HISAM SIDAOUI defends Islam

[Ali Sina]

HISAM SIDAOUI defends Islam

[Muslim Blood]

First of all, I would advise Mr. Hisam to lay off Ali Sina, for in the end, he will have to face the same Creator that Mr. Hisam will...

Secondly, Ali Sina is no child that he needs to be reprimanded or taught what Islam is and isn't, he is grown enough to understand and read up on his own about Islam, and I have no doubt he did, but having no faith placed in his heart, the seeds of Islam fell on it like barley falls on barren rock...It yielded nothing except confusion and ultimately apostasy...

In the end, Ali Sina would face the Creator with his deeds and Mr. Hisam with his...As Muslims, I advise Mr. Hisam to better himself as a Muslim...

You to your way and we to ours...Simple as that.
_________________
To me all atheists resemble cats, dogs and pigs...For only lower life forms are incapable of having a conscious faith...Belief is only the domain of higher thinking beings.

[IoshkaFutz]

Ciao Ali,

To his own mind and the minds of his fellow Muslims, Hirsam Sisaoui has dirproven you simply through the manifestation of his contempt.

When you are bolstered by the word of God there is nothing to discuss. What human would ever win a debate with the devil? He calls you the devil. He knows that he cannot slay you, but he summoned the couarge to go right in front of your lair and launch insults.

"Ali Sina you're a stinker!"... and then tail between his legs, he skedaddles, proud of himself.

Hirsam will not come back. According to his way of thinking (which to us is like throwing the dartboard at the darts instead of vice versa) he has done all that is required.

It's like a fan of Juventus going to the Inter curve of the stadium and shouting a curse. To the Juventino, there's no need to feel logically justified for his team passion. He knows that if he doesn't run he'll get his ass kicked in, so he hits and he runs, satisfied that he did absolutely everything he had to do.

Islam is a belief system hermetically sealed to fresh input and therefore incapable of soul-searching honesty, hard logic.

The poor folks are dependant on Kaffirs to do all the thinking (doubting) for them. We are the ones who through a process of doubt and verification (science) raise the overall threshold of knowledge for them. We are the ones who also raise the level of their morality. We abolished slavery for them (most of them), we have raised the level of their women (from minus 15 to minus 5), we with our ingenuity provide them with the gadgets, the hardware and software.

The Muslim contribution to humanity is shockingly, scandalously low (kicking a dead horse here).

But that's what happens to folks who call converts "reverts"... The whole way of thinking leads to stagnant pond societies...

I read statistic somewhere that a best seller in the Arabic world with its millions and millions, doesn't reach anywhere the volume of a best seller in Tel Aviv alone.

Fresh knowledge vs Old Certainties.

Oh well, you'll meet your creator when you die... yet another curse, this time from Muslim Blood.

The theology of threats and curses!

[Anton]

Muslim blood wrote,

[rand]

Hisam relies on ad hominem which is a logical fallacy.

http://webpages.shepherd.edu/maustin/rhetoric/fallacies.htm

[momtaz]

What is Hisam doing in Australia? Piggy, hurry up, pack him up and send him away to Pakistan or Afghanistan where he rightly belongs.
_________________
What is the cause of Islamic Terrorism & Madness?

"It is ISLAM, it is the BOOK, and it is the MUHAMMED"
yeezevee

[Iznogoodh]

[piggy]

[piggy]

It seems Hisam had a role to play in sueing and shutting down and silencing David Oldfield of One nation fame.

According to:

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s925911.htm

Quote:

David Oldfield sued over terrorism website
AM - Saturday, 16 August , 2003 08:10:34
Reporter: Mark Tamhane
HAMISH ROBERTSON: Pauline Hanson's controversial former chief advisor, David Oldfield, is at the centre of a case which could set new limits on what material can legally be published on the internet.

A Melbourne lawyer has taken action against the One Nation politician under Victoria's new Racial and Religious Tolerance Act.

Mark Tamhane reports.

MARK TAMHANE: New South Wales Upper House MP, David Oldfield, says muslimterrorists.com serves an important function.

DAVID OLDFIELD: It's a resource, an archive, and provides forum for people with regards to the debate generally in Australia and internationally on Islam and terrorism.

MARK TAMHANE: Mr Oldfield says muslimterrorists.com is not racist and people will only find it offensive if truth offends them.

But statements on the site like: "Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims" have outraged Hisam Sidaoui.

The Melbourne lawyer is trying to use Victoria's new Racial and Religious Tolerance Act to close the site down and sue David Oldfield.

HISAM SIDAOUI: Because I'm an aggrieved person under the Victorian legislation, and I'm seeking my legal redress.

MARK TAMHANE: Are you confident of success?

HISAM SIDAOUI: Absolutely.

MARK TAMHANE: Mr Oldfield is a resident of New South Wales and the website muslimterrorists.com is currently hosted by an ISP in that state.

Why are you bringing this action under the Victorian law?

HISAM SIDAOUI: Because the legislation provides redress against any such actions or vilifications inside or outside Victoria.

MARK TAMHANE: David Oldfield believes Hisam Sidaoui's complaint is vexatious, and he will attempt to have the action dismissed at a hearing in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal later this month.

The former Hanson advisor says the Victorian law is "strange".

DAVID OLDFIELD: I mean, let's face it, the Internet goes everywhere.

You have no way of stopping it going into certain juridictions and really I think, the onus is on the person who opens the site and dowloads the material, rather than the people who are responsible for putting the material on the site.

MARK TAMHANE: Closely watching the outcome is the Internet Industry Association of Australia.

The group was involved in a High Court case last year about the reach of the Internet, which gained international notoriety.

It was the landmark ruling that paved the way for Melbourne businessman, Joseph Gutnick, to sue an American on-line magazine in his home state of Victoria.

The Association's Chief Executive, Peter Coroneos, says if Mr Sidaoui's action suceeds, the precedent set in the Gutnick decision could be extended from defamation to also cover religious and racial vilification.

PETER CORONEOS: While I hasten to say at the outset that we in no way shape or form condone the publication of racist or offensive material on the Internet, the Internet is, by its nature, a global medium.

And we believe that, particularly we said this in the context of the Gutnick case, when we were in fact granted leave by the High Court to intervene in the defence of that case, that the fact of publishing content on the internet is a very powerful thing and permits an unprecendented level of communication and for the most part, for the common good.

But you’d really want to avoid a situation where people are starting to restrain what they're saying on the Internet, for fear that somewhere in the world, some country may have a law that prohibits the very thing that you're trying to say.

HAMISH ROBERTSON: Peter Coroneos.

[piggy]

It seems HISAM SIDAOUI has been busy.

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

File No: 2001/0083

Complaint No: 12470

Investigation No: 965

Licensee:
Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Station:
ABC Television

Name of Program:
'Backberner'

Date/s of Broadcast:
30 March 2000

Date of Complaint
8 February 2001

Name of Complainant (if not confidential):
Mr Hisam Sidaoui

Relevant Legislation/Codes:
ABC Code of Practice

Clause 2.4

Issues:
Denigration of Islam

Decision Date:
10 August 2001

DECISION:

The ABA determined that the ABC breached clause 2.4 of the ABC Code of Practice by the broadcast of the 'Backberner' program on 30 March 2000.

[momtaz]

That was some clever detective work there piggy. Good one!
_________________
What is the cause of Islamic Terrorism & Madness?

"It is ISLAM, it is the BOOK, and it is the MUHAMMED"
yeezevee

[Joshua]

This part is interesting. Hisam said "In conclusion, I challenge your courage, your fake prophecy and whatever manhood you possess to publish my response on your evil website. I identify myself as: HISAM SIDAOUI of Melbourne , Australia".

Well, surprise surprise. Ali posted both of your e-mails. You will not come on this forum and reply to some of the posts here. So far, it would appear that Ali is the one with courage and you are the one lacking in courage. The evidence is right here, evidenced in your lack of participation here. This is a certain conclusion. So, how do you still feel that you are the one with courage and Ali has none? If my point here is correct, you will not even answer my question, and I'm betting that will be the case. Isn't that just like human nature? Everybody else has the faults that we do not realize that we have ourselves. Hisam sees Ali as a coward because Hisam is a coward. The funniest part is that so many muslims seem to come here with the impression that they have some sort of ground breaking information without realizing that they are merely repeating the same, ill thought out and incomplete notions, that many before them have. Then they get disappointed and then angry when they discover that their notions are not ground breaking, and not even effective in the least. This is where all that anger comes from. Factual information can be quite a frustrating thing for many muslims. This is actually the problem. ?they come here confident that they have all the answers, because that's what they've been told, and then they experience shock and anger when people provide them with new information that they have never considered. This is precisely why you never hear them give a coherent, logical response to any of these points made in here, because it is a surprise to them. They honestly don't know what to do when faced with this additional information, except become angry and hurl personal insults.

Hisam, apparently you are an Attorney. So you would have to be intelligent enough to know that as soon as someone attacks someone's personal issues in a debate, thereby deviating from the issue of the debate, they are admitting frustration and hence have already admitted that they have no other answers and thereby have admitted that they have lost the debate. If you use this kind of mentality in court, then I don't see you being very successful in the cases you pursue. You have shown yourself to be highly flawed and unbecoming of an Attorney. Apparently you practice Law. Well, my advice to you is keep praticing it until you learn how to do it. I would love to see your diploma from Law school because I just ran out of toilet paper. Real attorneys argue the issues and present factual evidence. You have yet to do either.

[KhepuBlue]

I am Al-Hamdullah a Muslim , born and bred in Australia for 43 years.
Being an individual who has made his convicted religious choice of living, and a minority member in a Western society, has its challenges particularly in these troubled times. Then there are the mischief-makers, rather, scavengers like yourself who feed in a frenzy on trouble, just to make a name for themselves.



Why is it that muslims, even those born and raised in English speaking countries, still cannot speak the language? Exactly how many times have you been born in 43 years? How many times have you been bred in 43 years?
I can understand why your religion has been convicted, if there was ever a religion worthy of conviction it's islam.

You are an entertainer, a shock-jock, a Jerry Springer (equal sophistication),

Wow, I didn't know Jerry Springer was shown in Australia!!!!

[marky]

Can you imagine a "Jerry Springer" type of show in a Muslim country like Saudi Arabia or Iran ?

It wouldn't be about sleeping with your husbands brother or wifes sister, it would be about the "perversion" of removing your veil, or horrror or horrors, a woman driving !

From my non-Muslim education, one only has to see how Islam behaves when it runs countries to make it obvious that there is something seriously wrong with it.

I am not talking about secular countries like Turkey, but Islamic countries where the laws are Islamic (i.e. Sharia).

Living in the West and then going to live in one of those would be like being captured in WW2 and being sent to a concentration camp.
_________________
No need to hide behind slogans of deceit, Claiming that you're a religion of peace, We just don't believe you, We can clearly see through, The madness that you're feeding your people, Jihad ... (Stuck Mojo - Open Season)

[Guest]

Hisam SIDAOUI