Nov. 27, 20001
I read you article on the numeric miracle of The Quran, I agree
to the best of my knowledge that it is a hoax, but I do have questions
regarding your attitude towards the authenticity of The Quran and Mr.
Ali Sina's ignorant comments on the validity of the Teachings of The
ALLAH Challenges in The Glorious Quran "....produce a Surah like
it..." . The challenge of the Qur'aan for man to produce its like
is not, as some suppose, merely like the uniqueness of Shakespeare,
Shelly, Keats, or Homer. The Qur'aan differentiated itself in its very
structure. Poetry in Arabic falls into sixteen different
"Bihar" and other than that they have the speech of
soothsayers, rhyming prose, and normal speech. The Qur'aan's form did
not fit into any of these categories. It was this that made the Qur'aan
inimitable, and left the pagan Arabs at a loss as to how they might
combat it as Alqama bin Abdulmanaf confirmed when he addressed their
leaders, the Quraish:
First of all Quran is not
poetry therefore such statement is absurd. It is to a certain extend
rhyming prose. The fact
that Quran does not fall into any established category of Arabic writing
is no miracle. It just shows that Muhammad was ignorant of the Arabic
grammar. A man who makes incoherent speeches that is disorganized and
nonsensical is a stupid man not a prophet. There is nothing intelligent
in Quran. A painter, a dancer, a musician or a poet can challenge his
competitors to produce something as good as his, but Quran is a
hodgepodge of gibberish and cogitations of a sick mind. Only another mad
man can create such nonsense. What miracle is there in that collection
of inanities? Only a fool or someone who is brainwashed by faith would
think that Quran is a work of art and inimitable.
"Oh Quraish, a new calamity has befallen you.
Mohammed was a young man the most liked among you, most truthful in
speech, and most trustworthy, until, when you saw gray hairs on his
temple, and he brought you his message, you said that he was a sorcerer,
but he is not, for we seen such people and their spitting and their
knots; you said, a diviner, but we have seen such people and their
behavior, and we have heard their rhymes; you said a soothsayer, but he
is not a soothsayer, for we have heard their rhymes; and you said a
poet, but he is not a poet, for we have heard all kinds of poetry; you
said he was possessed, but he is not for we have seen the possessed, and
he shows no signs of their gasping and whispering and delirium. Oh men
of Quraish, look to your affairs, for by
Allah a serious thing has befallen you."
Whose words are these? This
is what Muhammad said about himself. He phrased them as if his imaginary
god was the speaker. He was a pathological liar. He fooled people by his
lies. What else do you expect a narcissist say about himself? It is a
shame that 1400 years later still there are people who are so naïf as
to believe a schizophrenic narcissist was a messenger of God.
These are the sixteen Al-Bihar (literally
"Seas", so called because of the way the poem moves, according
to its rhythmic patterns): At-Tawil, al-Bassit, al-Waafir, al-Kaamil,
ar-Rajs, al-Khafeef, al-Hazaj, al-Muttakarib, al-Munsarih, al-Muktatab,
al-Muktadarak, al-Madeed, al-Mujtath, al-Ramel, al-Khabab. So the
challenge is to produce in Arabic, three lines, that do not fall into
one of these sixteen Bihar, that is not rhyming prose, nor like the
speech of soothsayers, and not normal speech, that it should contain at
least a comprehensible meaning and rhetoric, i.e. not gobbledygook.
There are 16 right ways to
compose poetry in Arabic and there are infinite wrong ways. Muhammad
just wrote some meaningless prose that fall within the latter
A simple, mostly objective - and admittedly partly
objective - challenge. "...and if you cannot do it, and certainly
you cannot do it, then fear the fire whose fuel is men and stones."
These thoughts are the
thoughts of a crazy man. How can the creator of this universe be so
stupid to brag with a bunch of humans down in this planet to prove his
Arabic is better? This is such a naïf mentality that baffles any
This will therefore prove that it is from Allah,
and thus that its contents are accurate, including the fact of its
revelation to Mohammed (Peace be upon him).
Does it really? If you are
so adamant to fool yourself you are entitled to your thoughts. But this
to me is proof that Muhammad was a sick man. There is no proof here.
Open your eyes if you have eyes. In your mind Muhammad was a real
messenger of God and Quran is the word of God brought to him by Gabriel.
Now tell me if Muhammad was not the messenger of God but a liar would he
have spoken about himself differently? Would you believe me if I tell
you that I am a messenger of God and for proof I myself tell you few
verses claiming these are the verses of God that are said in my support?
Would it be enough proof if I said God would burn you in hell for
eternity if you disbelieve in me and reject his words that only I can
hear? Do you have any other proof except the testimony of Muhammad
himself that he was a messenger of God?
You need not be bothered about Avadhanis not
knowing arabic, there aer a numerous set of Arab non muslims who are
well versed and may come to your aid if you can request them, if you can
really face challenges not human but Divine. Please go ahead if ye are
truthful in feeling that the Avadhanis knowing Arabic can beat The
And you go ahead in
believing that the gibberish of a sick man is an inimitable miracle!
Regarding Mr. Ali Sina's most ignorant comments on
the Validity of The Quranic Teachings, Shareeah demands that anyone who
slanders a woman and fails to produce a proof should be whipped 80
lashes, no law in this world protects the right of a woman to this
extent. We all know well what happened to Mrs. Diana as a consequence of
media slanders against her, she even suffered from ailments as a dire
consequence of the slanders. This event is evident enough for the
Islamic law to outsmart any of your so called modern man made useless
laws failed utterly in checking any sort of human crimes.
It is sad that you think
this barbaric and primitive injunction is so advanced. Obviously Muslims
with this level of intelligence deserve nothing but Islam. It is beyond
any civilized person to think whipping people is to exalt women.
Muhammad told men to beat
their wives if they are disobedient (Q.4:34) He said they are deficient
in intelligence. He said their testimony is not worth in a court of law
because they are prone to mistakes. All that does not denigrate women.
But if a man is whipped 80 lashes that is what exalts her!
I admit that sometimes I lose hope and think you Muslims are
subhuman. How and a 21st century man think this way is
In civilized world Sir,
the person who is being slandered can sue and if the defendant is found
guilty, s/he would pay fines. Beating people, whipping or lapidating
them are practices of very primitive societies.
Not just that, do he really know the pre-requisites
to cutoff a man's hand in Shareeah, please ask him learn that first. You
know what, Saudi Arabia a land where Shareeah is practised at its
minimum not even 25% (if iam right) managed to emerge as the best state
when it comes to reduced crime rates, what if 100%?.
Saudi Arabia is the most
corrupt country in the planet. I lived in Saudi Arabia for a few months
and visited Mecca. Yes petty thieves do not exist there but white-collar
theft, bribery and corruption is rampant. Muhammad’s barbaric law of
cutting the hand of a thief punishes small thieves who often have to
steal to feed their family or themselves. But those thieves that still
millions of billions of dollars are sitting comfortably in their palaces
and no harm comes to them.
I earnestly request not to publish unauthentic
ignorant words from ignorant people that can hurt the feelings of
genuine hearts, and please dont publish any article having half
knowledge on the topic being discussed in that.
awaiting your reply,
Despite your request “not
to publish ignorant words from ignorant people” I decided to publish
your letter so every one can see the level of intelligence of Muslims
even those who apparently are schooled and know the Arabic categories of