JUST MY OPINION

[slick_horsie]

I find this site very amusing, and I am surprised that people actually believe the garbage Ali Sina preaches. Mr Sina clearly is preaching hate towards Muslims, for what reason I have no idea. He is entitled to his opinions as is everyone but to fill peoples head with rubbish like this is a whole different matter. I believe anyone that preaches hate towards another has bad intentions at heart, that includes Muslim as well. Not only does he take Islam out of context he isolates Islam as the only religion to commit crimes. Not once does he compare it to other religions which have committed far more atrocities.

Lets take Christianity for example, what does Mr Sina have to say about the Crusades? A whole civilisation was destroyed by Christian crusaders in newly discovered America. What comparison does Mr Sina have for Islam? Crusaders raped and looted an entire population and this is well recorded History, it's fact! What facts can Mr Sina throw up against Islam on the same scale as the Crusaders? None! But Mr Sina and his followers will make excuses and etc....

What about Jesus, who according to Christians was crucified by jews and still isn't recognised as a prophet!

Islam does not state to be a new religion but a continuation of Judaism and Christianity. Prophet Muhammad is a messenger just like Jesus and Moses before him. If Islam is incorrect and wrong then I am sorry so must Christianity and Judaism be wrong also. Islam's principles and laws are based on those two religions. Yet Mr Sina singles out Islam.

Muslims don't hate on Judaism and Christianity because they see it as part of their religion, now I'm referring to learned Muslims. The average person with any given faith is open to interpretation from people such as Mr Sina and therefore you will get Muslims and people of other faiths whom will preach hate. Though in general Muslims will not hate and kill people of other faiths unless their way of life is threatened as is the case in the world today. I'm sorry but unless I'm deaf dumb and blind Muslims aren't doing the killing in the world today, Muslims are being killed! Now I sense some of you idiots laughing at that sentence. Do the History. At the peak of the Islamic world Muslims allowed people of other faiths to practise for a payable tax. Which is fair considering Christians and Jews slaughtered all Muslims out right.

Muhammad didn't just climb down from a mountain and form a clan to go on a rampage through the middle east as Mr Sina makes it out to be. He preached just like Jesus, only when jews were attempting to kill him and his followers did he retaliate. Does that make him a murderer? My opinion it's called self defence.

How can a whole empire be built on the foundation that a madman has laid? I say madman because that is what Mr Sina makes Muhammad out to be. An empire consists of a flourishing economy, trade. Co-existing with people of their own kind and foreigner's. Laws and politics, science and engineering. Now in the Islamic world all these things existed. Do some research on the Moors or the Ottomans and the Mughals A people i believe have been excluded out of history though a very successful peoples in all aspects. How can a peadophile, a murderer, rapist, thief achieve or ignite the spark that created all this? Please Mr Sina explain that to me.

I went to visit the British museum a short while ago, they had a whole floor dedicated to Islamic art and culture. A guide told us about what Muslims have achieved and what they have contributed to humanity. This is an educated guide with no doubt a degree, told me about Islam. Now why should I listen to what Mr Sina has to say, and not The British Museum? The museum displayed Islamic artefacts and scripture right before me and they were comparable to those of other empires such as China. How can a bloodthirsty cult display such talent and importance to the advancement of humanity? Simple answer, Islam is not a danger to the world today as it never was. Mr Sina is attempting to brainwash you and he's doing a very bad job at it unless you are completely dumb.

Mr Bush staged the threat of terrorism as is Mr Sina doing right now. The world isn't doomed because of Muslims. Two world wars, as I recall the Muslims had nothing to do with that. Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Were? I didn't see any. Seizing oil and looting now I know theirs plenty of that going on. Everything that Mr Sina claimed Muhammad has done to expand/conquer. Mr Bush is doing right now to Muslims. People need to open their eyes and stop listening to others. Switch the television off and get your backside on to the Internet. Research, all the evidence is there for you. Type Islam into wikipedia (a non-muslim online encyclopaedia) you will be amazed to find what Muslims have contributed to society. This is a good site, shows the real horrors that American soldiers are committing in the Muslim lands. http://mindprod.com/politics/israel.html

Everything I have expressed here is my opinion. I maybe wrong, maybe right but it's an opinion brought about by growing up in Britain. I know the faults Islam has or rather Muslims create, but religion in general is difficult, it all comes down to a fight over which one is right. Please don't single out Islam as the reason for the worlds problems.

Islam is here to stay, it's been around for a few thousand years I don't think Mr Sina and his clowns will get rid of it any time soon. Whatever you decide please make an educated informed decision. Don't listen to people, YOU learn the facts and decide for yourself. If then you still feel the same then you have my respect. To those who still feel Bush is doing the right thing then there's no hope for you.

[ixolite]

[Jam]

[slick_horsie]

Typical response from Dr Sina's clown, again like Mr Sina you single out Islam as the only religion to do crime. Yes Islam conquered many countries but what did they establish afterwards? Why can't Sina's clown understand that every religion, every race or tribe will conquer new land. People will perish atrocities will be committed. It's what happens afterwards that truly shows the intentions of the offending party.

Unlike the Crusaders who plundered the land and raped the people of everything and i mean everything. Spread all sorts of diseases filled their pockets with riches. Mughal empire in India for example. The Moors in Spain, these empires flourished. In what part of the world have crusaders left such a positive impact?

Jesus was handed over to the Romans by the Jews to be crucified. As I understand the Romans where hesitant but Jews insisted. This is no secret, it's there on the Internet or books for you to read. I'll be honest I got it from Mel Gibsons movie the passion of christ

[slick_horsie]

By the way I think this site in great in the sense that you get a lot of intelligent individuals who will prove a point with facts and sources outside this website. I've learnt good things about Islam that I never knew, just the same I have learnt bad things Muslims have done.

I think what this site set out to do it has done the opposite, it's certainly made me look further into my faith. It has raised questions which I have researched to answer, but the answer is completely different to what Mr Sina claims.

[Jam]

The site is critical of Islam/Muhammad because it is the chosen subject. If you have criticisms of Christians etc, make your own website. But if you're going to be on here, quit complaining and try to refute this site's claims.
_________________
Sickening morals:
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/33597
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/20910
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/14022
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/1018
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/1493
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/111881

[yeezevee]

[Winston]

If you want to actually learn something about the crusades before you try to use them to defend the many genocides perpetrated by Muslims then read this exerpt from a book called 'The Prophet of Doom'

There are no such bargains in the Gospels (referring to paradise for jihad). Killing is not an express ticket to heaven. Yahshua (Jesus) never asked his followers to "slay" anyone. Yahshua mentions killing only once. He tells a parable about a ruler in the final days of the to be forgotten to encourage Christians to be productive, not destructive.

In the Torah, Yahweh (the real Gods name) asked the Israelites to kill once, as well. He told Moses and Joshua to remove those poisoned by the Canaanite religion from the land. They were like Muhammad's Muslims: immoral, terrorizing, plundering, enslaving, and murdering. Their religion was as corrupt as Islam - equally demonic. Yahweh recognized it was more compassionate to exterminate some Canaanites than it was to allow them to seduce millions. He made the right call, but the Jews failed to execute his order.

Let's consider Yahweh's moral justification for fighting. Imagine that you were God and knew the thousand people most responsible for the September 11th suicide bombings. You know that they have been poisoned to believe that mass murder is a service to you. Left alone, they will corrupt and murder thousands. Would you kill them before they perpetrated these crimes or would you let them go ahead?

Now move back in time to the dawn of the 20th century. As usual, the world is full of bad people and bad ideas, but two doctrines are especially lethal - Communism and Nazism. Because you've read their maifestos and have maneuvered in time, you know what is going to happen. Within their first three decades, these dictatorial, intolerant, and violent dogmas will lead directly to the annihilation of over fifty million people and to the indoctrination of a billion more. Given the opportunity, would you exterminate a few thousand aspiring Communists and Nazis to save the lives of the fifty million their regimes butchered? Would you do it to save a billion people from being forced into submission - forced to live in civil, religious, intellectual, and economic poverty? Would you do it to keep them from growing strong enough to kill you, your neighbors, and your children? What is the most moral, just, and compassionate choice?

Perhaps now you know why Yahweh ordered his people to slay the practitioners of a doctrine virtually identical to Islam. But don't get carried away. His last command to kill was 3,200 years ago. His command wasn't open ended. It was directed at a specific group of people, in a specific time and specific place. Apart from self defense, that's the end of the story.

So, when you hear Muslims defend their violent doctrine, saying that the Bible is equally warlike, you'll know the truth. Yahweh asked once. He identified the reason and the people. The order wasn't open ended, either. And, even if it were, there are no Canaanites to kick around. What's more, the Jews were expressly forbidden from taking a spoil. When the walls of Jericho fell, its storehouses remained filled. Children were not sent off into slavery; women were not raped as if they were booty. The Judeo-Christian scriptures have to be corrupted to inspire such horrible acts.

Allah, by contrast, gave Muslims hundreds of commands to kill. His orders were open-ended - surviving throughout time. And his intended victims were many: those who worshiped the one true God, many gods, or no gods at all. Allah especially hated Christians and Jews, ordering Muslims to fight them until they were "wiped out to the last." This is fundamental Islam - the very core of Muhammad's message.

That said, there is one Bible verse that appears to be both open ended and to encourage violence. As such, Psalm 149 became the rallying cry for the Crusades. In actuality it is prophetic, speaking of what's called the "to be forgotten," and of the return of the Messiah. In the fashion of Hebrew poetry, the Psalm presents a series of nine couplets - pairs of phrases that say the same thing in different words.

Let's review them. The first couplet speaks prophetically of the new millennium, of the church and saints: "Praise Yahweh. Sing unto Yahweh a fresh song, and sing his praise in the congregation of saints." The second celebrates the end of the to be forgotten, and the Messiah's return: "Let Israel rejoice in Yahweh who made them, let the Children of Israel be joyful in their King." Then, "Let them praise Yahweh's character in dance, let them sing praises unto Yahweh with the tambourine and harp." Speaking of the Messiah's gift of salvation, the next reports: "For Yahweh is pleased with his people; He will glorify the meek with salvation." The fifth couplet reveals: "Let the saints be joyful in this glorious honor; let them shout from their resting place." At Christ's return the souls of the saints will be raised from their graves.

A Catholic Pope misinterpreted the sixth verse to advance his personal agenda: "Let the exaltation of the Almighty be in their mouths, and a two-edged sword be in their open hand." A two-edged sword is the Bible's metaphor for divine judgment or rendering a godly verdict. That's why it's in an "open hand," which could not wield an instrument of violence. Its pair in the couplet references the exalted words of the Almighty, suggesting an oral verdict, not a slashing weapon. The seventh pair proclaims: "To advance vengeance upon the nations and punishment upon the people." This speaks to the final judgment of Yahweh on those who attack Israel during World War III, midway through the to be forgotten. Interesting, in that the predicted Magog war against Israel is perpetrated entirely by Islamic states.

This is followed by: "To yoke kings together, bringing them forth, and those who are severe will be tied with iron twine." In other words, following God's verdict, the purveyors of false doctrines, those who are severe, will be restrained. The final couplet reveals: "To advance the verdict upon them, prescribed by the splendor of his saints. Praise Yahweh." The entire Psalm is prophetic, speaking of the final judgment of nations following the Messiah's return in power and glory. There is no command to fight or kill anyone.

Since Islam's principle defense is to claim that Christians have performed no better, especially during the Crusades, I want to bring your attention to two incredibly important historical facts. First, Pope Benedict IV: he reigned in 1033 A.D., precisely 1,000 years after Yahshua's resurrection. Benedict became like Muhammad, demonic, fixated on the occult, demented, delirious, and lascivious. The Church became corrupt, fixated on rituals, suppression, and money. With power-hungry men at the helm, it splintered, ultimately causing cleric and king to send men off on fool-hearty crusades.

The second historical fact is that the Crusaders weren't Christians. They couldn't have been. Four centuries had passed since the last sermon was given in a language common to the people of Europe. The first Bible to be printed in the vulgar tongue, John Wycliffe's, wouldn't find quill for another four centuries. To be a "Christian" one must know the Messiah. He could not have been known to the men who fought. They carried his symbols, nothing more.






The 3rd fact that I would like to add myself is that the crusades only took place because it was in retaliation to Islamic conquests (who else)...Islam spread far and wide in its first 100 years, unfortunately this was not because Islam is a beautiful and peaceful religion, it was because it inspired Arabs (for the first time in recorded history) to pick up swords, march out of their lands in order to raid, murder and destroy all the infidel lands.
_________________
Islam is troublesome....Read this book www.prophetofdoom.net

[Marley]

[Rebel]

[Jam]

[Ram]

[piggy]

[ixolite]

[Brendalee]

So, slick horsey, you would maintain that Muslims had nothing to do with the two world wars. Tsk, tsk! Such ignorance.

Are you proud to display your ignorance that the Ottoman empire threw itself into the first world war on the side of the Germans? How did you imagine that the Ottomans were defeated, and thrown out of the Middle East? How did you imagine that the French and British mandates came about and all the new nation states were formed there?

Are you proud to display your ignorance that Muslims fought on both sides in the second world war? That the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was a great ally of Hitler and formed two Muslim SS DIVISIONS for Hitler and was head-to-head plotting with Hitler to kill the Jews in Muslim countries?

You fly your ignorance like a banner, as if you should be proud of it. How you expect anyone to take your drivel seriously after exposing your ignorance so loudly is beyond my comprehension.