|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hector

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Feodor Fathon wrote: |
may be i'm not clever to arrange words but i thought u got my words ... dont hide from it !!
first, i told you that Abu Sufyan still cannot accepted Islam by his heart after he met Heraclius (u can read it in first page of this topic) |
That is merely your opinion devoid of evidence. And thanks for admitting Mo was a fool for believing Abu Sufyan had accepted Islam. Did you know that he gave Abu Sufyan 100 camels and 40 measures of gold as reward for participating in Hunain and Taif?
| Feodor Fathon wrote: |
| second, i told you that when he was dying he seem worry peoples around him was not sure of his islamic faith |
What nonsense. All he said was that he didn't sin after he converted to Islam. You're just making things up. _________________ What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evenstar
Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey .who are you ??
ok ..listen buddy ... i will never ashame of my fault in analyzing. as long as it's about history ... some one can makes some mistake in this case.
even scientist made mistake. ..... always there a new evidence for changing our analyzing before.
by the way ... i've new evidence now .. would ya give me some comment for it ?
ok ... Hector said that Heraclius came to Jerusalem in 630 AD. but i've new evidence that in 629 heraclius came to jerusalem (ilya)...here we are :
At first he found himself helpless before the Persian. armies (see PERSfA: Ancient History; and CHosRogs II.) of Chosroes II., which conquered Syria and Egypt and since 616 had encamped opposite Constantinople; in 618 he even proposed in despair to abandon his capital and seek a refuge in Carthage, but at the entreaty of the patriarch he took courage. By securing a loan from the Church and suspending the corn-distribution at Constantinople, he raised sufficient funds for war, and after making a treaty with the Avars, who had nearly surprised the capital during an incursion in 619, he was at last able to take the field against Persia. During his first expedition (622) he failed to secure a footing in Armenia, whence he had hoped to take the Persians in flank, but by his unwearied energy he restored the discipline and efficiency of the army. In his second campaign (62426) he penetrated into Aimenia and Albania, and beat the enemy in the open field. After a short stay at Constantinople, which his son Constantine had successfully defended against renewed incursions by the Avars, Heraclius resumed his attacks upon the Persians (627). Though deserted by the Khazars, with whom he had made an alliance upon entering into Pontus,; he gained a decisive advantage by a brilliant march across the Armenian highlands into the Tigris plain, and a hard-fought victory over Chosroes general, Shahrbaraz, in which Heraclius distinguished himself by his personal bravery. A subsequent revolution at the Persian court led to the dethronement of Chosroes in favor of his son Kavadh II. (q.v.); the new king promptly made peace with the emperor, whose troops were already advancing upon the Persian capital Ctesiphon (628). Having thus secured his eastern frontier, Heraclius returned to Constantinople with ample spoils, including the true cross, which in 629 he brought back in person to Jerusalem. On. the northern frontier of the empire he kept the Avars in check by inducing the Serbs to migrate from the Carpathians to the Balkan. lands so as to divert the attention of the Avars.
http://55.1911encyclopedia.org/H/HE/HERACLIUS.htm _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
it means Abu Sufyan didnt converted Islam yet in 629 AD ..and Heraclius invited Abu Sufyan to Jerusalem in 629 AD ...
what u say ? _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
monasjazz

Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 3735
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
what does the reason Heraclius invited Abu Sufyan ?
bring out your mind to think it ..
 _________________ The truth doesn't come out from your mouth , but instead the true truth comes out from the OBJECT itself
o+< |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hector

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Feodor,
Don't boast. You haven't defeated anyone.
The date of the visit of Heraclius to Jerusalem is usually taken to be 630AD. Some people say it was in 629AD but the consensus is that it was in 630AD. This is the date we should take as it is generally accepted.
http://www.roman-emperors.org/heraclis.htm
In 630 Heraclius traveled to Jerusalem where he returned the Holy Cross to the city among much acclaim.
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-07-06.html
Heraclius' plan to forcibly baptise Jews after his triumphal entry into Jerusalem in 630
You can't get an encyclopedia more authoritative than Encylcopedia Brittanica.
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9040092
In 630 he personally restored the Cross to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.
Now, please go back to the Indonesian forum and apologize for falsely claiming you have defeated anyone. In fact, it is you who have been defeated.
At least before you claim you have defeated me, you should read my inevitable rebuttal. _________________ What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hector wrote: |
Feodor,
The date of the visit of Heraclius to Jerusalem is usually taken to be 630AD. Some people say it was in 629AD but the consensus is that it was in 630AD. This is the date we should take as it is generally accepted.
|
only that ??
did you mean majority is truth ???
1. Majority said "earth is a centre of solar system" and minioity didint said so.
2. Majority said "Universe is exist fixed" and minority said universe is from BIG BANG
NOW in the same way u said Majority is truth ...ha ha
even u dont have evidence to help your choice betwen 630 and 629 ..
in this case i can use the hadits to support that Heraclius came to jerusalem (ilya) in 629 AD because the hadith is valid (shahih) ...
 _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
hector : do you have witness that heraclius came to jerusalem in 630 AD ???? ........ a name please !!
I've a witness that Heraclius came to Jerusalem in 629 AD ... because he met Heraclius in ceasing fire (hudaibiyah II agreement) betwen meccans and Muhammad.
he was ABU SUFYAN  _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dengkul_moe
Joined: 17 May 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmmm
I've read through page 1-5, but still I can't find Feodor's answer of Hector's Q : YES or NO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Feodor Fathon

Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 681 Location: INDONESIA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dengkul_moe wrote: |
Hmmmm
I've read through page 1-5, but still I can't find Feodor's answer of Hector's Q : YES or NO |
it's over ... !  _________________ WHAT EVER !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ygalg

Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 7401 Location: israel
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let Heraclius Judges who was Muhammad
was the purpose of this thread to verify Muhammad's prophet-hood by Heraclius? _________________ </islam>
Hajj Amin al-Husseini:
"Kill the Jews wherever you find them"
Qur'an 2:191:
"And kill them wherever you find them" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher123
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i'm interested, also somebody please clarify the alleged year when Muhammad sent the letter to Heraclius (628AD allegedly)... is there any non-islamic source for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seifullaah73
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He is right! this argument is over.
Only thing you can do is say something completely different which wil make you more idiotic or use the same excuse wich is stupidity,
No matter what you have lost this argument.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher123
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll contribute with a reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclius
...
The war against Persia
When Heraclius took power, the Empire was in a desperate situation. Phocas's initial revolt had stripped the Danube frontier of troops, leaving the most of the Balkans at the mercy of the Avars. The Persian King Chosroes II, who had been an ally of Maurice, used his death as an excuse to launch a war against the Byzantines. Chosroes had at his court a man who claimed to be Maurice's son Theodosius, and Chosroes demanded that the Byzantines accept him as Emperor. The Persians had slowly gained the upper hand in Mesopotamia over the course of Phocas's reign; when Heraclius' revolt resulted in civil war, the Persians took advantage of the internal conflict to advance deep into Syria.
Heraclius offered peace terms to the Persians upon his accession, but Khosrau refused to treat with him, viewing him as just another usurper of Theodosius' throne. Heraclius' initial military moves against the Persians ended disastrously, and the Persians rapidly advanced westward. They took Damascus in 613, Jerusalem in 614 (damaging the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and capturing the Holy Cross in the process), and Egypt in 616. They made raids deep into Anatolia as far as Chalcedon, a town lying almost opposite of Constantinople across the Bosporous. At night, it was said, the people of Constantinople would see Persian watch-fires and their reflection on the water. The Persians were also in communication with the Avars.
The situation was so grave that Heraclius reportedly considered moving the capital from Constantinople to Carthage. But he remained in the East and worked on reorganizing the Byzantine military. He developed the idea of granting land to individuals in return for hereditary military service. The land so granted was organised into thema, a Greek word to describe a division of troops, and each theme was placed under the command of a strategos or military governor. This arrangement ensured the continuance of the Empire for hundreds of years and enabled Heraclius to reconquer lands taken by the Persians, ravaging Persia along the way.
Once he had rebuilt the army, Heraclius took the field himself in 621, the first emperor to campaign against a foreign enemy in person since Theodosius I. Confident that Constantinople was well defended, and unwilling to engage in a war of attrition over the lost eastern provinces, he marched across Asia Minor and invaded Persia itself. He would stay on campaign for several years. In 626, Constantinople itself was besieged by the Avars; but Persian attempts to cross the Bosporus and aid the Avars were repulsed by the Byzantine navy, and the Avars withdrew. Meanwhile, Heraclius acquired the assistance of the Khazars and other Turkic troops. Heraclius also exploited divisions within the Persian Empire, keeping the great Persian general Shahrbaraz neutral by convincing him that Chosroes had grown jealous of him and ordered his execution. At the Battle of Nineveh in 627, the Roman forces (without the Khazars who left Heraclius) defeated the Persians under Rhazates. When Chosroes still refused to make peace, Heraclius continued his campaign; as he approached the Persian capital of Ctesiphon, the Persian aristocracy deposed Chosroes. His successor made peace with Heraclius by restoring all the empire's former territories. The Persian Sassanid dynasty never recovered from this war; it took years for a strong king to emerge from a series of coups, and soon the Arabs overwhelmed the sinking state.
Heraclius took for himself the ancient Persian title of "King of Kings", dropping the traditional Roman imperial title of "Augustus". Later on, he styled himself as Basileus, the Greek word for "King", and that title was used by the eastern Roman emperors for the next 800 years. Heraclius also discontinued the use of Latin as the empire's official language, replacing it with Greek. Although the empire called itself Roman throughout the rest of its history, it was in reality a Hellenic empire from Heraclius onward.
In 630, he reached the height of his power, marching barefoot as a pious Christian pilgrim into Jerusalem and restoring the True Cross to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher123
Joined: 09 Nov 2005 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another account:
http://heraclius.en.wikimiki.net/
In 629 he allied with the Ethiopians and began to win proinces he lost to Persia. The Ethiopians put tremendous military pressure on the Persians whos armies were no match for the fast moving Ethiopians, who were more than happy to crush Persia for an earlier invasion of the arabian pennisual that was Ethiopian controlled. When Khosrau still refused to make peace, Heraclius continued his campaign; as he approached the Persian capital of Ctesiphon, the Persian aristocracy deposed Khosrau. His successor made peace with Heraclius by restoring all the empire's former territories. The Persian Sassanid dynasty never recovered from this war; it took years for a strong king to emerge from a series of coups, and soon the Arabs overwhelmed the sinking state. Heraclius took for himself the ancient Persian title of "King of Kings", dropping the traditional Roman imperial title of "Augustus". Later on, he styled himself as Basileus, the Greek word for "Emperor", and that title was used by the eastern Roman emperors for the next 800 years. Heraclius also discontinued the use of Latin as the empire's official language, replacing it with Greek. Although the empire called itself Roman throughout the rest of its history, it was in reality a Hellenic empire from Heraclius onward. In 630, he reached the height of his power when he marched triumphantly into Jerusalem and restored the True Cross to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|