Faith Freedom International :: View topic - The one and only Obama-thread

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Attention: Year 2009 is here Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.

The one and only Obama-thread
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 138, 139, 140, 141 Next

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> World Politics

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

THHuxley_redux

Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1248
Location: Denver, CO

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject:

piggy wrote:

Quote:

Birth Certificates

In Australia, the Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages issues birth certificates for the state or territory in which the birth took place.

If you were born in Australia on or after 20 August 1986, in addition to the birth certificate, you will also need to provide evidence that one parent was an Australian citizen or had permanent resident status at the time of your birth.

Copies or extracts of a birth certificate.

Copies or extracts of a birth certificate are not acceptable. If born in Australia, an original full birth certificate issued by a state or territory Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages must be presented in support of each new adult passport application (but not a renewal form) and each child application regardless of whether the child has had a previous passport. Commemorative birth certificates are not accepted.

Passports Tips and Hints

Commemorative birth certificates, birth extracts, photocopies or facsimile copies are not acceptable. A commemorative birth certificate is A3 in size and has a theme or a fancy design. A standard birth certificate is always issued with a commemorative certificate and this should be used for passport purposes.

Good for Australia.

When Obama applies for an Australian passport, then perhaps someone will care.
_________________
Nullius In Verba

piggy

Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 6372
Location: Godwana

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:58 pm Post subject:

THHuxley_redux wrote:

piggy wrote:

Quote:

Good for Australia.

When Obama applies for an Australian passport, then perhaps someone will care.

Yeah ............ whatever .............. it just showed you how WRONG you are!

THHuxley_redux

Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1248
Location: Denver, CO

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:01 am Post subject:

piggy wrote:

Yeah ............ whatever .............. it just showed you how WRONG you are!

Sure it did.....

...if Obama was an Australian applying for an Australian passport.

Last I looked, he was not.

A birth certificate in Australia is still a certification of the original record in the Register (which is itself not a birth certificate). Unless it has that official seal, signature and certification is not valid for a passport. The regulation points out (exactly as I have been repeatedly saying) that even a photo-image of the record is a worthless piece of paper without that official certification.

I know you still don't get it.
_________________
Nullius In Verba

bob

Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 3051
Location: Paris, France

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:39 am Post subject:

THHuxley_redux wrote:

Quote:

Berg goes further in the audacity of his deceit. He has actually has put on his web site and his advertisements a quotation he attributes to Sarah Obama: "I was in the delivery room in (Mombosa [sic]) Kenya when he was born Aug. 4, 1961."

And Brave Steed replied

Quote:

Maybe he has some artifact of evidence which gives him an honest right to do so. I have not heard that evidence. Maybe he is being dishonest. Maybe he is not. Even if he is being dishonest, that does not make him wrong. I've heard of people, including police officers, faking evidence to clinch criminal cases that they were sure of.

What an intriguing statement from someone who wishes to 'defend the Constitution' and make sure the law is respected ... an 'artefact of evidence' giving someone an 'honest right'. What's an 'artefact of evidence' BS? Real evidence or an... artefact?

Whatever. As Berg is sure that Obama was born in Mombasa then he is justified in faking the evidence by inventing quotations from Sarah Obama. Where did you learn so much about legal procedures BS? Pyongyang?
_________________
"Ecrasez l'infâme!"

piggy

Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 6372
Location: Godwana

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:07 am Post subject:

THHuxley_redux wrote:

piggy wrote:

Yeah ............ whatever .............. it just showed you how WRONG you are!

My point has been made, much to your dislike at being proven WRONG!

Squirm all you like, it won't change that FACT!

FACT ............. the birth certificate & the extract are two different documents.

Both are endorsed by authorized officials ......... but CLEARLY DIFFERENT documents = NOT THE SAME ............. duh!

You have admitted that there is no legislation that provides for a COLB to be acceptable as a substitute for a BIRTH CERTIFICATE as the regulation/code REQUIRES, and that the COLB is a bureaucrat's invention.

Therefore Obama has not made (if at all) an acceptable CLAIM (yet to be approved) of citizenship until such time as he produces a BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Here is an image copy of a Hawaiian certification (NOT certificate) of live birth - NOT a Birth Certificate.

Here is the image copy of a Hawaiian certification (NOT certificate) of live birth provided by the Obamabots - NOT a Birth Certificate.

Here is an image copy of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE (NOT certification) - a certified image copy.

The certification (COLB) provided by Obama is NOT an ORIGINAL birth certificate (which IS available upon application) NOR is it a COPY of the ORIGINAL.

It relies on information that is may well have been submitted for the records by lay-persons who have uttered false oath and set in motion as hoax............... Obama's reluctance and apparent refusal to furnish an image copy of the ORIGINAL BC is in defiance of the regulations, the US Constitution & those PEOPLE of USA who have every right to petition the US Govt to redress their grievance in this matter.

The ONLY reliable source of information for Obama's CLAIM, (still in progress and subject to approval of citizenship) to be in accordance with the regulations, is to furnish an image copy of the ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Cop it sweet ............... you have been proven WRONG!

I know you still don't like it!

.

THHuxley_redux

Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1248
Location: Denver, CO

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject:

piggy wrote:

My point has been made, much to your dislike at being proven WRONG!

Squirm all you like, it won't change that FACT!

The only point you have made is that you cannot defend your falsehood with American law... so you have resorted to Australian law. The profound inadequacy of such a tactic speaks for itself.

It is no more relevant than simply making up laws out of thin air... something you also have periodically resorted to.

Now.... since the rest of your post is simply the repeatedly refuted falsehoods of a woman who has moved from merely ignorant to actively dishonest, there is no need to rebut its multiple untruths yet again.

I will only repeat what the State of Hawaii Department of Health announced when presented with the Obama COLB:

“It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate.”
_________________
Nullius In Verba

Last edited by THHuxley_redux on Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:06 pm; edited 1 time in total

Gaul&Carthage

Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 4914

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject:

F*uck Australia! G&C

diotima64

Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 16559
Location: middleearth

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject:

Gaul&Carthage wrote:

F*uck Australia!

G&C

_________________
Ahmed the wife-beating bahgat moslem said:
"I said I will beat MY ILL CONDUCT WIFE if she insists on her ill conduct"

Gaul&Carthage

Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 4914

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject:

Why so confused girl? G&C

diotima64

Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 16559
Location: middleearth

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:38 pm Post subject:

Gaul&Carthage wrote:

Why so confused girl?

G&C

It´s my natural state of being.
_________________
Ahmed the wife-beating bahgat moslem said:
"I said I will beat MY ILL CONDUCT WIFE if she insists on her ill conduct"

Gaul&Carthage

Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 4914

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject:

Nice place to be. So much to discover. Others here have no uncertainty. All is already known and reduced... What a hoot! G&C

piggy

Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 6372
Location: Godwana

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject:

Gaul&Carthage wrote:

F*uck Australia!

G&C

Get off the thread please, or contribute to the matter about Obama.

Gaul&Carthage

Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 4914

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject:

Say please. G&C p.s. Oh you did...okay it's all yours...just don't get me worked up again mate. Good luck.

piggy

Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 6372
Location: Godwana

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:06 pm Post subject:

THHuxley_redux wrote:

piggy wrote:

My point has been made, much to your dislike at being proven WRONG!

Squirm all you like, it won't change that FACT!

The only point you have made is that you cannot defend your falsehood with American law... so you have resorted to Australian law. The profound stupidity of such a tactic speaks for itself.

It is no more relevant than simply making up laws out of thin air... something you also have periodically resorted to.

Now.... since the rest of your post is simply the repeatedly refuted falsehoods of a woman who has moved from merely ignorant to actively dishonest, there is no need to rebut its multiple untruths yet again.

I will only repeat what the State of Hawaii Department of Health announced when presented with the Obama COLB:

“It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate.”

Hawaii State COLB is not a birth certificate, unless you can show that it is provided for by LAW as an acceptable substitute for a BIRTH CERTIFICATE as is REQUIRED to make a CLAIM of citizenship. .............. NOT A BUREAUCRATIC INVENTION ............

Here it is again, for those with the ego problem that appears to stand in the way of sound reasoning..........are you ready? .............. see if you get it this time ..................

piggy wrote:

THHuxley_redux wrote:

piggy wrote:

Yeah ............ whatever .............. it just showed you how WRONG you are!

Here is the image copy of a Hawaiian certification (NOT certificate) of live birth provided by the Obamabots - NOT a Birth Certificate.

Here is an image copy of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE (NOT certification) - a certified image copy.

Last edited by piggy on Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

THHuxley_redux

Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1248
Location: Denver, CO

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject:

piggy wrote:

Hawaii State COLB is not a birth certificate, unless you can show that it is provided for as a substitute by LAW. .............. NOT BUREAUCRATIC INVENTION ............

A COLB is a birth certificate BY DEFINITION.

It is not a substitute for anything.

It is absolute legal proof of Obama's citizenship by birth.
_________________
Nullius In Verba

Display posts from previous:

	Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> World Politics	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 138, 139, 140, 141 Next
Page 139 of 141

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum