|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
katlike

Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 4015 Location: If I told you, it would be a lame game of hide and seek.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: Is being too emotional really a flaw for woman? |
|
|
In the thread: Egypt - women judges "Un-Islamic" http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38361,
Rand posted a Q&A from a muslim website.
http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=3285&ln=eng&txt=judge%20women
It is about the role of woman as leaders.
| Quote: |
| Undoubtedly this is proven by reality. People know from experience that only men are fit for leadership, because women by nature are more emotional and more easily swayed by their feelings and compassion. These qualities have been created in women to enable them to carry out their most important duty, which is that of motherhood and nurturing children. Men, on the other hand, are not usually swayed by their emotions as women are. Their way is usually one of logic and deliberation, which form the essence of responsibility and leadership. |
My question of debate is the bolded part. If one is going to argue that the supreme creator and leader of us all is allah, and allah is the most merciful and compassionate, how can the characteristic of being emotional and compassionate be deemed a hinderance for leadership? More so does anyone really want an unemotional leader who lacks compassion? _________________ [/islam].
FYI~ It takes glass one million years to decompose, which means it never wears out and can be recycled an infinite amount of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Huston

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 4790 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looking to Jungian psychology, the use and expression of emotion is mainly used with what is called the feeling function. While most women have this function, it is believed the Bill Clinton, and Osama Bin Laden have this function as well. Of course, women are socialized to be this and men that, so men with feeling won't be as noticable and women with thinking (the opposite of feeling) won't be as noticable.
It is most likely the Bush is a feeling type. Bush Sr. being a thinker. Perhaps Hitler was also a feeler, along with Jesus, and Gandhi _________________ "The pendulum of the mind alternates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong."-Carl Jung
Psychology of Muhammad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
katlike

Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 4015 Location: If I told you, it would be a lame game of hide and seek.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Huston,
I so agree with what you are saying. I find it silly to say "men are able to rule with logic and rationality while woman are too emotional to be in charge" when the reality is, men are just as prone to emotions. Isn't it emotions that make us human? Maybe they are forced to show only the "right" emotions (whatever that is suppose to mean). I am tired of hearing the muslim rationale that woman are too "emotional" and this is seen as a character flaw, I cannot see how this is a flaw, nor can I see how it is only women who succumb (is that the correct word?) to these "emotions". _________________ [/islam].
FYI~ It takes glass one million years to decompose, which means it never wears out and can be recycled an infinite amount of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Huston

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 4790 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| katlike wrote: |
Huston,
I so agree with what you are saying. I find it silly to say "men are able to rule with logic and rationality while woman are too emotional to be in charge" when the reality is, men are just as prone to emotions. Isn't it emotions that make us human? Maybe they are forced to show only the "right" emotions (whatever that is suppose to mean I am in the same boat when it comes to being what "right"). I am tired of hearing the muslim rationale that woman are too "emotional" and this is seen as a character flaw, I cannot see how this is a flaw, nor can I see how it is only women who succumb (is that the correct word? In the word of those who fear emotion, perhaps) to these "emotions". |
I don't know anything that is living that does not have emotions. I know for myself, I don't show my emotions, and I am usually looking at things from a detached perspective, but emotions are still an overpowering aspect of myself, those who deny emotions are seriously neurotic and in need of a serious of help. _________________ "The pendulum of the mind alternates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong."-Carl Jung
Psychology of Muhammad |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gonzophilosopher

Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 760 Location: Dar-Ul-Gehenna
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Katlike,
While I agree that emotions are a natural part of every human being, I do strongly believe that decisions - especially those made by political leaders and more especially judges - must be made based on objective evidence and not "feelings" (or subjective evidence). I would not trust any leader who made crucial decisions based on their emotions.
However there is absolutely no reason to suppose that women are more likely to base such decisions on emotions and feelings than men are. And as for the ridiculous notion that women are not suited to the role of leadership I have only 2 words to say: Margaret Thatcher.
Best Regards,
Gonzo _________________ "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles" - Ayn Rand
</Islam> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
katlike

Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 4015 Location: If I told you, it would be a lame game of hide and seek.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi gonzophilosopher!
I havent seen you around lately, it's real good to hear from you! You said:
| Quote: |
| I do strongly believe that decisions - especially those made by political leaders and more especially judges - must be made based on objective evidence and not "feelings" (or subjective evidence). I would not trust any leader who made crucial decisions based on their emotions. |
That is a very good point. Nor would I. Most diffently for judges, not sure about political leaders. I would want a judge to stick to the facts. A political leader, don't we want at least some emotion? Can anyone really do a good job without allowing some bit of emotion?
Let me ask it a bit better.
Creative people are most creative when they ignore their emotions? _________________ [/islam].
FYI~ It takes glass one million years to decompose, which means it never wears out and can be recycled an infinite amount of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gonzophilosopher

Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 760 Location: Dar-Ul-Gehenna
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Katlike,
Nice to see you too
| Katlike wrote: |
A political leader, I would want at least some emotion. Can anyone really do any job without allowing some bit of emotion? |
There is no harm in showing some emotion as long as decisions are not based on them. To cite an extreme example, a leader should never base the decision to declare war on their emotions or feelings. Although they may feel the emotions of fear (for the loss of life, of losing the war), disgust (again at the potential loss of life) or on the other end of the scale pleasure maybe(blood lust, personal enjoyment/prestige) - the decision must be based on objective reasoning (the level of threat to the rights of the individuals of their country).
Regards,
Gonzo _________________ "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles" - Ayn Rand
</Islam> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gonzophilosopher

Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 760 Location: Dar-Ul-Gehenna
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Katlike wrote: |
Creative people are most creative when they ignore their emotions? |
No, but their actions should not be determined by their emotions. I'll expand on this later but I'm about to go to bed.
Regards,
Gonzo _________________ "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles" - Ayn Rand
</Islam> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
katlike

Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 4015 Location: If I told you, it would be a lame game of hide and seek.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| No, but their actions should not be determined by their emotions. I'll expand on this later but I'm about to go to bed. |
Looking forward to it. I think it is an interesting topic and I am not convinced that being emotional is a crippling flaw, I brought up the topic cause I am sick of hearing the woman are too emotional to do anything of importance other than mothering children and husbands. I get that the general stereotype of this line of thinking is flawed, but I don't understand the base argument that having emotions is seen as a weakness.
Plus, I think an arguement could be made that there hasn't ever been an action that wasn't dictated by an emotion, it really boils down to what emotions are precieved as a strength (masculine), and which is considered a weakness (feminine). We all the know the stereotypes of those emotions so I won't bother to identify them, but it has always been an emotion that powered the action none the less.
Again, looking forward to your post and exploring this topic more.
Peace, Love and Health
Katlike _________________ [/islam].
FYI~ It takes glass one million years to decompose, which means it never wears out and can be recycled an infinite amount of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MsWesterner
Joined: 11 Nov 2006 Posts: 11888
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
calling women emotional for being either sensitive or feeling for others is too simplistic.
there are lots of emotions.
one sees males assuming that if a woman may have a weep about something, she is emotional and they portray it as weak when it is isnt......and the same male may be the very one to throw something at someone, or punch a hole in the wall....and thats emotion also!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gonzophilosopher

Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 760 Location: Dar-Ul-Gehenna
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Katlike wrote: |
I am not convinced that being emotional is a crippling flaw, I brought up the topic cause I am sick of hearing the woman are too emotional to do anything of importance other than mothering children and husbands. I get that the general stereotype of this line of thinking is flawed, but I don't understand the base argument that having emotions is seen as a weakness.
|
This, I completly agree with. Our emotions are a very useful barometer of whether what we are doing/thinking is good or bad for us and there is nothing wrong with expressing emotion; it is a healthy part of our nature as human beings.
| MsWesterner wrote: |
calling women emotional for being either sensitive or feeling for others is too simplistic.
there are lots of emotions.
one sees males assuming that if a woman may have a weep about something, she is emotional and they portray it as weak when it is isnt......and the same male may be the very one to throw something at someone, or punch a hole in the wall....and thats emotion also!!!! |
This is an excellent point; the term emotional is ambiguous and I think I need to explain how I define emotion/emotional in the context of what I am trying to argue.
When I say that a decision should not be driven by one's emotions, I mean that a decision - especially that made by a political leader or judge, needs to be based primarily on objective, rational reasoning, over subjective, irrational feeling (such as intuition, faith, revelation). The emotional aspect (i.e. my definition of emotion in this context) of this is when you perform an act or make a decision based on pure emotion, such as anger and disregard rationality (or at least relegate it to a secondary of emotion). If something has made you angry it generally indicates that it is something that is either harmful to you or your principles and some action needs to be taken to remedy this. It is the action you then take that must be based on objective rational reasoning if it's consequences are to be effective.
| Katlike wrote: |
Plus, I think an arguement could be made that there hasn't ever been an action that wasn't dictated by an emotion, it really boils down to what emotions are precieved as a strength (masculine), and which is considered a weakness (feminine). We all the know the stereotypes of those emotions so I won't bother to identify them, but it has always been an emotion that powered the action none the less.
|
I would disagree with the term "dictated" for the reason that I consider emotions to be more of an consequence of an idea than a cause. Some decisions, however have been/are purely emotionally driven - with rationality completely neglected, and these can cause a great deal of harm - the cartoon riots being a prime example.
| Katlike wrote: |
Creative people are most creative when they ignore their emotions?
|
To expand on what I answered before; ignoring your emotions is effectively denying a subconcious barometer of whether what you are doing is good or bad - as long as rational thought is also applied then if it feels good it usually is good and vice versa. In order to be truly creative you need to be rationally motivated (have a purpose) and this can be in perfect harmony with emotion (passion for your purpose - the purpose being the creation).
Best Regards,
Gonzo _________________ "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles" - Ayn Rand
</Islam> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valkyrianna

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Through observing muslim women and reading their rantings about their men for years I see that islam creates women who are emotional basket-cases. To make a judgement you need to trust in yourself and your own ability to think for yourself and others. Muslim women are powerless. Their men are emotionally damaged, but posess power from top positions to those who exercise power just within the home.
The silence-treatment is most usually used as a means of a muslim male in trumphing his way through.Unable to identifying and explaining to his wife a feeling he have to resort to keeping his mouth shut. Most dont though, but some do adhere to islamic adab and keep their pie-holes clamped until the wife has submitted to whatever.
A wife scared of divorce or a cowife, being beraved of her children in the event of a divorce and unable to support herself in such a case becomes unable to make decisions but will cling on to whatever for dear life. She knows her sisters predicaments too and know that the grass is just as brown on the other side.
Muslim women resort to playing games in interacting with their men. Whenever trouble arises in a muslim home the woman is told sabr sabr, duah duah and to try to appease her husband. As a Kafira I would be ashamed to deal with my husband in such a manor. I would be packing the bags of a man who was never tought to deal with his feelings faster then he could say "emotial criple".
I have never seen men in my country, or any western country display such embarrasing emotional outcries as muslim men. Not speaking of in their homes, but on the streets.Is hatred not a feeling? Is anger not a feeling? I see muslim men crying, shouting, using extreme violence and threats of them. These are all displays of emotions, severely disturbed ones. Islam creates emotionally disturbed people. Emotions are not just positives. In my part of the world I do however see men display emotions on a daily basis. Positive emotions. Sympathy and empathy, in a sweet, kind and loving way.
Sympathy and empathy may be womens domain worldwide, correct me if I am wrong, but this fact does not make them bad decisionmakers. You don`t have to be a Thatcher to be a good leader. A good leader should have sympathy and empathy as he or she is in charge of the well-fare of others.
A judge must weigh mitigating circumstances for the perpetrator and the feelings of the victims family. As multitasking is not the males best domain, you could argue that women are better suited at a judges job
The man in islam is the imam of the family and financially and decisionally responsible for the family unit. One good indication that women are better decisionmakers then men and the islamic ideal is a flwa is the experience of several aid-agencies.
Instead of giving men power to distribute money as they please, they directly support the women of the area in developing better living-conditions for their families making the whole society to thrive. This has been a huge success and more and more money is targeted directly at women.
However, back to the matter. The system of islam, the way muslim children are brought up segment stereotypes of gender-roles. I would rather not be in front of a muslim female judge whos mind is on the 5th day of her husbands silent-treatment, the 1674th of such tactics, her contemplating divorce as he last night finally spoke and said he was getting another wife and worrying about wether she will get married again and if she will get to keep her children. But in all fairness, I would not like to be judged by a muslim in any case
But I would not go wheeeheee, I got a female judge in the western system. As professionals I am afraid that both females and males who took on the daunting task of studying law, practicing it and finally landing a judges job are be able to lay away their personal worries out of work, just as I have to do when I enter the office. A female judge is not a "get out of jail" card in my world. She is a wildcard just as her male co-workers. Lest someone can give some statistics here that female judges give lower sentences then their male counterparts?
What I do know for sure is that muslim male judges give the most horrific, nauxiating and inhuman sentences. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
katlike

Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 4015 Location: If I told you, it would be a lame game of hide and seek.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very good points both Gonzo and Valkyrianna.
I think the point that the term emotional is ambiguous is what offends me the most.
Gonzo:
| Quote: |
| I would disagree with the term "dictated" for the reason that I consider emotions to be more of an consequence of an idea than a cause. Some decisions, however have been/are purely emotionally driven - with rationality completely neglected, and these can cause a great deal of harm - the cartoon riots being a prime example |
Perhaps dictated is the wrong word. Interesting for us all to make a mental note that the primary rioters in the cartoon fiasco were male.
Gonzo:
| Quote: |
| To expand on what I answered before; ignoring your emotions is effectively denying a subconcious barometer of whether what you are doing is good or bad - as long as rational thought is also applied then if it feels good it usually is good and vice versa. In order to be truly creative you need to be rationally motivated (have a purpose) and this can be in perfect harmony with emotion (passion for your purpose - the purpose being the creation). |
I do wholeheartedly agree with you on this. You were able to pinpoint it better than I.
Valkyrianna:
| Quote: |
| Muslim women resort to playing games in interacting with their men. Whenever trouble arises in a muslim home the woman is told sabr sabr, duah duah and to try to appease her husband. As a Kafira I would be ashamed to deal with my husband in such a manor. I would be packing the bags of a man who was never tought to deal with his feelings faster then he could say "emotial criple". |
I have noticed the same. The woman are not able to be woman, they are forced to into a bizarre childish role and it seems to me, forced to be overly "emotional" just to have voice.
| Quote: |
| A good leader should have sympathy and empathy as he or she is in charge of the well-fare of others. |
My point exactly!
| Quote: |
| However, back to the matter. The system of islam, the way muslim children are brought up segment stereotypes of gender-roles. I would rather not be in front of a muslim female judge whos mind is on the 5th day of her husbands silent-treatment, the 1674th of such tactics, her contemplating divorce as he last night finally spoke and said he was getting another wife and worrying about wether she will get married again and if she will get to keep her children |
That is certainly a terrifying thought that I had not thought of!
| Quote: |
| But I would not go wheeeheee, I got a female judge in the western system. As professionals I am afraid that both females and males who took on the daunting task of studying law, practicing it and finally landing a judges job are be able to lay away their personal worries out of work, just as I have to do when I enter the office. A female judge is not a "get out of jail" card in my world. She is a wildcard just as her male co-workers. Lest someone can give some statistics here that female judges give lower sentences then their male counterparts? |
Agreed. I doubt there are any statistics that would prove female judges are more lax than male judges here in the West. Which is why it really burns me when I hear that stupid line...woman are too emotional to do anything well but stay home!
I guess in order for islam to prove it is correct on the role of the sexes, it would have to prove that woman are by nature less rational, not too emotional. To keep throwing the term emotional out there as a reason why woman should be considered the weaker sex, islam makes yet another fatal flaw.
Thanks to all who answered, I have some good points to think about and hopefully will be able to put those points to good use in future debates with people who want to dismiss what I say because I am by nature "too emotional" !  _________________ [/islam].
FYI~ It takes glass one million years to decompose, which means it never wears out and can be recycled an infinite amount of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valkyrianna

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To add to your arguments I would also look into male/female brain-patterns. A male does not necissarily have an intirely male-patterened brain and vice versa. The islamic claim proposes that the male/female bran is a complete static, whereas the reality is that brains differ amongst individuals, but general studies show minor diffirences.
Males do have a larger preoptic area of the Hypothalamus, estimated at 2.2 %. This area deals with mating behavior. In what matter does a judge need a slightly higher urge to mate in order to qualify for the bench? The Suprachiasmatic Nucleus of the Hypothalamus is diffirent in shape and m a y send signals in the brain diffirently, this part also deals with mating, but again, where does the mating need of a judge come in as a factor in the case?
Neuroscience for kids - suitable for muslims
Gender and the brain suggests that genderroles have segmented the miniscular diffirences:
| Quote: |
| It makes sense that brains vary between the sexes, according to some researchers. In ancient times, each sex had a very defined role that helped ensure the survival of the species. Cave men hunted. Cave women gathered food near the home and cared for the children. Brain areas may have been sharpened to enable each sex to carry out their job. |
The islamic system is based on the gender roles of cave men and women and would like to keep developing this system.
I will leave you with a horrific example of what islamic family dynamics regarding women as decisionmakers can produce:
The ridiculous life of a canadian convert in Egypt and the sad demise that can occur when a woman lays her life and decisions in the hands of a muslim male" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ajax

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Posts: 2927 Location: Elysian Fields
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| katlike wrote: |
| Quote: |
| No, but their actions should not be determined by their emotions. I'll expand on this later but I'm about to go to bed. |
Looking forward to it. I think it is an interesting topic and I am not convinced that being emotional is a crippling flaw, I brought up the topic cause I am sick of hearing the woman are too emotional to do anything of importance other than mothering children and husbands. I get that the general stereotype of this line of thinking is flawed, but I don't understand the base argument that having emotions is seen as a weakness.
Plus, I think an arguement could be made that there hasn't ever been an action that wasn't dictated by an emotion, it really boils down to what emotions are precieved as a strength (masculine), and which is considered a weakness (feminine). We all the know the stereotypes of those emotions so I won't bother to identify them, but it has always been an emotion that powered the action none the less.
Again, looking forward to your post and exploring this topic more.
Peace, Love and Health
Katlike |
Being emotional is not a crippling flaw. Not having a capability to feel emotion is. There are a lot of psychopaths out there who are psychos because they feel nothing. How about not feeling a damn thing when sawing a head off because the victim was a kaffir?
Having/feeling an emotion is not the same as acting on an emotion. Being rational simply means that you recognize what emotion a subject invokes brings in you and you carefully put that emotion aside. Not rashly acting out the impulse brought by the emotion and calmly use logics is what being rational is about... not feeling dead inside.
The capacity of being rational is largely learned. Historically, women are excused to act emotionally and it feeds the myth that they can't be rational. It becomes a catch-22. It's been shown that women are capable on handling tasks that require them to set emotions aside. Unless there are proofs that they are freaks of nature, I'd say women have the ability to learn to be rational as well.
On the flip side of the coin, men are not always a rational being either. When muslims claims that hormones make women unfit for some jobs, they keep forgetting that men also have hormones and testosterone is a pretty dominant one. How often does a cop let a beautiful woman go with a warning instead of giving her a speeding ticket? Lust, a product of hormones, is responsible for that, right? The fact that burqas are required to prevent men from being tempted is a proof how strong lust governs muslim mind. _________________ Religion of Blood, Religion of Death
(Full length avatar) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|