Go to FFI
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Attention: Year 2009 is here Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
What interfaith dialogue?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> [Archived] Comments on the Articles Posted in the Main Site
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freeland wrote:
As a matter of fact I always say that most of southern Italians are lazy, nobody ever said that I was generalising; because we know it is true. I also declared that most of Northern Italians (like me) are very cold and strict some times even arrogant and egoistic. Nobody said that I’m racist.

Maybe because you gave specifics such as 'most', 'southern', 'northern' & 'italian'?

freeland wrote:

Every culture or race has positive sides and negative sides. As far as I’m concerned I really didn’t see till now the positive sides of Muslims. Perhaps you can tell me some.


Positive sides? Gosh I dont know of anything.

All Im saying is that is wrong to blanket all of them with grave accusations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mughal wrote:
Dear freeland,

Another exellent article and many thanks for sharing that with us.


Huh? Is he the guy who wrote that article that Sina posted (?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

doubtless wrote:

Dr. No. the issue is not whether the average viewer gives a damn. The issue is how do you distinguish between those who support the Quran and the Sunnah of Mohammad and those who do not.

No the issue I am raising is whether it is right or wrong to use subjective generalizations on the muslim people on this planet.

I dont even see anything on that article that limits the critique on those muslims who follows the sunnah.


doubtless wrote:

The definition is very clear: a muslim is he who upholds the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad. If one does not then he is not a muslim. He may be calling himself a muslim for safety, for wanting to belong to a community, etc. etc.

Its like saying 'a christian is he who upholds the bible and the apostolic traditions'. Thus denying the title 'christian' on protestants.


Why, what do you suggest we call those people who calls themselves muslims and yet follow only the quran and the belief in a sole creator and in mohammad as his prophet?

doubtless wrote:

but he is not a muslim according to the believers.

Let them squabble about that issue as Christians squabble about who is the true Christian and who is not.

doubtless wrote:

I have yet to meet any quran only muslim who can explain the quran without the sunnah of muhammad. It cannot be done. Quran becomes utterly unintelligble without the muslim history supporting it.


Maybe you should go out a little. For I have met such muslims. And their explanations are quite good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mughal



Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 1211
Location: Islamabad,Pakistan Glasgow,Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear dr no,

from diplomacy point of view you are right in raising the issue with labelling of muslims but doubtless is also correct in defining muslims on the basis of the islamic criterion. I myself wrote something along these lines long ago showing that muslims are only muslims if they adhere to their islamic creed. Knowing what islamic creed is and knowing that one is not a muslim unless one believes in upholding this creed, one is correct in labelling all muslim the same ie sinners and the saints. This is not our fault but that muslims fundamentally identify themsleves by their religion rather than country or region.

You see dear friend, the quran only divides people as believers and unbelievers and then tells believers to declare war on unbelievers. Now whoever is a believer has to follow the quran and not listen to us kafirs.

Muslims are in two minds, they do not wish to give up the ghost of islam and they want us to accept them as well despite the fact that they are the ones who have declared a unilateral war against all the kafirs in the world for ever.

Nonetheless, world is not black and white so being a bit diplomatic is perhaps a bit better for us. However as far as the truth is concerned freeland is absolutely right from definition point of view.

Regards and
_________________
All the best from Mughal at http://www.religionandsecularism.gq.nu/favorite_links.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mughal wrote:

from diplomacy point of view you are right in raising the issue with labelling of muslims but doubtless is also correct in defining muslims on the basis of the islamic criterion.


HI Mughal,

If that is the case then what do you suggest we call those people who calls themselves 'muslims' and yet follow only the quran and the belief in a sole creator and in mohammad as his prophet?

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freeland, I think Dr. No was right in raising the concern.
Any article like this which labels Muslims as a whole, should state clearly that there are believing Muslims and it is them we are refering to, etc
Quote:
Muslims are violent, hate mongers, haughty, arrogant, revengeful and lazy.


The problem is this: PC people who read the article will be angry and will start talking about the nice moderate non-practicing Muslim (who you call non-Muslim) they met in real life. We have to be careful about the PC, they're an idiotic bunch who doesnt know about Islam, but they are ones who make our task difficult so its important to shut them up.
If you take care of this, you can be SURE that no PC will dare to say anything. So again, any article that does this must be careful in also telling people who is Muslim and who is not because to PC's and Muslims, the westernized Muslim who has a girlfriend and only knows how to say Allah hu Akbar - is also a Muslim - this is what you should keep in mind.
To stop them from arguing, its good to deal with them right there so it shuts them up. Otherwise they scream and discredit FFI and the article as racist and what not.
Back to top
freeland



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doc,

I wrote “Muslims”. It’s clear that I’m complaining about Muslims that follow Quran and Sunna, since you (I suppose) do not follow those teachings you are not one of those “prone to violence, haughtiness, arrogance and revenge in Allah’s cause. (I hope)
I have some non-practicing Muslim friends and when I write about “Muslims” or Islam I never think to include them.
Of course even many not Muslims are criminals, but this web site is about Islam and Muslims; we are trying to expose Islam and stubborn Muslims so if I want to write about western criminals I would chose another site.

Ps: I’m not a guy but a woman

Grazie Mughal
:P
_________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe...
[Albert Einstein]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freeland



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I Think diplomacy is for politician , for hypocrites.
If Ali thinks I’m a racist, I instigate violence or hate I don’t think he would publish my articles.
What I’m trying to say is that Muslims who follow Quran and sunna in a fundamentalist way are prone to hate all non Muslims and to kill to achieve their goals. Is it better now? I never ment to offend anyone, just to express my opinion.
_________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe...
[Albert Einstein]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freeland wrote:

I wrote “Muslims”. It’s clear that I’m complaining about Muslims that follow Quran and Sunna, since you (I suppose) do not follow those teachings you are not one of those “prone to violence, haughtiness, arrogance and revenge in Allah’s cause. (I hope)

That is still wrong. There are about 1 billion of these 'Quran & Sunnah Muslims'. And there is no way for you to even prove that 51% of them falls under your subjective blanket. Your article would have been great if not for this deadly folly.


freeland wrote:

I have some non-practicing Muslim friends and when I write about “Muslims” or Islam I never think to include them.

Well what you think did not reflect on your article. And thus your 'muslim friends' would have a very good reason for thinking ill of you when they read what you’ve done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DoctorNO



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freeland wrote:
I Think diplomacy is for politician , for hypocrites.
If Ali thinks I’m a racist, I instigate violence or hate I don’t think he would publish my articles.

Even the great Ali Sina makes mistakes. FFI is a great asset against the threat of Islam, please modify your article to include what you said below...

freeland wrote:

What I’m trying to say is that Muslims who follow Quran and sunna in a fundamentalist way are prone to hate all non Muslims and to kill to achieve their goals. Is it better now? I never ment to offend anyone, just to express my opinion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freeland



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a matter of fact a couple of them read the article and didn’t say anything ill about it, perhaps they understood what I meant. I might seem harsh and arrogant but I really don’t care what the Muslims will think about it. I don’t write to please them since they call me kafira, and don’t respect my belief, my opinions, my person.
Then not 50% but 100% of those who follow Quran and sunna think all non Muslims are kuffars, that they should be discriminated, subjugated, humiliated and killed if they apostatize or don't pay the giziya because the Quran and Sunna says so; they fall under "my subjective blanket" .
You don’t need a billion of Muslims prone to violence, hate and discrimination… just 1% of them can bring much damage to our countries. We should stop being so prig.
_________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe...
[Albert Einstein]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freeland



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ali can take off my article from FFI it will not change my opinion.

You see I prefer people to dislike me for expressing MY opinion rather then be loved for expressing THEIR opinion.
_________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe...
[Albert Einstein]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mughal



Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 1211
Location: Islamabad,Pakistan Glasgow,Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Dr No,

thank you very much for your kind response and raising a serious question, I think dealing with islamic ideology is the easy bit but dealing with muslims is something that does need some sort of tolerant approach. On the other hand if we do not turn the screw on muslims a bit every now and then, they will remain unaffected and will carry on the way they are. So we are between the rock and the hard place ie we are damned if we do and damned if we don't.

We ex-muslims are suffering because of islamic creed as well as at the hands of muslims both sunnis and shias. These very muslims who live in free world do not allow us freedom to speak our minds amongst them and are ready to kill us for leaving islam. We have the very same mullahs in these countries that we have in muslim countries like Dr Qaradawi of Egypt. So the question is, how to get these muslims to see sense? We cannot get muslims to see sense merely by being critical of islam, hence the need for putting spotlight on muslims as well because they are the ones who carry out islamic injunctions. Without somehow forcing muslims to see the errors of their ways, we are not going to make much difference.

So my question is, how to get muslims to turn away from violent and barbaric islam without creating a hateful reaction to them? Perhaps to answer this question we need to have a really good discussion on this issue on a thread specially dedicated to this topic.

Regards and
_________________
All the best from Mughal at http://www.religionandsecularism.gq.nu/favorite_links.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Iznogoodh



Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 970

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freeland wrote:
As a matter of fact a couple of them read the article and didn’t say anything ill about it, perhaps they understood what I meant. I might seem harsh and arrogant but I really don’t care what the Muslims will think about it.

As an atheist that doesn't love Muslims all too much, I might still care what they think. Phrases like "Muslims are arrogant, haughty and this and that and such" are words that chase away any who comes here out of curiosity, convinced as he is that FFI is just another site where people can only see things in black and white.


Iznogoodh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ali Sina



Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 4607

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
You see I prefer people to dislike me for expressing MY opinion


Dislike you? I think I am falling in love with you. That is my kind of woman
_________________
Don't be a follower, but a prophet unto your own.


Last edited by Ali Sina on Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> [Archived] Comments on the Articles Posted in the Main Site All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

 

  Search the Forum