|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Aceology
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
| Aceology wrote: |
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
| Brendalee wrote: |
| Hey Ahmed, I can accept that. But you should understand that it you theoretically accept ahadith about Aisha's age as you did at the start of this, then the other ahadith are also going to be used. |
Read my cooment again, it was only based on the assumption that such crtap of hadith is true, on the other hand I do not believe such crap of hadith, because as far as I believe according to some other hearsay crap, the prophet married such womnan when she was 18 years old
let's move on to the next slam dunk, do you have anything new that you want to be slammed? |
pick and choose eh ? how do you feel about crucifying people ? not any better than marrying children. |
 |
 _________________ My Youube channel :
http://www.youtube.com/user/AceoIogy
Do you like my posts ? Read more here ;
http://www.debatefaith.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AhmedBahgat

Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 10001
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
will any ignorant kafir bring new allegations for me to slam dunk?, look kafirs, your cooperation will be appreciated, however if you run out of your crap, I can bring my own slam dunks in here, what do you think, ignorant kafirs bound to eternal hell? _________________ Click to read and watch my 10000 comment on FFI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AhmedBahgat

Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 10001
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zorasta_Russ wrote: |
"Lifting up the heavens is only possible if the earth is flat. And the heavens stay up with invisible pillars without falling on top of us because Allah: [وَيُمْسِكُ السَّمَآءَ أَن تَقَعَ عَلَى الاٌّرْضِ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِهِ]
(He withholds the heaven from falling on the earth except by His permission. )[22:65] |
Hello again ZR
I will give you one more chance to explain the above, to how it may be a contradiction, the reason I offered you such chance is because I believe that it is a good possibility for me to make the 32 slam dunk
back to you _________________ Click to read and watch my 10000 comment on FFI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
piscohot

Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 3928
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Hello ZR
I will get back to you in about 48 hours as I have another mother of all slams to dunk:
Salam Bro Watawasu
Look mate, the so called Tafsirs of al Quran by all such confused people was another fame game that all these people were playing, they just copied each other because they lack any atom weight of intellect to work it out themselves, exactly like the goons of FFI who copy those Mufasiroon crap while as well do not have an atom weight of intellect to realize their confusion
Let me now show you and show every goon on FFI, how they and their fellow confused Mufasiroon are LOGICALLY wrong, this is going to be another mother of all slams BTW
Those Mufasiroon are basing their tafsir to 65:4 on the fake crap of hadith b y Bukhari and others in which the so called Aysha claimed that the prophet married her at 6 and consumed his marriage when she was 9, which means that he had to wait for her period, THERE IS NO OTHER LOGICAL REASON but that, because if she did not have their period at 6 why wait till 9 to consume the marriage.
Let’s now assume for argument sake that such alleged hadith by the so called Aysha is true, this means that from the age of 6 till the age of 9, the prophet did not have sex with her, this also means that when he had sex with her she at least had her period ONCE, let’s now assume that the prophet divorced her before she was 9 and before she reached her first period, i.e. SHE NEVER HAD HER PERIOD before divorce, i.e. THE PROPHET NEVER HAD SEX WITH HER before the assumed divorce, in this case Aysha can not have Iddah of three months, rather NO IDDAH whatsoever, let’s look at the following verse:
O you who believe! when you marry the believing women, then you divorce them before you touch them, you have in their case no term which you should reckon; so make some provision for them and send them forth a goodly sending forth.
[The Quran ; 33:49]
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِذَا نَكَحْتُمُ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ ثُمَّ طَلَّقْتُمُوهُنَّ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ تَمَسُّوهُنَّ فَمَا لَكُمْ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ عِدَّةٍ تَعْتَدُّونَهَا ۖ فَمَتِّعُوهُنَّ وَسَرِّحُوهُنَّ سَرَاحًا جَمِيلًا (49)
-> See what the verse clearly tells: ثُمَّ طَلَّقْتُمُوهُنَّ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ تَمَسُّوهُنَّ فَمَا لَكُمْ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ عِدَّةٍ تَعْتَدُّونَهَا , i.e. then you divorce them before you touch them, you have in their case no term which you should reckon , should have been very clear for the dumb and ignorant Mufasiroon, and their fellow FFI goons, that is if they bloody use just a tiny part of their brains, but it seems they have no brains at all to even use part of it, now let’s look at 65:4 again and it should be clear that all those Mufasiroon and their felon FFI goons are a bunch of confused freaks who should never talk Quran because simply they could not understand it:
And (as for) those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, if you have a doubt, their prescribed time shall be three months, and of those too who have not their menstruation; and (as for) the pregnant women, their prescribed time is that they lay down their burden; and whoever is careful of (his duty to) Allah He will make easy for him his affair.
[The Quran ; 65:4]
وَاللَّائِي يَئِسْنَ مِنَ الْمَحِيضِ مِنْ نِسَائِكُمْ إِنِ ارْتَبْتُمْ فَعِدَّتُهُنَّ ثَلَاثَةُ أَشْهُرٍ وَاللَّائِي لَمْ يَحِضْنَ ۚ وَأُولَاتُ الْأَحْمَالِ أَجَلُهُنَّ أَنْ يَضَعْنَ حَمْلَهُنَّ ۚ وَمَنْ يَتَّقِ اللَّهَ يَجْعَلْ لَهُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِ يُسْرًا (4)
-> The verse above is telling us the the Iddah of some type of wives should be 3 months, one of these types of wives are: وَاللَّائِي لَمْ يَحِضْنَ , i.e. and of those too who have not their menstruation , according to the confused Mufasiroon and the FFI goons, this group of wives are those who had never had their menstruation, i.e. children, i.e. like Aysha when she was 6 years old when the prophet married her as alleged by the hearsay hadith, THIS CAN NEVER MAKE SENSE because in such case those young wives never ever reached their menstruation as alleged by the confused Mufasiroon and their fellow FFI goons, which should also mean that their husbands never touched them as the prophet never did with Aysha (as alleged in the hearsay hadith), i.e. THEY HAVE NO IDDAH as 33:49 told us, here it is again: ثُمَّ طَلَّقْتُمُوهُنَّ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ تَمَسُّوهُنَّ فَمَا لَكُمْ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ عِدَّةٍ تَعْتَدُّونَهَا , i.e. then you divorce them before you touch them, you have in their case no term which you should reckon , but 65:4 clearly tells us that they must have 3 months Iddah, i.e. 65:4 can not be talking about those who have never reached menstruation rather those who ate least reach it once
Here you have it, I just slam dunked all those confused Mufasiroon and their fellow FFI goons, this means that we have another mother of all slams:
 |
mother of all slam dunks?
Hardly, you sneaky lying storyteller for Allah........
Why are you talking about Aisha when many here have seen you proclaimed that you BELIEVED Aisha NEVER existed in the first place?
This is how sneaky Ahmed is:
first he brings sura 33.49 which said that as long as the man divorced his wife without having sex with her, then there is no need for observation of Iddah and she can marry immediately.
Next, he brings sura 65.4 which tells the 'iddah' to be observed before marriage.
THEN he claimed that since the quran said that 'iddah' must be observed, that means the women who were mentioned as divorced in sura 33.49 can only refer to mature women as there is no need for the order of 'iddah' if the girl was still immature.
Question here is, sneaky Ahmed,
Which event occur first?
The marriage or the divorce?
You think you can get away with your lies by putting the event sequence in reverse?
When you look at sura 65.4, it mentioned the observation of 'iddah'( a period of three months for women and those who have yet to have their menses) before you can marry them.
Then sura 33.49 says that if you have married them BUT have not touch them and wants to divorce, then 'iddah' is not necessary for their next marriage. Why? The reason for 'iddah' was not broken because the women had not been touched by the husbands during the marriage. 'iddah' did not apply to the mature divorced women in this case and likewise it would not have applied to the divorced immature girls. Where is the proof that there are no immature divorced girls in this case, Ahmed?
The only thing that do not make sense here is your stupid claim that the young wives NEVER EVER reach menstruation.
There you go Ahmed, slapped in the face again.
how many times do I need to tell you that you cannot claim slamdunks with your made-up stories? _________________ Ratio of Men to Women in Islamic heaven - 1:72
Quran Miracle 16:69 :BEES EAT FRUITS...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AhmedBahgat

Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 10001
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a reply from brother Windsor of FI site to Aksel:
Hello brother AhmedBahgat. It's been more than 2 weeks!
| Quote: |
Thanks for conveying message Ahmed, your friend should really join the forum.
|
No thanks. I do not accompany haters and bigots.
| Quote: |
| Zoroastrianism is not racist |
I said it thrives on Nazi ideologies (A unique religion for a unique race/ethnicity), which is certainly true.
| Quote: |
yes I would be happy to see the majority of Iranians return to Zoroastrianism, it is the homeland of our Prophet after all,
|
See? This is exactly what I am talking about. Zoroastrians believe in Zoroastriansim mainly because it's the "Persian" religion. It's the religion of our ancient forefathers and the rest of that crap argument. You do not follow Zoroastrianism because it is the true religion, but because you believe it is the "Persian" religion, that all Persians must be Zoroastrians or they would not really be Persians, that they would lose their identity. Most Zoroastrians make religion an ideology and mix religion with race in a disgusting way.
If Zoroaster was not Persian, you would not have believed in such a primitive religion for one second. Rational people follow the true religion, not the primitive religions of their ancient forefathers.
| Quote: |
but I don't resent Iranian Bahais or Jews...
|
But you resent Iranian Muslims?!
| Quote: |
in fact I empathize with them, especially the Bahais, as all are living together under the restrictions of Sharia law.
|
They are not living under the restrictions of Sharia law. Sharia law does not have restrictions. IRI is not Islam! They apply traditional Shia rules which at sometimes are worse than the Sunni rules. I try to get this into the head of Zoroastrians but they are too stupid to understand it.
| Quote: |
| I'm not really sure what he wants me to say here as he's only given examples of his personal experience with Zoroastrians. He is talking about a religion of ~2,700,000 souls (an upper estimate) and he is very unlikely to have met and talked with a representative sample of us in his lifetime. |
You are the second sensible Zoroastrian I have come across. The rest were racist bigoted arrogant and ignorant scumbags.
| Quote: |
| Anyway, Zoroastriansism does care for non-Aryans, in fact for the world and all its people. |
Any religion should care for the whole world. That's the point of religion actually!
| Quote: |
Windsor made reference to our "stupid scripture", so I'd appreciate a textual reference from him.
|
Does he want a reference to what i consider stupid in their scriptures or just any reference?
Anyway I think the whole idea of asha and druj to be laughable really. _________________ Click to read and watch my 10000 comment on FFI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sum
Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 8527 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello my irrational friend, AhmedBahgat
Your quote -
Rational people follow the true religion, not the primitive religions of their ancient forefathers.
This is where you went wrong. If you were rational you wouldn`t touch Islam with a barge pole. It is only your brainwashing through your formative years that made you a muslim. If you had been brought up in your formative years in a Hindu family you would have been a Hindu and much better for it.
Can`t you see the logic of what I am saying? Am I correct?
sum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AhmedBahgat

Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 10001
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello FFI boys & girls
An ignorant goon of FFI gang, in the name of Islamis_Tashit, is way too much into his collection of Harry Potter books, Bugs Bunny cartoons, and Nickelodeon channel that he said the following:
| Islamis_Tashit wrote: |
| And these are shooting stars which chase the jinn!! :roll: |
So I quizzed his ugly pinhead:
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Hahaha, are you still living in your Barbie world, deluded punk?
The shooting stars are only found in the cartoons you stupid, where exactly the Quran mentions shooting stars?
let's see what an ignorant jerk like you will bring on the table as evidences |
He came back with the following wishful thinking crap:
| Islamis _Tashit wrote: |
What else is in the sky, visible and bright for us to see, and a flame that "appears" to fly across the sky as if it was thrown at something or pursues something? 15:17-18, 37:6-10, 67:5, 72:8-9
Go ahead genius. Tell us. Is there something else that we can see in the sky that matches this? So why don't you just dismiss me and thereby admit you don't have an answer? |
Clearly, he is cornered, now he is wishful thinking that the Quran means as such, i.e. the Quran is talking about shooting stars, I guess he is very deep into his Barbie world along with his boyfriend Kim,
You can see that he just mentioned verses numbers without walking me through it to prove his allegation, possibly after being cornered he does not have the stamina, so let me uppercut him with no mercy and make the 32 slam dunk
Today’ slam is about a few Arabic words:
1) The word Masabih, a plural to mean Lamps
2) The word Shihab, a singular to mean Meteor
3) The word Shuhuba plural to mean Meteors
First of all, the argument t in here is not about what the Quran said regarding shooting the Jinn, this is because we can never prove it due to the fact said in the Quran that WE CANNOT SEE THE JINN
O children of Adam! Let not the Shaitan tempt you as he caused your parents to exit from the garden, pulling off from them their clothing to show them their private parts, indeed he sees you, he and his tribe from where you do not see them. Indeed We have made the Shaitans to be the guardians of those who do not believe.
[Al Quran ; 7:27]
يَا بَنِي آدَمَ لَا يَفْتِنَنَّكُمُ الشَّيْطَانُ كَمَا أَخْرَجَ أَبَوَيْكُمْ مِنَ الْجَنَّةِ يَنْزِعُ عَنْهُمَا لِبَاسَهُمَا لِيُرِيَهُمَا سَوْآتِهِمَا ۗ إِنَّهُ يَرَاكُمْ هُوَ وَقَبِيلُهُ مِنْ حَيْثُ لَا تَرَوْنَهُمْ ۗ إِنَّا جَعَلْنَا الشَّيَاطِينَ أَوْلِيَاءَ لِلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ (27)
-> See: ۗ إِنَّهُ يَرَاكُمْ هُوَ وَقَبِيلُهُ مِنْ حَيْثُ لَا تَرَوْنَهُمْ , i.e. indeed he sees you, he and his tribe from where you do not see them. , i.e. humans can not see the Jinn according to the Quran, therefore the kafirs can not use such argument asking the Muslims to prove that something that is called Jinn is being shot by such type of missile the Quran is talking about
The argument in here is simply, DID THE QURAN EVER MENTION SHOOTING STARS?
The answer is NO. Shooting stars are only found in the children magazines, there is no such thing that is called shooting stars . What the Quran said however that the Shuhub (Plural) or Shihab (Singular) (Meteors & Meteor) are the objects that are used to shoot the evil jinn, I have to stress that the Quran never told us that the Meteors are created for such reason only, rather they are used to shoot the evil jinn, i.e. there might be another reason for their creation. the Quran never told us why Allah created the meteors.
Let me now look at the first verse, Ugly is using to prove his crap
And We have adorned the lowest heaven (sky) with lamps, and We have made such (Lamps as) missiles to drive away Shaitans, and We have prepared for them the torture of fire.
وَلَقَدْ زَيَّنَّا السَّمَاء الدُّنْيَا بِمَصَابِيحَ وَجَعَلْنَاهَا رُجُومًا لِّلشَّيَاطِينِ وَأَعْتَدْنَا لَهُمْ عَذَابَ السَّعِيرِ (5)
[The Quran ; 67:5]
-> As you can clearly see, the verse never mentioned any shooting stars, the verse only said about the lower sky that: We have adorned the lowest heaven (sky) with lamps, and We have made such (Lamps as) missiles to drive away Shaitans, i.e the word used is: ِمَصَابِيحَ , Masabih, Lamps
-> A child should recognise that when looking at the night sky we see thousands of bluish light bulbs, i.e. thousands of bluish light lamps, i.e. the word lamp is used as a metaphor because there is no real lamps that decorate the stars, the word Lamp can be used as a metaphor to describe an object that shines its own light, other objects that do not produce light on its own can not be described as Lamps this is because those objects only reflect the light, unlike the objects that produce their own light of course, logically speaking, a burnt out bulb can’t be used in a lamp any more and has to be replaced this is because the bulb can not produce light on its own any more. the message of 67:5 is simply as follow:
The sky is decorated with LAMPS and these LAMPS may be used to shoot the Jinn, Had Ugly Tashit expressed his allegation as The Quran tells us that there are shooting lamps that shoot the Jinn, he would have been very accurate, however he is basing all his crap on the words SHOOTING STARS which never appeared in the Quran, that is how much confused he is.
-> Now we know that at least 4 objects that produce or reflect the light:
1) The planets
2) The stars
3) The comets
4) The meteors
From the above list, we can use the metaphor Lamp to the following objects from the above list:
1) The stars
2) The comets
3) The meteors
This is because all these three objects produce light on their own, the planets however can not be described metaphorically as such because they do not produce light on their own.
The Ugly goon Tashit then referred to verses 37:6-10 as being his other evidences to prove that the Quran is talking about SHOOTING STARS, these verses will clearly expose his ignorance because the verses explicitly told us what is used to shoot the Jinn, let’s have look:
6: Indeed, We have decorated the lowest heaven with an adornment of the planets,
7: And a safeguard against every rebellious Shaitan.
8: They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side,
9: Being driven off, and for them is a perpetual torture,
10: Except him who snatches off but once, then there follows him a piercing meteor.
[The Quran ; 37:6-10]
إِنَّا زَيَّنَّا السَّمَاءَ الدُّنْيَا بِزِينَةٍ الْكَوَاكِبِ (6)
وَحِفْظًا مِنْ كُلِّ شَيْطَانٍ مَارِدٍ (7)
لَا يَسَّمَّعُونَ إِلَى الْمَلَإِ الْأَعْلَىٰ وَيُقْذَفُونَ مِنْ كُلِّ جَانِبٍ (8)
دُحُورًا ۖ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ وَاصِبٌ (9)
إِلَّا مَنْ خَطِفَ الْخَطْفَةَ فَأَتْبَعَهُ شِهَابٌ ثَاقِبٌ (10)
-> 37:6 is talking about something else that is decorating the sky, see: Indeed, We have decorated the lowest heaven with an adornment of the planets,, the important point is, even though the planets don’t produce their own light, they still reflect the light that hits them, and they still look like bluish lamps (the wrong metaphor of course), but that is only for the observer, he/she just look at the sky and see two or four or 100 blue lights decorating it, possibly some of those blue lights are planets which reflect the light but the observer does not now which is which , they just look the same. 37:6 is explicitly telling us about one of these objects used in decorating the sky, i.e. the planets.
-> 37:7 is telling us another information about such decorated sky, that it is protected against the Shaitans with some sort of a system: And a safeguard against every rebellious Shaitan.
-> 37:8 is telling us about those shaitans and elaborating to what is happening to them by such very advanced alarm/defence system : They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side, , this is an amazing verse because even though it talks about something that we can not see (the Jinn) we still see the meteor with the naked eye, however we hardly see any of this meteors, myself possibly saw no more than 10 in my 43 years of life, HOWEVER verse 37:8 implies that it is happening in very high number, see the words: وَيُقْذَفُونَ مِنْ كُلِّ جَانِبٍ , i.e. and they are shot from every side , this sentence implies that it is happening all the times in masses, the amazing fact is, while we hardly see the meteors, they are indeed hitting the earth atmosphere almost 100 times a day on average.,
-> Verse 37:9 is telling us why such system in place for the Jinn: Being driven off, and for them is a perpetual torture,
-> Then the last verse 37:10 is explicitly telling what type of such objects that is used as missiles: Except him who snatches off but once, then there follows him a piercing meteor. , see the words: شِهَابٌ ثَاقِبٌ , Shihab Thaqib, i.e. piercing meteor, the word SHIHAB is very common in Arabic and it means one thing only METEOR.
Now, I do agree that the meteor are commonly known as shooting stars, but again that is in our Barbie world, and not in the real world, in the real world the shooting stars must be the meteors, see what Wiki says about the meteors:
A meteoroid is a small sand- to boulder-sized particle of debris in the Solar System. The visible path of a meteoroid that enters Earth's (or another body's) atmosphere is called a meteor, or commonly a "shooting star" or "falling star.
Commonly known does not mean that this is what the Quran is talking about, what counts in any argument against the Quran by the goons has to be what the Arabic words used and in the case 37:10 the Quran clearly and explicitly told us that the missiles used to drive off the Jinn are Meteors, and even when the Quran used a metaphor to describe such missiles, it never used the metaphor of shooting stars rather the metaphor of LAMPS as explained in 67:5
17: And We guard it against every stoned devil,
18: But he who steals a hearing, so there follows him a clear meteor.
[The Quran ; 15:16-18]
وَحَفِظْنَاهَا مِن كُلِّ شَيْطَانٍ رَّجِيمٍ (17)
إِلاَّ مَنِ اسْتَرَقَ السَّمْعَ فَأَتْبَعَهُ شِهَابٌ مُّبِينٌ (18)
-> Again the Quran is telling us about the defence system that is guarding the sky against those rebellious devils And We guard it against every stoned devil,, then it tell us what exactly that will follow and hit those from among them who will try to spy on the sky: إِلاَّ مَنِ اسْتَرَقَ السَّمْعَ فَأَتْبَعَهُ شِهَابٌ مُّبِينٌ , i.e. But he who steals a hearing, so there follows him a clear meteor. , again can you see the word Shihab, again, it only means Meteor, nothing is metaphor in here
And for the third and fourth time, the Quran tells us the same in the two verses 72:8-9, however one of those verse uses the plural form of Shihab which is Shuhub, i.e. Meteors:
8: And that we sought to reach heaven, but we found it filled with strong guards and meteors.
9: And that we used to sit in some of the sitting-places thereof to steal a hearing, and he who listens now would meteor lying in wait for him
[The Quran ; 72:8-9]
وَأَنَّا لَمَسْنَا السَّمَاء فَوَجَدْنَاهَا مُلِئَتْ حَرَسًا شَدِيدًا وَشُهُبًا (8)
وَأَنَّا كُنَّا نَقْعُدُ مِنْهَا مَقَاعِدَ لِلسَّمْعِ فَمَن يَسْتَمِعِ الْآنَ يَجِدْ لَهُ شِهَابًا رَّصَدًا (9)
-> See in 72:8 the Jinns said : فَوَجَدْنَاهَا مُلِئَتْ حَرَسًا شَدِيدًا وَشُهُبًا, i.e. but we found it (the sky) filled with strong guards and meteors., then they said they even elaborated further in 72:9 فَمَن يَسْتَمِعِ الْآنَ يَجِدْ لَهُ شِهَابًا رَّصَدًا , i.e. and he who listens now would meteor lying in wait for him
Finally, here is an image from Google online translator showing the meaning of the word Shuhub:
As you have seen, the Quran never in any of the above verses mentioned by Ugly Tashit, that the stars are used to shoot the rebellious devils, rather Shuhub which only have one meaning (meteor), which is very accurate to the current facts of science that we know it, IN FACT HAD THE QURAN SAID THAT THE SHOOTING STARS ARE USED TO SHOOT THE JINN, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A CLEAR SCIENTIFIC MISTAKE IN THE QURAN
My special thanks to Ugly Tashit for giving me a hand to dunk the 32nd slam
# 32 _________________ Click to read and watch my 10000 comment on FFI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charleslemartel

Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 1071
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Today’ slam is about a few Arabic words:
1) The word Masabih, a plural to mean Lamps
2) The word Shihab, a singular to mean Meteor
3) The word Shuhuba plural to mean Meteors
First of all, the argument t in here is not about what the Quran said regarding shooting the Jinn, this is because we can never prove it due to the fact said in the Quran that WE CANNOT SEE THE JINN
|
LOL. You are already copping out even before you began, AB!! I say this because "shooting the jinn" IS also one of the issues as Quran explicitly says that. Secondly, there are many many things which we cannot SEE, yet they have been proven; so you are obviously wrong even before you begin.
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
O children of Adam! Let not the Shaitan tempt you as he caused your parents to exit from the garden, pulling off from them their clothing to show them their private parts, indeed he sees you, he and his tribe from where you do not see them. Indeed We have made the Shaitans to be the guardians of those who do not believe.
[Al Quran ; 7:27]
يَا بَنِي آدَمَ لَا يَفْتِنَنَّكُمُ الشَّيْطَانُ كَمَا أَخْرَجَ أَبَوَيْكُمْ مِنَ الْجَنَّةِ يَنْزِعُ عَنْهُمَا لِبَاسَهُمَا لِيُرِيَهُمَا سَوْآتِهِمَا ۗ إِنَّهُ يَرَاكُمْ هُوَ وَقَبِيلُهُ مِنْ حَيْثُ لَا تَرَوْنَهُمْ ۗ إِنَّا جَعَلْنَا الشَّيَاطِينَ أَوْلِيَاءَ لِلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ (27)
-> See: ۗ إِنَّهُ يَرَاكُمْ هُوَ وَقَبِيلُهُ مِنْ حَيْثُ لَا تَرَوْنَهُمْ , i.e. indeed he sees you, he and his tribe from where you do not see them. , i.e. humans can not see the Jinn according to the Quran, therefore the kafirs can not use such argument asking the Muslims to prove that something that is called Jinn is being shot by such type of missile the Quran is talking about |
Even if it is granted to you that you need not prove the existence of Jinn, it will not allow you to escape the boomeranging slam dunk .
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
| The argument in here is simply, DID THE QURAN EVER MENTION SHOOTING STARS? The answer is NO. Shooting stars are only found in the children magazines, there is no such thing that is called shooting stars . What the Quran said however that the Shuhub (Plural) or Shihab (Singular) (Meteors & Meteor) are the objects that are used to shoot the evil jinn, I have to stress that the Quran never told us that the Meteors are created for such reason only, rather they are used to shoot the evil jinn, i.e. there might be another reason for their creation. the Quran never told us why Allah created the meteors. |
For your kind information, meteors are commonly called shooting stars. But you surely already know it. However, call it whatever, you will not be able to come out of the "chasing" mess
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
| A child should recognise that when looking at the night sky we see thousands of bluish light bulbs, i.e. thousands of bluish light lamps, i.e. the word lamp is used as a metaphor because there is no real lamps that decorate the stars, the word Lamp can be used as a metaphor to describe an object that shines its own light, other objects that do not produce light on its own can not be described as Lamps this is because those objects only reflect the light, unlike the objects that produce their own light of course, logically speaking, a burnt out bulb can’t be used in a lamp any more and has to be replaced this is because the bulb can not produce light on its own any more. |
It is good for you that you now know there are no real lamps; too bad Allah did not know it.
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
the message of 67:5 is simply as follow:
The sky is decorated with LAMPS and these LAMPS may be used to shoot the Jinn, Had Ugly Tashit expressed his allegation as The Quran tells us that there are shooting lamps that shoot the Jinn, he would have been very accurate, however he is basing all his crap on the words SHOOTING STARS which never appeared in the Quran, that is how much confused he is. |
. Even with lamps, Quran is talking crap, can't you see it? Allah did not know what a star really is. He thought they were lamps just like a child would think.
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
From the above list, we can use the metaphor Lamp to the following objects from the above list:
1) The stars
2) The comets
3) The meteors
This is because all these three objects produce light on their own, the planets however can not be described metaphorically as such because they do not produce light on their own. |
. I rarely laugh so much, thank you. Neither meteors, nor comets, produce light on their own. This is what happens to one who thinks all the world's knowledge is contained in the DIVINE Quran.
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
-> 37:8 is telling us about those shaitans and elaborating to what is happening to them by such very advanced alarm/defence system : They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side, , this is an amazing verse because even though it talks about something that we can not see (the Jinn) we still see the meteor with the naked eye, however we hardly see any of this meteors, myself possibly saw no more than 10 in my 43 years of life, HOWEVER verse 37:8 implies that it is happening in very high number, see the words: وَيُقْذَفُونَ مِنْ كُلِّ جَانِبٍ , i.e. and they are shot from every side , this sentence implies that it is happening all the times in masses, the amazing fact is, while we hardly see the meteors, they are indeed hitting the earth atmosphere almost 100 times a day on average., |
Oh my!! this is so hilarious!! You not having seen more than 10 meteors does not mean others have not or cannot see hundreds of meteors. Modern man does not see them because he lives in cities full of light and hardly ever glances at the night sky. Even if you look at the sky from a well-lit city, the light all around obscures the visibility of stars as well shooting stars or meteors. Go and ask some village folks if they have seen hundreds or thousands of shooting stars
This is not in the least amazing, dear AB; it is only your gullibility and the burning desire to defend the absurdities of Quran at any cost which is causing you to get amazed.
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Blah blah blah |
I never expected such a childish response from you; but that only reflects on the stupidity Quran is full of and not your own. You are a reasonably intelligent guy blinded by the fear of hell; you can't help it.
I will leave the actual arguments to IAT; he has done a masters in this topic.
Good luck to you, AB; you are in for a great shock (boomerang).  _________________ Happy New Year to Everyone
Fear is the most powerful emotional tool, it can turn off the areas of the brain responsible for rational thought.
Is that why Muslims can't be rational? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Apple Pie

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Posts: 823 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
The argument in here is simply, DID THE QURAN EVER MENTION SHOOTING STARS?
The answer is NO. Shooting stars are only found in the children magazines, there is no such thing that is called shooting stars . |
How about this children’s mag…
وما هو بقول شيطن رجيم
Wama huwa biqawli shaytanin rajeemin
81.25 And he is not on account of the expelled serpent’s saying.
رجيم = “rajeemin”
“rajeemin” definition:
Adjective. Thrown at, or cast at, with stones. Said to be applied to the devil because he is cast at with shooting stars. Stoned. Generally meaning put to death by being stoned. Cursed, or accursed; and in this sense applied to the devil. Reviled, also applied to the devil; and so in the two senses here following: driven away; expelled; put, or placed, at a distance away, or far away; cut off from friendly or loving communion or intercourse; forsaken; or abandoned. One thrown off (with curse), rejected.
It comes from the root “rajama”, which means the throwing, or casting, of stones: this is the primary meaning. Stones. The act of slaying in any manner, but generally stoning, i.e. putting to death by stoning. The act of beating, or battering the ground with the feet. The act of cursing. The act of reviling. The act of driving away; expelling; putting; or placing; at a distance, away, or far away. The act of cutting off from friendly, or loving communion or intercourse; or abandoning; to stone, cast stones, stone to death; curse; revile; expel; put a stone (on a tomb), speak conjecturally; guess; surmise.
References:
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume three, pp. 1047 - 1049
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur’an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 204
Occurrences of “rajeemin/rajeemun” in the Koran: 4
Locations: 15.17, 15.34, 38.77, 81.25
Occurrences of the root “rajama” and its 10 forms in the Koran: 14
Locations: 3.36, 11.91, 15.17, 15.34, 16.98, 18.20, 18.22, 19.46, 26.116, 36.18, 38.77, 44.20, 67.5, 81.25 _________________ http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/The_Koranic_Bible |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
piscohot

Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 3928
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Hello FFI boys & girls
Watch while I, Ahmed, the selfappointed storyteller for Allah spins another of my ridiculous..oops.. I mean convincing slam dunk on you.
Now we know that at least 4 objects that produce or reflect the light:
1) The planets
2) The stars
3) The comets
4) The meteors
-> 37:8 is telling us about those shaitans and elaborating to what is happening to them by such very advanced alarm/defence system : They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side,
|
advanced defence system...
Remember Ahmed, you CANNOT claim slamdunks on madeup stories.
Listen to exalted assembly?
Allah holds a meeting everyday? _________________ Ratio of Men to Women in Islamic heaven - 1:72
Quran Miracle 16:69 :BEES EAT FRUITS...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cassandra

Joined: 07 Nov 2005 Posts: 4495
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
| Aceology wrote: |
| Blah Blah..... |
Ignorant
The Quran says Ankiho Al Nisaa, i.e. marry the women, the Quran never said Ankiho Al Atfal, i.e. marry the children
You are dismissed due to your stupidity |
4:127 says nisa can mean NEW BORN girls. Did you forget Julian Charteris kicking your ass on that issue? Why do you pretend that you haven't been refuted? Your delusion is like a limpet on a crag, isn't it?
Here is Julian's post again:
| Julian Charteris wrote: |
How does Allah (aka Muhammad) define nisa in surah an-nisa?
an-Nisa' 004:127
ويستفتونك في النساء قل الله يفتيكم فيهن ومايتلى عليكم في الكتاب في يتامى النساء اللاتي لاتؤتونهن ماكتب لهن وترغبون ان تنكحوهن والمستضعفين من الولدان وان تقوموا لليتامى بالقسط وماتفعلوا من خير فان الله كان به عليما
Wayastaftoonaka fee alnnisa-i quli Allahu yufteekum feehinna wama yutla AAalaykum fee alkitabi fee yatama alnnisa-i allatee la tu/toonahunna ma kutiba lahunna watarghaboona an tankihoohunna waalmustadAAafeena mina alwildani waan taqoomoo lilyatama bialqisti wama tafAAaloo min khayrin fa-inna Allaha kana bihi AAaleeman
And they ask for your opinion/clarification in the women, say: "God decreed/clarifies in them (F), and what is read/recited on you in The Book in the women orphans/minors that lose their father, those who (F) you did not give them (F) what was written/dictated to them (F), and you desire that you marry them (F), and the weakened from the children/new borns, and that you take care of to the orphans/minors that lose their father with the just/equitable; and what you make/do from goodness, so that God was/is with it knowledgeable."
In other words, when Muslims ask about who are these nisa, Allah (aka Muhammad) said they are:
1. Orphans
2. Female wards
3. Those you desire to marry
4. The weakened from the children or new born.
These are the categories of females for whom the term 'nisa' in surah al-nisa refers to. |
What's the point of you refusing to admit you've been beaten? What's the point of you repeating your refuted propositions ad nauseum? From Julian's debate with you, we know that nisa does not only mean mature women but can mean even children or new born. Time to move on, Ahmed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aceology
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="piscohot"]
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Hello FFI boys & girls
Watch while I, Ahmed, the selfappointed storyteller for Allah spins another of my ridiculous..oops.. I mean convincing slam dunk on you.
Now we know that at least 4 objects that produce or reflect the light:
1) The planets
2) The stars
3) The comets
4) The meteors
-> 37:8 is telling us about those shaitans and elaborating to what is happening to them by such very advanced alarm/defence system : They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side,
|
 _________________ My Youube channel :
http://www.youtube.com/user/AceoIogy
Do you like my posts ? Read more here ;
http://www.debatefaith.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
piscohot

Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 3928
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aceology wrote: |
| AhmedBahgat wrote: |
Hello FFI boys & girls
Watch while I, Ahmed, the selfappointed storyteller for Allah spins another of my ridiculous..oops.. I mean convincing slam dunk on you.
Now we know that at least 4 objects that produce or reflect the light:
1) The planets
2) The stars
3) The comets
4) The meteors
-> 37:8 is telling us about those shaitans and elaborating to what is happening to them by such very advanced alarm/defence system : They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are shot from every side,
|
 |
becareful Allah might sic his very advanced defence system on you!
 _________________ Ratio of Men to Women in Islamic heaven - 1:72
Quran Miracle 16:69 :BEES EAT FRUITS...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
infidel_01

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 1443
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
AB wrote:
37:6 is talking about something else that is decorating the sky, see: Indeed, We have decorated the lowest heaven with an adornment of the planets,, the important point is, even though the planets don’t produce their own light, they still reflect the light that hits them, and they still look like bluish lamps (the wrong metaphor of course), but that is only for the observer, he/she just look at the sky and see two or four or 100 blue lights decorating it, possibly some of those blue lights are planets which reflect the light but the observer does not now which is which , they just look the same. 37:6 is explicitly telling us about one of these objects used in decorating the sky, i.e. the planets.
|
Thanks AB for admitting that your all-knowing allah is wrong this time by using wrong metaphore (your words).
The creator should have known the difference between stars, meteorite, planet etc, but this allah knows nothing better than a 7th century camel herder "MO". And most surprising and disgusting part is that educated people like you still believe in such crap quran, even after proven wrong "n" number of times. What a pity.
IAT is absolutely right when he says that you mobots can lie to yourselves in whatever possible way, to keep yourselves in this evil cult "Islam".
This is the miracle of islam, it keeps its mobots so fearful that they can't see the truth even if it is thrown on their faces. What a waste of human brain & life... _________________ It is NOT IMMORAL for muslims to have non-muslims as slaves and sex slaves; But it is definitely IMMORAL for non-Muslims to own Muslim slaves -- Allah Diya, MTD & NAV;
WHY? None could answer  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AhmedBahgat

Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 10001
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Charles,
Let's have a break from my slams and just relax with the following article that I wrote sometime back
This is going to be a tough one to understand and will be eaven tougher to understand for a kafir bound to hell like you, however it is all logical and only needs a rational mind to understand it, therefore I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you may have one.
Firstly,1400 years ago the people understanding (at least in Arabia) that the earth is stationary and everything in the sky rotates around it including the sun, so 1400 years ago they considered the sun is the one that moves around the earth somehow, indeed this understanding was flawed in conjunction with their wrong understanding that the earth is flat and not round, so they thought the sun appears for its daily course to the whole flat earth at once then disappear to the other uninhibited flat side before it appears again as it rotates around the flat earth.
When the following Quran verse was revealed that says the sun runs to a destined point, no one wondered as they understood already that the sun moves around the earth, i.e. the verse did not cause any confusion stating that the sun moves, howver the verse never specified the path of the movement of the sun:
And the sun runs on to a resting place; that is the ordinance of the Mighty, the Knowing.
[The Quran ; 38:36]
وَالشَّمْسُ تَجْرِي لِمُسْتَقَرٍّ لَّهَا ذَلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ (38)
-> As I stated, the above verse did not cause any confusion to the Arabs or the enemy of the Quran at the time of revelation, because they already thought that the sun runs around the stationary earth, their understanding was that, the earth is the centre of the heaven.
-> But surely the verse does not talk about the sun running around the earth as it never said that, rather the sun runs to an appointed place, period.
The verse I want to discuss is verse 25:45, this verse starts with a very common Quran sentence أَلَمْ تَرَ, which means in the common language Can't you see?, whenever I see this Arabic words in the Quran I have to stop and read carefully what will follow, definitely it means that Allah is about to tell us a sign Can't you see?, the signs can vary from a clear visual one to historical one to a simple fact, but what I found, that whenever it is a a sort of a scientific fact, it MUST comply with all generations' understandings even if their understandings are wrong, like the movement of the sun that I explained above, and that is what I discovered with the help of Allah in verse 25:45.
The verse was stated in a way that does not conflict with whatever understanding at that time with miraculous use of short and briefed Arabic words, we will see that the verse is literally talking about a visual scientific miracle The movement of the shade, that the people can see clearly while the former people are thinking wrongly that the shade moves due to the movement of the sun around earth, on the other hand the later people knows that the movement of the hsade is due to the movement of the earth around its axis of rotation. For me as one of the later people, the verse is talking indirectly about the earth as we all know that the shade movement is a product of the earth movement around its axis and has nothing to do with the movement of the sun any where in the universe
Let's first look at the verse and see if you can understand it, it is telling to us to investigate closely one of the signs of Allah, represented in the movement of shades on earth:
Have you not considered (the work of) your Lord, how He extends the shade? And if He had pleased He would certainly have made it stationary; then We have made the sun an indication of it
[The Quran ; 25:45]
أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى رَبِّكَ كَيْفَ مَدَّ الظِّلَّ وَلَوْ شَاء لَجَعَلَهُ سَاكِنًا ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَا الشَّمْسَ عَلَيْهِ دَلِيلًا (45)
-> The verse starts by telling us to look at the sign of our God through the miracle of the shade movement :Have you not considered (the work of) your Lord, how He extends the shade? and in Arabic : أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى رَبِّكَ كَيْفَ مَدَّ الظِّلَّ, very clear meaning in both Arabic and English, simply, Allah is telling us to look at the shade of objects as these shades extend from 0 length to infinity, then Allah is telling us that If He had willed to stop the shade from moving He would have done so : And if He had pleased He would certainly have made it stationary, and in Arabic وَلَوْ شَاء لَجَعَلَهُ سَاكِنًا, Well, the Quran did not say that Allah will make the sun stationary to cause the shade to be stationary as the people of the past thought of the wrong cause of the shade movement, so I understood it that indirectly Allah meant He would have stopped the earth from rotating around its axis, let's invistgate my calim in details:
You may say this can be indirectly valid for the sun too, i.e to stop the sun instead of stopping the earth according to their wrong understanding at the time that the sun rotates around the stationary earth, which I may agree if the sun was never mentioned in the verse i.e. if the sun nor earth was mentioned in the verse then the verse indirectly applies to both as being the one to be stopped to stop the shade, however what came next in the verse surprised me then stroke me hard, Allah said straight after He said that He would have made the shade stationary, then He would have made the Sun an evidence of the still shade: then We have made the sun an indication of it and in Arabic ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَا الشَّمْسَ عَلَيْهِ دَلِيلًا
-> See, Allah said that He will make the shade stationary without saying that he will make the sun stationary, this is an important point, because the Quran clearly said in another location 21:33 that the sun swims in an orbit, i.e. if the Quran has said that the sun will be made stationary to make the shade stationary, no one 1400 years ago would have argued because their understanding was the sun moves around earth and the Quran also said that the sun swims in an orbit NOT AROUND EARTH, but if the Quran has said so i.e the sun will be made stationary to make the shade stationary then this will conflict with the science now days but not back then 1400 years ago, as we now know that the shade movement is a result from the earth rotation around its axis
-> So the Quran said the shade will be made stationary and the sun will be an evidence that it is stationary, WITHOUT SAYING THAT SUN WILL BE MADE STATIONARY
-> Well, any object on earth that have shade is actually part of the rotating earth even the atmosphere is part of the rotating earth, i.e. when Allah said first that He will make the shade stationary, He actually means indirectly that He will make the earth stationary around its axis then the sun will be there to prove that the shade and earth are stationary without mentioning earth at all in the verse, so no conflict may arise with the people 1400 years ago when their understanding was that the earth is already stationary therefore and according to their wrong understanding, it can't be stopped because it is already stationary
You have to consider that Allah did not need to say He would have made the sun an evidence of the still shade, unless He is telling us a hidden message, I say this because (logically speaking) we need a source of light to see any shade, and the people used to see the shade when the sun is up in the sky not at night, therefore, saying He will make the sun an evidence of the still shade has no extra info regarding the shade other than to eliminate the sun as the source of the shade movement, do you get it? it is a tough one i know, therefore you need to thin k really hard for this one
Cheers _________________ Click to read and watch my 10000 comment on FFI
Last edited by AhmedBahgat on Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:30 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|