE for the hundredth time.

  10. Tom Cheria says:

    No one has ever seen God. (John 4:12)

    God = Absolute Goodness. God is an abstract – no one can see Absolute/Pure Goodness.

    The Father is greater than I. (John 14:28)
    Jesus’s life is an example – he was just showing how to be humble – being humble is mostly good.

    But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Mark 13:32)

    Just teaching mankind to be humble. (That’s all)

    My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46)

    Jesus’s life is meant to be an excemplary example – This is what homsapiens should ask themselves when they are totally unjustly punished. In life there will be many circumstances when this could be used. Life is not easy for most people.

    By myself, I can do nothing: I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who has sent me. (John 5:30)

    Absolute goodness aka God sent “himself” in flesh i.e. Jesus to be an role model for homo sapiens to emulate.

    I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father. (John 16.28)

    Yes Jesus the flesh is going back to the abstract aka Absolute Goodness. (That’s all)

    Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me. (John 16.32)

    This is how Jesus is teaching homo sapiens to be confident and face life as it presents.

    No one knows about that day or hour, not even the Son, but the Father only. (Matthew 24:36)
    Not knowing the time is not a sin. Jesus isjust being humble and teaching people being humble is cool.

    For as the Father has life in Himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself. (John 5:26)
    Jesus is being humble – teaching people to be humble (That’s all)

    The Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees the Father doing, because whatever the Father does, the Son does also. (John 5:19)

    God has restrictions he cannot sin. God = Absolute Goodness. Jesus cannot sin unlike allah who sins and asks people to sin.

    Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. (Mark 10:18)

    Jesus is teaching people to be humble.

    When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone. (James 1:13)

    Jesus never templed anyone. SATAN(aka allah) tried 3 times to tempt Jesus to bow to the SATAN and failed all 3 times. Unfortunately SATAN succeeded in making 1.5 billion people bow to SATAN 5 times daily.

    I agree with Anonymous..

    Even IDOL worship or even if someone worships poop that worship is TRILLION times better than allah(SATAN) worship. Idols or poop don’t ask people to SIN but allah the SATAN always asks people to SIN.

  11. Face_The_Truth says:

    Screen-name Anonymous says:
    Any religion and prophet is a trillion times better than Islam and the prophet of Islam. This is for sure.

    ISLAM IS PROMOTED AND SUSTAINED BY CHRISTIANISM.

    THERE WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN A “PAKISTAN” WITHOUT BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS.

    THE MOST NOTORIOUS INTER-SERVICES INTELLIGENCE MILITARY AGENCY WAS FOUNDED IN 1948 A.D. BY A BRITISH CHRISTIAN ARMY MAJOR IN ORDER TO MURDER, RAPE, AND EXILE ALL “HINDUS” THEN RESIDING IN THEIR FOREFATHERS’ LAND (I.E., THE NEWLY CREATED WEST PAKISTAN).

    BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS DID EVERYTHING HUMANLY POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO UPROOT “HINDUISM” SO THAT THE SUN ON THE BRITISH CHRISTIAN EMPIRE WOULD NEVER SET.

    AFTER THE PARTITION IN 1947 A.D., HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MUSLIMS FROM NEWLY CREATED “PAKISTAN” WERE BROUGHT TO ENGLAND FOR JOBS AND OTHER OPPORTUNITIES FOR MUSLIMS’ HELP FOR DIVIDING THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT — SO THAT NEWLY INDEPENDENT INDIAN “HINDUS” WOULD NEVER SUCCEED FINANCIALLY, MILITARILY AND SOCIALLY — SO THAT INDIAN “HINDUS” WOULD ALWAYS BE UNDER MILITARY ATTACKS FROM NEWLY CREATED “PAKISTAN”.

    MUSLIMS IN INDIAN SUBCONTINENT ALWAYS CONSIDERED INDIAN “HINDUS” DESPICABLE KUFFAR WHO REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE SIMPLE FACT THAT, INDIAN “HINDUS” HAD BEEN WORSHIPPING FALSE MANY GODS — WHEN THERE COULD NEVER BE MANY GODS!!!

    MUSLIMS IN INDIAN SUBCONTINENT ALWAYS CONSIDERED INDIAN “HINDUS” DESPICABLE KUFFAR WHO REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, MUHAMMAD THE ARABIAN WAS THE LAST OR FINAL “MESSENGER” OF ONE AND ONLY TRUE GOD NAMED “ALLAH”.

    SO, WORLD’S CHRISTIANS PROMOTE MUSLIMS WHILE DEMOTING “HINDUS” IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE.

    LOSING CONTROL OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT WAS A HUGE FINANCIAL LOSS FOR BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS.

    BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS LOOTED IN EXCESS OF ONE HUNDRED MILLION BRITISH POUND-STERLING FROM INDIAN SUBCONTINENT EVERY YEAR — YEAR AFTER YEAR — DURING THE BRITISH CHRISTIAN COLONIAL RULE OF APPROXIMATELY 150 YEARS.

    INDIAN POOR PEOPLE PAID WITH THEIR BLOOD AND HARD-LABOR FOR ALL THE CHRISTIAN IMPERIAL GLORY OF BRITISH CHRISTIAN MONARCH IN PARTICULAR AND EUROPEAN BRITISH CHRISTIAN PEOPLE IN GENERAL.

    IT WAS A WONDERFUL THING TO LOOT WEALTH OF OTHER NATIONS IN ORDER TO PROMOTE SO-CALLED “CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION” OF WESTERN EUROPE DURING THE COLONIAL TIME!!!

    AND, BRITISH CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISTS REWARDED PAKISTANIAN MUSLIMS FOR MUSLIMS’ ERNEST EFFORTS TO DESTROY ALL “HINDUS” OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT EVERY WAY POSSIBLE IN PERPETUITY.

    TODAY, SECOND GENERATION MUSLIMS ARE IN HIGH POLITICAL OFFICES OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT IN EUROPE.

    CHRISTIAN WOMEN VERY EASILY FALL IN “LOVE” WITH ALL MUSLIM BASTARDS IN EUROPE.

    LINK

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-5659299/Who-Shahid-Khan-Meet-man-primed-ownership-800m-Wembley-Stadium.html

  12. Anonymous says:

    Any religion and prophet is a trillion times better than Islam and the prophet of Islam. This is for sure.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Dear ‘Found the Truth’.

    You have found the false and not the truth. Please read the Bible, before you open your mouth and insult others.

    Jesus was not God

    The below are just some of the statements made by Jesus himself, which very clearly indicate that he was not God.

    01 ‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ (Matthew 22:37)

    The above is the greatest commandment of Jesus. He clearly states to love God and not himself.
    02 No one has ever seen God. (John 4:12)

    Jesus was seen and thus he was not God.
    03 The Father is greater than I. (John 14:28)

    This is another strong statement that makes a distinction between Jesus and God.
    04 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father” (Mark 13:32)

    Only God knows about the day of judgement.
    “A time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father.” (John 16.25)

    Another very strong statement that makes a distinction between Jesus and God.
    05 My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46)

    Another very strong statement that makes a distinction between Jesus and God.
    06 By myself, I can do nothing: I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who has sent me. (John 5:30)

    Jesus relies on God, by himself he can do nothing.
    07 A time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father. (John 16.25)

    Very clearly Jesus and his father are two different beings.
    08 I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father. (John 16.28)

    Jesus went back to the father, not himself.
    09 Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me. (John 16.32)

    Jesus stating his father is different from himself.
    10 No one knows about that day or hour, not even the Son, but the Father only. (Matthew 24:36)

    Here Jesus makes a distinction between what he knows and what the father knows.
    11
    My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me, yet not as I will, but as Thou will. (Matthew 26:39)

    Jesus is accepting that there is God’s will, thus he is not God.
    12 For as the Father has life in Himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself. (John 5:26)

    Jesus received his life from God.

    13 The Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees the Father doing, because whatever the Father does, the Son does also. (John 5:19)

    Jesus declares that he is following a pattern laid down by God. He is expressing obedience to God.
    14 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. (Mark 10:18)

    Here Jesus emphatically makes a distinction between himself and God.
    15 Our Father, which art in Heaven. (Matthew 6:9)

    Jesus praying to his father, not to himself.
    16 Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. (John 17:21)

    In this prayer Jesus defines the term “to be one.” It is clearly accomplished through the relationship of two autonomous beings. Christian believers are to model their relationship (to become one) after the relationship of God and Christ (as God and Christ are one). Notice that “to be one” does not mean to be “one and the same.”
    17 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being. (Hebrews 1:3)

    A police officer is the radiance and glory of the government. This does not mean the officer is the President.
    18 When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone. (James 1:13)

    Jesus was tempted in every way, but God cannot be tempted. Therefore Jesus said, “don’t call me good, none are good, only God.”
    19 During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission. Although he was a son, he learned obedience from what he suffered and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him. (Hebrews 5:7-9)

    Jesus had to walk a course of faith and obedience to God to achieve perfection.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Dear ‘Found the Truth,

    Please read the Bible, Jesus did order innocent men and women to be killed.

    Jesus ordered Slaughter of innocent men, women, and children

    “And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain.” (Deuteronomy 2:34 KJV)

    “Don’t assume that I came to bring peace on the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” (Matthew 10:34 CSB)

    “But bring here these enemies of mine, who did not want me to rule over them, and slaughter them in my presence.’” (Luke 19:27 CSB)

    Only one example should suffice to illustrate the success of Jesus’ teaching; “slaughter them in my presence.”

    Godfrey of Bouillon conquest of Jerusalem (c1060-1100) ― Known as the “First Crusade:”

    “The defenders fled along the walls and through the city, and our men pursued them killing and cutting them down as far as Solomon’s Temple, where there was such a massacre that our men were wading ankle deep in blood … Then the crusaders rushed around the whole city, seizing gold and silver, horses and mules, and looting the housing that were full of costly things. Then, rejoicing and weeping from excess of happiness, they all came to worship and give thanks at the sepulcher of our savior Jesus. Next morning, they went cautiously up the temple roof and attacked the Saracens, both men and women [who had taken refuge there], cutting off their heads with drawn swords … Our leaders then gave orders that all the Saracen corpses should be thrown outside the city because of the stench, for almost the whole city was full of dead bodies … such a slaughter of pagans had never been seen or heard of, for they were burned in pyres like pyramids, and none save God alone knows how many they were.”

    Raymond of Aguiles provided eyewitness account which shows the spiritual excitement that the carnage produced among the Christians.

    “Wonderful sights were to be seen. Some of our men (and this was more merciful) cut off the heads of their enemies; others shoot them with arrows, so that they fell from the towers; others tortured them longer by casting them into flames. Piles of heads, hands and feet were to be seen in the streets of the city. It was necessary to pick one’s way over the bodies of men and horses. But these were small matters compared to what happened at the Temple of Solomon, a place where religious services are normally chanted … in the temple and the porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed it was a just and splendid judgement of God that this place should be filled with the blood of unbelievers since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.”

  15. Vijai Singh says:

    “Everything calculated to advance the dissemination of truth is like poison to begin with, but like nectar in the end.” Swami Dayanand.

    True religion cannot be any other religion, but the very first one. Any one after the first most certainly cannot be the work of an All-perfect and All-wise God, but ignorant men, who held the view the planet was flat and the sun was moving.

    “Swami Dayananda Saraswati is certainly one of the most powerful personalities who has shaped modem India and is responsible for its moral regeneration and religious revival”. Subhas Chandra Bose.

    Wrote Gandhi’s assassin:-
    “If devotion to one’s country amounts to a sin, I admit I have committed that sin. If it is meritorious, I humbly claim the merit thereof. I fully and confidently believe that if there be any other court of justice beyond the one founded by the mortals, my act will not be taken as unjust. If after death there be no such place to reach or to go, there is nothing to be said. I have resorted to the action I did purely for the benefit of the humanity. I do say that my shots were fired at the person (Mohandas Ghandhi) whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to lakhs of Hindus.” – Shri Nathuram Vinayak Godse.
    Nathuram
    Attack on Arya Samaj:- “Gandhiji ostentatiously displayed his love for Muslims by a most unworthy and unprovoked attack on the Arya Samaj in 1924. He publicly denounced the Samaj for its supposed sins of omission and commission; it was an utterly unwarranted reckless and discreditable attack, but whatever would please the Mohammedans was the heart’s desire of Gandhiji. The Arya Samaj made a powerful but polite retort and for some time Gandhiji was silenced, but the growing political influence of Gandhiji weakened the Arya Samaj. No follower of Swami Dayanand could possibly be a Gandhian Congressman in politics. The two things are entirely incompatible; but the lure of office and leadership has induced numerous Arya Samajists to play the double game of claiming to be Gandhi to Congressmen and Arya Samajists at the same time. The result was that a ban on Satyartha Prakasha was imposed by the Government of Sind four years ago and the Arya Samaj on the whole took it lying down. As a result its hold on Hindu social and religious life has been further considerably crippled. Individual members of the Samaj are and were strong nationalists. The late Lala Lajpat Rai, and Swami Shradhanand to mention only two names were staunch Arya Samajists but they were foremost amongst the leaders of the Congress till the end of their life. They did not stand for blind support to Gandhi, but were definitely, opposed to his pro-Muslim Policy, and openly fought him on that issue. But these great men are gone now. We know that the bulk of the Arya Samaj continues to be what they always were, but they are ill-informed and badly led by the self -seeking section of the Samaj. The Samaj has ceased to be the force and the power that it was at one time.”

    (d) (ii) “Gandhiji’s attack did not improve his popularity with the Muslims but it provoked a Muslim youth to murder Swami Shraddhanandji within a few months. The charge against the Samaj that it was a reactionary body was manifestly false. Everybody knew that far from being reactionary body the Samaj had been vanguard of social reforms among the Hindus. The Samaj had for a hundred years stood for the abolition of untouchability long before the birth of Gandhiji. The Samaj had popularised widow remarriage. The Samaj had denounced the caste system, and preached the oneness of not merely the Hindus, but of all those who were prepared to follow its tenets. Gandhiji was completely silenced for some time but his leadership made the people forget his baseless attack on the Arya Samaj and even weakened the Samaj to a large extent. Swami Dayanand Saraswati who was the founder of the Arya Samaj; had no fad about violence or non-violence. In his teaching the use of force was not ruled out but was permissible if morally desirable. It must have been a struggle for the leaders of the Arya Samaj whether to remain within the Congress or not because Gandhiji insisted on non-violence in all cases and Swami Dayanand made no bones about it. But Swamiji was dead and Gandhiji’s star was ascendant in the political firmament.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: