Go to FFI
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Attention: Year 2009 is here Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
Answering FaithFreedom.org
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Comments on the Main Site and Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sanitarium



Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 6891
Location: where my time is better spent.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mersk wrote:
:- To moderate or ban all those critical of Islamic culture and Quranic teachings.


Oh! To be a fly on the inside of M's inbox when Yasnov sends *that* request
_________________
-------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anxious



Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Location: Library and Internet

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am a new member here, and reached to the website answering faithfreedom through this website. I have only an objective question. I have seen many debates their like Zuhar vs. Ali Sina . Bassam Zawadi vs Ali Sina, Nadir Ahmed vs Ali Sina etc. I am aware that those are the edited versions of the debates. Among those debate, I got the unedited version of Nadir Ahmed (owner of examine the truth) vs Ali Sina here in faithfreedom.org here http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/NadirAhmed.htm .

Are the unedited versions of other debates also available on faithfreedom?
_________________
Defeat the defeat before the defeat defeats you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skynightblaze



Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 1155
Location: A place where i sniff a paedophile

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

anxious wrote:
I am a new member here, and reached to the website answering faithfreedom through this website. I have only an objective question. I have seen many debates their like Zuhar vs. Ali Sina . Bassam Zawadi vs Ali Sina, Nadir Ahmed vs Ali Sina etc. I am aware that those are the edited versions of the debates. Among those debate, I got the unedited version of Nadir Ahmed (owner of examine the truth) vs Ali Sina here in faithfreedom.org here http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/NadirAhmed.htm .

Are the unedited versions of other debates also available on faithfreedom?


1))
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/zuher.htm( ALI SINA VS ZUHER)

2)) http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/looting51122.htm(debate on looting part 1--- ALI SINA VS BASAM ZAWADI )

3)) http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/looting51223.htm(debate on looting part 2 ---ALI SINA VS BASAM ZAWADI)

Below is the link to all the debates that have actually taken place. You can check this link for any debate that ali sina. had with the muslims
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates.htm

You can go through articles written by answering christianity and the articles of ali sina. You can see that answering christianity doesnt have scholarly articles .They post it just for the sake of posting . When someone says "ALi SINA EXPOSED" it attracts popularity to their site. If you still think that answering christianity has an edge over ali sina please post the article here in the folder "Quran and Hadiths" . People here are scholarly and would definately solve your doubts . No one will force you and it will be upto your intellect to decide who is right .
_________________
Simba is my name and paedophile hunting is my game!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baloch



Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 37
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was there and had some fun.

Please have a look at one of the exchange I had .

http://www.answering-faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=274&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

It gets intresting after page 3.

Mr. Zuber and Mr. Sohail ( known well here) ventured some responses but they mostly offered personal insults and irrelevent inanities. And these worthies presumed to debate Ali Sina! They look like clones of Zakir Naik.


Your comments are welcome.

Khuda Hafiz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
yeezevee



Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 17109

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well baloch., zubair is here in FFI

http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/search.php?search_author=zubair
we canteach that guy here also., I am glad you went there., Let us slap those baby butts here in this folder also..llo..

yeezevee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Baal



Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 4418
Location: Egypt

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Baloch, i created an account over there. I noticed a confusion about the word "Dakhla" or "Dokhla"

Dakhal is the verb for Enter or Penetrate in the case of 'Entering a Woman'.

Nikah is the verb for a "Legal Intercourse". Because the verb is so commonly used in the koran, the scholars agreed that the use of the word in the koran only applies to the legal aspect of Nikah (ie: Marriage) or any condition that would permit a man to legally Enter (dakhal) a woman. Like 'Nikah' what the right hand possess.
_________________
"Kad Kazab Alayna Muhammed"
Islam is Not Genetically Inherited from your Parents.
"Child brides in non-Western society is about love, marriage and husband and wife bonds." - AMuslim arguing for his Nabey Al-Saleh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Baal



Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 4418
Location: Egypt

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Baloch, i created an account over there. I noticed a confusion about the word "Dakhla" or "Dokhla"

Dakhal is the verb for Enter or Penetrate in the case of 'Entering a Woman'.

Nikah is the verb for a "Legal Intercourse". Because the verb is so commonly used in the koran, the scholars agreed that the use of the word in the koran only applies to the legal aspect of Nikah (ie: Marriage) or any condition that would permit a man to legally Enter (dakhal) a woman. Like 'Nikah' what the right hand possess.
_________________
"Kad Kazab Alayna Muhammed"
Islam is Not Genetically Inherited from your Parents.
"Child brides in non-Western society is about love, marriage and husband and wife bonds." - AMuslim arguing for his Nabey Al-Saleh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baloch



Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 37
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Language is so wonderful a subject. No wonder the Bible says something like "in the beginning there was the word (logos) and the word was with the Lord " . But I digress.

Thank you for your input, Baal. I suppose you know Arabic. As an Urdu speaking Muslim ( well Balochi, too) I had always thought that 'Nikah' meant marriage per se. It had all the association of decorum and solemnity and nuances of the sacred and the divine. Just as in the case of 'marriage'.

I was surprised to be told that 'Nikah" is Arabic equivalent of 'Fcuk'. So what is the Arabic word for Marriage?

Khuda Hafiz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
brainout



Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 811
Location: Not here, notify off

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baloch, why didn't zuher answer what you were saying? For all his posting, he spent most of it telling you how bad you were, and maybe I missed it, but he never answered your portrayal of the Koranic 'heaven'. It's not even remotely possible that raisins reside on couches, perpetually fresh. So why virgins? He didn't seem to deny that they are perpetual virgins, but did seem deny that sex was therefore the reason for them being virgins. Why then stress that they are virgins, and not explain why?

Nor is there any other holy book I know which depicts heaven as a sexual thing (well, I don't remember the Hindu depiction all that well).

The Bible quotes he makes -- why, I can't fathom, Bible is condemning those things, not approving them -- don't answer squat in what you said. The squeamishness of the West is well-known historically, no doubt about it.

Did I miss his answer? Was he unwell when he posted? Sorry to interrupt. Please forgive me.
_________________
"Relax, and know that I am God." Psalm 46:10.
Youtube vids on why Islam is bad: click here.
Prejudice eisegetes, but wisdom exegetes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
baloch



Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 37
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello yeezevee!


Zuber and his sidekick Suhail ( it may be other way around) are both so stupid. Every time one responds with some rubbish the other fellow is there applauding him. I Pakistan we call such solidarity " Chamchagiri"

The word " Chamcha" has entered English language thanks to Salman Rushdie's Satanic verses.

Anyway, Take care.

Hi Baal.

Yes, I see you on Answering-Faithfreedom.

My knowledge of Arabic is zilch. I am only discussing an appropriate translation for "dakhla" as used in Bukhari's hadith.

I kicked up a hornet's nest when I said that it should be translated as "cuff" ( you know what I mean) rather than as "consumating the marriage"

I am not much of a debator but these guys(Suhail and Zubair) are downright childish.

Hi "brainout"

All interuptions are always welcome. No need for apologies. You are right to notice how abusive they are. One guy even called my mother a prostitute.

Now I see that he (Suhail) has put his exchange with me on the Homepage.

I feel honored to be there with "yeezevee"

take care all of you.

Khuda Hafiz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mullah Rock N Roll



Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 1224
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Answering FaithFreedom.org Reply with quote

Yasnov wrote:
manta ray wrote:
I stumbled on this site:

Answering FaithFreedom.org

It seems that new site is more professionally managed than this site : )

Wassalam,
Yasnov


Answering Faithfreedom engages in censorship. I recently tried to post a thread taken from a book written by a renowed Shia cleric, Ayathollah Golpayghani. In that book this Aytahollah accuses Oman al Khattab (2nd Caliph), of forcibly taking Ali ibn Abi Talib by the sword and making him pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr. He also states that Omar went around threatening & intimidating people to pledge their allegiance as well.

He also accuses the some of the companions of Mohd of hatching a plot to kill the prophet and his family.

My whole thread was censored and not published, and I recd a PM from their administrator to stop posting such controversial topics.
_________________
From amongest us came the prophets to teach
And from the pulpit they preached
They prayed, they slayed, and they passed away,
Yet our ills remain as pebbles on a beach - Al Maari
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mullah Rock N Roll



Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 1224
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baloch wrote:
hello yeezevee!


Zuber and his sidekick Suhail ( it may be other way around) are both so stupid. Every time one responds with some rubbish the other fellow is there applauding him. I Pakistan we call such solidarity " Chamchagiri"

The word " Chamcha" has entered English language thanks to Salman Rushdie's Satanic verses.

Anyway, Take care.

Hi Baal.

Yes, I see you on Answering-Faithfreedom.

My knowledge of Arabic is zilch. I am only discussing an appropriate translation for "dakhla" as used in Bukhari's hadith.

I kicked up a hornet's nest when I said that it should be translated as "cuff" ( you know what I mean) rather than as "consumating the marriage"

I am not much of a debator but these guys(Suhail and Zubair) are downright childish.

Hi "brainout"

All interuptions are always welcome. No need for apologies. You are right to notice how abusive they are. One guy even called my mother a prostitute.

Now I see that he (Suhail) has put his exchange with me on the Homepage.

I feel honored to be there with "yeezevee"

take care all of you.

Khuda Hafiz.


Hi Baloch,

I post there as Gus Yaqub. Must admit that you do a great job and give those guys a run for their money. There is this fanatic out there who calls himself Peacebwu. This fanatic called me a "satanic idiot" and engaged in personal attacks. These guys do not take kindly to challenges, and are "chamchas" of Answering Christianity.com. When they run out of ammunition, they start providing links to Answering Christianity.
_________________
From amongest us came the prophets to teach
And from the pulpit they preached
They prayed, they slayed, and they passed away,
Yet our ills remain as pebbles on a beach - Al Maari
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baloch



Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 37
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Mullah Yaqub

I read with intrest your engagement with Mansoor_ali. I am sure you gave this idiot a sleepless night or two.

Can you please let me have the material you could not post at Ans-FFI,
I mean the stuff from Goplpayghani ?

Thanks.

Khuda Hafiz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
charleslemartel



Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 1071

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baloch wrote:
Hi Mullah Yaqub

I read with intrest your engagement with Mansoor_ali. I am sure you gave this idiot a sleepless night or two.

Can you please let me have the material you could not post at Ans-FFI,
I mean the stuff from Goplpayghani ?

Thanks.

Khuda Hafiz.


Hi Baloch,

I love your posts on a-ffi. I wonder whether those guys are achieving what they set out to achieve by launching that forum (or are they achieving exactly the opposite?). It is my guess that they will soon start thinking about it, if they are not doing it already. :-)

Any impartial visitor can see how the critics of Islam are faring there vis a vis Muslims.

I would love to read the material from Yaqub too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mullah Rock N Roll



Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 1224
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

baloch wrote:
Hi Mullah Yaqub

I read with intrest your engagement with Mansoor_ali. I am sure you gave this idiot a sleepless night or two.

Can you please let me have the material you could not post at Ans-FFI,
I mean the stuff from Goplpayghani ?

Thanks.

Khuda Hafiz.


Hi Baloch,

With pleasure.

http://al-islam.org/discussions_mahdi/

Thanks,
Mullah
_________________
From amongest us came the prophets to teach
And from the pulpit they preached
They prayed, they slayed, and they passed away,
Yet our ills remain as pebbles on a beach - Al Maari
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Comments on the Main Site and Forum All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 2 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

 

  Search the Forum