|
Attention: Year 2009 is here
Wishing a very Happy New Year to all members of FFI. Our new and improved site is ready. To visit main site, click at faithfreedom.org and to visit our new forum, click at forum09.faithfreedom.org and register again. Do not worry about your old forum posts and PM, everything is saved here till 31st December, 2008 for future references.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rocketman
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 230
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fathom
I never thought I would be saying this, but thanks' Fathom. I do not agree with your assessment that Jesus the man and Christ the Spirit are to be separated, but I thank for your insight. I think sometimes, even when you are not provoked, you have a tendency to talk down to your audience. When you give your opinion as your opinion, and that without condescension ,you will at least have an audience that will not return such in like manner.
Again I do appreciate you insight, but I truly do not believe the man Jesus is to be distinct from His own Spririt. You do have and interesting way at looking at Christ, but just as we are,in our own earth suit, part and parcel with our soul and spirit, so it is that Christ was part and parcel with his earth suit. As He has now, just as we who believe will have when we leave this earth, and that being a heavenly body without spot of blemish. As Jesus Himself said we will be like angels. God is One and when all is accomplished the Son Himself will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, that God may be all in all.
There are many things that we can and are being discussed. In the future I will try not to be snide and sarcastic, if you in turn will try not to teach, but only submit. We more than likely will not agree on much, but it may lead to a more Christ like discussion.
As you know Fathom, whether now or down the road, I will do my best to challenge what I see, "as some of your wacky ideas". So this should be interesting. You move from point quite a bit, and I have to learn to not take the rabbits foot and run down the trail, but to stay focused and deal with one item at a time.
I will join the conversation again, but right now it time for some shut eye. PS. No more about scholarship  _________________ If ever there was a time to use the brain we were born with it is now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fathom

Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 4062
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rocketman wrote: |
Fathom
I never thought I would be saying this, but thanks' Fathom. I do not agree with your assessment that Jesus the man and Christ the Spirit are to be separated, but I thank for your insight. I think sometimes, even when you are not provoked, you have a tendency to talk down to your audience. When you give your opinion as your opinion, and that without condescension ,you will at least have an audience that will not return such in like manner. |
Actually if you closely examine this thread you will see that the only times I talk down to people is after I have been provoked. I mean, just go right back to my first post on this thread, and you will see me presenting my views without even talking to anyone, and I ended my statement with a courteous "thank you." But immediately after, along comes the snide remarks, and that's when I delivered the "attitude."
All through this thread you will see that I refrained from directly insulting people through name-calling. But all you will see is a mountain of insults and name-calling directed towards me. This is obvious to anyone who critically examines this thread. However, you must understand that the name-calling and insults towards me is a way of calling me down, and belittling me.
My response to that was to become a master at reflecting this 'talk-down-to-you" practice right back towards my attackers. As you can see, it has been so effective that most of this thread was skewed off-topic just to insult me.
My demeanor is not naturally to talk down to anyone. Nor is it a demeanor of a snob. I am a teacher at heart, and this teaching is what I do in real life in both my professional life and personal life.
My natural demeanor is to help people learn. But if people are going to insult me, I will pour on the snob routine only to piss them off. After all, if they are going to talk down to me with insults, I will demonstrate to them how a master can talk down to them without even uttering an insult.
And as you can see, it is very effective. Therefore, treat me with common courtesy and the snob goes away. It's really not the way I am, but it's what you will see from me if I am personally disrespected.
| rocketman wrote: |
Again I do appreciate you insight, but I truly do not believe the man Jesus is to be distinct from His own Spririt. You do have and interesting way at looking at Christ, but just as we are,in our own earth suit, part and parcel with our soul and spirit, so it is that Christ was part and parcel with his earth suit. As He has now, just as we who believe will have when we leave this earth, and that being a heavenly body without spot of blemish. As Jesus Himself said we will be like angels. God is One and when all is accomplished the Son Himself will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, that God may be all in all. |
I understand your view, but again if we separate Jesus from Christ it by no means implies that the person of Jesus did not have his own soul aside from the spirit of Christ within him. Think back for a moment to when Jesus was baptized by John. Let me show you a train of thought; a theory if you will.
I believe that nothing more is under-rated in terms of importance than the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist. I mean, how often do you actually see this event being discussed in detail in church? Even when I was training to be a paster all those years ago I cannot recall this event being discussed much at all. But let us take a look at it objectively.
In each of the 4 gospels we have a record of Jesus being baptized by John. The fact that this event is described in all 4 gospels should tell you of its significance. It is an important event. Let me show you why I believe it is very significant.
| Quote: |
Mat 3:16 - 17 And Jesus, when He had been baptized, went up immediately out of the water. And lo, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon Him. And lo, a voice from Heaven, saying, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Mar 1:10 - 11 And immediately coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him. And there came a voice from Heaven, saying, You are My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Luk 3:22 And the Holy Spirit came down in a bodily shape, like a dove on Him. And a voice came from Heaven, which said, You are My Son, the Beloved; I am delighted in You.
Joh 1:32 And John bore record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from Heaven like a dove, and He abode on Him. |
Each of those verses above show us that Jesus received a Spirit from heaven immediately after he was baptized. What you should perhaps understand is that this event shows you that Jesus was baptized with the Holy Spirit, with Luke describing it as the Holy Spirit exactly. What perhaps you should also understand is that if Jesus himself was full of the Holy Spirit before this point in time, then why would it come to him again?
The reason, I believe, is because Jesus was as human as you or I. Is it any coincidence that it wasn't until after he was baptized in the Holy Spirit that God said, "This is my son?" This entire event demonstrates to you that Jesus, the man, did not have the Holy Spirit before this baptism.
He was baptized in the Holy Spirit in the exact same way you were, and all who are baptized in the Holy Spirit can claim to be a son/child/daughter of God because that is precisely what we become. In effect, anyone who is baptized in the Holy Spirit becomes a Christ- a son of God. I know what you're thinking, but let me give you something from Paul:
| Rom 8:14 - 17 wrote: |
| For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption by which we cry, Abba, Father! The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God. And if we are children, then we are heirs; heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ; so that if we suffer with Him, we may also be glorified together. |
Therefore, when you are baptized by the Holy Spirit, you are then lead by the spirit of God, just as Jesus was when the Holy Spirit lead him out into the desert for 30 days and nights. You become "One" with Christ, and thus are equal to Christ.
When you receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, it represents a cleansing of your own spirit. All your sins are washed away, and your spirit is re-born, thus "born again." At that very moment of your baptism, you are spiritually perfect, with no blemish. There is no such thing as someone being more perfect than anyone else. When one is perfect, no one can be better. Thus, when Jesus was baptized, he was perfect, and when you were baptized, you were equally perfect.
Jesus did not think it robbery to be equal to God, and thus you should not think it robbery to be equal to Jesus. Jesus wants you to be perfect; he does not want you to be less than him. He wants you to be "Christ-like," meaning, he wants you to be like Christ.
So therefore, from a spiritual view, the reason God said "This is my son in whom I am well pleased" was not because he was speaking about the physical person of Jesus, but about the spirit in Jesus becoming perfected through the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The spirit of Jesus became One with the Christ and thus became the Christ from the baptism of John.
It is perspectives like this that do not force me to speculate about verses such as the following:
Mat 19:17 And He said to him, "Why do you call Me good? There is none good but one, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments."
What you read there, and understand, is precisely what Jesus said. Because he was physical, he was not good. The only one who is good, is God because God is spiritual. The physical is never good, because it is flesh. The flesh has nothing to gain in this life or the next, as so:
Joh 6.63 It is the Spirit that makes alive, the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit and are life.
It also helps you to unravel the mystery behind this verse:
Mat 12:32 And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him. But whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this world or in the world to come.
The above verse confuses Christians to no end because they understand the Son of Man to be Jesus, and understand Jesus to be God, and also part of an equal Trinity. Therefore, the verse above seems to contradict their beliefs because it clearly differentiates between Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
However, when you consider the Son of Man as referring only to the physical person of Jesus, and not to the Christ spirit within him, then that verse becomes perfectly understandable. Jesus is telling you that you can say anything you want against his physical person and be forgiven, but if you insult what is holy and spiritual within him, you will not be forgiven.
Now I can understand how and why you may wish to reject this perspective of mine, but if you look for the good in anything, you can never be harmed. Thus, find what is good and true about what I said, and add it to your faith.
| rocketman wrote: |
There are many things that we can and are being discussed. In the future I will try not to be snide and sarcastic, if you in turn will try not to teach, but only submit. We more than likely will not agree on much, but it may lead to a more Christ like discussion. |
As mentioned, I am a teacher by nature, and Christ is the model by which I teach. But all you need to do is view what I say as a theory, and either accept or reject according to how you feel about it. You never know, I may actually say something that makes your eyes pop out because you would see a perspective that had not before ever crossed your mind. I'm still learning also, and also still pick up a few good perspectives from Christians such as yourself.
We are all teachers; it's the "Christ" in us that makes us that way. _________________ Team FFI - The Quest For The Historical Jesus.
Website: http://members.shaw.ca/TeamFFI
Forum: http://teamffi.myfreeforum.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocketman
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 230
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fathom addresses rocketman:
| Quote: |
| I understand your view, but again if we separate Jesus from Christ it by no means implies that the person of Jesus did not have his own soul aside from the spirit of Christ within him. |
This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ even before He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Therefore just as we have our own body, soul, and spirit, so did Jesus, But He was unique.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
Think back for a moment to when Jesus was baptized by John. Let me show you a train of thought; a theory if you will.
I believe that nothing more is under-rated in terms of importance than the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist. I mean, how often do you actually see this event being discussed in detail in church? Even when I was training to be a paster all those years ago I cannot recall this event being discussed much at all. But let us take a look at it objectively.
In each of the 4 gospels we have a record of Jesus being baptized by John. The fact that this event is described in all 4 gospels should tell you of its significance. It is an important event. Let me show you why I believe it is very significant.
Quote:
Mat 3:16 - 17 And Jesus, when He had been baptized, went up immediately out of the water. And lo, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon Him. And lo, a voice from Heaven, saying, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Mar 1:10 - 11 And immediately coming up out of the water, He saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him. And there came a voice from Heaven, saying, You are My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
Luk 3:22 And the Holy Spirit came down in a bodily shape, like a dove on Him. And a voice came from Heaven, which said, You are My Son, the Beloved; I am delighted in You.
Joh 1:32 And John bore record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from Heaven like a dove, and He abode on Him.
|
So far so good, nothing to disagree wtih
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Each of those verses above show us that Jesus received a Spirit from heaven immediately after he was baptized. What you should perhaps understand is that this event shows you that Jesus was baptized with the Holy Spirit, with Luke describing it as the Holy Spirit exactly. What perhaps you should also understand is that if Jesus himself was full of the Holy Spirit before this point in time, then why would it come to him again? |
Actually Jesus was not baptized with the Holy Spirit when He was baptized by John the Baptist. If you would turn to Luke 1:11 it states "for today in the city of David there has been born for you a "Savior, who is Christ the Lord." Previously in Luke 1:35, "And the angel answered and said to her "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy offspring shall be called the Son of God. Since after Jesus died and was raised again we find Him commissioning His disciples also known as apostles to "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit". As you can see ,Jesus, before He has even taken His first breath as a new born baby was proclaimed to be the Son of God, and the Christ, and the Savior for all people.
I know from past postings that you only believe Jesus words, but unless you believe the Qur'an ,Jesus was a baby and could not claim this for Himself. There are many in the scriptures that the Holy Spirit comes upon, but they are not all Christs. The Holy Spirit revealed to Simeon that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. His response after seeing and holding the baby Jesus was "Now Lord, Thou dost let Thy bond servant depart in peace, according to Thy word.
As you know Fathom Christians believe in the whole teaching of the word, and it is plain from these scriptures that The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit are the one God. Jesus states this clearly in the above verse Matt. 28:19. I believe the Holy Spirit coming upon Jesus at His baptism was to empower Him to do His work here on earth and was the beginning of His earthly ministry. God's saying , "that this is my Son in Whom I am well pleased", I believe was a compilation of Jesus life to that point; that of being an obedient Son, etc.
Additionally when Jesus was only twelve years old He refers to God as His own Father. I will not take time to list all those in both old and new testaments have had the Holy Spirit come upon them, for you are as familiar with these as I, but just to say they weren't all Christ because of the infilling.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| The reason, I believe, is because Jesus was as human as you or I. Is it any coincidence that it wasn't until after he was baptized in the Holy Spirit that God said, "This is my son?" This entire event demonstrates to you that Jesus, the man, did not have the Holy Spirit before this baptism. |
Yes I do believe that Jesus was as human as you and I. As I stated previously this was His coming out party so to speak. As I have referenced above, but only in part so as not to make this post longer than need be, Jesus was Christ even before taking His first breath. It is impossible to separate Jesus the man from Jesus the Lord.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| He was baptized in the Holy Spirit in the exact same way you were, and all who are baptized in the Holy Spirit can claim to be a son/child/daughter of God because that is precisely what we become. In effect, anyone who is baptized in the Holy Spirit becomes a Christ- a son of God. I know what you're thinking, but let me give you something from Paul: |
Your first sentence above is accurate enough. But look at what Jesus says to John the Baptist in referring to His baptism, "Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness."
What does Jesus mean by this statement? That although it wasn't necessary let it be done. Why? You only have to read what the Baptist says to Jesus just prior, "I have need to be baptized by you, and do You come to me?"
What is baptism for? I am glad you asked? It is for the cleansing of sin, a sign of repentance, but Jesus Himself was sinless, and had no need to repent . Why then was He baptized? What does He say? "To fulfill all righteousness for it is fitting. He didn't hold himself above anyone, although He was above everyone.
This is another reason His Father speaks to Him, and everyone else around Him hears "This is my Son in Whom I am well pleased". As you know Fathom, the bible states the Jesus left all His Godly attributes in heaven, and was totally dependent on the Father, just as we are.
He was our example and lived His life in such a way that although, 'being God, He did not regard equality with God as a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant , and being made in the likeness of,men, and being found in appearance as a man , He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. " Phil. 2:7-8
This is why, although being God in the flesh , Jesus submitted as our example, and as we must, for the filling of the Holy Spirit, and this in order to do His will. Although as a Christian I believe I am sealed with the Holy Spirit , I too realize that I need to submit myself on a daily basis even though the Holy Spirit dwells within me.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
Rom 8:14 - 17 wrote:
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption by which we cry, Abba, Father! The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God. And if we are children, then we are heirs; heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ; so that if we suffer with Him, we may also be glorified together. |
This is so true, and I thank my God for my adoption into His family. To be adopted into a family means that at one time we were not of that family. We have a son, but decide to adopt, that adopted son is no less now part of the family, but he will always have been adopted. Jesus the Christ was not adopted but was with the Father from the beginning, the One and Only Begotten Son of God; who was incredibly gracious to us in while we were yet sinners died for us, that we could be saved. Saved and adopted and now co-heirs with Jesus. This however can not make us Christ Jesus, but only his brethren.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
Therefore, when you are baptized by the Holy Spirit, you are then lead by the spirit of God, just as Jesus was when the Holy Spirit lead him out into the desert for 30 days and nights. You become "One" with Christ, and thus are equal to Christ.
|
Agreed until right to the last five words. Although we become as sons and daughter we will always be his creation, and therefore not equal. I think Lucifer felt this way too. Lets not let this happen to us.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| When you receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, it represents a cleansing of your own spirit. All your sins are washed away, and your spirit is re-born, thus "born again." At that very moment of your baptism, you are spiritually perfect, with no blemish. There is no such thing as someone being more perfect than anyone else. When one is perfect, no one can be better. Thus, when Jesus was baptized, he was perfect, and when you were baptized, you were equally perfect. |
I will have to disagree with much of this above paragraph. When one is baptized they are placed into or sprinkle with water. This is an act of obedience , and is to signify the death to self, and our old ways, and to proclaim publicly our faith, and newness of life in Christ. We at this time are no more spiritually perfect than we were before baptism. We are but babes in Christ and know little of Him, just as a new born babe knows nothing about his parents; except that something is indeed different. Our spirituality is not the same as the cleansing of our soul . Before we believed in Christ our spirit was considered dead unto Him. It is here I must make aware that being born again and being baptized have noting to do with each other. One, accepting Jesus and savior is the believing part, being baptized into Him is the obedient part. You can have one without the other. But I would recommend doing the first without following up with the second. Again, as I have said before Jesus was perfect, for He was God incarnate, and did not need to be baptized. Our obedience to be baptized show our love and commitment publicly to Christ , but we will no could we ever be perfect as the one who created us. Are we called to be perfect? Yes, in fact we are called to be like Christ. It is indeed up to us to work out our salvation with fear and trembling.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Jesus did not think it robbery to be equal to God, and thus you should not think it robbery to be equal to Jesus. Jesus wants you to be perfect; he does not want you to be less than him. He wants you to be "Christ-like," meaning, he wants you to be like Christ. |
The clay can not say to the potter, "Why did you make me this way". I am not God, but I believe I am one of His "bestests" creations. He has called me to be perfect and to be Holy, but never as He said "be my equal" Again I believe Lucifer thinking was along the same lines. So again I say, let us not travel the same path.
Fathom
| Quote: |
So therefore, from a spiritual view, the reason God said "This is my son in whom I am well pleased" was not because he was speaking about the physical person of Jesus, but about the spirit in Jesus becoming perfected through the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The spirit of Jesus became One with the Christ and thus became the Christ from the baptism of John.
|
This has been covered thoroughly, and has been thoroughly debunked. Of course this is opinion based and according to the whole of the Bible, by the same authors that recorded Jesus words.
Fathom:
| Code: |
It is perspectives like this that do not force me to speculate about verses such as the following:
Mat 19:17 And He said to him, "Why do you call Me good? There is none good but one, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments." |
The man who approached Jesus is not calling Him good, he is asking Him what good thing shall he do that he may obtain eternal life?" Read the previous verse. Matt. 19:16 . Jesus answers him by turning the question up Himself, "why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.
It is here that I believe Jesus is claiming to be God by using an indirect approach as He was pron to do, as when He said to His mother, "what have I to do with you". This saying "there is only One who is good" is as always making Himself equal to His Father. This may be a stretch, but at least it is a stretch in agreement with the whole of the Bilbe.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
What you read there, and understand, is precisely what Jesus said. Because he was physical, he was not good. The only one who is good, is God because God is spiritual. The physical is never good, because it is flesh. The flesh has nothing to gain in this life or the next, as so:
|
This is tuly a gnostic teaching and is very much your right to have it.
As you are well aware the Bible speaks much of this belief.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Joh 6.63 It is the Spirit that makes alive, the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit and are life. |
We as people were made perfect, but with free choice to disobey. Disobedience is sin. It is not our flesh that is corrupt, but sin using the flesh. We in ourselves the flesh without the Spirit can do nothing.
Fathom:
I
| Quote: |
t also helps you to unravel the mystery behind this verse:
Mat 12:32 And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him. But whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this world or in the world to come. |
Here Jesus is referring to the cleaning of a demon possessed man of which the pharisees are accusing Him of casting the demons out by the leader of demons Beezebul. In a nut shell Jesus was telling them you can insult me all you want but if you claim this power of God to be of Satan you will never be forgiven, neither in this age nor of the age to come.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| The above verse confuses Christians to no end because they understand the Son of Man to be Jesus, and understand Jesus to be God, and also part of an equal Trinity. Therefore, the verse above seems to contradict their beliefs because it clearly differentiates between Jesus and the Holy Spirit. |
As explained previously God is not thin skinned, nor is any part of the God head, but when one calls something that God does and gives that credit to evil, well you know the result.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| However, when you consider the Son of Man as referring only to the physical person of Jesus, and not to the Christ spirit within him, then that verse becomes perfectly understandable. Jesus is telling you that you can say anything you want against his physical person and be forgiven, but if you insult what is holy and spiritual within him, you will not be forgiven. |
Hopefully this has been covered enough and refuted as much. There is no way that Jesus and the Christ are divided in scripture. This line of thought is gnostic and as been accepted by its followers such as Fathom.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Now I can understand how and why you may wish to reject this perspective of mine, but if you look for the good in anything, you can never be harmed. Thus, find what is good and true about what I said, and add it to your faith. |
When the serpent suggested to Eve. that the tree of knowledge was good to eat, in some respects it probably was, but the outcome was death. I will pass, and you might consider passing too.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| As mentioned, I am a teacher by nature, and Christ is the model by which I teach. But all you need to do is view what I say as a theory, and either accept or reject according to how you feel about it. You never know, I may actually say something that makes your eyes pop out because you would see a perspective that had not before ever crossed your mind. I'm still learning also, and also still pick up a few good perspectives from Christians such as yourself. |
Touche !
Fathom
| Quote: |
We are all teachers; it's the "Christ" in us that makes us that way.
|
I hope I have been courteous in my disagreement with your theories, I also hope to persuade in your error that I believe you are continuing to make. Until next time Rocketman. _________________ If ever there was a time to use the brain we were born with it is now.
Last edited by rocketman on Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:52 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocketman
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 230
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fathom and to all this is an edit of the above post to Fathom. I was in a hurry and was needed to help my family prepare for Easter. I have put the missing words and any corrections in Blue. I have also left out Fathoms part for brevity. Thanks
Fathom the corrections are mainly for you, before you post your retort.
This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ from the moment of His being conceived by the same Holy Spirit. Therefore just as we have our own body, soul, and spirit, so did Jesus, But He was unique.
Actually Jesus was not baptized with the Holy Spirit when He was baptized by John the Baptist. (The Holy Spirit came upon Him, because He was in submission to His Father) If you would turn to Luke 1:11 it states "for today in the city of David there has been born for you a "Savior, who is Christ the Lord." Previously in Luke 1:35, "And the angel answered and said to her "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy offspring shall be called the Son of God.
(Since not deeded) after Jesus died and was raised again we find Him commissioning His disciples also known as apostles to "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit". As you can see ,Jesus, before He has even taken His first breath as a new born baby was proclaimed to be the Son of God, and the Christ, and the Savior for all people.
I know from past postings that you only believe Jesus words, but unless you believe the Qur'an ,Jesus was a baby and could not talk to claim this for Himself. There are many in the scriptures that the Holy Spirit comes upon, but they are not all Christs. The Holy Spirit revealed to Simeon that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. His response after seeing and holding the baby Jesus was "Now Lord, Thou dost let Thy bond servant depart in peace, according to Thy word.
As you know Fathom Christians believe in the whole teaching of the word, and it is plain from these scriptures that The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit are the one God. Jesus states this clearly in the above verse Matt. 28:19. I believe the Holy Spirit coming upon Jesus at His baptism was to empower Him to do His work here on earth and was the beginning of His earthly ministry. ( although Jesus was God He left His powers with the Father,) God's saying , "that this is my Son in Whom I am well pleased", I believe was a compilation of Jesus life to that point; that of being an obedient Son, etc.
Additionally when Jesus was only twelve years old He refers to God as His own Father. I will not take time to list all those in both old and new testaments have had the Holy Spirit come upon them, for you are as familiar with these as I, but just to say they weren't all Christ because of the infilling.
Yes I do believe that Jesus was as human as you and I. As I stated previously this was His coming out party so to speak. As I have referenced above, but only in part so as not to make this post longer than need be, Jesus was Christ even before taking His first breath. It is impossible to separate Jesus the man from Jesus the Lord.
Your first sentence above is accurate enough. But look at what Jesus says to John the Baptist in referring to His baptism, "Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness."
What does Jesus mean by this statement? That although it wasn't necessary let it be done. Why? You only have to read what the Baptist says to Jesus just prior, "I have need to be baptized by you, and do You come to me?"
What is baptism for? I am glad you asked? It is (a symbol for the)for the cleansing of sin, a (public )sign of repentance, but Jesus Himself was sinless, and had no need to repent . Why then was He baptized? What does He say? "To fulfill all righteousness for it is fitting. He didn't hold himself above anyone, although He was above everyone.
This is another reason His Father speaks to Him, and everyone else around Him hears "This is my Son in Whom I am well pleased". As you know Fathom, the bible states the Jesus left all His Godly attributes in heaven, and was totally dependent on the Father, just as we are.
He was our example and lived His life in such a way that although, 'being God, He did not regard equality with God as a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant , and being made in the likeness of,men, and being found in appearance as a man , He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. " Phil. 2:7-8
This is why, although being God in the flesh , Jesus submitted, as our example, and as we must, for the filling of the Holy Spirit, and this in order to do His will. Although as a Christian I believe I am sealed with the Holy Spirit , I too realize that I need to submit myself on a daily basis even though the Holy Spirit dwells within me.
This is so true, and I thank my God for my adoption into His family. To be adopted into a family means that at one time we were not of that family. We have a son, but decide to adopt, that adopted son is no less now part of the family, but he will always have been adopted. Jesus the Christ was not adopted but was with the Father from the beginning, the One and Only Begotten Son of God; who was incredibly gracious to us in while we were yet sinners died for us, that we could be saved. Saved and adopted and now co-heirs with Jesus. This however can not make us Christ Jesus, but only his brethren.
Agreed until right to the last five words. Although we become as sons and daughter we will always be his creation, and therefore not equal. I think Lucifer felt this way too. Lets not let this happen to us.
I will have to disagree with much of this above paragraph. When one is baptized they are placed into or sprinkled with water. This is an act of obedience , and is to signify the death to self, and our old ways, and to proclaim publicly our faith, and newness of life in Christ. We at this time are no more spiritually perfect than we were before baptism. (Accept where before we were dead now we are alive) We are but babes in Christ and know little of Him, just as a new born babe knows nothing about his parents; except that something is indeed different. Our spirituality is not the same as the cleansing of our soul . Before we believed in Christ our spirit was considered dead unto Him. It is here I must (state) that being born again and being baptized have noting to do with each other.
One, accepting Jesus as savior is the believing part, and being baptized into Him is the obedient part. You can have one without the other. But I would recommend (not) doing the first without following up with the second. Again, as I have said before Jesus was perfect, for He was God incarnate, and did not need to be baptized. Our obedience to be baptized show our love and commitment publicly to Christ , but we will could never be as perfect as the one who created us. (even though He calls us to be, it is He who perfects us) Are we called to be perfect? Yes, in fact we are called to be like Christ. It is indeed up to us to work out our salvation with fear and trembling.
The clay can not say to the potter, "Why did you make me this way". I am not God, but I believe I am one of His "bestests" creations. He has called me to be perfect and to be Holy, but never as He said, "be my equal" Again I believe Lucifer thinking was along the same lines. So again I say, let us not travel the same path.
This has been covered thoroughly, and has been thoroughly debunked. Of course this is (my) opinion based and according to the whole of the Bible, by the same authors that recorded Jesus words.
The man who approached Jesus is not calling Him good, he is asking Him what good thing shall he do that he may obtain eternal life?" Read the previous verse. Matt. 19:16 . Jesus answers him by turning the question (upon) Himself, "why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.
It is here that I believe Jesus is claiming to be God by using an indirect approach as He was pron to do(another Jewish idiom such), as when He said to His mother, "what have I to do with you". This saying "there is only One who is good" is as always, making Himself equal to His Father. This may be a stretch, but at least it is a stretch in agreement with the whole of the Blbbe.
This is tuly a gnostic teaching and is very much your right to have it.
As you are well aware the Bible speaks much of this belief.
We as people were made perfect, but with free choice to disobey. Disobedience is sin. It is not our flesh that (that was made) corrupt, (but sin that uses the flesh). ( We in ourselves the flesh without the Spirit can do nothing.(of eternal good)
Here Jesus is referring to the cleaning of a demon possessed man of which the pharisees are accusing Him of casting the demons out by the leader of demons Beezebul. In a nut shell Jesus was telling them you can insult me all you want but if you claim this power of God to be of Satan you will never be forgiven, neither in this age nor of the age to come.
As explained previously God is not thin skinned, nor is any part of the God head, but when one calls something that God does and gives that credit to evil, well you know the result.
Hopefully this has been covered enough and refuted as much. There is no way that Jesus and the Christ are divided in scripture. This line of thought is gnostic and as been accepted by its followers such as Fathom.
When the serpent suggested to Eve. that the tree of knowledge was good to eat, in some respects it probably was, but the outcome was death. I will pass, and you might consider passing too.
Touche !
I hope I have been courteous in my disagreement with your theories, I also hope to persuade in your error that I believe you are continuing to make. Until next time Rocketman.
_________________
This is the only way I new to edit my post so that it would be more understandable. Of course when I arrived back home the edit feature had already expired. I am truly sorry if this is to much to work with. Fathom my attempt at correcting the obvious will always be insufficient ,for there will always be loopholes. Again sorry for the mess. And Happy Easter to you and all. _________________ If ever there was a time to use the brain we were born with it is now.
Last edited by rocketman on Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:50 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
piggy
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 6372 Location: Godwana
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rocketman wrote: |
| This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ from the moment of His being conceived by the same Holy Spirit. |
Do you know this to be true or is it your belief?
Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova?
I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap.
Let's get back to the core issues like, credibility of the writings of the 'apostles' or gospel authors, the degree of accuracy of interpretation, the level of understanding .................. and the other-agenda, ritualistic, zealot, folk-lore, legend-maker, crowd-manipulater and gullible-fools factors.
Regardless of your beliefs on the matter, can you show clearly where Jesus claims:
a) to be the only son of god?
b) to be god?
c) to be born of a virgin, conceived of a spirit and not a man?
d) to have resurrected the body of Jesus from lifelessness?
Can you show where if it were so that Jesus had nothing to do with the above a) to d) ............. that it would change anything of his message?
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fathom

Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 4062
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before I respond, I would like to lay down the groundwork of what is required for evidence to support each of our views. It's perfectly fine to have a point of view, but I think it's only that something known as a "chain of evidence" be used to support that view.
A chain of evidence in this situation will of course be totally textual, since there really isn't anything else to work with. It should also be almost totally restricted to the Holy Bible, and/or restricted to other universally accepted church documents.
Along with the chain of evidence there should be a "cohesive train of thought" which uses the evidence to support our final conclusions. The cohesive train of thought will demonstrate how we go from Point A to Point B, while using the textual evidence for support. It will explain our views while drawing from the chain of evidence to postulate a conclusion.
Therefore, through the examination of your post, I will demonstrate to you what the problem is with your argument, and also demonstrate to you how I use the chain of evidence in conjunction with a cohesive train of thought.
With that being said, let's take a look at what you said ...
| rocketman wrote: |
Fathom addresses rocketman:
| Quote: |
| I understand your view, but again if we separate Jesus from Christ it by no means implies that the person of Jesus did not have his own soul aside from the spirit of Christ within him. |
This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ from the moment of His being conceive by the same Holy Spirit. Therefore just as we have our own body, soul, and spirit, so did Jesus, But He was unique. |
This does not actually work with scripture, because the Christ existed long before Jesus was ever born. This has been illustrated to you by Jesus himself in the verses where he asked the Pharisee who's son the Christ would be, and then uses a Psalm of King David to prove the existence of Christ at the time of King David.
Fact: A man named Jesus could not be the Christ before he was born, for the simple fact that a man named Jesus did not exist before he was born. I am speaking about a physical man named Jesus. This is only a logical train of thought. Nothing can exist before it exists. Jesus was born from a woman, and did not exist before he was born. This is an obvious truth.
The spirit of Christ is what existed at the time of King David, and not a man named Jesus. That is why you do not see Jesus' name in the OT.
Fact: You do not ever see even once the name of Jesus in the OT. Yet Jesus himself shows you Christ in existence long before Jesus was ever born.
So the problem you have with this argument is a matter of evidence. I can prove what I am saying with the precise words of Jesus. But can you show me the precise name of "Jesus" in the OT? No you cannot. Sure, you can give me interpretation and the the opinions of the Gospel writers who said such things as "Immanuel" etc, but you will not produce the name of Jesus anywhere in the old testament.
Since even common sense tells us that a man named Jesus did not exist before he was born, what other rational explanation can you offer for the existence of Christ at the time of King David, as Jesus himself illustrated?
Obviously Jesus was not speaking of the Christ as a physical man, so what else would he be referring to? What other options exist?
There is only one option; "Spirit." And since that is the only option available, then what was the state of existence of the Christ before Jesus was born? What was the state of existence of the Son of God before Jesus was born? What is the original state of existence of Christ, the Son of God?
Again, the only option is "Spirit." There was no physical man named Jesus. There was no flesh body. There was only "Spirit."
There is no possible way you can refute this with any evidence. The Son of God in his original state is in fact a spirit named Christ, and was not a man named Jesus.
So let us review the chain of evidence while using a cohesive train of thought:
In the verses of Matthew 22.42 - 22.45, Jesus uses a Psalm of King David to clearly illustrate the existence of Christ during the time of King David, hundreds of years before Jesus was born. This clearly illustrates that existence of Christ before the physical manifestation of a man named Jesus.
This chain of evidence and train of thought is what is required to prove your points. In my next post I will examine other things you said. _________________ Team FFI - The Quest For The Historical Jesus.
Website: http://members.shaw.ca/TeamFFI
Forum: http://teamffi.myfreeforum.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocketman
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 230
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fathom
| Quote: |
Before I respond, I would like to lay down the groundwork of what is required for evidence to support each of our views. It's perfectly fine to have a point of view, but I think it's only that something known as a "chain of evidence" be used to support that view.
A chain of evidence in this situation will of course be totally textual, since there really isn't anything else to work with. It should also be almost totally restricted to the Holy Bible, and/or restricted to other universally accepted church documents.
Along with the chain of evidence there should be a "cohesive train of thought" which uses the evidence to support our final conclusions. The cohesive train of thought will demonstrate how we go from Point A to Point B, while using the textual evidence for support. It will explain our views while drawing from the chain of evidence to postulate a conclusion.
Therefore, through the examination of your post, I will demonstrate to you what the problem is with your argument, and also demonstrate to you how I use the chain of evidence in conjunction with a cohesive train of thought.
With that being said, let's take a look at what you said ... |
This is hopefully what we have always been striving for. There is one matter I will mention here since ground rules are being mentioned.
I would much prefer that when you state you evidence to support your claim you do so as evidence and not proof, and therefore the pretense of victory is not claimed. When you say things such as, "I can not dispute such and such", you are stating your opinion as fact before you have heard the other side. I will point examples of this out as I respond to this post, and put them in red, so that in the future you can state your opinion with out coming to a final judgement .
Previous post
| Quote: |
Fathom addresses rocketman:
Quote:
| Quote: |
| I understand your view, but again if we separate Jesus from Christ it by no means implies that the person of Jesus did not have his own soul aside from the spirit of Christ within him. |
|
RM previous rebuttal
This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ from the moment of His being conceived by the same Holy Spirit. Therefore just as we have our own body, soul, and spirit, so did Jesus, But He was unique.
Fathom
| Quote: |
| This does not actually work with scripture, because the Christ existed long before Jesus was ever born. This has been illustrated to you by Jesus himself in the verses where he asked the Pharisee who's son the Christ would be, and then uses a Psalm of King David to prove the existence of Christ at the time of King David. |
This is true but what you have stated and what I have stated are not the same. You are saying Christ existed long before (the man )Jesus was born. What I have said is that Jesus when He was born was always the Christ. So yes Jesus Christ the savior existed from eternity past, but Jesus Christ the man existed only after being born.
Fathom
| Quote: |
Fact: A man named Jesus could not be the Christ before he was born, for the simple fact that a man named Jesus did not exist before he was born. I am speaking about a physical man named Jesus. This is only a logical train of thought. Nothing can exist before it exists. Jesus was born from a woman, and did not exist before he was born. This is an obvious truth.
|
Again you are trying to separate Jesus from the Christ. They are one in the same. Jesus the man who walked the earth was not born yet. Jesus the Christ was with the Father from eternity past.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| The spirit of Jesus Christ is what existed at the time of King David, and not a man named Jesus. That is why you do not see Jesus' name mentioned in the OT. |
Totally agree
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Fact: You do not ever see even once the name of Jesus in the OT. Yet Jesus himself shows you Christ in existence long before Jesus was ever born. |
True again. Jesus the man.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| So the problem you have with this argument is a matter of evidence. I can prove what I am saying with the precise words of Jesus. But can you show me the precise name of "Jesus" in the OT? No you cannot. Sure, you can give me interpretation and the the opinions of the Gospel writers who said such things as "Immanuel" etc, but you will not produce the name of Jesus anywhere in the old testament. |
Wrong premise, it has noting to do with what we are talking about, and proves absolutely nothing.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Since even common sense tells us that a man named Jesus did not exist before he was born, what other rational explanation can you offer for the existence of Christ at the time of King David, as Jesus himself illustrated? |
This is true, I never stated the man Jesus Christ existed before He was born, that would be ridiculous. But let's see if I can explain this without being too wordy. Jesus Christ existed from eternity past, along with God the Father and God the Holy Spirrit. . Please stay with me. In Ephesians 1:3-6 it states
"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved."
There was no need in the Old Testament to call the Christ Jesus, for as you have said ,and I have agreed, Jesus Christ as man did not exist, for He had not been born. This plan for the Christ to be born as a man was from eternity past as I am sure you will agree. This being true, what other name would befit a needed savior? How else could man be saved? Doesn't the scriptures say that all men have sinned?
Jesus means what? YHWH saves. God came in the flesh to save us from our sins, this is in a nutshell the whole the the Bible. What was the Christs name when He walked on earth as a man? JESUS! So even though Christ was from everlasting He was born into this world only once. Doing so does not change the preincarnate Christ even Jesus, for the scriptures say, "For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin. Christ and Jesus are one in the same, but until Christ was born as a man the scriptures did not refer to Him by name, but only by title. The above scripture in Ephesians states clearly that God presdestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ before the foundation of the world. Who new? This is the Mystery that was hidden from prior generations, that everything is summed up in Christ Jesus.
| Quote: |
| Obviously Jesus was not speaking of the Christ as a physical man, so what else would he be referring to? What other options exist? |
He was referring to Himself as His Fathers Son. "My Lord said to Your Lord"
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| There is only one option; "Spirit." And since that is the only option available, then what was the state of existence of the Christ before Jesus was born? What was the state of existence of the Son of God before Jesus was born? What is the original state of existence of Christ, the Son of God? |
Answering first sentence above: since Jesus has been with the Father from eternity past there are a myriad of answers. Being with Abraham Gen. 18:2-33; the burning bush Exodus 3:14 and many others I will list later at your request, but right now it is late. god is Spirit, That means They are All Spirit, Father, Son, Holy Spirit. What it doesn't mean is the Son was not named Jesus from eternity past.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| Again, the only option is "Spirit." There was no physical man named Jesus. There was no flesh body. There was only "Spirit." |
It is getting late and I may be getting a little rummy, but I agree with you and must be missing your point. Of course there was no physical man; Jesus Christ the man wasn't born yet.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| There is no possible way you can refute this with any evidence. The Son of God in his original state is in fact a spirit named Christ, and was not a man named Jesus. |
Fathom you have got to be kidding Christ is a title not a name. It is not the last name of Jesus either, but Jesus is this Christ.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
So let us review the chain of evidence while using a cohesive train of thought:
|
We will see.
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| In the verses of Matthew 22.42 - 22.45, Jesus uses a Psalm of King David to clearly illustrate the existence of Christ during the time of King David, hundreds of years before Jesus was born. This clearly illustrates that existence of Christ before the physical manifestation of a man named Jesus. |
True
Fathom:
| Quote: |
| This chain of evidence and train of thought is what is required to prove your points. In my next post I will examine other things you said. |
Thus far my friend I believe your chain of evidence and train of thought are only yours and do not prove what you wish to prove.
_________________
Thanks' Fathom,
From what you have posted thus far, I can not see that you have made your point. Much of what you have said I have agreed, but as you can see your proof in dividing the Christ from Jesus is not convincing. I hope I have given you some food for thought. _________________ If ever there was a time to use the brain we were born with it is now.
Last edited by rocketman on Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocketman
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 230
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
piggy
| Quote: |
rocketman wrote:
This is true, but Jesus was always the Christ from the moment of His being conceived by the same Holy Spirit. |
Do you know this to be true or is it your belief?
|
[quote]
Hi Piggy. To answer your question it is what the Bible says. Please read Luke 1:26-35. This should explain what I believe. Please write me back if you do not have ready access to the scriptures. Also in Is. 7:14
this virgin birth was predicted.
Piggy
| Quote: |
| Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova? |
Yes & No. The seed of a women Gal. 4:4.Ref. Gen:3:15 speaking of Satan and Jesus, but her seed.
Piggy
| Quote: |
I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap.
|
You certainly have the right to think as you please.
Piggy
| Quote: |
Let's get back to the core issues like, credibility of the writings of the 'apostles' or gospel authors, the degree of accuracy of interpretation, the level of understanding .................. and the other-agenda, ritualistic, zealot, folk-lore, legend-maker, crowd-manipulater and gullible-fools factors.
|
Not sure I follow.
Piggy
| Quote: |
Regardless of your beliefs on the matter, can you show clearly where Jesus claims
|
Many of these I have answered for you before, but you didn't agree.
Jesus was one to brag on Himself, therefore if you were to ask if He inferred as much. then yes. Did those He addressed believe He claimed to be the Son of God
Piggy
| Quote: |
| a) to be the only son of god? |
John 3:16-18 Begotten means to be (sired) (one of kind) (unique). As I remember you posted some other definition that was a denial to this, but it didn't fit the context, and basic message of the Bible.
John 8:33; Matt. 26: 63-65.
| Quote: |
| c) to be born of a virgin, conceived of a spirit and not a man? |
above vs. in Luke; prophesied in Isiah
| Quote: |
| d) to have resurrected the body of Jesus from lifelessness? |
At the end of each gospel the resurrection story is told. Jesus was killed, buried and raised from the dead. I am not sure what you are getting at these are way to obvious.
Piggy
| Quote: |
| Can you show where if it were so that Jesus had nothing to do with the above a) to d) ............. that it would change anything of his message? |
Raising from the dead is a pretty special task for anyone. If I understand your question would it make any difference if Jesus could of some how orchestrated the above A-D. Well not as a human, As a human these would certainly be impossible for God . For the preincarnate Christ he new what was coming. Probably didn't answer your question, but I gave it my best shot. If you could possibly be a little clearer in the future, than perhaps my answers will be a little more pertinent.
PS if perhaps your last question refers to these proclamations as being absent, and His message standing on its own. Is this what you are asking? Let me know _________________ If ever there was a time to use the brain we were born with it is now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
landmark

Joined: 25 Dec 2005 Posts: 1186 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| piggy wrote: |
| Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova? |
The immaculate conception of the historical man, Jesus Christ, has been scientifically shown to be possible!
| piggy wrote: |
| I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap. |
On the contrary, it is not crap, it is called 'parthenogenesis'
Yours truthfully
Paul  _________________ By their fruits you shall know them |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fathom

Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 4062
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| So the problem you have with this argument is a matter of evidence. I can prove what I am saying with the precise words of Jesus. But can you show me the precise name of "Jesus" in the OT? No you cannot. Sure, you can give me interpretation and the the opinions of the Gospel writers who said such things as "Immanuel" etc, but you will not produce the name of Jesus anywhere in the old testament. |
Wrong premise, it has noting to do with what we are talking about, and proves absolutely nothing. |
I bet you were hoping I would just let this slide? Now now now, we can't be doing that!
This is where your argument falls apart. What this means is that you cannot go from Point A to Point B because the chain of evidence is broken.
In order for you to justify that Jesus was always the Christ throughout eternity, you need to show evidence of Jesus in existence before he was born. Sure, we can supply evidence of a Christ in existence before Jesus was born, but what is required here is to place the person of Jesus into existence in the Old Testament.
The only way you can do that, is to show his name.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| Since even common sense tells us that a man named Jesus did not exist before he was born, what other rational explanation can you offer for the existence of Christ at the time of King David, as Jesus himself illustrated? |
This is true, I never stated the man Jesus Christ existed before He was born, that would be ludicrous. But let's see if I can explain this without too much wordiness. Jesus Christ existed from eternity past, along with God the Father and God the Holy Spririt. . Please stay with me. In Ephesians 1:3-6 it states
"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved." |
Okay, so you have used the words of Paul to help fortify your position. That's fine, because I understand how your faith works. However, to one who is critically analyzing the bible as a whole, and as book comprising of multiple books, I can only see Paul's words as his personal understanding and opinion.
What this means, rocketman, is that "faith" is required to believe in what Paul said. This cannot be construed as evidence of anything other than faith. It's perfectly fine that you have faith and accept Paul's words on faith, for even I love many of the perspectives that Paul has to offer.
But unfortunately, everything Paul says is subjective. Therefore, the readers here can make a decision on the value of this evidence based upon what it's worth to them personally.
However, if they don't have any faith, then it's going to be worthless to them.
| rocketman wrote: |
There was no need in the Old Testament to call the Christ Jesus, for as you have said ,and I have agreed, Jesus Christ as man did not exist, for He had not been born. This plan for the Christ to be born as a man was from eternity past as I am sure you will agree. This being true, what other name would befit a needed savior? How else could man be saved? Doesn't the scriptures say that all men have sinned? |
But to go from Point A to Point B, we need the evidence. Your train of thought is all there and it's fine, but without the evidence to make your train of thought cohesive, then all we have from you is your beliefs.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Jesus means what? YHWH saves. God came in the flesh to save us from our sins, this is in a nutshell the whole the the Bible. What was the Christs name when He walked on earth as a man? JESUS! So even though Christ was from everlasting He was born into this world only once. Doing so does not change the preincarnate Christ, for the scriptures say, "For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin. Christ and Jesus are one in the same, but until Christ was born as a man the scriptures did not call Him Jesus, although the above scripture in Ephesians states clearly that God presdestined us to adoption as sons before the foundation of the world. Who new? This is the Mystery that was hidden from prior generations, that everything is summed up in Jesus Christ. |
Again, you are quoting a belief from Paul, yet even that requires further evidence.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| Obviously Jesus was not speaking of the Christ as a physical man, so what else would he be referring to? What other options exist? |
He was referring to Himself as His Fathers Son. |
A human being named Jesus was the Son of God? Yet that is countered by the very uttered words of Jesus with such verses as:
Joh 4:24 God is a spirit, and they who worship Him must worship in spirit and in truth.
Joh 3.6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
Jesus tells us clearly that God is a spirit, and that Spirit gives birth to spirit. Therefore, if we say that a flesh man was the Son of God, then we are clearly contradicting the words of Jesus. If God is a spirit, and that Spirit gives birth to spirit, then the only logical conclusion we can arrive at is that the Son of God- the Christ- is a spirit.
This is yet more evidence that the true nature of the Son of God is spiritual.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| There is only one option; "Spirit." And since that is the only option available, then what was the state of existence of the Christ before Jesus was born? What was the state of existence of the Son of God before Jesus was born? What is the original state of existence of Christ, the Son of God? |
Answering first sentence above: since Jesus has been with the Father from eternity past there are a myriad of answers. Being with Abraham Gen. 18:2-33. Many others I will list later at your request, but right now it is late. god is Spirit, That means They are All Spirit, Father, Son, Holy Spirit. What it doesn't mean is the Son was not named Jesus from eternity past. |
Yet, you still have not managed to go from Point A to Point by by demonstrating any evidence to support the name of Jesus as being the Son of God prior to the birth of Jesus by Mary.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| Again, the only option is "Spirit." There was no physical man named Jesus. There was no flesh body. There was only "Spirit." |
It is getting late and I may be getting a little rummy, but I agree with you and must be missing your point. Of course there was no physical man; Jesus Christ the man wasn't born yet. |
But there was no Christ named Jesus before Jesus was born either. There is no evidence to support that there was.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| There is no possible way you can refute this with any evidence. The Son of God in his original state is in fact a spirit named Christ, and was not a man named Jesus. |
Fathom you have got to be kidding Christ is a title not a name, and Jesus is this Christ. |
Fine, but either way, the Son of God in his original state is in fact a spirit entitled Christ, and was not a man named Jesus. To call a man named Jesus as "Christ," you need to consider whether or not the eternal everlasting God can die.
If a flesh man could be Christ, and Christ is regarded as God by God Himself, then it is a complete contradiction to say that God can die, as in Jesus dying on the cross. For if God were to die, how then could God be everlasting and eternal?
Indeed, Jesus tells you that God is a spirit, and he also shows you that the Christ is God in that Psalm he gave to the Pharisee regarding David's son. Therefore, Christ is a spirit and would have no physical body that would die.
| rocketman wrote: |
| Fathom wrote: |
| This chain of evidence and train of thought is what is required to prove your points. In my next post I will examine other things you said. |
Thus far my friend I believe your chain of evidence and train of thought are only yours and do not prove what you wish to prove. |
It's really not a matter of proof, but of what approximates the truth the closest. Since I have provided evidence to fully support the train of thought, and connected Point A to Point B with the evidence, then my point stands without sufficient refute.
Yet, we see the problem with your position above. You cannot connect the name of "Jesus" to the Christ in the OT because the name of Jesus was never mentioned in the OT.
You also have a problem arguing against the uttered words of Jesus whereas he shows you clearly with a Psalm that Christ is God, and in the Gospel he says God is a spirit. Therefore ...
1. God is a Spirit.
2. Christ is God.
3. Christ is therefore a Spirit.
However, with your position we see this:
1. God is a Spirit.
2. Christ is God.
3. Christ is therefore flesh?
Which one of the above approximates the truth the closest?
If we are to say that Christ is a flesh man named Jesus, then we clearly contradict the teachings of Jesus. _________________ Team FFI - The Quest For The Historical Jesus.
Website: http://members.shaw.ca/TeamFFI
Forum: http://teamffi.myfreeforum.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jacquelina

Joined: 27 Mar 2005 Posts: 1027 Location: New York metropolitan area
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
To all of you who are arguing over the nature of this maverick rabbi and his life history: it was written several decades AFTER Jesus was alive! Thus, the authors only dimly remembered Jesus, if at all, from during his lifetime, and more likely heard about Jesus from someone else. Why not try picking on a Messiah who lived a bit closer to home and within living memory?
(Menachem Schneerson, as shown by http://mentalblog.com)
Oh? Not comfortable with that? How about this one instead?
(yup, you know who! Kudos to Wikipedia and the NY World-Telegram for this.) _________________ Look ahead, but think of what you left behind. ("Beware of the dark side of the Force.") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
piggy
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 6372 Location: Godwana
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| landmark wrote: |
| piggy wrote: |
| Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova? |
The immaculate conception of the historical man, Jesus Christ, has been scientifically shown to be possible!
| piggy wrote: |
| I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap. |
On the contrary, it is not crap, it is called 'parthenogenesis'
Yours truthfully
Paul  |
The 'immaculate conception' refers to Mary, mother of Jesus ............ it doesn't refer to Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate_Conception
The Immaculate Conception is, according to Roman Catholic dogma, the conception of Mary, the mother of Jesus without any stain of original sin, in her mother's womb:
You might give some thought to the notion that a circle of people planned a 'Mary', for her to be kinda like a primitive religious sacrifice for 'god' or 'god-spirit' to impregnate.
It was essential that her conception have its foundation in a spiritual-sex act between her parents aiming to render her not of the lust, but with a high reverence for the 'holy sex-act'.
Somehow the three guys from Persia were involved.
Mary was the beginning of an orchestrated move to maintain a united/single-minded school of thought, a christ-consciousness that had already been observed to exist in the nature of men.
The whole aim was to produce an untainted child from Mary ............ Jesus was a 'planned pregnancy'.
Jesus was a product of 'spiritual family-planning'.
To kick-start the consciousness.
Here's some more about the point at hand.
http://www.catholic.com/library/Immaculate_Conception_and_Assum.asp
The Immaculate Conception
It’s important to understand what the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is and what it is not. Some people think the term refers to Christ’s conception in Mary’s womb without the intervention of a human father; but that is the Virgin Birth. Others think the Immaculate Conception means Mary was conceived "by the power of the Holy Spirit," in the way Jesus was, but that, too, is incorrect. The Immaculate Conception means that Mary, whose conception was brought about the normal way, was conceived without original sin or its stain—that’s what "immaculate" means: without stain. The essence of original sin consists in the deprivation of sanctifying grace, and its stain is a corrupt nature. Mary was preserved from these defects by God’s grace; from the first instant of her existence she was in the state of sanctifying grace and was free from the corrupt nature original sin brings.
When discussing the Immaculate Conception, an implicit reference may be found in the angel’s greeting to Mary. The angel Gabriel said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you" (Luke 1:2 . The phrase "full of grace" is a translation of the Greek word kecharitomene. It therefore expresses a characteristic quality of Mary.
The traditional translation, "full of grace," is better than the one found in many recent versions of the New Testament, which give something along the lines of "highly favored daughter." Mary was indeed a highly favored daughter of God, but the Greek implies more than that (and it never mentions the word for "daughter"). The grace given to Mary is at once permanent and of a unique kind. Kecharitomene is a perfect passive participle of charitoo, meaning "to fill or endow with grace." Since this term is in the perfect tense, it indicates that Mary was graced in the past but with continuing effects in the present. So, the grace Mary enjoyed was not a result of the angel’s visit. In fact, Catholics hold, it extended over the whole of her life, from conception onward. She was in a state of sanctifying grace from the first moment of her existence.
Cite your source as regards 'scientifically shown to be possible' ...........we are talking about a 'spirit' impregnating a human woman.
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
landmark

Joined: 25 Dec 2005 Posts: 1186 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: [/quote][quote="piggy"] |
|
|
| piggy wrote: |
| landmark wrote: |
| piggy wrote: |
| Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova? |
The immaculate conception of the historical man, Jesus Christ, has been scientifically shown to be possible!
| piggy wrote: |
| I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap. |
On the contrary, it is not crap, it is called 'parthenogenesis'
Yours truthfully
Paul  |
The 'immaculate conception' refers to Mary, mother of Jesus ............ it doesn't refer to Jesus. |
Oops, sorry for misleading you with that Catholic term and all its added on made up Catholic dogma. I am not a Catholic nevertheless, I should of been aware of its meaning. Neither do I believe in this exclusive Catholic dogma that is attached to it
| piggy wrote: |
| Cite your source as regards 'scientifically shown to be possible' |
My source was only referring to your original question about whether: -
| piggy wrote: |
| 'Jesus was conceived without combination of human sperm & ova?' |
I therefore think I shouldn't reveal my source, because it is not compatible to the spiritual aspect of who Jesus's father was.
| piggy wrote: |
| ...........we are talking about a 'spirit' impregnating a human woman.. |
That was not what I was wanting to discuss; rather, whether it was conceivable (nice pun) that Jesus Christ could of had no earthly father because he was the offspring of a virgin,s womb; simple as that. _________________ By their fruits you shall know them |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ixolite

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Posts: 12939 Location: land of pork and beer
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| landmark wrote: |
| piggy wrote: |
| Do you say that Jesus and/or the christ was/were conceived without combination of human sperm & ova? |
The immaculate conception of the historical man, Jesus Christ, has been scientifically shown to be possible! |
[citation needed]
| Quote: |
| piggy wrote: |
| I think one would be off with the fairies to believe this crap. |
On the contrary, it is not crap, it is called 'parthenogenesis'
Yours truthfully
Paul  |
Jesus was a girl?
| Quote: |
par·the·no·gen·e·sis
A form of reproduction in which an unfertilized egg develops into a new individual, occurring commonly among insects and certain other arthropods |
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Parthogenesis _________________ </islam>
"Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Goldthwait H. Dorr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
humandecency

Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 18818 Location: This side of the black stump.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get it, ixolite.
Why do ask if Jesus was a girl? Shouldn't you be asking if Jesus was an insect or other certain arthropod? _________________ The Swordy Whahabian flag bears the sword, islamic symbol of peace.
>>paradoxtoparadise]<<
>>> http://www.geocities.com/humandecency/first <<<
™ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|