Edip Yuksel vs Ali Sina Page 37
Edip Yuksel vs. Ali Sina
Round X - page 37
|
|
These are childish explanations that satisfy only the already convinced. I only quoted two examples, one about Abu Lahab and the other about Job. But there are many other examples where the Quran is not clear unless the sha’ne nozool of those verses are known. A good example of that is the Surah Bara’a that I quoted in page 15 of this debate. For example the Verse 5 of that Sura says when the “forbidden months are passed, then fight and slay the Pagans”. What are these forbidden months? This is not insignificant. This Sura is instructing Muslims to shed blood. So it is a matter of life and death to know what those forbidden months are. The Quran does not make this clear. Therefore without the tafseer the Quran is incomprehensible. I can bring hundreds of examples like this. No person can make sense of the Quran without the knowledge of the events surrounding it, not even you. That is why in you book, you relied extensively on hadith.
|
2. Ali Sina frequently makes false claims with hyperbolic pontifications. |
The verse 7:166 is completely asinine. Of course not all Muslims are dumb. It is natural that some of them see the stupidity of this verse and try to reinterpret it. For example Miraj is an absurdity and many Muslims like Rumi gave “spiritual” meaning to it. Nonetheless the verses about Jews becoming apes are not allegorical. That is why Rumi could not change them even though he was a brilliant man. Some scholars, like you, claim they are allegorical. But the verses are very clear. If these scholars insist that black is white that does not change the truth. There are also scholars that say, the Quran is a tolerant book. Does it make any difference? They are simply lying. Anyone can see the Quran is not a tolerant book just as anyone can see that those verses are not allegorical.
|
3. Ali Sina has the habit of putting words in his opponent's mouth. |
I asked you to explain what do you mean by "Islamic Reform". You are beating around the bushes but not answering my simple question. Why instead of accusing me of being dishonest, you just don’t explain what you mean. I asked you a simple question. What does Islamic Reform mean? I understand it as reforming Islam. You say I am ignorant and my understanding is wrong. So please explain it so even an ignorant person like me can understand.
You are following a pattern of evasion by resorting to ad hominem and introducing red herrings.
|
4. Ali Sina lacks academic rigor, and when it is in his advantage, he confuses modern Arabic with classic Arabic, or uses third class unreliable sources. Another example: He criticizes the Quran for being unscientific by reading the verses of the Quran like a third grader. For instance, he refers to verse 18:86 and understand it as "Koran teaches us that the Sun sets in a muddy spring." He ignores the fact the verse is not describing an astronomic event, but the PERCEPTION of Zul Qarnain (the one with two generations), since he verse introduces the perception as "HE FOUND". I urge anyone to search google by putting the following words in quotation "sun set behind" and they will find that more than ten thousand sites, including modern universities astronomy sites "teaches us that the Sun sets" behind the mountains, clouds, trees, etc. If you wish you may search for "sun sets in" OR "sun set in." |
We already discussed the word Jizyah and from the text of the verse 9:29 it is clear that this is not something desirable. It says: fight them “until they pay Jizyah with their own hands and they are humiliated”. The word saagher means subdued and humiliated.
حَتَّى يُعْطُواْ الْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ
We have not yet discussed the verse 18:86 or other absurdities of the Quran. This I hope we start doing in our next phase of debate. So far we discussed the incomprehensibility of the Quran and its inhumanity. The absurdities of the Quran require a dedicated discussion.