Al-Kitaab, Embryology and Cloning (Amazing Birth)

[Abudosama]

Righteous

• Here come a programmer. :-D

[Righteous]

Regarding your quote...

[gupsfu]

[Abudosama]

Righteous, The Binary Programmer

[Hector]

Abudosama,
I'm confused with your explanation.

You wrote:

[Righteous]

[Abudosama]

Creation Of Man
http://it-is-truth.org/CreationOfMan.shtml

[Phedippedes]

[babushree]

[Abudosama]

color=red]BABU SHREE The FORGER. [/color]

Itching ? 8-| :-D :O
_________________
SALAM-UN-ALAIKUM, to All brothers & Sisters in Islam(submition) and Eemaan(Peace).

Good Wishes and blessing of their god or no god to non-Muslim (who lack submission and Peace).

[Righteous]

Unfortunately, Prof. Keith Moore was a dupe that was unwittingly used by Muslims to prove their point. Goes to show that you cannot dice with the devil - your name will forever be misused by him.

This poor man's work has been waylaid by these bandits.

See http://answering-islam.org.uk/Index/M/moore.html
MOORE, KEITH L., PhD, F.I.A.C.
of the Department of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Canada. He stimulated a great deal of interest within Islam by his article "A Scientist's Interpretation of References to Embryology in The Qur'an". Because of his influential position, many Muslims thought that scientific information on embryology has vindicated the Qur'an. Interestingly, however, Dr. Moore has not risked his reputation in the medical establishment by publishing his findings except in Islamic journals. The Islamic edition of his textbook is not even available in the British Library or the U.S. Library of Congress, nor in the medical libraries in Western countries. It is thus clear that this article does not find its recognition among his peer scientists.

Follow the link to http://answering-islam.org.uk/Quran/Science/embryo.html:
It seems that not even Prof. Moore is sufficiently convinced by the scientific "facts" in the Qur'an to risk his reputation as a highly respected professor of anatomy in the medical establishment. The Islamic edition of his textbook is not available even in the British Library or the US Library of Congress, let alone other medical libraries in Western countries [54], presumably because he is aware that not only do the Islamic contributions in it contradict known science, but they also contradict what he has written in the standard version of his textbook.

This foolish man was bought by the Muslims to write a version of his book for Islam. The devil's temptations are too much for the weak to overcome ...

[THHuxley]

More on Moore:

Dr. Keith L. Moore, Ph.D., F.I.A.C. of the Department of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Canada, has become a favorite of Islamic apologists ever since he accepted an invitation to produce a special edition of his Embryology Text Book specifically for use by Muslim students in Islamic Universities.

In articles published widely across Islamic web sites, Dr. Moore goes on the record to provide a generous assessment of the Qur’an and hadith in the light of modern knowledge about embryology. But a review of his “analysis” shows the extent to which he had to twist both the Islamic scriptures and modern science in order to get the “facts” to correlate.

Specifically, Moore’s intellectual lapses are these:

1) He liberally translates Arabic into terms that no Arabic speaker would consider justified, but that allows him to pretend the Arabic is closer to truth than it really is. For example, in spite of the fact that almost three dozen translations of “alaqah” found on line never once exclude the word “clot,” Moore writes instead that “The word "alaqah" refers to a leech or bloods*cker.”

2) He completely ignores the timing of phases dictated by the hadith, for to consider them renders even his mistranslation unintelligible. For example, after mistranslating “alaqah” to mean “a leech or bloods*cker,” he then compares it to the human embryo at 24 days gestation. But 24 days is still firmly within the “nutfah” phase, when the embryo should actually look like a “drop of seed.” He does the same with “mudghah,” comparing it with the embryo at 28 days, still in the “nutfah” phase and only four days later than he had assigned to “alaqah.”

Why did he do it?

One might speculate on the reasons Dr. Moore might have for this travesty of embryology, but actually the answer is a simple one. He was quite well paid by the Saudi government for the use of his name, and for no real additional work. The textbook he delivered to the Saudi Universities that commissioned the work is titled, "The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology with Islamic Additions." (ISBN 0-7216-6472-5).

The base textbook was work that Moore had completed years before. He did nothing new for this new edition. The “Islamic Additions” are actually the work of an Abdul-Majeed A. Azzindani, and not Dr. Moore’s at all.

Now that's good old fashioned capitalism.

An interesting side bar (of no real importance, but entertaining none the less) is that the Acknowledgments for the book recognize a number of “distinguished scholars” who supported the book with time or money. And number 6 on the list?

Sheik Osamah bin Ladin.
_________________
Nullius in Verba

[mike England]

[THHuxley]

[Hector]

mike England,
As a devout Christian, you should ask yourself if Jesus Christ the Saviour would act as silly as you do. I suppose He would forgive you for you cannot help yourself - God made you the way you are.

The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning, but the heart of fools is in the house of mirth. Ecclesiastes (ch. VII, v. 4)

It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, than for a man to hear the song of fool. Ecclesiastes (ch. VII, v. 5)

Wisdom is before him that hath understanding; but the eyes of a fool are in the ends of the earth. Proverbs (ch. XVII, v. 24)
_________________
What sort of man would f*ck a sweet little prepubescent nine-year-old child who liked playing with dolls and swings? Mo the demon Pedophile.