I
believe the position is very clear. We should have the interest of the
child before us. Providing a happy, normal life for any child, and the
creation of a harmonic society on the basis of secularism i.e.
separation of religion from the state, are the right principle and the
basis of a right and just position. Respect for multi-culturalism and
cultural relativism leads to discrimination against some sections of the
society, violations of human rights for some sections, double standards,
and the creation of a disintegrated and segregated society, where people
are put into different pigeon boxes and identified by their cultural or
religious backgrounds, instead of as equal citizens. Diversity is fine
but creating boxes and stamping people’s foreheads with their religion
or their family’s or community’s religion is wrong. Furthermore,
children are not given proper scientific education in these faith
schools. They are given a one-sided education which is more based on
superstition than science. Thus a normal life is denied from them.
We
then come to the question of gender and sexual equality. Faith schools
in general, and Islamic and Jewish schools in particular are based on
sexist values and beliefs. In all religious schools there is a very
definite defined gender role. Girls are considered as a whole different
kind of human being than boys. There you have gender apartheid and
segregation which is very discriminatory against girls and women. We
have a long history of fighting for women’s rights in
Europe
. Especially the gender roles have been challenged
significantly in the past 30 years in
Western Europe
. The religious schools deny that and contradict
society’s achievements. They turn the clock backward. We should not
let this happen. Bringing up children in religious schools is wrong and
has to be banned.
Bahram
Soroush: Some might say fair
enough, you want secular education, that children should be left alone
until they reach the age of maturity, until they are 16, and then they
can decide what religion to have or what not to have. But they also say,
what about the rights of the parents? Don’t they have any rights and
responsibilities towards raising their children? Aren’t you excluding
them of their rights?
Azar
Majedi: No, I am not excluding any one of
their rights. Parents definitely have a responsibility towards their
children. They also have some rights. These rights and responsibilities
must be defined by the society as a set of universal laws. Parents are
responsible to provide their children, in the framework of their means,
with a happy, normal and safe life. They must provide their children
with love, security and safety. But this does not mean that if a child
is born in a poor or disadvantaged family, the society will leave the
child to have only what the parents are capable of providing. Society
has a duty toward the well being of the child. That is why there are
internationally recognised charters and declarations to safeguard and
protect children. Modern society has recognised the need for such laws.
That is why every civilised society has laws regarding obligatory
education, prohibition of child labour, criminalising physical and
sexual abuse of a child and so on. By passing such laws, the society has
taken the matters in its own hand out of the parents’ realm of rights.
We are not living in a feudal system where the parents - actually the
father - decide over the whole family’s existence. For example,
according to Islamic laws, a father or a grandfather can kill his
children without being prosecuted. This is a law in some countries.
Modern, civil society has abolished this right. I want to say rights are
not absolute and ahistorical. Each society must define these laws
according to the well being of children and in light of children’s
interests. In my opinion, indoctrination of children is one of those
so-called rights that must be taken away from parents. Education must be
standardised and universal for every child in a given society.
What
I am trying to say is that there is a responsibility by the society
towards children as much as there is parents’ responsibility towards
children. That happy, normal and secure life that I was talking about is
partly society’s responsibility in all aspects: economically and
education wise. The society will not leave it to the parents just
because the children are born in a particular family to teach them
whatever they want and brain wash them with superstition. There is
actually a law and a limited safeguard that the society offers to
children if the parents are abusive. Society would intervene and take
the child’s side.
I
think abuse is understood as merely sexual or physical and verbal
violence whereas indoctrination and brain washing of children with
superstition and prejudgments must also be recognised as abuse.
Inflicting or imposing religious or cultural customs upon children that
hinder healthy physical and mental development must be considered as
abuse. I consider child veiling as a serious violation of children
rights. In the same token, sending children to religious schools is a
serious violation of their rights.
Bahram
Soroush: It particularly affects
the girls. Doesn’t it?
Azar
Majedi: It does. Religion by its nature
and as an ideology is very much sexist and male chauvinist. Christianity
has been challenged in the 18 and 19th century, from the French
revolution to the transformation of the European society from a feudal
society to a capitalist system. It has been pushed back in the society
and is more or less behaving itself. Islam however, has not gone through
the same process. Islam has never been dealt with like this in the
societies that it was born in. Islam has never been challenged in this
way, has never been pushed back from the society. Moreover, for the past
3 decades a political movement has been born and developed, which takes
its ideology and policy from Islam and is very reactionary, i.e.
political Islam. This
movement is not only religious but also political. We can see what
political Islam is doing, gaining more and more inroads in western
society as well. We know Islam’s record, what Islam says; it is
written black on white and we know how male chauvinistic and sexist it
is. Gender apartheid is the basis of Islam. The veiling of children and
many other abuses should be stopped. If you expose a girl or even a boy
to that culture and education, you are actually depriving these children
of a humane life, especially the girls. Islamic schools must be stopped
because this gender discrimination is embedded in Islam.
TV
International interview dated January 2005. Bahram Soroush hosted the
programme whilst Maryam Namazie was away.
*
See International TV English with Maryam Namazie
Week
beginning
Sunday May 15, 2005
Programme
Maryam
Namazie is back hosting her weekly TV International programme (www.anternasional.tv/english).
In this week’s programme of
May 15, 2005
, she interviews Azar Majedi on whether the world can
live with
Iran
's nuclear weapons, Bahram Soroush on our being
labelled Islamophobic, and Hamid Taqvaee on the two poles of
international terrorism.
TV
International English is a weekly hour-long news analysis and commentary
programme that focuses on the
Middle East
and rights and freedoms from
a progressive and Left standpoint. Watch TV International English every
Sunday from
11.00 - 12.00pm
Tehran
time (
7.30-8.30pm
London
time). The programme is
broadcast on Satellite: Telstar 12, Centre Frequency: 12608 MHz, Symbol
Rate: 19279, FEC: 2/3, Polarization: Horizontal. It an also be viewed on
its website: www.anternasional.tv/english.