Evil is real, just as darkness is real. Islamic
fundamentalism is evil in every sense. We need a leader to stand against
this evil with strength of character and determination. What was Kerry’s
response to Islamic Terrorism? “We’ll reach out to Muslims” he said.
This is not good enough! If someone is attacking
you with the intent to kill you, you can’t reach out to him. You have to
defend yourself. Kill him or you’ll be killed. Muslims can’t be
reached. They are not listening. They are not open to dialogues. They burn
books which are critical of Islam and kill their authors. They are like
zombies programmed to kill. They are not coming to our Internet forums and
ban us if we go to theirs. (See my failed attempt
to reach out to Muslims. Try them and see if you have a better
chance.) But they are determined to kill us. Their faith is unwavering.
Their resolve is unshaken. We have no other choice but to fight back.
If your enemy is focused with the intent to kill
you, you must be focused to defend yourself and kill him first. If he
takes a warring posture, you must take a warring posture. If he reaches
for his gun you must reach for your gun. This does not equate you to your
enemy. Mr. Wills and his liberal co-ideologists have lost the notion of
right and wrong. Their faith
in political correctness has blinded them to reality. They have no
understanding of the dangers that this world is facing. The world is being
threatened to extinction and all that these politically correct spin
doctors can prescribe are more appeasements.
These are no doctors! They have no understanding
of the gravity of the situation in which we live. Evil must be fought,
terrorism must be quashed. Truth may vary from person to person but
justice is the same to everyone. Oppression is wrong, whether it is in
. If you can't tolerate a despot, jailing people for their political views
and executing them in
why would you tolerate them in
? Isn't this hypocrisy? Isn't this moral relativism? How much duplicity
and double standard is enough?
If a president believes in creationism, it does
not affect my freedom and my life. If the religionists can tolerate a
secular president, why shouldn't secularists tolerate a religious
president? Shouldn't the secularists be the first to defend the freedom of
thoughts and beliefs?
But if a president cannot distinguish right from
wrong, if he cannot see Evil for what it is, if he does not understand
that we are in war, if he is a pacifist in war, if he thinks terrorism is
only a nuisance no worse than gambling and prostitution, if he thinks that
he can stop Islamic Terrorism by “reaching out to Muslims”, he does
not understand the dangers of the time. He is still a flower child, but
not a statesman. By electing him I will be putting my life and the lives
of millions in danger. Then his views on secularism become irrelevant.
Mr. Wills brings us the example of Europeans. But
he forgets that thanks to their liberalism, moral relativism and political
correctness the Europeans are now far worse than the Americans. They live
in fear in their own countries. They are afraid to speak because they
could be assassinated. It was only a couple of days ago that the Dutch
filmmaker Theo Van Gogh was butchered cycling in a park in the daylight by
a Muslim who thought his documentary about Muslim women was blasphemy and
he should be put to death. Is this the kind of paradise that the Liberals
are envisioning for
? Thanks, but no thanks! I
will stick with a president who prays to his God no matter how irrational
it may be but can distinguish the right from wrong and is not squeamish to
Despite the losers' claim, this election was not
about the gay rights, science vs. faith, economy or even the war. It was
about principles. It was about values, about human decency and justice. It
was a triumph of truth over political correctness and a victory of
principles over moral relativism.