Wafa Sultan Refuted!

QuranSearch.Com · Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280

Assalamu Alaikum,

Well apparently Hector, you got smoked again by Brother Keren Abiz.

Maybe you wont run this time, and yell about how your source is right and his is wrong lol, and maybe you will give a good response.

We are still waiting for you to write a nice rebuttal to me, where you can post all your references, so that you can get creamed on the authenticity of your sources.

Please visit my newest rebuttal to Sam Shamoun on this issue located here:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/umar/umar_mary2_rebuttal.htm

Thanks,

ben malik3 · Joined: 16 Oct 2005 Posts: 105

Hey Hector,

Even other Muslims want to get these idiots banned:

http://www.petitiononline.com/acosam06/petition.html

Hector · Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan

Mr.keren Abiz · Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 459 Location: Indonesia.

To Hector,

According Abdullah Yusuf Ali in his commentary that Quran Surrah 5: 52 & 53 was revealed in A.H. 7 (look at the footnote 3754) which is after Mariyah (ra) arrived in Medina. Which means the Prophet (saw) had already married Maryah (ra) before the ayah was revealed.

Mary the Coptic never married after the death of the Prophet. So Maryah (ra) was his wife or Umm Al Mu’minun (the mother of believers: Qs 33:6) not his slave before the verse was revealed.
_________________
"God created man in His image, then Christian pagans came along and recreated God in man's image", how stupid hihaaa!

Blogger Hacks and Tips

Goku · Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 4449 Location: England, UK

Hector · Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan

QuranSearch.Com · Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280

For one thing, the idiot hector doesnt realize that I SAID THAT I WILL REFUTE THE AUTHENTICITY OF IBN TABARI AND KATHIR IF HE WRITES A REBUTTAL TO ME!! [/b

Also, lets just see how stupid Hector is, here is Yusuf Ali's tafsir:

This was revealed in A.H. 7. AFTER THAT the Prophet did not marry again EXCEPT the [b]handmaiden Mary the Copt, who was sent as a present by the Christian Muqauqas of Egypt. She became the mother of Ibrahim, who died in his infancy.

(Source: The Quran: Text translation and Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Footnote#3754)

Here is Sura 33:52:

It is not lawful for thee (to marry more) women after this, nor to change them for (other) wives, even though their beauty attract thee, except any thy right hand should possess (as handmaidens): and God doth watch over all things.

So my friend, dont even go there, and try to say RasoolAllah went against the Qur'an as per Yusuf Ali, since you obviously dont know what your talking about, hence you earned the title ROOKIE.

Your not capable, or qualified to even critique Islam, and if you be a man and write your nice rebuttal to me, so that I can show you how gullible you are for quoting your sources, then everyone will be convinced how bad you are.

Thanks,
www.answering-christianity.com

The Far Side · Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 200

QuranSearch.Com · Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280

Good, tell Hector to include that when/IF he writes a refutation to me, so that I can expose you both at once.

The Far Side · Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 200

QuranSearch.Com · Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280

LOL.. Sure I did

Hector · Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan

QuranSearch,
Are you a moron? I have told you I don't write for the main site. Never have and Never will. How many times do I have to tell you that?

You are a rude idiot. Why should I give you the publicity of being on the main site? You are UNWORTHY as you have proven here. What sort of person are you? You are rude and expect people to do what you say. I WILL NOT give you the satisfaction since you didn't even bother to ask nicely. Now crawl back under the answering-christianity rock and curl up with your fellow snakes Osama Abdallah and Bassam Zawadi.

If you can refute me then do it at your own site. I'd love to see you refute Tabari and Ibn Kathir.

PS: Sam Shamoun already kicked your ass with that Yusuf Ali tafsir of 33:52, but you are too stupid to realize that Yusuf Ali actually disproves you.
_________________
What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile.

Junkmaster · Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 2922

Hey Q.com,

Here is a free piece of advice, don't use the underline function on a web address as you did in your original post. The forum will automatically convert web addresses to valid links for the most part but apparently using the underline function on a web address prevents that functionality. As in this example here http://www.faithfreedom.org , see how you can't click on the link.

I'm not clear on what exactly the argument being debated is and I'm pretty sure I've read most of this thread. Is that link that doesn't work in your original post the main argument or a counter argument to a greater argument?
_________________
When I was young, I thought Islam was quixotic. As I aged, I thought Islam was pernicious. But now I am starting to think Islam is just another of God's cosmic jokes.

QuranSearch.Com · Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280

LOOOL, you feel that Shamoun refuted me on Sura 33:52, while I just refuted Shamoun on that in my article, and I refuted you on it above.

Little baby hector, dont cry, remember, you used to post pictures a crying babies for me lol, now if you dont write the rebuttal, everyone will see just what a coward you are, so are you going to be tough enough to do it or what???

Hector · Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 7144 Location: Astroistan