Translation: Islam is not evil but the Infidels are because they expose Islam. When Muslims loot, rape and kill infidel women and children no one should criticize them.
“Allah meherban toh gadha pehalwan.”
(If Allah blesses a donkey it can become Hercules)
– A popular saying in India
My heartiest congratulations to Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Malala Yousafzai on her becoming an honorary Canadian citizen. Congratulations for making it that big without any struggle. I wholeheartedly support her efforts to help more girls get into school. It reminds me of the value of education for the underdeveloped Islamic nations to lift out of instability and providing a more promising future to their people because nothing has as much impact on society’s future wellbeing as the level of education of their woman folk. When a girl child is educated she will not only be able to help herself, but also to her family, her country, her people – the benefits will be many.
Malala had made the Muslim Ummah proud when she received the Nobel Prize because the Muslim Ummah is so underachieved in comparison to the non-Muslim world, particularly to the Jewish faith whom the Quran (2.65; 5.60; 7.166) considers as descendants of monkeys and pigs. From Islamic scriptures we can find that Allah loves illiteracy and hates education. He sent Muhammad as a guardian of illiterates (Bukhari: 3.34.335). Allah’s love for illiteracy is so intense that he has promised the first entry to paradise to the illiterate Muslims and the last entry to the educated Muslims (Sunaan Ibn Majah: V.4290).
According to Nobel’s will, the Peace Prize shall be awarded to the person who in the preceding year “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses” (Chen, 2011, p. 57). From my understanding of this statement, I cannot make out how out of all the girls cruelly shot by Islamic terrorist groups, Malala was the only one chosen for the Prize by the honorable members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. It’s sad that the Committee did not find better alternatives than her in the entire world. Can anyone disagree with me that there are thousands, if not millions, of people who had devoted their entire life for promoting girls’ education?
Anyway, I am least bothered if Malala really deserved it or not because I have lost all respect for the Prize when Yasser Arafat the “unrepentant terrorist with a long legacy of promoting violence” (Ahluwalia et al., 2012, p. 145) received the Peace Prize in 1994, and Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948) who gave humanity the most pacific ways to resist what is wrong through his doctrine of nonviolence, and make us learn the importance of truth was not a deserving candidate. When Arafat came to Oslo for the prize ceremony he carried a sidearm, .357 Magnum silver-plated handgun which he removed at public events to make a concession to local sensibilities (Nordlinger, 2012, p. 308). Ironically, even Adolf Hitler was nominated for Nobel Peace Prize during 1939. The horizon of the Committee is too narrow and their decisions are mostly politically motivated.
In this article I wish to scrutinize some of Malala’s statements about Islam that she made after coming to the world’s attention and becoming something like a fairy queen.
- Islam means peace.
- For me Islam is a religion of peace.
- Islam gives justice to every human.
- Muhammad never advised his followers to “go around killing people”…We are not representing the true Islam.
- I am proud to be a Muslim.
- Boko Haram is misusing the name of Islam.
- Islam tells us every girl and boy should be educated. I don’t know why the Taliban have forgotten it.
- Islamic terrorists are not Muslims anymore.
When I read Malala’s comments like these, I just turn my face aside and smile. Islam is derived from the Arabic verb ‘aslama’, which means to accept, surrender, or submit (to the will of Allah), not peace and Muslim means ‘one who submits’ (Falk, 2008, p. 17; Shah, 1974, p. 57; McHugh and Southworth, 2002, p. 30; Llano, 2005, p. 84). For Malala Islam might be a religion of peace, but for those who have read the Qur’an and Muhammad’s Sunna, Islam is a deadly cult… a killing machine. There are at least 160 militant verses in the Qur’an that openly promote hate. The mantra ‘Islam is peace’ is almost 1,400 years out-of-date. The seed of terrorism is germinating inside every Muslim. Anyone who has put a single grain of trust on Muhammad and his Qur’an fills up his mind with unjustified hate and paranoia, and he is bound to have similar destructive ideas like his Prophet. The ‘peaceful Muslims’ would not hesitate to implement Jizya tax on Christians and Jews, and slit the throats of Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, ex-Muslims, atheists and agnostics according to the Sharia law. Qur’an says,
“But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war).” (Q: 9.5)
“…fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah…” (Q: 2.193)
“And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated and oppressed.” (Q: 4.75)
“… enmity and hatred have appeared between us and you forever until you believe in Allah alone …” (Q: 60.4)
“And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah…” (Q: 4.75)
“And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely Allah sees what they do.” (Q: 8.39)
“We will, without doubt, help our messengers and those who believe, (both) in this world’s life and on the Day when the Witnesses will stand forth.” (Q: 40.51)
“Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them).” (Q: 47.4)
“Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them.” (Q: 9.14)
“When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger.” (Q: 8.12)
“And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith.” (Q: 2.191)
“Behold! Allah promised you one of the two (enemy) parties, that it should be yours: Ye wished that the one unarmed should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the Truth according to His words and to cut off the roots of the Unbelievers.” (Q: 8.7)
“That He might cut off a fringe of the Unbelievers or expose them to infamy, and they should then be turned back, frustrated of their purpose.” (Q: 3.127)
“It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. Had it not been for a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe penalty would have reached you for the (ransom) that ye took.” (Q: 8.67-8)
“O Prophet! Strive hard against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge indeed.” (Q: 9.73)
“Truly Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in battle array, as if they were a solid cemented structure.” (Q: 61.4)
Deep down, every “believer” is potentially the judge and executioner of every “nonbeliever”. The peaceful face of Islam is a deception. It is the political mask of violent Islam. These self-serving messages of a seventh century Malignant Narcissist passed down to the Muslims generation after generation as unquestionable word of Allah and as time passed, men were found to take up these words and make them into weapons to cause injustice, oppression, domination, and for conversion by force. For the civilized non-Muslim world, the word Muslim is synonymous with deception, hate, murder, bloodshed, rape, delusion, terrorism, crime, suicide-bombing, honor-killing etc, etc. Therefore, I refuse to be fooled by Malala’s words that Islam gives justice.
There is nothing in Islam that can make the Muslims proud. Islam is a barbaric religion which is completely devoid of spirituality. Name any antisocial activity and it’s already there amongst Muslims. In a country when Muslims are a minority they demand more and more privileges and rights for minorities from the host country. When their number grows by birth or immigration, they want to impose the Sharia rule. When they become majority, they start bringing death and destruction to the host nation and start ethnic cleansing. This is not a matter of pride but the worst type of disloyalty and hypocrisy.
There is a traditional rule for Muslims when addressing non-Muslims that they must declare Islam is a religion of peace even before they are asked about it. This is an old habit, dead habit and a token statement. Since the noblest goal of a Muslim is to assist Islam rule the world, these moderate Muslims shamelessly try to deceive others with their twisted logic and pathological lying. They repeat the same lies again and again thinking that it would become true if often repeated. Therefore, I cannot blame Malala for repeating that outdated statement wherever she gets a chance – too many times to remember. What this Nobel queen is doing today is based on this principle of Joseph Goebbels, the minister of propaganda of Nazi Germany,
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it… it becomes the truth.” (Khabbaza, 2010, p. 61)
For this reason, the Muslims often use this outdated statement ‘Islam is a religion of peace’, and hope that the whole world will believe to it. While those so-called ‘peaceful Muslims’ use this term for obvious reasons, those who know Islam use this term sarcastically. I have never seen a Christian boast about how they are the largest religion in the world, or, a Hindu … how his religion is the oldest surviving religion in the world, or, a Jain… how his religion is the most tolerant religion in the world. I am really amused by the Islamic logic – if you don’t agree that Islam is a religion of peace, you will meet with epithets such as ‘racist bigoted Islamophobe’, verbal or physical assaults, and if this does not work, we will play the victim card, such as Boko Haram and Taliban are not real Muslims, Islamic terrorists are not Muslims anymore etc… etc.
This is a typical Muslim mentality. And yes, Malala is not an exception. I understand her position – Islam is essential for what she is today. Malala will never tell us that a major part of the history of Islam is written in blood. Terrorism is there in every cell of Islam. Islam cannot survive without terrorism because terrorism is the life-giving force of Islam. Those who are against terrorism have no place in Islam; they are infidels. As Habis al Saoub, in his Arabic document, entitled ‘A Martyr’s will’ quoted (Spencer, 2003, p. 23); “The Prophet Muhammad’s seventh-century assertion is that abandoning the cause of jihad is a disgraceful act tantamount to leaving the Islamic religion”.
So, the religion of peace and justice that Malala sings often does not exist. The mask of violent Islam is this ‘peaceful’ Islam which Malala promotes. All other religions except Islam are peaceful. Jainism is the only religion which has the principle of ‘Kathora Ahimsa’ (strict nonviolence) as its central doctrine. Hinduism talks about ‘Sarva dharma sambhava’ (equal respect for all religions). Hinduism is also known as Sanatana Dharma and the five principal virtues prescribed by all schools of Sanatana Dharma are, nonviolence, truthfulness, non-stealing, chastity and non-covetousness. Buddhism speaks about toleration, kindness, humbleness, peace and ‘Pancha Sila’ (the five rules of morality – killing any living being, stealing, adultery, lying, drinking intoxicating drinks). Sikhism advises us to restrain from ‘Punj Chor’ (five cardinal vices – ego, lust, greed, attachment, anger) which should be fought with the weapons of wisdom and knowledge.
Christianity teaches us love, brotherhood and forgiveness. All the teachings of Christianity are based on four essentials: humbleness or faith and trust in God, communication with God through prayer and self-denial, observance of the law which is written in Scripture and in the hearts of those who love the truth, and the offering of sacrifice to God and partaking of the sacrificial offering. The Jews believe that God appointed them to be His chosen people in order to set an example of holiness and ethical behavior to the world and peace is seen as something that comes from God, which would only be fully realized when there is justice and harmony not just between peoples but within individual communities.
The instructions of Allah and Muhammad’s worldview were totally different from other religions. Muhammad’s bizarre beliefs, incredible teachings, self-elevation and immense hate are well reflected in his Qur’an. In sum; a religion like Islam is a curse upon humankind. The Prophet of Islam did not come to the world to bring something good like other religious teachers. He came to this world to preach hatred, brutality and slaughter.
“Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror. The treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.’” (Bukhari: 4.52.220)
“(Muhammad said) ‘Rejoice, Allah has promised us victory after tribulation. This increased the Muslims faith and submission’. When cities were conquered Muslims used to say, ‘Conquer for yourselves whatever seems good to you because all treasures were given to Muhammad’.” (Tabari: VIII.12)
“And much booty that they will capture. Allah is ever Mighty, Wise. Allah promised you much booty that ye will capture, and hath given you this in advance, and hath withheld men’s hands from you, that it may be a token for the believers, and that He may guide you on a right path.” (Q: 48.19, 20).
Islam is the paranoid delusion of an ordinary early-medieval unlettered Arab businessman. Putting such vain self-delusion on a par with the profound insights of a Shankaracharya, a Christ, a Buddha, a Confucius, a Mahavira Jain, a Gandhi, a Laozi or a Socrates is plainly absurd. If anyone wants to search for beauty, truthfulness, purity, high morality and upright thoughts in Prophet Muhammad, then surely he is living in a fool’s paradise.
Contrary to Malala’s opinion, Muhammad had advised his followers to ‘go around killing people’. Malala’s beloved prophet was in fact a terrorist, criminal and murderer whose entire spiritual life was based on victimizing innocents and indulging in mindless violence, carnage and massacre. He destroyed peace wherever he went, and in its place brought terror, bloodshed and death. Such a disgusting character can be compared to the vampires only. He was the evil incarnate.
Muhammad was ‘soulless’ like a vampire with no conscience and a never-ending thirst for human blood. Torturing innocent victims is a vampire’s favorite activity. In real life we describe those who lack any kind of empathy, sympathy, mercy, and consideration etc for others as ‘soulless’. Muhammad was deprived of all human qualities. He lacked sensitivity or the capacity for deep feeling. If the goal in life is the spiritual enlightenment to unite the conscious mind with the soul, then undoubtedly Muhammad was a great loser.
“The Prophet said, Allah made me victorious with terror.” (Bukhari: 1.7.331).
“The Prophet said, ‘Hear me. By Him who holds Muhammad’s life in his hand, I will bring you slaughter’.” (Ishaq: 130; Tabari: VI.101)
“It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land.” (Q: 8.67)
“Allah said, ‘A Prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’” (Ishaq: 327)
“Killing disbelievers is a small matter to us.” (Tabari: IX.69).
“Killing them (infidels) was sweeter than drink.” (Ishaq: 576)
“Warfare is ordained for you…” (Q: 2.216).
“… if you kill, kill well: and if you slaughter, slaughter well” (Al-Nawawi, Hadith no. 17).
Malala wants us to believe that Boko Haram is misusing the name of Islam. The fact is, the chief of Boko Haram Abubakar Shekau had studied Islam ‘under a traditional cleric’ and then he had further Islamic education at Borno State College of Legal and Islamic studies. Abubakar is fluent in five languages. He is an educated man, and certainly he knows what the true essence of Islam is. Similarly, The ISIS chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi held a PhD from the Islamic University in Baghdad. So the terrorists are real Muslims, contrary to what Malala desperately wants us to believe.
Since Prophet Muhammad had detested education, Taliban as loyal followers had not actually ‘forgotten’, as Malala wants us to believe that Islam tells every girl and boy should be educated, rather they are following the true Islam.
Therefore, this school-going accidental Nobel Laureate is a habitual liar. She is actually promoting her religion through lies, deception and by misusing the power and recognition that came unexpectedly with the Nobel Prize. As Imam Jafar Sadiq (cited Richardson, 2006, p. 170) advised,
“One, who exposes something from our religion, is like one who intentionally kills us”.
“You belong to a religion that whosoever conceals it, Allah will honor him and whosoever reveals it, Allah will disgrace and humiliate him”.
This is called Al-taqiyya (legal deception) in Islam which allows the Muslims to literally deny any aspect of their faith, and defined as (Richardson, 2006, p. 172), “Taqiyya is merely uttering of the tongue, while the heart is comfortable with faith.”
It is ridiculous to compare Malala with other Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, such as Mother Teresa (for ministering to the poor, sick, orphaned and dying spanning almost half a century), The International Committee of the Red Cross (for its work during the First and Second World Wars), Martin Luther King Jr (for his work to end racial discrimination in the United States through nonviolent means), Linus Pauling (for his campaign against nuclear weapons testing), Henry Kissinger (for the 1973 Paris agreement intended to bring about a cease-fire in the Vietnam war and a withdrawal of the American forces), Andrei Sakharov (for his struggle for human rights, for disarmament, and for cooperation between all nations) and Amnesty International (for protecting the human rights of prisoners of conscience) etc. Malala is as worthy a Nobel Peace Prize winner as Yasser Arafat.
During December 2015, Malala opposed President Trump’s Muslim ban policy. According to her President Trump’s policy is “full of hatred, full of this ideology of being discriminative towards others” (AFP, 2015). Is it so? Then what about the hateful Qur’anic verses that I have mentioned above amongst many others? How to distinguish between peaceful Muslims and radical Islamic terrorist groups? Both so-called peaceful Muslims and terrorists follow the same Qur’an. How would we know if our nice-looking ‘moderate’ friend is an Islamic supremacist in disguise? Can Malala enlighten us on this matter?
On one occasion Malala advised President Trump, “The more you speak against Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists it will create” (Scott, 2017, p. 62). This is a twisted threat to silence the critics. Indirectly Malala agrees that Islam creates terrorism, but funny enough, she still believes that Islam is a peaceful religion. She wants to say, Islam is not evil in the world but we are because we expose Islam. It means, when Muslims loot, rape and kill non-Muslim women and children we should not criticize them. We must give up our freedom of speech if we don’t want to create more Muslim terrorists. We should not criticize Islam and Muslims so that they can do their job and get away with it.
Malala, on another occasion, had decried President Trump’s orders barring refugees and immigrants from Syria and a raft of other Muslim countries.
“I am heartbroken that today President Trump is closing the door on children, mothers, and fathers fleeing violence and war… I am heartbroken that America is turning its back on a proud history of welcoming refugees and immigrants – the people who helped build your country, ready to work hard in exchange for a fair chance at a new life… I am heartbroken that Syrian refugee children, who have suffered through six years of war by no fault of their own, are singled out for discrimination…. I ask President Trump not to turn his back on the world’s most defenseless children and families.” (cited Wang, 2015)
Here, I have a question – how many oil-rich Muslim nations, as example Qatar, Kuwait, Brunei Darussalam, UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain have opened their borders to the Syrian refugees? Five wealthiest Muslim countries on the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain) have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism as terrorists could be hiding within an influx of people. Some Muslim nations have handed over aid money, but the Infidel nation, Great Britain has donated more than Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar combined. Sherif Elsayid-Ali, Amnesty International’s Head of Refugee and Migrants’ Rights, has slammed their inaction as “shameful”.
“The records of Gulf countries are absolutely appalling, in terms of actually showing compassion and sharing the responsibility of this crisis… It is a disgrace.” (Edmunds, 2015)
None of the Gulf States signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, which legally defines a refugee as “A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality” (Hathaway, 2005, p. 1004). Total donations from the Gulf States are around £589 million, less than a quarter of America’s £2.8 billion and the Great Britain had handed over £920 million till September 2015 (Edmunds, 2015). It’s really a shame.
Why the folklore queen Malala is silent on this issue? If Islam gives justice to every human, as Malala wants us to believe, why these oil-rich Muslim nations are not taking moral, ethical, responsible steps and change their policy? Here I don’t deny the fact that Muslim refugee crisis is a serious humanitarian problem that must be dealt with. My question is, why Malala wants the non-Muslim nations to deal with this purely Muslim problem? Why the oil-rich Muslim nations are silent and doing almost nothing to rescue millions of helpless people that are victims of civil war and Islamic jihadist rape and enslavement considering huge financial and land resources available to them? Arab armies are waging wars against Israel, but why aren’t they fighting ISIS? Why Malala is not ‘heartbroken’ on these issues? What is the purpose of shedding crocodile tears over President Trump’s decision?
Hundreds of Islamic human rights groups, such as CAIR and ISNA operating in the West dedicating their energy and billions of US$ to promote Islam, but they are also silent on this issue (Darwish, 2015). There are many reasons behind this apathy.
- Arab nations leave the non-Arab Muslims in the dust. They know the Western society will never lack compassion and action to rescue the refugees. Arabs would rather spend their petrodollars on expanding their religion in the West. In Islam death is more important than life. Hence saving lives and avoiding human tragedy are not more important than jihad in their desert culture. Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations will never open their borders to poor Muslims in distress. Even Egypt rejected the Darfur refugees who were later forced to go to Israel, which took them.
- In the West there is no shortage of Useful Idiots (a political jargon –someone who can be easily manipulated to support one side of an ideological debate which they are not fully aware) who still believe that Islam promotes brotherhood.
- Stealth Jihad – the refugees from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan will spread Sharia in Europe, which is the main goal of jihad. More refugee intake means more Muslims to spread Sharia faster.
The root of Muslim refugee problem is in Islam itself, which Malala desperately wants to hide from us. At the same time there is no shortage of useful idiots who would fall prey to her crocodile tears. By accusing President Trump, she is playing a victim card. Here the crying Nobel baby is showing a typical Islamic victim mentality which is an essential part of Muslim strategy for gaining sympathizers who can help them push for aspects of Islamic law.
Therefore, dear little Malala, President Trump has all the rights to save his Nation from your ideological brothers. No Muslim nation wants to take Syrian refugees because of the risk of terrorism. If President Trump has similar concern about USA, how can we call him a racist, bigoted ‘Islamophobe’? Also, his Muslim policy does not create terrorists. Muslim terrorists are created by your Qur’an, Sira and Hadith collections. Your beloved Prophet was a hardcore terrorist and cold-blooded murderer, and your ideological brothers consider him a role model – this is how the terrorists are created. Your satanic religion is a cancer in the Human Race and the civilized non-Muslim world will treat your ideological brothers and sisters in the same way the human body deals with a cancer. Dear kid, you are absolutely no different from those perverted Muslim clerics who stand in front of a crowd and spit their anti-west hate-speech. This is real Islam.
Dear little Nobel Princess, you are an inexperienced kid to advice President Trump. As per Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the US President is advised by a special cabinet. Hence, you don’t have to act like a shrill Victorian school headmistress touting your self-importance every now and then. President Trump is a brilliant man; he always did what he said he was going to do. He is not fighting only to save USA from Muslim aggression but he is fighting on behalf of the whole Human Race. Today the whole world is showing interest to what President Trump says. What he is doing today the whole civilized world will do tomorrow. (With due respect to ex-Muslims) Those who are born and brought up in the gutter of Islam will naturally sing the praises of Islam, and you are not an exception. If Islam is a peaceful religion then who shot you at the back of your head? If infidel nations are hateful to Muslims, then who airlifted you on a private plane for cutting edge treatment in Birmingham, saved your life and provided you private education and housing? You are so ungrateful that you have never acknowledged this fact in any of your speech.
Your Nobel Peace Prize medal is neither a certification of your high IQ nor makes your utter lies as truth. We all know little school-goers often tell lot of lies. Your Islam is complete and utter garbage and nonsense. Only speaking against it will win the hearts and minds – this is how the tribe of ex-Muslims is growing at a tremendous rate.
If war is what your ideological brothers want, the civilized world is ready for it. Tell your ideological brothers to come forward, we are cleaning our guns. We will never stop criticizing Islam and exposing its falsehood. We will never submit to Islam; we will rather die fighting to save our nations, our women and children. We will not rest until we erase the name of Islam from the face of this beautiful world.
- AFP (2015); Malala: Trump’s ideology ‘tragic, full of hatred’ Mail online, URL: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-3361791/Malala-Trumps-ideology-tragic-hatred.html (last accessed April 30, 2017)
- Edmunds, Donna Rachel (2015); Muslim Countries refuse to take a single Syrian refugee, cite risk of exposure to terrorism, Breitbart, September 5, 2015 issue, URL: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/05/gulf-states-refuse-to-take-a-single-syrian-refugee-say-doing-so-exposes-them-to-risk-of-terrorism/ (last accessed April 30, 2017)
- (eds.) Ahluwalia, Pal; Atkinson, Stephen; Bishop, Peter; Christie, Pam; Hattam, Robert and Matthews, Julie (2012); Reconciliation and Pedagogy, Routledge, NY
- Chen, Chaomei (2011); Turning Points: The Nature of Creativity, Springer, Philadelphia, USA
- Darwish, Nonie (2015); Why Did Oil-Rich Arab Countries Abandon Muslim Refugees, Frontpage Mag. September 4, 2015 issue URL: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260025/why-did-oil-rich-arab-countries-abandon-muslim-nonie-darwish (last accessed April 30, 2017)
- Falk, Avner (2008); Islamic Terror: Conscious and Unconscious Motives, Praeger Security International, Westport, USA
- Hathaway, James C. (2005); The Rights of Refugees under International Law, Cambridge University Press, UK
- Khabbaza, Albert (2010); The Last Tango in Baghdad, Author House, Bloomington, USA,
- Llano, Josh (2005); Reaching African-American Muslims for Christ, Xulon Press, USA
- McHugh, Michael and Southworth, John (2002); Story of the Middle Ages, Christian Liberty Press, Illinois,
- Nordlinger, Jay (2012); Peace, They Say: A History of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Most Famous and controversial prize in the world, Encounter Books, NY.
- Richardson, Joel (2006); Antichrist: Islam’s Awaited Messiah. Pleasant Word. A division of Winepress Publishing. Enumclaw.
- Scott, Cody (2017); Daily Skeptic: A collection of essays from 2016, The daily Skeptic Blog, Texas
- Shah, Idries (1974); The Elephant in the Dark: Christianity, Islam and the Sufis, The Octagon Press, London,
- Spencer, Robert (2003); Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad still threatens America and the West. Regnery Publishing. Washington DC.
- Wang, Amy B (2015); I am heartbroken’: Malala criticizes Trump for ‘closing the door on children’ fleeing violence, The Washington Post, URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/01/28/i-am-heartbroken-malala-criticizes-trump-for-closing-the-door-on-children-fleeing-violence/?utm_term=.1d83599cd764 (last accessed April 30, 2017)