Skip to Content

What is Wahabism?

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF versionBy: Ibrahim Lone Introduction What is Wahabism? This is a fundamental question that arises in the minds of those who are not fully acquainted with the nuances of this Cult within the Cult of Islam. Wahabism is Islam personified in today's age. Wahabism reiterates the same philosophy, which the Prophet of Islam had brought about 1400 years ago - the philosophy of the Superiority of the Arabs. Before we proceed farther, let us understand what Wahabism is not about. Wahabism is not about religion, it's not about spirituality or God, it is about the superiority of the Arabs over all other nations. I have tried to bring forth the character and the personality of the Prophet of this sub cult and his mentor Abdullah Ibn Sa'ud. It is extremely important that we know who the founding fathers of this cult were in order to understand the cult itself. Simply because it is important to go through the mind of the leader before examining the cult. Just like no study of Islam is complete without studying its Prophet. Like wise, the study of Wahabism is incomplete without studying its founding father. A historical background of the conditions in Arabia at the advent of Wahabism Wahabism has its origins in the deserts of Arabia which from time immemorial has been the haunt of highwaymen and nomads who tolerated no rule or social organization other than their own ancestral systems. Even the so called brotherhood of Islam could only temporarily combine them into unstable groups to unite for a raid or plunder.  The Bedouins continued their blood feuds, and their history remained practically the same everlasting story of tribal jealousy and consequent as before the advent of Muhammad and the subsequent spread of his Cult. As it was the duty of the Caliph to safeguard the passage to the cities of Mecca and Medina, the Western Coast routes were more or less under his control. The Ottomans, as holders of the Caliphate had no other wish  than that being the most powerful Muhammadan rulers, though it was essential to maintain their authority of the protection of the Holy cities and the pilgrimage routes. But in every other aspect Arabia remained practically independent of the Turkish Government. The Sherifs of Mecca who possessed nominal eccleststic sovereignty were as powerless politically as the Turkish Government, and were unable to control the tribes. The inhabitants of the towns or Oasis mostly belonged to the most conservative and rigid of the four orthodox Sunni Schools of Islam: that of Ibn Hanbal, while the East-Arabia Sheltered some Shafiates, the coast of Quweit some Malakites, and some coasts of the East even some Shiites who were the remnants of the Carmanthian sects. Economically the entire country was destitute. Not even a slowly increasing population could thrive on its soil, and a constant efflux into Mesopotamia and Syria just served to keep the remainder practically on the borderline of starvation. As the economic conditions remained stationary, the social conditions had also remained practically unchanged since the time of Muhammad Understanding Ibn Abdul Wahab In Arabia, any historian has the rare opportunity to study the original social conditions petrified in their natural surroundings, as time seems to have slumbered into the desert. Modern Arab history is simply a mirage reflected from its past. In the last century or so Arab nationalism has found expression in the revived Islamic doctrines of Ibn Taymmiyaa, from which Muhhamad bin Abdul Wahab (1703-1791) drew his inspiration. Ibn Abdul Wahab was born at Uyanina, a small town in Najid. His father's name, who incidentally was a Hamabalite Ulema, although far from being in accord with the teachings of his son, gave the appellation to the movement called Wahabism. Wahabi is more or less a nickname in Arabia; the Arabs like to call themselves Muwahhidun or monotheists, as they believe that they practice monotheism in the purest form. Muhammad went through the usual curriculum of Islamic studies from which he probably developed his enthusiasm for the teachings of Ibn Taymiya at Medina, where he lived for some time. After the death of his father in 1740 he started to preach his doctrines publicly. He railed against the system of offering homage to human beings and to their graves. He reproached mysticism for its indifference to the law of his Prophet. The veneration of saints was an abomination for him any form. He did not recognize the consent of human authority in any form and preached the return to the two sources of Islam "the Quran and the primitive Sunnah". He said " Ye have the book (Quran) and sunnah, study the word of God and act according to it even if the majority disagrees with you." He proscribed all speculative explanations in exegesis and jurisprudence and adhered, like the Zahirites, to the literal sense of the Quran and the Hadith. He rejected all innovations by which Islam had tried to adapt itself to the changing conditions, and waged an implacable war against the laxities introduced by the mundane spirit at the cost of primitive austerity. The teachings of Ibn Abul Wahhab roused anxiety even amongst the Hanbalites of Arabia. The pious conservative probably sympathized with the tendency of his doctrines, but his insistence of on the practice of the puritan tenets frightened those who indulged in daily transgressions In 1744, owing to the persecution of the ulemas, he was forced to seek refuge in Darriya, in the house of the  Amir Muhammad Ibn Sa'ud, and from this time the theological controversy entered on to a political phase. Ibn Sa'ud agreed to become his patron, and concluded a pact with him. The religious propagandist had now gained the support of an executive authority (asab us-seyf) behind him. Those who believed on their account were invited to defend the faith, those who hesitated were brought over by the prospect of booty, and those who resisted were forced by intimidation. The blood-feuds of the Bedouins were forbidden or restrained, and their restless energy was directed against the Kafirs, at least those whom Ibn Sa'ud and the Wahabis regarded as such. This new movement proceeded on parallel lines to its predecessor's in the 6th century. No other line of advantage was possible. The state, in accordance with the Wahabi doctrine, which solely followed the actions of the Prophet of Islam, extracted one-fifth of the booty, and also collected the Zakat from the believers. It converted the inhabitants of the rebellious province of Kasim into tenants on the principle of kharadj. The Arabia of the 7th century revived again. The state was based on the army, and this has to be kept busy to secure maintenance. The nomads of Arabia always eager to join promising movements, got interested in Wahabism, and prospects of booty soon attracted the Beouins of Central and East Arabia to the camp of Sa'ud. Towards the end of the 18th century Sa'ud and his Wahhabis became the greatest power in the peninsula. They started harassing the pilgrims of Mecca, and robbing the presents of the Sultans, in the same way that the Prophet of Islam had in his early days of Prophet hood. Then they attacked the Shia communities at Nadjaf and Karbala, just like Muhammad used to attack the Jewish communities. History repeated itself even into the minutest details. The iconoclastic zeal of the Wahabis destroyed the mausoleums and cupolas erected over the graves, and removed the heavily embroidered silk carpets of Kaaba. In Medina the Muhammad's tomb was robbed f its treasures hoarded through the centuries. The ulemas cowed by the Tafkir were powerless against these vandalisms. The Wahabis continued to rob the pilgrims and ultimately the Hajj was brought to suspension altogether. Decline and rise of Wahabism Encouraged by the uncharted success, hordes of Arabs pressed northwards into Syria and Mesopotamia. The Ottomans were powerless against Sa'ud, and were forced to entrust the pacification of the Arabia to the Pasha of Egypt, Muhammad Ali. It was not an easy task. Desert warfare has proved difficult even for the best organized armies. The campaign of the Egyptians resulted in severe recourses until they had to take recourse to more glittering weapons than swords. Money was set rolling amidst the Bedouins who, as in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, had greater faith in gold than in sacred doctrines. The capital of Abdullah Sa'ud at Darriya was stormed in 1818, and the Amir and some leaders of the Wahabis were taken as prisoners and sent to Constinopole where they were executed. This was a hard blow to Wahabism. The family of Sa'ud first retired to Riyadh, then to Kuwait on the Persian Gulf, as they could not withstand the rivalry of their former foes, the Ibn Rasheed of Mount Shammar. The extension of the political influence of Germany over Turkey, which found its economic expression in the building of the Baghdad railway stretching out its feelers towards the Persian Gulf, created a new situation. The British Government was looking for new allies in Arabia against the Turko-Germanic alliance. In the 6th century the situation had been exactly similar. The Byzantines stationed the Ghasanides in Syria as buffers against the Laskmides of Hira who were feudatories of the Sassanians. These two Arab dynasties remained in a continual conflict; they won and lost battles exactly as what was going to happen again. In a similar vein fights had been going on between the Rasheedis and the Sa'uds. In the beginning the Rasheedis had gained an important advantage. But later on Sa'ud invented a most efficient stratagem. He established several camps at important spots where he assembled his Bedouins and drilled them in the rigid doctrine of wahabism, and also taught them the art of agriculture. He formed a brotherhood of reliable and trustworthy elements to serve as a nucleus for fresh organizations. The Turks weakened by their defeat in the Balkan war were obliged to maintain a passive attitude in Arabia. Long before the marcia su Roma the Wahabi fiasco was created. They had their national pride, their rigid national creed devoid of all influences of foreign origin, and a national esprit se corps which acknowledged implicit obedience to one idea and to one master. They even had their own distinct uniform-a counterpart to the black-shirts of Mussolini-a white garment and a white turban. The brotherhood of the Wahabbis, know as the Ukhuwwat was a military organization ready to strike at any moment. Characteristically enough, like the first communities of Islam, the Ukhuwwat does not recognize tribal organization. It is an organization of the Arabs, irrespective of tribal adherence, guided by the ideals of Islam. The shrewdness of Sa'ud, just like his prophet's, realized its coveted fruits. In 1921 he defeated his old rival Ibn Rasheed, and massacred his family. In 1924 he victoriously entered Taif and Mecca from where Hussain Ibn Ali the sheriff and Caliph had fled. The kingdom of Hijaz ceased to exist. A new sultanate that of Sa'ud, an independent Arabic state, stepped onto the stage of history; we know this Sultanate as Saudi Arabia today. After effects and conclusion The intransigency in maters religion, its national outlook and its attitude towards foreign politics found many adherents abroad. In India and Pakistan the Salafiya (conservatives) and the Ahle Hadith (traditionalists) are more or less inspired by the Wahabite tendencies. Simply because it helps them to keep the Muslims away from a secular education. Wahabism is a militant state. It could not remain satisfied with its achievements. In order to enlarge the status that it enjoyed in the Muslim world it had to expand its economic boundaries. We see this influence today, as Wahabi Saudi Arabia exports its citizens, sets up Islamic chairs in Western universities, sets up Maddarssas in South and South East Asia. These are all ways and means to expand it. With the advent of the age of petroleum the militant tendency of the Islam which today manifests itself through the Wahabis has got the most important tool to spread itself in today's world. If the world does not recognize the threat that this menacing ideology presents to the existence of Human kind, we might yet face another World War.
0
Your rating: None

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Islam is like laxative.Small

Islam is like laxative.Small doses of it make you rush to the crown and large doses make you stick to the crown and even larger doses make you sick and mega doses will kill you.Wahabism is a mega dose of laxative.Islam in small or mega doses reminds you of the need to crap.That's in short islam.


It's very sad when you find

It's very sad when you find well educated people writing stuff they're not sure about. Who said wahabisim means arabs are superior? There is no such group called wahabis, they've been labeled by other people.


Excellent article.

Excellent article.


Good!!!

Good!!!


Why don´t just give Muslims

Why don´t just give Muslims HAM ASS?


So, is Saud trying to tell us

So, is Saud trying to tell us that the arabs do NOT feel superior to everyone? I say they may subliminally recognize an inferiority in themselves, but they have been brainwashed into thinking Islam is the only thing, for everyone in the world, to gulp in, or be force fed it. When they call Christians Jews and Hindus names, and then engage in world-wide temper tantrums when a cartoonist holds a mirror up to them so they can see how others view them, it is at least a desperate move to assure themselves that they are superior. And when they march through towns inciting "Butcher those who insult Islam" while THEY continually insult everyone else, they try to claim a respect they have nort earned and do not merit.


LONDON - january - 1150

LONDON - january - 1150 words
Jewish editor sacked for publishing article

This article was sent to Debbie Ducro, an American-Jewish journalist with the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle. She published it, and was fired the next day.

Quest for justice
By Judith Stone

I am a Jew. I was a participant in the Rally for the Right of Return to Palestine. It was the right thing to do.

I've heard about the European holocaust against the Jews since I was a small child. I've visited the memorials in Washington, DC and Jerusalem dedicated to Jewish lives lost and I've cried at the recognition to what level of atrocity mankind is capable of sinking.

Where are the Jews of conscience? No righteous malice can be held against the survivors of Hitler's holocaust. These fragments of humanity were in no position to make choices beyond that of personal survival. We must not forget that being a survivor or a co-religionist of the victims of the European Holocaust does not grant dispensation from abiding by the rules of humanity.

"Never again" as a motto, rings hollow when it means "never again to us alone." My generation was raised being led to believe that the biblical land was a vast desert inhabited by a handful of impoverished Palestinians living with their camels and eking out a living in the sand. The arrival of the Jews was touted as a tremendous benefit to these desert dwellers. Golda Meir even assured us that there "is no Palestinian problem".

We know now this picture wasn't as it was painted. Palestine was a land filled with people who called it home. There were thriving towns and villages, schools and hospitals. There were Jews, Christians and Muslims.

In fact, prior to the occupation, Jews represented a mere seven per cent of the population and owned three per cent of the land.

Taking the blinders off for a moment, I see a second atrocity perpetuated by the very people who should be exquisitely sensitive to the suffering of others. These people knew what it felt like to be ordered out of your home at gun point and forced to march into the night to unknown destinations or face execution on the spot. The people who displaced the Palestinians knew first hand what it means to watch your home in flames, to surrender everything dear to your heart at a moment's notice. Bulldozers levelled hundreds of villages, along with the remains of the village inhabitants, the old and the young. This was nothing new to the world.

Poland is a vast graveyard of the Jews of Europe. Israel is the final resting place of the massacred Palestinian people. A short distance from the memorial to the Jewish children lost to the holocaust in Europe there is a levelled parking lot. Under this parking lot is what's left of a once flourishing village and the bodies of men, women and children whose only crime was taking up needed space and not leaving graciously. This particular burial marker reads: "Public Parking".

I've talked with Palestinians. I have yet to meet a Palestinian who hasn't lost a member of their family to the Israeli Shoah, nor a Palestinian who cannot name a relative or friend languishing under inhumane conditions in an Israeli prison. Time and time again, Israel is cited for human rights violations to no avail. On a recent trip to Israel, I visited the refugee camps inhabited by a people who have waited 52 years in these 'temporary' camps to go home. Every Palestinian grandparent can tell you the name of their village, their street, and where the olive trees were planted. Their grandchildren may never have been home, but they can tell you where their great-grandfather lies buried and where the village well stood. The press has fostered the portrait of the Palestinian terrorist. But the victims who rose up against human indignity in the Warsaw Ghetto are called heroes. Those who lost their lives are called martyrs. The Palestinian who tosses a rock in desperation is a terrorist.

Two years ago I drove through Palestine and watched intricate sprinkler systems watering lush green lawns of Zionist settlers in their new condominium complexes, surrounded by armed guards and barbed wire in the midst of a Palestinian community where there was not adequate water to drink and the surrounding fields were sandy and dry. University professor Moshe Zimmerman reported in the Jerusalem Post (30 April, 1995), "The [Jewish] children of Hebron are just like Hitler's youth."

We Jews are suing for restitution, lost wages, compensation for homes, land, slave labour and back wages in Europe. Am I a traitor of a Jew for supporting the right of return of the Palestinian refugees to their birthplace and compensation for what was taken that cannot be returned?

The Jewish dead cannot be brought back to life and neither can the Palestinian massacred be resurrected. David Ben Gurion said, "Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves...politically, we are the aggressors and they defend themselves...The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country...".

Palestine is a land that has been occupied and emptied of its people. Its cultural and physical landmarks have been obliterated and replaced by tidy Hebrew signs. The history of a people was the first thing eradicated by the occupiers. The history of the indigenous people has been all but eradicated as though they never existed. And all this has been hailed by the world as a miraculous act of God. We must recognise that Israel's existence is not even a question of legality so much as it is an illegal fait accompli realised through the use of force while supported by the Western powers. The UN missions directed at Israel in attempting to correct its violations of have thus far been futile.

In Hertzl's 'The Jewish State' the father of Zionism said: "We must investigate and take possession of the new Jewish country by means of every modern expedient." I guess I agree with Ehud Barak (3 June 1998) when he said, "If I were a Palestinian, I'd also join a terror group." I'd go a step further perhaps. Rather than throwing little stones in desperation, I'd hurtle a boulder.

Hopefully, somewhere deep inside, every Jew of conscience knows that this was no war; that this was not G-d's restitution of the holy land to it's rightful owners. We know that a human atrocity was and continues to be perpetuated against an innocent people who couldn't come up with the arms and money to defend themselves against the western powers bent upon their demise as a people.

We cannot continue to say, "But what were we to do?" Zionism is not synonymous with Judaism. I wholly support the rally of the right of return of the Palestinian people. here.


If Arabs were considered

If Arabs were considered superior in Wahabism, why BinLaden (whos labeled wahabist) declared Malla Omar Caliph prior to 9/11? No, Wahabism is just a Puritan Islamic movement supported by the Oil and US backed tribal dictators.


every religion is given

every religion is given labels by other people if they like it they keep it if they dont they are offended


I am amazed with it. It is a

I am amazed with it. It is a good thing for my research. Thanks


Wahabism its saudi cult to

Wahabism its saudi cult to protect saudi family,was founded by british agent to divide muslim world .....wahabism is corrupt form of islam,or should i say it got nothing to do with islam,or so hould i say its a saudi version of Zionism..wahabies are the people who oppose Prophet teachings,and denie his presence...they are worse then christian or jews,most terrorist follow wahabi teachings,like Osama bin laden ,Mullah omer,taliban,all follow wahabism,wahabism got other branches like,Deobandi,Salafi,Ahl e hadit,Tawahid,and tabhlighi jammat..wahabis work closely with zionists,to fullfill their dream..wahabism is a cult who is enemy of islam,only ture muslims are Ahle Sunnah wal jamat,who are Sunni follow Prophet mohamed Teaching and respect for other religions...if you wanna protect the world,wipe wahabism from the world...defeat wahabism defeat terrorism....a true sunni and muslim...peace