This
author makes it clear that Islam does not recognize gender equality.
However, to justify the superiority of man over woman he uses a very
circular reasoning. He says men are superior because they dominated women
throughout the history. He neglects the fact that the reason men dominated
women was because women were not given the opportunity to compete. This is
like tying the hands of a person and then saying "look, he is
incapable of using his hands".
He
continued: “For those who have conviction in religion there is little
scope to deny the role of gender in determining values, rights and
responsibilities that are often diametrically at odds with the idea of
gender equality. Male dominated Prophethood was one example, another one
is: polygyny. It is clearly permitted in Islam and also found in the
Biblical texts (Prophet Solomon and David)."
I
could not have said this better. The problem with this Muslim and his
twisted line of reasoning is that he does not judge religions by their
fruits but rather tries to judge the values by what religions and in
particular Islam teaches. Evil, in the sight of this person and his ilk is
good because it was recommended by the prophet.
Yvonne
Haddad, a professor of Islamic studies at
Georgetown
University
, commenting on Dr. Wadud’s controversial action said; the service goes
against the religion's traditions.
"It's
a time when people can get away with anything," Haddad said.
"When people have a breakdown of traditional leadership, largely
because the
U.S.
government has delegitimized the Muslim leadership in
America
, American Muslims are searching for new leaders more able to address
their daily needs."
"People
in
America
think they are going to be the vanguards of change," Haddad said.
"But for Arab Muslims in the
Middle East
, American Muslims continue to be viewed on the margins of the
faith."
This
is just an example of how in Islam bigotry always wins. Reforming Islam
and modernizing it is impossible. The Quran stands in the way as the main
obstacle to any reform. The fundamentalists will always come victorious.
Dr.
Amina Wadud, speaking as part of a series sponsored by
York
University
and the Noor Cultural Centre, midway through her speech titled "The
Quran, Women and Interpretive Possibilities," waded into the
minefield by addressing some controversial passages of the Quran. Breaking
the ultimate taboo in the Muslim narrative, she stated that despite the
fact the Quran explicitly asks for cutting off the hands of thieves, she
did not agree with the Quran. She said she understood that this was a very
difficult subject to talk about, but she would be dishonest to herself if
she did not express her views.
She
maintained that as a Muslim with Allah close to her heart, in all honesty
she could not continue with the hypocrisy of lying about how she felt
about some verses of the Quran. [source]
The
question that begs an answer from Dr. Wadud is why she is still a Muslim.
If she disagrees with the Quran, can she still call herself a Muslim?
Isn’t this a bigger hypocrisy? Although Dr. Wadud's courage is
admirable, her adherence to Islam is unreasonable. It is very clear that
Islam cannot be reformed and the main obstacles to reform are the Quran
and the Sunnah. If Dr. Wadud does not agree even with the Quran, why she
maintains the pretense of calling herself a Muslim? Wouldn't it be better
if she leaved Islam to the benighted Muslims and joined the rank of the
enlightened and liberated ex-Muslims?
This
is the ultimate question that Dr. Wadud has to answer, not just to Muslims
and to the world, but also to herself. Why can’t she cut her umbilical cord
from Islam? If she does not agree with the violent and barbaric passages
of the Quran that constitute most of it, why she calls herself a Muslim?
By
declaring her disagreement with parts of the Quran, Dr. Wadud has already
crossed the line and has entered the rank of apostates. She is now a
target of Islamic terrorism and she could be assassinated anytime. She is
no more a Muslim as far as Muslims are concerned. Maybe it is time that
she denounces Islam altogether and come to term with her own apostasy.
Islam
cannot be reformed. The only change possible is through eradication. To
eradicate Islam you have to get out of it. You can’t cut a branch while
you are sitting on it. You can’t demolish a house while you are living
in it. It’s time to leave Islam and demolish it from outside.
Back
< 1 2
3
|