 |
Faith Freedom International

|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
abdullahnoor
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 990
|
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 9:24 pm Post subject: Muhammad propagated sex slavery? Look again! |
|
|
There has been so much talk by Muslim haters that Islam propagates sex slavery. They talk about having sex with women captives of war.
However, Islam did not propagate this barbaric act, instead, it put a stop to it. This was discussed in the “Mary of Copt” thread, under the section “Muhammad”.
So where did these teachings originate? The answer is, The Bible! Yes, that is correct. So Muslim haters, if you condemn Islam because you thought that Islam propagated this act, what is your opinion now about Judaism and Christianity?
Numbers 31:1 - 17
| Quote: |
31:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
31:2Avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites: afterward shalt thou be gathered unto thy people.
31:3 And Moses spake unto the people, saying, Arm some of yourselves unto the war, and let them go against the Midianites, and avenge the LORD of Midian.
31:4 Of every tribe a thousand, throughout all the tribes of Israel, shall ye send to the war.
31:5 So there were delivered out of the thousands of Israel, a thousand of every tribe, twelve thousand armed for war.
31:6 And Moses sent them to the war, a thousand of every tribe, them and Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, to the war, with the holy instruments, and the trumpets to blow in his hand.
31:7 And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they slew all the males.
31:8 And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely, Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor they slew with the sword.
31:9 And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods.
31:10 And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire.
31:11 And they took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beasts.
31:12 And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho.
31:13 And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp.
31:14 And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.
31:15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
31:16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.
31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
|
Judges 21
| Quote: |
21:8 And they said, What one is there of the tribes of Israel that came not up to Mizpeh to the LORD? And, behold, there came none to the camp from Jabeshgilead to the assembly.
21:9 For the people were numbered, and, behold, there were none of the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead there.
21:10 And the congregation sent thither twelve thousand men of the valiantest, and commanded them, saying, Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead with the edge of the sword, with the women and the children.
21:11 And this is the thing that ye shall do, Ye shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman that hath lain by man.
21:12 And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young virgins, that had known no man by lying with any male: and they brought them unto the camp to Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.
|
Again like the previous example, save the virgins for yourselves!
The above is the treatment of women captives in a war. Now let us look at the concept of slavery. Slavery is propagated in the Bible!
Exodus
| Quote: |
21:1 Now these are the judgments which thou shalt set before them.
21:2 If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.
21:3 If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him.
21:4 If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself.
|
Perpetual generation of slaves for masters!
| Quote: |
21:5 And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free:
21:6 Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.
21:7 And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do.
|
Selling your daughter? Notice that sex discrimination above too!
More on slaves….
Jeremiah
| Quote: |
34:8 This is the word that came unto Jeremiah from the LORD, after that the king Zedekiah had made a covenant with all the people which were at Jerusalem, to proclaim liberty unto them;
34:9 That every man should let his manservant, and every man his maidservant, being an Hebrew or an Hebrewess, go free; that none should serve himself of them, to wit, of a Jew his brother.
|
Hebrew slaves set free. Non-Hebrew slaves? Good luck. Serve your master till eternity!
Now look at who is obsessed with virgins!
Jerimiah
| Quote: |
44:15 But the priests the Levites, the sons of Zadok, that kept the charge of my sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from me, they shall come near to me to minister unto me, and they shall stand before me to offer unto me the fat and the blood, saith the Lord GOD:
44:20 Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only poll their heads.
44:21 Neither shall any priest drink wine, when they enter into the inner court.
44:22 Neither shall they take for their wives a widow, nor her that is put away: but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel, or a widow that had a priest before.
|
More on capturing beautiful women in a war for yourselves as a reward!
Deut
| Quote: |
21:10 When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,
21:11 And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;
21:12 Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;
21:13 And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.
21:14 And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her.
|
Hey yeezevee! I know you are reading this. What say you about Safiyah now?
Did Moses teach such things? Muslims never believed that. After all, the Quran claims the Bible has been corrupted. But Christians swear their word on the Bible!
The Bible even slimes Jesus. Look at the language they put in Jesus’ mouth.
Matt
| Quote: |
25:1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
|
Likened heaven to a place of virgins? Don't Muslim haters always say Muhammad talked about virgins and paradise? What say you now bigots?
Now look at who is talking war.
Matt
| Quote: |
10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
|
So Muslim haters. what do you say now? We now know that Christian scriptures taught us how to get slaves. Christian scriptures also tells us how to have sex with women slaves. And how to wage war.
If you condemn Islam and Muhammad (p) and Muslims for such “teachings”, how about condemning Christianity and Christians now? _________________ If you deny that the universe was designed, then by default, you are saying the universe occurred by chance.
If you say, “Your belief in Allah is unscientific!", I will say, “So is your belief in chance!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I dont like christianity or judism anymore than I do islam. From the little I do know about them, they too opress women among other not so pleasant attributes posess. However, because my knowlege of both these two religions is quite limited, as I have not experianced them, while I have experianced islam, I cannot really comment on them. About sex slavery in islam, if it does not propogate it as you claim, then why would have muhammad allowed it in the first place? It does not have to be encouraged to be propogated. Even the allowence of something can allow it to thrive. And is it any surprise? Some sick-minded men would take advantage of this privalage without giving it a second thought. And you can deny that these hadiths are correct (there are many listed already on this site that confirm what I am saying), then why do so many muslims today accept them? Has god allowed it's own followers to beleive in something false and go astray?
Also it seems that muslims are encouraged to follow only the quran but not the hadiths because the hadiths could easily have been changed. But wouldnt this be true of the quran also? Could there not have been one person who, by simple unintentional error, could have written something down incorrectly after muhammad's death? Seems pretty far-fetched to me that the quran we read today is the EXACT same book supposedly revealed to muhammad. I dont care how good the ancient's memories were. Wouldnt it seem, thinking non-religiously for a moment of course, that SOMEWHERE along the line someone would change something?  _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
abdullahnoors signature: "If you say, proove the universe was created by allah, then I say, prove the universe exists by chance."
Well abdullah, I dont claim either. I know neither can be proved, so I remain neutral on the subject. I refuse to beleive anything if there is no solid evidence to support it. Even the notion that there is no creator.  _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doubtless
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 1497
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Judaism and Christianity have renounced slavery a long time ago. Muslim countries were made to renounce slavery under force only in 1962. Islam has not yet renounced slavery, given how the muslims behave in sudan and nigeria. Then there are muslims like Abdullanoor who are unable to say that the policy of letting old men marry children by muslims for the last 1400 years, (and which is still going on in muslim countries where the highly respected Islamic religious leaders are still marrying 9 and 10 year old because those laws and policies were based upon emulating Muhammad) are barbaric and should be stopped in this day and age!! Is there any jew or christian that claims that slavery or brutalization of children is acceptable at present? But there are "Islamic Scholars" who are giving Fatwas saying that these barbaric customs are muslims rights because Allah has given them the law, and it is only the kaffirs that want them stopped! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rand
Joined: 28 Jul 2002 Posts: 1752
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Abdullahnoor,
I have trouble following your logic:
1. The bible advocates slavery.
2. The bible is corrupted so that God did not advocate slavery in the real old testament.
3. Islam advocates/allows slavery.
4. Therefore slavery is okay because...????
My opinion is that the old testament were written by people thousands of years ago. If one wants to study ethics one should read books on ethics.
Best wishes,
Rand |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abdullahnoor
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 990
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Crow
| Quote: |
Personally, I dont like christianity or judism anymore than I do islam. From the little I do know about them, they too opress women among other not so pleasant attributes posess. However, because my knowlege of both these two religions is quite limited, as I have not experianced them, while I have experianced islam, I cannot really comment on them.
|
But how long were you a Muslim? How much do you really know about Islam? So you say your experience as Muslim is enough to comment? Is that not what I say that this is a hate site? That this site is a haven for ex-Muslims and/or Muslim haters to grind an axe?
| Quote: |
About sex slavery in islam, if it does not propogate it as you claim, then why would have muhammad allowed it in the first place? It does not have to be encouraged to be propogated. Even the allowence of something can allow it to thrive. And is it any surprise?
|
I have shown you in the Mary of Copt thread that sex slavery was stopped in stages. That has always been the way. Riba was stopped in stages. So was intoxicants. Just because the first stage did not fully stop it does not mean that it did not stop it totally. For example the first stage of stopping the consumption of intoxicants was not to pray while drunk. Does that mean Muslims can drink today? We know that is not true, because later on, intoxicants were banned totally. But the idea was to do it in stages, because Allah knows that people must get used to it.
Same goes for sex slavery. However, no matter what, Muslim haters NEVER get to see the total ban of sex slavery. They only see the first stage as “propagating” it!
Crow
| Quote: |
Some sick-minded men would take advantage of this privalage without giving it a second thought. And you can deny that these hadiths are correct (there are many listed already on this site that confirm what I am saying), then why do so many muslims today accept them? Has god allowed it's own followers to beleive in something false and go astray?
|
and
Doubtless
| Quote: |
Judaism and Christianity have renounced slavery a long time ago. Muslim countries were made to renounce slavery under force only in 1962. Islam has not yet renounced slavery, given how the muslims behave in sudan and nigeria.
|
You say you hate Islam and not Muslims. But then proceed to talk about what Muslims do and avoid understanding what Islam teaches! If you really think what Muslims have done is wrong, then go ahead condemn the Muslims for their wrong deeds. But to condemn ALL MUSLIMS and Islam as well?
Doubtless
| Quote: |
Then there are muslims like Abdullanoor who are unable to say that the policy of letting old men marry children by muslims for the last 1400 years, (and which is still going on in muslim countries where the highly respected Islamic religious leaders are still marrying 9 and 10 year old because those laws and policies were based upon emulating Muhammad) are barbaric and should be stopped in this day and age!!
|
Don’t Muslim haters simply looooove to twist things? I have given you my answers how Islamic practices can change or remain unchanged in Bismikaah. I have even directed you to the links. http://forum.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?t=3650
I have even invited you to ask questions there. You avoided me. Now you bring you the same issues that I have addressed?
Get a life, oh hypocrite!
Rand
| Quote: |
I have trouble following your logic:
1. The bible advocates slavery.
2. The bible is corrupted so that God did not advocate slavery in the real old testament.
3. Islam advocates/allows slavery.
4. Therefore slavery is okay because...????
|
I have trouble following you too.
Show how Islam advocates slavery. I have actually shown you how Islam put a stop to it, when it was the Bible that started it!
See how you twisted that the Quran propagated slavery?
| Quote: |
My opinion is that the old testament were written by people thousands of years ago. If one wants to study ethics one should read books on ethics.
|
Who is talking ethics? We are talking about sex slavery. Notice you were quick to condemn Islam, when it actually puts a stop to it, but remain defensive about Christianity when it is explicit in propagating it?
There you have it guys, as I said, this is a hate-the-Muslims site. Condemn Islam even though it puts a stop to vices, but let the real culprit go! _________________ If you deny that the universe was designed, then by default, you are saying the universe occurred by chance.
If you say, “Your belief in Allah is unscientific!", I will say, “So is your belief in chance!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abdullah, dont tell me I dont know what islam teaches. I've read the quran. I was a muslim for about a year. And no matter how many times people tell me this is the right interpretation or that is the right interpretation, I dont care. If this religion was true, then god would have made it to be more understandable. From my experiance, its confusing as hell. I dont see why I would be punished for refusing to beleive something that has caused so much confusion and bad actions. You'd think god could make it's instructions a hell of a lot more understandable.
By the way, you claim islam puts a stop to vices? Look around you! What do you see in islamic countries? Muslim men cheating on their wives(even if they have multiple wives), raping, committing acts of sacralige..you'd think people would be more adherent to its beleifs if it were a true religion. No, I'm not saying adultery, rape, etc does not happen in the west. But at least in the west the women can speak up without worrying about her family's reaction! But for a religion that supposedly puts a stop to vices, there are a hell of a lot of them around! _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the way, like I said, I've read the quran, and I have nowhere seen the practice of slavery abolished. _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rand
Joined: 28 Jul 2002 Posts: 1752
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abdullahnoor wrote:
| Quote: | Show how Islam advocates slavery. I have actually shown you how Islam put a stop to it, when it was the Bible that started it!
See how you twisted that the Quran propagated slavery? |
Dear Abdullahnoor,
The bible preceded the Quran. I do not know who invented slavery. I do not have the necessary resource material to investigate judaism and christianity's view toward slavery. My sense from studying judaism and the old testament is that there are sources pro and con many issues. But today slavery is wrong, the bible is a human document, and it was mistaken on this issue.
The Quran allowed slavery and was also wrong on this issue.
Best wishes,
Rand
| Quote: | | [2.178] O you who believe! retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain, the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by his (aggrieved) brother, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement. |
| Quote: | | [4.92] And it does not behoove a believer to kill a believer except by mistake, and whoever kills a believer by mistake, he should free a believing slave, and blood-money should be paid to his people unless they remit it as alms; but if he be from a tribe hostile to you and he is a believer, the freeing of a believing slave (suffices), and if he is from a tribe between whom and you there is a convenant, the blood-money should be paid to his people along with the freeing of a believing slave; but he who cannot find (a slave) should fast for two months successively: a penance from Allah, and Allah is Knowing, Wise. |
| Quote: | [16.75] Allah sets forth a parable: (consider) a slave, the property of another, (who) has no power over anything, and one whom We have granted from Ourselves a goodly sustenance so he spends from it secretly and openly; are the two alike? (All) praise is due to Allah! Nay, most of them do not know.
[16.76] And Allah sets forth a parable of two men; one of them is dumb, not able to do anything, and he is a burden to his master; wherever he sends him, he brings no good; can he be held equal with him who enjoins what is just, and he (himself) is on the right path? |
| Quote: | | [24.32] And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves; if they are needy, Allah will make them free from want out of His grace; and Allah is Ample-giving, Knowing. |
| Quote: | | [39.29] Allah sets forth an example: There is a slave in whom are (several) partners differing with one another, and there is another slave wholly owned by one man. Are the two alike in condition? (All) praise is due to Allah. Nay! most of them do not know. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abdullahnoor
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 990
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2003 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rand
| Quote: |
Dear Abdullahnoor,
The bible preceded the Quran. I do not know who invented slavery. I do not have the necessary resource material to investigate judaism and christianity's view toward slavery. My sense from studying judaism and the old testament is that there are sources pro and con many issues. But today slavery is wrong, the bible is a human document, and it was mistaken on this issue.
The Quran allowed slavery and was also wrong on this issue.
|
You see what you want to see and do not see what you want to see. I have explained how slavery was removed in stages in the Mary of Copt thread in this section.
But then, you being a Muslim hater is expected to twist, isn’t it? _________________ If you deny that the universe was designed, then by default, you are saying the universe occurred by chance.
If you say, “Your belief in Allah is unscientific!", I will say, “So is your belief in chance!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(Has read the mary of copt thread before replying) So how does the allowence of coitus interuptus help get rid of slavery? So, if the woman gets pregnant, which would be against her will most likely, then she's stuck with a baby, though she may be free, whom she did not want in the first place? And what if for some reason she never got pregnant? Then she'd be forced to be a sex slave. And another thing: If muhammad's followers were so devout to his teachings, then why could he have not simply forbade slavery, sexual or otherwise, altogether? I understand it was a cultural practice, but you'd think people would understand him if they were indeed so nobel in their intentions. Take me for example: If for some reason I found out that something I enjoy doing and is acceptable, such as...hmm, lets say roleplaying, somehow hurt someone very greatly, then I'd stop doing it because it would be the right thing to do. (yes, I know rping has nothing to do with this topic, I was using it as an example, please dont preach about going off topic to me ) _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CroMagnon

Joined: 28 Apr 2002 Posts: 2112 Location: West Kafiristan
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
War + captured women + soldiers + rape = horrible, according to all moral opinions and religions
War + captured women + soldiers + an islamic 'marriage offer' that can't be refused + rape = horrible, according to all moral opinions and religions.... errr... ooops... well... no... not according to ALL opinions and religions... _________________ Sheikh Ahmad al Kat'ani:
"every hour 667 muslims are converting to christianity" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CroMagnon wrote: | War + captured women + soldiers + rape = horrible, according to all moral opinions and religions
War + captured women + soldiers + an islamic 'marriage offer' that can't be refused + rape = horrible, according to all moral opinions and religions.... errr... ooops... well... no... not according to ALL opinions and religions... |
*Applauds*  _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abdullahnoor
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 990
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I said, Muslim haters see what they want to see, and do not see what they do not want to see.
Crow
| Quote: |
(Has read the mary of copt thread before replying) So how does the allowence of coitus interuptus help get rid of slavery? So, if the woman gets pregnant, which would be against her will most likely, then she's stuck with a baby, though she may be free, whom she did not want in the first place?
|
Sex slavery has been around a loooong time. The first stage to the abolishment of sex slavery is to give these slaves their freedom through pregnancy. By prohibiting coitus interruptus, it would prevent men from cheating these slaves their chance of freedom.
| Quote: |
And what if for some reason she never got pregnant? Then she'd be forced to be a sex slave.
|
If the ruling had not come, wouldn’t she remain a sex slave anyway? So which was better? With the ruling or without?
| Quote: |
And another thing: If muhammad's followers were so devout to his teachings, then why could he have not simply forbade slavery, sexual or otherwise, altogether?
|
This is the part you do not want to see. I have given you Yusuf Ali’s interpretation of the versus. According to him, marriage was used to abolish the practice of sex slavery altogether.
But no, you had to listen to Egyptian Kafir, the wannabe Arab Linguist expert who goofed and is still goofing about the meaning of “riba”!
| Quote: |
I understand it was a cultural practice, but you'd think people would understand him if they were indeed so nobel in their intentions.
|
What you don’t understand is that it was a cultural practice and the Quran took steps to eradicate it in stages, with the versus as explained by Yusuf Ali, the final stage.
But you, as a Muslim hater sees that as allowing sex slavery and legalising it through marriage!
What can I say? _________________ If you deny that the universe was designed, then by default, you are saying the universe occurred by chance.
If you say, “Your belief in Allah is unscientific!", I will say, “So is your belief in chance!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| abdullahnoor wrote: | As I said, Muslim haters see what they want to see, and do not see what they do not want to see.
Crow
| Quote: |
(Has read the mary of copt thread before replying) So how does the allowence of coitus interuptus help get rid of slavery? So, if the woman gets pregnant, which would be against her will most likely, then she's stuck with a baby, though she may be free, whom she did not want in the first place?
|
| Sex slavery has been around a loooong time. The first stage to the abolishment of sex slavery is to give these slaves their freedom through pregnancy. By prohibiting coitus interruptus, it would prevent men from cheating these slaves their chance of freedom.[/quote]
Did I deny sex slavery has been around for a long time? Nope. And Like I said, why not just abolish slavery alltogether? Would muhammad's followers trust his judgement anyways? And is they were freed upon becoming pregnant, then coitus interuptus would be preventing their liberation, because it prevents pregnancies. And then if she did become pregnant, she would be left with only two grim choices: Stay with her rapist as his wife or stake it out on her own with his offspring.
| Quote: |
And what if for some reason she never got pregnant? Then she'd be forced to be a sex slave.
|
If the ruling had not come, wouldn?t she remain a sex slave anyway? So which was better? With the ruling or without?
| Quote: |
And another thing: If muhammad's followers were so devout to his teachings, then why could he have not simply forbade slavery, sexual or otherwise, altogether?
|
[/quote]This is the part you do not want to see. I have given you Yusuf Ali?s interpretation of the versus. According to him, marriage was used to abolish the practice of sex slavery altogether.[/quote]
So the woman is married to her rapist. How romantic!
[/quote]But no, you had to listen to Egyptian Kafir, the wannabe Arab Linguist expert who goofed and is still goofing about the meaning of ?riba?![/quote]
| Quote: |
I understand it was a cultural practice, but you'd think people would understand him if they were indeed so nobel in their intentions.
|
[/quote]What you don?t understand is that it was a cultural practice and the Quran took steps to eradicate it in stages, with the versus as explained by Yusuf Ali, the final stage.[quote]
Like I said, why not eradicate it alltogether? That would save a LOT of women from traumatic sexual violations. I DO understand that is was a cultural practice. I never denied that it was. _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool
Last edited by Crow on Tue Mar 11, 2003 3:25 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Student

Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Abdullah for telling me that you were once an unbeliever, before you chose to join Islam. Sorry for my misconception about you. You see, from where I am from, most people are Muslims only because they were born into Muslim families, and were raised from young to believe that Jews and Christians are evil, and that a pedophile is really a prophet. Serious! Very very few people join the religion on their own. For those who do, many do so because it pays to be a Muslim in an Islamic country; more rights and privileges, not to mention that an Islamic court normally looks more favourably on Muslims than on non-Muslims.
Let's talk a bit now on sex-slavery, or should I say, let's talk about how Islam treats its women. I am sure you had heard of honour-killings, right? It is a practise that is very common in most parts of the Islamic world. (Fortunately, it had yet to take root in South-east Asia.) I am sure you would had read of men killing their sisters, wives or daughters who step out of line,
so as to "preserve" the family honour.
You might be asking, "So what's your point? And what does this have to do with sex-slavery??" My point is, if Muslim men cannot be trusted to show regard for the lives of women in their own family, what makes you think they will show regard for the welfare and lives of women whom they don't really know?
Sex-slavery is forbidden in Islam? Why not refer to the life of Pedophile-Romeo, Muhammad for guidance on this topic? Didn't he slew the family of a Jewish woman and forcibly kept her for himself?? Was not your prophet a slave-keeper and a slave trader??
And if Islam was that good, why had millions of Muslims left their Islamic countries for non-Islamic nations?? Not surprising, as the Islamic way of governance and its laws, the Sharia code,
is a system that is inherently lacking in justice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Egyptian Kafir

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 474
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Sex-slavery is forbidden in Islam? Why not refer to the life of Pedophile-Romeo, Muhammad for guidance on this topic? Didn't he slew the family of a Jewish woman and forcibly kept her for himself?? Was not your prophet a slave-keeper and a slave trader??
|
Just wanted To inform you about the discussion of this topic (slavery in islam) here
http://forum.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?t=3786&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=22
please refere To my latest 5 posts in that page...
kind regards... _________________ “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.” ~ Oliver Wendell Holmes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abdullahnoor
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Posts: 990
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Crow
| Quote: |
Like I said, why not eradicate it alltogether? That would save a LOT of women from traumatic sexual violations. I DO understand that is was a cultural practice. I never denied that it was.
|
Talking about not reading and listening! Who says it was not eradicated totally?
I have explained in the Mary of Copt thread, that the versus quoted by EK of replacing sex slavery with marriage, according to Yusuf Ali’s interpretation, was aimed at removing sex slavery! By marrying the slaves, they become free women.
It would only take a matter of time, before all sex slaves would be free. In one generation, if these sex slaves do not have children, they will die childless. That means no more new slaves for the masters.
If on the other hand, they have children, they go free. Still no more new slaves for masters.
On the other hand, if you really desire the sex slave so much, marry her. She becomes a free woman and still no more new slaves for the master.
Can you not see the above? Has your bile, hate, contempt and pride blocked your eyes?
Now where the heck did you get the idea Quran propagate sex slavery?
The strangest I find about this sex slavery stuff is that while Islam took steps to eradicate sex slavery, not only do Muslim haters see it as propagating it instead, but simply let off the real propagators of that sex slavery – the Bible!
So like I have always said, is this not a hate site, a haven, a utopia, an ideal site, designed for Muslim haters to grind an axe here?
Student
This is indeed a hate site! Not long after I addressed the issues of contention, you come and raise the very same ones! As I said, this site is designed exactly for that. I don’t blame you. This site is so flooded you do not know the issues you raised have been discussed.
For sex slavery, Egyptian Kafir has pointed it out to you a thread. My advice is don’t just read his posts. Read mine too.
For your allegation about paedophile, read the “Aisha revisited” thread. A loooong one. Also note that I said that Muslim haters (including you I notice) would like to keep the Aisha slander alive.
If you really are sincere in finding out the truth, you would not have used words like Romeo or paedophile.
I suggest you also read the “Zaynab, daughter of Jahsh” thread.
But of course, I know that you being a Muslim hater, would still say he was a paedophile and that the Quran propagates sex slavery. After all, which Muslim hater would not say that?
As for honour killings, it is against Islam. Yes, these Muslims are practising something that is against Islam. So the Muslims are wrong. You want to condemn these Muslims for that? Be my guest! Just don’t accuse Islam wrongly that it preaches “honour killings”. _________________ If you deny that the universe was designed, then by default, you are saying the universe occurred by chance.
If you say, “Your belief in Allah is unscientific!", I will say, “So is your belief in chance!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chanakya
Joined: 27 Dec 2002 Posts: 2637 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Islamic women are still slaves thanks to mohammad and Koran..they cannot venture outside without covering themselves..their religion give sanctions to their husbands to bring home other women as wives and they can have only one husband,..muslim women have no power they are slaves..they cannot travel without permission of men..they can be beaten..they have to be obedient..they are treated worst than animals..
Abudulnoor is wasting his time to defend horrible cult..
Read Ali Dashti's "23 years" it tells a sordid tale about murder and plunder carried on by Muhammad..it is despicable that any sane person will defend such a man..every time he killed and maimed somebody... God revealed a sura to defend his sick actions....this man doesn't even stop at marrying his adopted sons wife and 6 year old child..I know it was culture..whole Arabia was sick..only sick people can support this kind of sickness..
Go ahead and call me muslim hater or whatever you want but in this internet age the truth cannot be hidden..i bet people like you defend Islam because muslim men like you have lot to gain at the expense of women and they were able to abuse and control women under the guise of this cult..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="abdullahnoor"]Crow
| Quote: |
Like I said, why not eradicate it alltogether? That would save a LOT of women from traumatic sexual violations. I DO understand that is was a cultural practice. I never denied that it was.
|
(/quote)Talking about not reading and listening! Who says it was not eradicated totally?(/quote)
You said so yourself. I was talking about eradicating it IN HIS DAY. If you took the time to THINK about what I was trying to say, you'd understand that!
(/quote)I have explained in the Mary of Copt thread, that the versus quoted by EK of replacing sex slavery with marriage, according to Yusuf Ali?s interpretation, was aimed at removing sex slavery! By marrying the slaves, they become free women.(/quote)
And you ignore me yet again: They would be marrying their rapists. Not the most romantic thing, now is it?
(/quote)It would only take a matter of time, before all sex slaves would be free. In one generation, if these sex slaves do not have children, they will die childless. That means no more new slaves for the masters.(/quote)
And yet again: WHY did muhammad not just forbid slavery of any kind altogether?
(/quote)If on the other hand, they have children, they go free. Still no more new slaves for masters.(/quote)
Unless they happen to capture them in another war, of course? And what are you suggesting here, that the children of concubines automatically become their master's sex slaves as well??
(/quote)On the other hand, if you really desire the sex slave so much, marry her. She becomes a free woman and still no more new slaves for the master.(/quote)
SHE MARRIES HER RAPIST!
(/quote)Can you not see the above? Has your bile, hate, contempt and pride blocked your eyes?9/quote)
No, rather my insight and intelligance has allowed me to critically look at this topic.
Now where the heck did you get the idea Quran propagate sex slavery?[/b]
I already answered that question, the quran states it. And unless you can clearly tell me, with 100% proof that it means something else, I'm going to continue to beleive it.
The strangest I find about this sex slavery stuff is that while Islam took steps to eradicate sex slavery, not only do Muslim haters see it as propagating it instead, but simply let off the real propagators of that sex slavery ? the Bible!
Like I said, the bible is no more noble than the quran! And I have been questioning why islam needed to take steps in the first place, rather than get rid of slavery all at once. It seems muhammad knew it was wrong, but wanted to hang on to it for as long as possible!
Another thing: You say that coitus interuptus was used as a means of freeing slaves. You also say that slaves were freed apon becoming pregnant. Then this is a contradiction, because coitus interuptus was used to PREVENT pregnancies!  _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Egyptian Kafir

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 474
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So Abd is still despertately bitting on his "stages" story....
| Quote: |
But no, you had to listen to Egyptian Kafir, the wannabe Arab Linguist expert who goofed and is still goofing about the meaning of riba
|
Are you STILL insisting on this crap, Abd ?? Yes Riba means the interest of a loan and Nothing else..I wonder Why is this sooo Hard To get through your skull.
What a dumbass.
| Quote: |
This is the part you do not want to see. I have given you Yusuf Ali’s interpretation of the versus. According to him, marriage was used to abolish the practice of sex slavery altogether.
|
and According to Ibn Katheer, It is not Anywhere mentioned as a something that You Must Do Instead of Sex with Slaves.
I am really interested How did you get the impression that Marrying slaves Was Something that quran orders Instead of having sex with slaves, yes You CAN marry your slaves, but its not something that Replaces your right to have sex with them.
The Case of marrying Slaves was mentioned in the verses (4-25) and (4-24) ,
Lets see what does they Say:
[those who do not have the means Wherewith to wed free believing women, They may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess ] (4-26)
This verse Sates that If you Cant have the means To marry Free women you Can Marry your Slave...That your Slave Is Not a "Muhrama" (the Ones Who you are forbidden to Marry)
where in that verse does it Say that Marrying Slaves is something that Replaces your permission of Having Sex with Slaves Abd ? I challenge you To Give Me One Verse That Sates that you Must Marry your slaves Instead Of Having Sex with them.
Lets see What Verse (4-24) Say:
[ Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess.) ] (4-24)
According To Ibn Katheer's Tafseer:
"The Ayah means, you are prohibited from marrying women who are already married, except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed, Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women.'' This is the wording collected by At-Tirmidhi An-Nasa'i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in his Sahih.
In conclusion Of the Above, We Understand:
1- You Cannot Marry Women Who are Already Married Except Married Slaves.
2- No Where Here Too does it mention What Abd Claims that You Must marry your Slave Instead Of Of Having Sex with them...But it only States That you Are not allowed to marry the Married Women except for the married Slaves you have Stolen.
3- According To The Hadith mentioned above, Wich is Recorded In the Following Hadith Books
a- Sahih Muslim
b- Al Tirmithi
c- Al Nasa'i
d- Ibn Jarir
The verse Also Allowed Muslims To Have Sex with the Already Married Slaves , Hence the Part ((Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women.''))
So Abdulla, What was your point AGAIN ?
Specially While Keeping This verse In Mind too, Abd :
| Quote: |
http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=23&tid=34728
(And those who guard their private parts. Except from their wives and their right hand possessions, for then, they are free from blame. But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors.) means, those who protect their private parts from unlawful actions and do not do that which Allah has forbidden; fornication and homosexuality, and do not approach anyone except the wives whom Allah has made permissible for them or their right hand possessions from the captives. One who seeks what Allah has made permissible for him is not to be blamed and there is no sin on him. Allah says:
(they are free from blame. But whoever seeks beyond that) meaning, other than a wife or slave girl,
(then those are the transgressors.) meaning , aggressors.
|
 _________________ “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.” ~ Oliver Wendell Holmes
Last edited by Egyptian Kafir on Tue Mar 11, 2003 5:42 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crow

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Posts: 1098 Location: Scarborough, Maine
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lets see What Verse (4-24) Say:
[ Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess.) ] (4-24)
Well, there you go, abdul. This obviously states that women who are married are off limits to the muslim men, unless they happen to be on the right hand. And since married women who are free, muslim or otherwise, are off-limits, what other conclusion can one rationally come up with other than the fact that this means concubines?
Therefore, muhammad DID allow sex with concubines, and did not forbid it. Nor does any verse in the quran forbid slavery, let alone sex slavery. Dont tell me I dont know what I'm talking about, I've read the quran. Nowhere does it forbid such practices. In fact it rather allows them, says "there will be no blame on you if you do this." _________________
KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!
Fischerspooner is weird..but cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|