| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:47 am Post subject: Mary in the Trinity? Wtf? |
|
|
Hey I just found this sura where JC is asked if he ever said he and Mary were gods. Everyone who knows the slightest thing about Christianity knows that Mary has never been part of the Trinity.
Now I know that Islam must have come up with some excuse for this obvious error. What is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I should have quoted the relevant sura.
| Quote: |
| 5:116 And when Allah saith: O Jesus, son of Mary! Didst thou say unto mankind: Take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah ? he saith: Be glorified! It was not mine to utter that to which I had no right. If I used to say it, then Thou knewest it. Thou knowest what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Thy Mind. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower of Things Hidden ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bumpity bump. Come on guys. Someone here must know about this.
I wanting to hit someone with this sura as a way of proving the Qur'an cannot be inerrant but I'm sure there's a standard Islamic defence against this charge. There has to be. It's too obvious a flaw not to have been mentioned before.
I'd like to be forewarned before I issue the challenge.
Help me out here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sanitarium
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 6891 Location: where my time is better spent.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:14 am Post subject: Re: Mary in the Trinity? Wtf? |
|
|
| osmanthus wrote: |
Hey I just found this sura where JC is asked if he ever said he and Mary were gods. Everyone who knows the slightest thing about Christianity knows that Mary has never been part of the Trinity.
Now I know that Islam must have come up with some excuse for this obvious error. What is it? |
Heya osmanthus, sorry for the late reply I have been a bit busy.
Yes, this (should be) a big sticking point with Muslims. Mary was never a part of the trinity. Here are the excuses Muslims give me:
1. Look at the catholics! They worship and revere Mary! Allah was referring to these catholics when he will ask Isa about what they believe!
The problem with this excuse is that not even Catholics have ever or will ever consider Mary to be a part of the trinity so this excuse is not valid.
2. Allah has infinite wisdom and is omnipotent. The Quran in this verse only talks about Mary being a 'partner' with Isa and Allah. How do we know that in the future, Christians will not incorporate Mary into their deity group? Allah knows best!
This is also unlikely.
I believe (and I have read) that there was a sect of christianity living in Muhammad's time that did indeed have Mary as part of the Trinity, and Muhammad mistakenly understood her to be part of it because of them. ie. he thought all Christians believed this.
This group however, it not enough to merit Allah having to ask Isa this question as almost the entirety of Christanity throughout time bleieves in the trinity as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
What do you think? Why would Allah address such insignificance?
Thanks
-Sani _________________ ------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Sani. Hey I was just chatting with a relative of mine who went to a theological college and has always been interested in the history of Christianity.
I asked if there had ever been a Christian sect, heretical or otherwise, in the Middle East, around the 7th century, that believed Mary (the virginal one) was a part of the Trinity.
The answer: no.
Now obviously this is only to the best of this person's knowledge, but the knowledge is usually pretty damned good.
What he did say was that the Gnostics regarded Mary Magdalene as the highest of Jesus' disciples. It is possible this is the source of the confusion. I'll do some more research. If anyone knows of additional information please post it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sanitarium
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 6891 Location: where my time is better spent.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| osmanthus wrote: |
Thanks Sani. Hey I was just chatting with a relative of mine who went to a theological college and has always been interested in the history of Christianity.
I asked if there had ever been a Christian sect, heretical or otherwise, in the Middle East, around the 7th century, that believed Mary (the virginal one) was a part of the Trinity.
The answer: no.
Now obviously this is only to the best of this person's knowledge, but the knowledge is usually pretty damned good.
What he did say was that the Gnostics regarded Mary Magdalene as the highest of Jesus' disciples. It is possible this is the source of the confusion. I'll do some more research. If anyone knows of additional information please post it. |
This is also quite possible. Perhaps there was not this sect. After all, we have only Quran/ahadith when researching Islam.
It is quite possible that Muhammad misunderstood what these monks believed and reported his misunderstanding as fact. This would explain how it got into the Quran
I am sure your friend's word is more reliable than the hadith lol.
Thanks
-Sani _________________ ------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mersk

Joined: 16 Jul 2004 Posts: 5764
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| osmanthus wrote: |
Bumpity bump. Come on guys. Someone here must know about this.
I wanting to hit someone with this sura as a way of proving the Qur'an cannot be inerrant but I'm sure there's a standard Islamic defence against this charge. There has to be. It's too obvious a flaw not to have been mentioned before.
I'd like to be forewarned before I issue the challenge.
Help me out here. |
Asking your average Muslim is not good enough anymore. Such questions should be directed public officials who believe in the oppressive nature of Islam ie stopping inquiries into Islam..
Anothe sura spoke of Allah telling DickMo Jesus did not preach about trinity,but Allah did not tell the Muslims why Jesus was persecuted, and for what reasons his followers were thrown into the lion's den?? What did DickMo have to say to his Muslims about early Christians. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mersk

Joined: 16 Jul 2004 Posts: 5764
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:45 pm Post subject: Re: Mary in the Trinity? Wtf? |
|
|
| Sanitarium wrote: |
I believe (and I have read) that there was a sect of christianity living in Muhammad's time that did indeed have Mary as part of the Trinity, and Muhammad mistakenly understood her to be part of it because of them. ie. he thought all Christians believed this.
What do you think? Why would Allah address such insignificance?
Thanks
-Sani |
DicMo was talking about the Catholics then which suggests that Allah did not know one iota what was going on since DicMo received the Quran from it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sanitarium
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 6891 Location: where my time is better spent.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: Mary in the Trinity? Wtf? |
|
|
| Mersk wrote: |
| Sanitarium wrote: |
I believe (and I have read) that there was a sect of christianity living in Muhammad's time that did indeed have Mary as part of the Trinity, and Muhammad mistakenly understood her to be part of it because of them. ie. he thought all Christians believed this.
What do you think? Why would Allah address such insignificance?
Thanks
-Sani |
DicMo was talking about the Catholics then which suggests that Allah did not know one iota what was going on since DicMo received the Quran from it. |
How do you know Muhammad was talking about the Catholics? Were Jesus' disciples also catholics? Did they hold Mary (still living) as higher than human?
I guess I'm asking when Catholicism reached Arabia (ie. into Muhammad's knowledge)
-Sani _________________ ------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sona
Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 3627 Location: On your wife
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the Qu'ran was sent to clear up mand made mistakes in the bible. In the bible the men changed at first it was mary part of the trinity, but then they realized she was a woman so they removed it. So the Qu'ran shows what the Christians edited out and changed the concept of trinity to make it more logical, the Qu'ran exposes this. _________________ Stupid ho's on here. Am done fool! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Catholicism isn't necessarily relevant here. The Orthodox Church and the Coptic Church (which are more applicable to the Middle East) were in on the Council of Nicaea, where the doctrine of the Trinity was hammered out.
Any Christians living in Arabia in the seventh century were most likely Coptic (like Egypt before the Islamic invasion) or from a minor heretical sect.
Speaking of which, I've been looking around and it turns out there were some sects which regarded Mrs Bonkless as divine. The Miriamites were one and the Collyridians were another. These are the only two I've found.
The former were present at the Council of Nicaea and the latter were recorded as living in Arabia at the same time.
Mind you this was several centuries before Mohammed. At the moment I haven't found records of either sect in seventh century Arabia, but of course this doesn't rule them out either.
In any case they certainly never spoke for the vast majority of Christians and the Qur'an appears to only have one conception of the Trinity, namely the one including Mary. The word "Trinity" is mentioned in two other suras but without stating who it included. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
osmanthus

Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 2120 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sona wrote: |
| Well the Qu'ran was sent to clear up mand made mistakes in the bible. In the bible the men changed at first it was mary part of the trinity, but then they realized she was a woman so they removed it. So the Qu'ran shows what the Christians edited out and changed the concept of trinity to make it more logical, the Qu'ran exposes this. |
Sona please fvck off out of this thread. I'm not in the mood for your meaningless drivel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sanitarium
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 6891 Location: where my time is better spent.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sona wrote: |
Well the Qu'ran was sent to clear up mand made mistakes in the bible.
|
Not what the Quran says, but lets play.
| Sona wrote: |
In the bible the men changed at first it was mary part of the trinity
|
I guess you are going to present evidence for this? A manuscript attesting to this, perhaps?
| Sona wrote: |
, but then they realized she was a woman so they removed it.
|
What do you mean they 'realised she was a woman'? Giving birth wasn't a good enough sign? Her physiology wasn't apparent? LOL What does this mean?
PS: Evidence please.
| Sona wrote: |
So the Qu'ran shows what the Christians edited out and changed the concept of trinity to make it more logical
|
It does? Where does the Quran present this?
| Sona wrote: |
| , the Qu'ran exposes this. |
Present evidence or don't waste our time.
Thanks
-Sani _________________ ------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ixolite

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 12939 Location: land of pork and beer
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sona wrote: |
| Well the Qu'ran was sent to clear up mand made mistakes in the bible. In the bible the men changed at first it was mary part of the trinity, but then they realized she was a woman so they removed it. So the Qu'ran shows what the Christians edited out and changed the concept of trinity to make it more logical, the Qu'ran exposes this. |
OMG!
Well, apart of the fact that Mary is a female name and the fact that (s)he gave birth what other things would have made the men think that (s)he was a man?
Btw, you know where that one ended up, don't you?  _________________ </islam>
"Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Goldthwait H. Dorr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheeto33

Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 3003 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sona is projecting - he takes a while to cop on to the fact that someone is a woman, so he assumes this is a mistake other men are likely to make. He's been interacting with me on this forum for months and only on Sunday realised that I am a woman, ( and only then when I told him so). _________________ .There’s no rape in islam only sex or adultery: a muslim can have sex with his wives or slaves without consent. With others it is adultery. Rape is from the perspective of women. No such thing in islam! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|