Go to FFI
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Attention: Year 2009 is here Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
Let's clear up all this pedophilia garbage...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Muhammad
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sahara



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 12461
Location: Banned

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excellent post Ummah Allergic.

I learnt alot from it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nightthief



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

IronMan wrote:
The Quran is as the Muslim always like to say, word of God and therefore, IT MUST BE ABLE TO STAND THE TEST OF TIME.
Of course it should and of course it doesn't. But then again, that's unsurprising since there is no god to begin with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nightthief



Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hector wrote:
A first cause/mover need not be sentient.
where did sentience come into my statement? what I stated is that absent a beginning, there can be no first cause.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shoeshiner



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 4684

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, whe wrote a very informative article.

My take on this is that if you can get a hard on for a 9 year old girl, no matter if she has reached puberty or not, then you are a pedophile. I don't care what any organization says or how anyone wants to define what pedophilia is. Mo not only got a hard on for Aisha, but he started having sex with her at 9. It is abnormal and evil. Also, that is not what a "prophet of all time" should promote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darth



Joined: 03 Dec 2004
Posts: 2493

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightthief wrote:

I am an atheist. There is no god and never could have been. A universe which has neither beginning nor end cannot have been created. Absent the event of creation, there can be no creator. Absent a creator, there is no necessary first mover - and thus no need for any god. More to the point, all religions depend upon some creation myth to define their god(s), precluding the possibility that any such god(s) could exist.

The man doth protest too much, methinks. If you are an atheist as you claim, why go to so much trouble to try and prove that mo was not a paedophile.

nightthief wrote:

As a recomendation, Darth: Stay away from me as long as I am on this forum.

Good you told me. In case I ever wish to oblige you I will know how to go about it. (Don't hold your hopes too high, though. I do not go out of my way to oblige those that try to come and spout BS about how having sex with a nine year old is a normal cultural thing).

nightthief wrote:

I do not care for people who exhibit poor judgement. I do not appreciate those who cannot keep a conversation civil and disrespewct others. And, I most definitely despise those who call me a liar.

Better to actually start despising lies first.

nightthief wrote:

Quite frankly, I am not the type to forgive and forget easily - and you'v emade a pretty nast first impression.

Like I give a rats arse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaSerpent



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 299

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The man doth protest too much, methinks. If you are an atheist as you claim, why go to so much trouble to try and prove that mo was not a paedophile.


Being an atheist doesn't mean you play loose and fast with logic simply because you don't like Mo. The implication is that respect to truth and integrity are incompatible with atheism. This sounds like the kind of baseless accusations rotunely thrown out by religious people to score cheap point.

Darth's response proves positively that being an atheist in and of itself does not signify intelligence.

I think Ummah Allegeric already gave a very well thought out response, I would like to read nightthief's follow up. Both sound well informed and articulate. Darth is basically wasting space here.

I know, I will be accused of being a muslim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
plata moya



Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 2741
Location: Muhammad stoned a she monkey for adultery.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaSerpent wrote:
Quote:
The man doth protest too much, methinks. If you are an atheist as you claim, why go to so much trouble to try and prove that mo was not a paedophile.


Being an atheist doesn't mean you play loose and fast with logic simply because you don't like Mo. The implication is that respect to truth and integrity are incompatible with atheism. This sounds like the kind of baseless accusations rotunely thrown out by religious people to score cheap point.

Darth's response proves positively that being an atheist in and of itself does not signify intelligence.

I think Ummah Allegeric already gave a very well thought out response, I would like to read nightthief's follow up. Both sound well informed and articulate. Darth is basically wasting space here.

I know, I will be accused of being a muslim.


Well who Care's if he's a atheist or not, what kind of fool would come here defending Mo's sick behavior got to be a criminal lawyer or a Muslim, my guess is he's a criminal Muslim
_________________
And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man, keep alive for yourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Junkmaster



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 2922

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The topic title is far from neutral. Why does an atheist feel the need to defend a 7th century warlord's sexual desires? Is Muhammad's pedophilia the only thing you consider 'garbage' or do you also consider the charges about his slave trading, murdering, robbing, religious intolerance, and raping as garbage as well?
_________________
When I was young, I thought Islam was quixotic. As I aged, I thought Islam was pernicious. But now I am starting to think Islam is just another of God's cosmic jokes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hector



Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 7144
Location: Astroistan

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pedophilia is merely a convenient tag for Mo f*cking a nine-year-old child. We could make up any number of words to convey the moral opprobrium of a 53-year-old man having sex with a 9-year-old child. What sort of man can obtain sexual arousal with a 9-year-old girl anyway, irrespective of whether she had or had not achieved menarche?
_________________
What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wachamalit



Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 3319
Location: Atheist corner.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read my signature.
_________________
Out of ideas for a new, witty signature. May add one later, but maybe not since I am too lazy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hector



Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 7144
Location: Astroistan

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightthief wrote:
Hector wrote:
A first cause/mover need not be sentient.
where did sentience come into my statement? what I stated is that absent a beginning, there can be no first cause.

Was I attacking you? I was adding to what you wrote. I'm merely stating that a first-mover need not be sentient - i.e. that first mover need not be a God.
_________________
What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Critus



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 309
Location: Chester

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:19 am    Post subject: Re: Let's clear up all this pedophilia garbage... Reply with quote

Superb! Umma_allergic, to be frank I never failed to catch more than what I need from your posts. Very genuine and insightful.....

Many thumbs up!!

Cheers
CS
_________________
"The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. They (Kafirs) should be kept at an arm’s length like dogs."
"Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam." (Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi, A SUFI Lived in India)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
piscohot



Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 3928

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:05 am    Post subject: Re: Let's clear up all this pedophilia garbage... Reply with quote

Jonas wrote:
Howdy, fellow infidels,

I have a post I would like you all to comment on. Someone I know and greatly respect made this post in the World Political Debates forum at mauisun after the topic of Mohammad and pedophilia came up. Please read it and give me your insights.

Thank you


Quote:

Originally posted by Nightthief at Mauisun

If a person has a sexual arousal pattern that indicates a preference or exclusive preference for thoise who are prepubesscent, he or she is a pedophile. If that primary arousal pattern does not exist, then he or she is not a pedophile. Cultural norms, the era one lived or lives in, and whether the individual has actually acted on this arousal pattern are irrelevant.



Good post Jonas!!!!

You have just confirmed Muhammad to be a paedophile............ from the hadiths, we all know that Aisha was not the only 'baby' that Muhammad had his eyes on............
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ixolite



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 12939
Location: land of pork and beer

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

plata moya wrote:
DaSerpent wrote:
Quote:
The man doth protest too much, methinks. If you are an atheist as you claim, why go to so much trouble to try and prove that mo was not a paedophile.


Being an atheist doesn't mean you play loose and fast with logic simply because you don't like Mo. The implication is that respect to truth and integrity are incompatible with atheism. This sounds like the kind of baseless accusations rotunely thrown out by religious people to score cheap point.

Darth's response proves positively that being an atheist in and of itself does not signify intelligence.

I think Ummah Allegeric already gave a very well thought out response, I would like to read nightthief's follow up. Both sound well informed and articulate. Darth is basically wasting space here.

I know, I will be accused of being a muslim.


Well who Care's if he's a atheist or not, what kind of fool would come here defending Mo's sick behavior got to be a criminal lawyer or a Muslim, my guess is he's a criminal Muslim

or a child-f!cker himself
_________________
</islam>

"Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Goldthwait H. Dorr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
umma_allergic



Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the positive feedback on my post.

My guess is that Nightthief was not trying to defend, exonerate, or in any other way assess the ethics of Mohammed's marriage to Aisha. Rather, he was interested in bringing greater accuracy to the discussion of this historical fact, by introducing clearer definitions. My guess is that he thought people were throwing around a clinical term, "pedophile", without really knowing what it meant, back on the board where this conversation originates.

In the community of people who deal with sexual abuse, it is important to differentiate child sexual abuse and child molestation from pedophilia. Pedophilia is relatively rare, whereas child abuse and child molestation are much, much more common. Government and social policies, when they are written, are usually targeted at the broader phenomenon of child sexual abuse, rather than pedophilia per se. Pedophilia per se is the interest of a small set of specialists in the psychiatric community, whereas the effort to stop child sexual abuse is much larger. However, people unfamiliar with the issue of child sexual abuse often mistakenly call it pedophilia - a much narrower term. Advocates for these kids need to point out that pedophiles form only a small percentage of those people who sexually abuse kids.

So in some contexts, distinctions like these are important. In fact, if Mohammed had not been a pedophile, and if we had seen this use of children as culturally-rooted, we still would have been able to make the case that a culture of the sexual abuse of children is piggybacking on Islam. However, there are indications, independent of Mohammed's marriage to Aisha, that he was in fact a pedophile, and his sexualization of children went beyond the norms for the culture of his time.

I think it is important to promulgate awareness of this additional support for Mohammed's pedophilia, to support the case that he was a pedophile. I have always hoped that evidence of Islam's lack of ethical universalism would open up the eyes of muslims to the problems with their religion, but this is rarely the case. I have observed that Mohammed's pedophilia, on the other hand, does cause the kind of cognitive dissonance that makes some of them reevaluate their loyalties. It is thus a crucial topic for liberating people from the Islamic mindlock.
_________________
Learn how to argue/debate properly
http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/argument.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacies
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Muhammad All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

 

  Search the Forum