Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF version
By Lee Jay Walker
 |
| Terrorists' attack on the World Trade Center buildings in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001 |
The United States is now gradually waking up to a growing internal Islamic menace which desires to kill in the name of Islam. In the past week you have had three different cases involving Islamists who desired to kill and intimidate the people of America. In the United Kingdom the same problem exists but just like in America, under President Obama, both nations are pandering to Islam and propagating false lies about this religion. Therefore, it is time to focus on the real factors behind the growing Sunni Islamic threat within America and in other nations.
The first important factor that must be understood is that this threat comes from radical Sunni Islam and not from Shia Islam. In America and the United Kingdom you have many Shia Muslims; however, it is clear that all major global Islamic terrorism derives from radical Sunni Islam.
It is also abundantly clear that the Ahmadiyya Muslim community is not involved in terrorism because their brand of Islam is based on different interpretations and this branch of Islam suffers greatly in Pakistan and other nations, for example in Indonesia. Therefore, it is vital to understand where the focus should be because Ahmadiyya Muslims and Shia Muslims, and other branches of Islam like the Alevi, must be split from where the problem exists.
In Lebanon you do have Shia terrorist organizations however they are focused on either internal problems in Lebanon or on the situation in Israel. Also, in Yemen you have current problems with the restive Shia population but once more this is an internal matter and not based on expanding jihad and the same applies to Shia organizations in Iraq and Pakistan.
Therefore, Islamic terrorist attacks in America, India, Indonesia, Kenya, the United Kingdom, and other nations, have all been done by radical Sunni Islamists. Also, the inspiration behind these terrorist attacks is coming from the same avenue and this avenue of terrorism and global Islamic jihad can be traced back to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
B. Raman, a specialist in this field stated in the South Asia Analysis Group, paper number 1767, that “While the Deobandi extremists have been backing—-openly or covertly—- Al Qaeda and its ideology, the Barelvis have been uncomfortable over it. Many of them have been critical of the use of the Pakistani territory by Al Qaeda and the (International Islamic Front) IIF for their terrorist operations in other countries. They have also been worried over the implications of the message disseminated by bin Laden in January, 2006, in which he claimed that plans for another terrorist strike in the US homeland were already underway.”
B. Raman also states that “There are two main groups of Sunni sectarian organisations in Pakistan—-the Sipah-e-Sahaba and the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, both strongly Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi and both members of the IIF, and the Sunni Tehrik, strongly Barelvi and anti-Deobandi-Wahabi-Salafi. Since many years, the Sipah-e-Sahaba and the LEJ have embarked on a campaign for the Arabisation and Wahabisation of the Barelvi Muslims and for removing the distorting influence of Hinduism. The Sunni Tehrik has been resisting the onslaught of the Deobandis, Wahabis and Salafis.”
Therefore, just like B. Raman points out, we can apply this to the international arena because the same forces and with Saudi financial backing, irrespective if government or organizations or wealthy individuals, is spreading the same message of hate to other nations far and wide. Yet why do nations like America, Indonesia, and the United Kingdom, and many others, allow this?
It is abundantly clear that the Muslim community in the UK in the 1960s and 1970s is very different to elements within the Muslim community today. According to B. Raman he states that “For the last fifteen years, there has been a conflict between the Deobandis and the Barelvis for the control of the mosques and their funds not only in Pakistan, but also in the UK. Previously, the Barelvis used to control the mosques in the UK frequented by immigrants from the sub-continent, but they have since been driven out by the Deobandis and Wahabis. This was the starting point for the radicalisation of the Pakistani-origin Muslims in the UK and in the other countries of West Europe. The ISI (Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence) has been supporting the Sipah-e-Sahaba and the LEJ in Pakistan as well as in West Europe.”
Therefore, it is clear that funding within Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is causing mayhem and it is obvious that you have “a war within Islam” and “an ongoing Islamic jihad” against moderate Muslims, other sects within Islam and against non-Muslims. Other channels of funding throughout the Middle East also applies but the mindset and ideological thinking is based on the same branches of Islam and it is clear where the counter-jihad must begin.
Yet amazingly, and even after September 11th, whereby nearly all Sunni Islamists were Saudi nationals; the United States destroyed a secular based nation in Iraq and ignored the greater problem. After all, how many American soldiers and other international forces have been killed by radical Saudi Islamists in Iraq or by Saudi Arabian organizations which preach jihad and hatred?
Given this, it appears that the focus of attention is based on the wrong area and even today Saudi Arabian funding is creating mayhem in mainly Muslim societies or mainly non-Muslim societies where Muslim minorities are growing.
Walid Phares, author of “The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad," and of many other books and a senior expert in this field, stated “Petro-Islamism is also having a big impact in the higher education sector. As Walid Phares, an expert on global terrorism remarks in The War of Ideas (2007), globally, "a wave of oil funding hit university after university, college after college, and research centre after research centre. The objectives were fully ideological: further the cause of Islam, support the Palestinian cause, and plant the seeds of the concept of an illegitimate West."
In Britain, a report about the growing rise of Islamic funding by Brunel University's Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies highlighted the nature of the problem. The report stated that more than $491 million dollars have been spent on funding Islamic study centres and other forms of propagation. These institutions include Cambridge and Oxford, therefore, radical Islamists have gained a foothold in major circles.
I myself studied at the University of London and radical Islam was clearly a daily problem and militants were often trying to spread their hatred and propaganda. It is also noticeable that Omar Sheikh who was convicted for the beheading of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter, also studied at the London School of Economics.
Getting back to the radical Sunni Islamic threat then it is vital to confront this threat openly and to stop hiding behind liberalism, moral relativism, or untold excuses for why we must understand the causes behind radical Sunni Islam. The apologist brigade, for example Karen Armstrong, and countless others, portray Islam to be a religion of peace but Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, did not show much peace towards his enemies, instead he either enslaved them, had them killed or they were exiled.
Another important factor which must not be overlooked is history. For example the Buddhist/Hindu lands which are now called Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan (especially influenced by Zoroastrianism), and other nations; all allowed diversity despite occasional bouts of religious tensions. Therefore, you had Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, Nestorian Christians, Pagans, Zoroastrians, and other faiths, all mingling together in a vast region
However, the onset of Islam changed all this because over time in both Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, the older religions of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism (the oldest religion), would be Islamized because of several factors.
These factors were multiple but clearly the role of Islamic jihad, dhimmitude, jizya, massive persecution, slavery, forced conversion, control of resources, and so forth, all culminated in a tide of Islamization.
Yet the leaders of these areas would also have believed that accommodation could have been met and that Islam was just another religion. However, Islam is based on victor and vanquished, and this religion is more like an ideology because it fuses religion, politics, economics, law, and the regulation of society, together and clearly non-Muslims are unequal (indeed Buddhists and Hindus are deemed to be subhuman because they are not people of the Book) in accordance with the teachings of Islam.
Even in 2009 apostates from Islam can be killed in accordance with the teachings of Mohammed and other religious believers are still suffering from Islamization. This applies to Christians being burnt alive in Pakistan, apostates from Islam being killed in Somalia, attacks against Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, persecution of Baha’is in Iran, Christian pastors being beheaded in northern Nigeria, Assyrian Christians and other minorities (Shabaks, Yazidis and Mandaean) also fear daily attacks and the same applies to the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.
The forces of Islamic jihad is ongoing and Buddhists face severe persecution in southern Thailand and the Chittagong Hill Tracts (also Christian and Hindu tribal's) in Bangladesh and of course Buddhism in history always collapsed when Islamic armies conquered their lands.
I stated in a past article, that “Today, just like the 7th century, Islam is still killing apostates or persecuting them. Today, just like in the 7th century, Muslims are still waging wars against non-Muslims in countless numbers of nations. Today, just like the 7th century, Muslim fanatics are still killing fellow Muslims who are deemed to be not Muslim enough.”
“The apologists will keep on making excuses; however, it is clear that in many parts of the Islamic dominated world, that hatred still dictates. Therefore, in 2009, just like in the 7th century, non-Muslims still suffer enormous persecution and some Islamists are still dreaming of spreading Islam by the sword or by propaganda.”
Now this war against non-Muslims and moderate Muslims alike is being waged in northern Nigeria against Christians, against Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, against Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and against Buddhists in southern Thailand. The same also applies to countless other conflicts or nations where minorities suffer enormous persecution, for example the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.
This jihad is now being propagated within nations like America and the United Kingdom. Yet how can you confront your enemy when you have to play by political correctness, pander to the very same people who want to enforce Islamic Sharia law on you or have dialogue with a religion which supports killing all apostates and treating non-Muslims unequally in Islamic Sharia law?
If we ignore the past diversity of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan, then one day our civilizations may end up the same way?
After all, just like the past, religious leaders and elites within the Buddhist, Hindu, Nestorian Christian, and Zoroastrian communities did not understand the true nature of Islam. However, by the time they understood it was too late and today Buddhism in Afghanistan and Pakistan is a distant memory and the same applies to Zoroastrianism in Uzbekistan. At the same time, in the modern world Buddhism may soon be a distant memory in southern Thailand if Islamists get their way and maybe Iraq will soon have no more Mandaeans?
Walid Phares comments on recent events in America and states that “The North Carolina cell, the New York subway plot, the Dallas attempt, the Illinois case, added to the previous cases of the shooting of a soldier in Arkansas, the precedent New York cells, Georgia’s young Jihadists, all the way back to the infamous Virginia paintball network, if anything gives us the genome of what is morphing inside the country — a vast body of dispersed cells with at least one binding force — the Jihadi ideology. The question thus is to find out who is propagating the doctrines of Jihadism: who is funding it; who is protecting the indoctrination operation which leads naturally to the rise of homegrown or foreign linked, lone wolves or packs of Jihadists, Terrorists. That is the real question: where is the factory?”
Therefore, it is vital to stop major funding which is spreading radical Sunni Islam and to focus on where the threat is. It is also vital that national governments work together and that history is not forgotten. Also, more attention must be focused on persecution and injustice “within the House of Islam” and the “real Mohammed” must be told instead of the Western liberal version which is bent on appeasement and revisionism.
LEE JAY WALKER
Was 9-11 really done by
Was 9-11 really done by Islamic extremists? Look at the evidence in this youtube video: watch it full. After watching the video, investigate each and every bit of evidence on the internet, newspapers etc. Do you still think Al Qaeda was responsible for these attacks? Ask yourself these questions who benefited from these attacks the most? (US government or Al Qaeda). Who had the will, the strength, the finances, the skill required to do all the attacks surrounding the events of 9-11 with military accuracy? (the US government or the group in a cave in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda). Why is the US government not presenting all the evidence in public regarding 9-11? What has it got to hind? And finally, If this was the works of Al Qaeda why is it to date they have never been able to carry out attacks of the same magnitude and nature? All of the proven Al Qaeda attacks before 9-11 and to date were many times smaller then the ones on 9-11. So therefore, anyone with a logical mind knows that Al Qaeda wasn’t responsible for the 9-11 attacks. Islam was indeed framed. The western governments and media are run by corporate interests not by the interests of its people (research this out) for example the war with Iraq would have never happened. Islam is a religion of peace (islamalways.com) and indeed they the wrong doers plan and plot and remember that ALLAH is the best of all planners.
Was 9-11 really done by
Was 9-11 really done by Islamic extremists? Look at the evidence in this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM watch it full. After watching the video, investigate each and every bit of evidence on the internet, newspapers etc. Do you still think Al Qaeda was responsible for these attacks? Ask yourself these questions who benefited from these attacks the most? (US government or Al Qaeda). Who had the will, the strength, the finances, the skill required to do all the attacks surrounding the events of 9-11 with military accuracy? (the US government or the group in a cave in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda). Why is the US government not presenting all the evidence in public regarding 9-11? What has it got to hind? And finally, If this was the works of Al Qaeda why is it to date they have never been able to carry out attacks of the same magnitude and nature? All of the proven Al Qaeda attacks before 9-11 and to date were many times smaller then the ones on 9-11. So therefore, anyone with a logical mind knows that Al Qaeda wasn’t responsible for the 9-11 attacks. Islam was indeed framed. The western governments and media are run by corporate interests not by the interests of its people (research this out) for example the war with Iraq would have never happened. Islam is a religion of peace (islamalways.com) and indeed they the wrong doers plan and plot and remember that ALLAH is the best of all planners.
I am the author of this
I am the author of this article!
Hmm, INVESTIGATE 9-11.
I see, Muslims never did September 11th, and London, and Madrid, and seriously, those suicide bombings in Iraq and Pakistan are being done by non-Muslims (really they are Christian nuns and Buddhists who are doing all these terrorist attacks, seriously, laughing to myself) - Oh, and those Christian converts being beheaded in Somalia by Sunni Islamists is not true, no seriously, they look like radical Muslims but in truth they are followers of Tom and Jerry and they come from Mars..................honestly!
I think that INVESTIGATE 9-11 resides in "cloud cuckoo land."
Now getting back to planet reality, we all know that radical Sunni Islamists did September 11th, and London, and Madrid, and Kenya, and so on.
In recent weeks radical Sunni Islamists have done terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, southern Thailand, and in other parts of the world.
SUNNI ISLAMISTS DID SEPTEMBER 11th, London, and so on and only "a deranged or conspiracy theorist" would doubt this fact.
Brother Lee Jay Walker, I am
Brother Lee Jay Walker, I am talking about 9-11 attacks ONLY in my small essay. Indeed, ALLAH the all-knowing and wise knows who’s really behind the 9-11 attacks. But looking at all the vital evidence do you really think Al Qaeda has a group in a cave can plan and implement attacks of this magnitude with military accuracy? I ask readers to investigate 9-11 from different sources.
Hello - I see, so Sunni
Hello - I see, so Sunni Islamists self-destructed because they refused to state that it wasn't them - so now you are saying that Osama Bin Laden and his followers claimed to do something in order that the Northern Alliance and America, and others, could destroy the power base of Al Qaida (Al Qaeda) and the rule of the Taleban (Taliban)?
And not only this, Al Qaida (Al Qaeda) in full knowledge that they are innocent still did not come clean because firstly, they wanted to be killed by the Northern Alliance and America; and then, they wanted to create mayhem in Iraq and Pakistan, and of course destabilze Afghanistan once more, and it is all based on them knowing that they are innocent, despite them coming clean?
Because, well, they wanted to be killed on a lie, and secretly they are dying because they love America?
Hmmm, and who were the great committed "Americans" or "not real terrorists" who decided to kill themselves and thousands of innocents with them?
Oh wait, "I have just seen a giant fairy" outside, amazing!
No, get back to planet reality - and why would Islamists who were caught afterwards brag about their involvement?
Not to mention, how come we know the names of people who did this barbaric deed?
ARE YOU CLAIMING THAT THESE PEOPLE, AND OTHERS NOT MENTIONED, WERE SECRETLY NOT MUSLIM - ?????
Hijackers: Mohamed Atta al Sayed (Egyptian), Waleed al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian), Wail al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian), Abdulaziz al-Omari (Saudi Arabian), Satam al-Suqami (Saudi Arabian)
Well, well, I really don't think so, do you really?
SO PLEASE SUPPLY THE NAMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO DID THIS ATTACK?
Thank you
Oh Brother. Watch the above
Oh Brother. Watch the above youtube video the answer is in there (link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM ). This and other videos like it are made by non-muslims. After watching the video, investigate each and every bit of evidence on the internet, newspapers etc. Adding up each and every bit of evidence all together and it DOESN'T proof that Al Qaeda was behind the attacks of 9-11. So LOGICALLY, think Al Qaeda a group in a cave in Afghanistan can really plan and implement attacks of this magnitude with military accuracy? and there attacks are normally much smaller than the ones on 9-11. Many ALLAH guide us to the truth.
We all know that muslims
We all know that muslims strap a bomb to them & blow themselves up in markets,buildings,places of worship,at parties,in busses,in trains,etc.
We all know that muslims pack a car or truck full of explosives and ram into security checkpoints and police stations.
We all know that muslims blow up planes for eg.Lockerbie bombings .
So why is it so hard to believe that muslims can also fly planes into buildings?
investigate 9-11, Do one
investigate 9-11,
Do one investigation. Draw a map of flash points in the world toda and find out for yourself what is common between them. Oh wait, you don't have to. It is well known that it is Islam but you can still try and verify for yourself.
The rumour mongers abound in history and the videos that you are trying to bring in are part of those rumours funded most likely by none other than muslims to absolve islam of the crimes against humanity
There is no such evidence
There is no such evidence that it was done by sunni islamists.. however may be a small part of muslims who claims but they are not muslims.. their behaviour is very clear either in the foots steps of evil Christians who does for the money or many for the personal beneifts and for the revenge for due of christians who abused and killed some innocent people in Iraq wars, and also few of them no doubt might be christians who claims to be they are muslims not in reality, but are fake christians. It is not a new for christians to showcase against the muslims and creates terror phobia in the name of terror. Actually there is nothing such proof of automic or nuclear bombs in Iraq, which the total world knows about it, Christians for their personal benfits some of theese criminals killed innocent people of Iraq and including Saddam, Whatever may be it was internal problems what might have been in Iraq, but American christians wanted to loot the rights of Iraq and for Oil is the main cause. The experience they had with Iraq and no doubt there may be some muslim countries like Iran who enriching the uranium for bombs. Every one knows the truth in and around the world that this christians killed many thounsands of innocent people with no kind on women and children. Actually, christians are criminals to create nonsense first to do with friendship and later with same group they behaves as terror and imposing, fooling around with people in the name of terror.
Al-qaida and taliban are the groups which were sponsored by America in genral. This is truth that chrisitans are very clever, they create some group of people from muslims to break within and develop differences in among muslims..
muslim love to lie and invent
muslim love to lie and invent fairytale, as a former muslim myself i know what true islam is, no moderation in islam those moderate muslim will be the first to be killed if radical muslim take over this world.
abu agool, you must have read
abu agool, you must have read some of the other posts on this thread. 'fairy tales' is a good way to describe some of their time wasted rants, or attempts to revise history.
I love to read from former Muslims because people like you, and Ali Sina, give the best insights into Islam.
A few weeks ago I attended a presentation by Walid Shoebat, and that man just motivated me like I couldn't believe. I have found some of his radio programs to be good sources of information too.
Something in my mind is not totally accepting the premise of this article though. Is it because the Shia are currently a minority sect within Islam that they haven't been the leaders of violent jihad? Would it be different if they had a more of a majority? And the reason for my doubt is Iran.
We all hear that the citizens of Iran are not with the leaders. Well, someone is in their army - it isn't made up of foreigners. And they are being exported to Venezuela. And we read that during the Iraq/Iran war that there was no problem with them sending out children to be mine sweepers.
And look at Iraq, and that little toad of a man, al Sadr, who is at the root of shia violence. He ran like a little girl when it appeared that he might be a target. But he has no problem with preaching hatred to get others to do his dirty work for him. And the violent rituals they perform on some of their holy days, just doesn't seem like a sect that would be peaceful if they were left to their own devices. It is Iran, along with many sunni nations, who want Israel wiped off the map. They are more open about it vs the sunni/wahabbis who slither around supporting the violence against Israel or are actively waging jihad.
And I should add that the Hezbollah have also signed a pact with Al Qaeda just like the other terrorist groups - hamas, wahabbis, muslim brotherhood (MB), and so many others affiliated with the MB and individuals that they are too numerous to list.
I am just not buying it that the Shia are all that peaceful.
BRIGHT - you do not live up
BRIGHT - you do not live up to your name, because you are certainly not BRIGHT?
Firstly, Iraq was secular and the deputy PM, Tariq Aziz, was Christian.
Also, America does not have a pro-Christian, pro-Muslim, or whatever policy - in the Balkans, with regards to Bosnia, Cyprus, and Kosovo, it is clear that America supported the Islamic community over the Christian community...................
Also, the American army is not based on religion, you can be atheist, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or whatever.
Now we all know that RADICAL SUNNI ISLAM did September 11, London, Madrid, Bali, and so on.
Hezbollah does not give two hoots about Al Qaeda. After all, Al Qaeda and other Sunni Islamic groups have killed countless numbers of Shia Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and other nations.
Global terrorism is coming from the Sunni Islamic camp and the internal threat in America, the UK, Indonesia, and so on, comes from radical Sunni Islamic organizations or individuals.
Islamic unity is a complete myth because the Kurds, Turkomans, Shia's, Sunni's, and others in Iraq, have no brotherhood and they all have internal divisions apart from the Turkomans.
America in the past was heavily involved in Latin America, Vietnam, and so forth; America clearly does not have an anti-Muslim policy, on the contray, America is bending over backwards in order to appease Islam alongside other major nations.
Iraq under Saddam Hussein also did not care about Islam. After all you had the Iran-Iraq war, the invasion of Kuwait, Kurdish persecution, and Shia persecution; during the rule of Saddam Hussein.
The issue is complex, but some people try to give simple answers and see enemies or make up dreams to fit their own special interests.
The reality is very different, of course!
LEE JAY WALKER
When mentioning the many
When mentioning the many world-wide attacks in the name of Islam - I think it is a shame that most (if not, all) forget about the Beslan Children: http://palestinename.com/beslan_school_attack.htm
There is no such thing as a 'Moderate Muslim' - according to the Koran. See: Out of the mouth of 'allah' - http://palestinename.com/islam_exposed_fr.htm
The tree is known by it's fruit; a fact that the 'conspiracy theorists' are not able to accept because the Truth is too much of a burden for them.
DILLAH - Please accept my
DILLAH - Please accept my apologies for not mentioning Beslan, yes, a truely barbaric crime and to target children like this in the hope of spreading radical islam was sickening, to say the least.
Oh Brother, You still didn't
Oh Brother, You still didn't watch this video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM ). Watch it and read the my first comment again. Let's learn the truth together about 9-11.
Muslims love their damn 9/11
Muslims love their damn 9/11 conspiracy theories even though they've been debunked over and over again by reputable sources. I guess if you can believe in Islam you will believe in anything.
The J00s did it!
sometimes i laugh to western
sometimes i laugh to western people because their foolishness about islam
history will repeat itself again, islam conquered arabian, islam conquered persian, islam conquered hindustan, islam conquered byzantium, islam conquered turkey, islam conquered egypt, islam conquered indonesia, islam conquered syria, etc
and now islam is back to conquer europe, america, not with military, but destroying from within
your fool democracy will be destroyed by islam
Investigate 9-11
Was 9-11 really done by Islamic extremists? Look at the evidence in this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM watch it full. After watching the video, investigate each and every bit of evidence on the internet, newspapers etc. Do you still think Al Qaeda was responsible for these attacks? Ask yourself these questions who benefited from these attacks the most? (US government or Al Qaeda). Who had the will, the strength, the finances, the skill required to do all the attacks surrounding the events of 9-11 with military accuracy? (the US government or the group in a cave in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda). Why is the US government not presenting all the evidence in public regarding 9-11? What has it got to hind? And finally, If this was the works of Al Qaeda why is it to date they have never been able to carry out attacks of the same magnitude and nature? All of the proven Al Qaeda attacks before 9-11 and to date were many times smaller then the ones on 9-11. So therefore, anyone with a logical mind knows that Al Qaeda wasn’t responsible for the 9-11 attacks. Islam was indeed framed. The western governments and media are run by corporate interests not by the interests of its people (research this out) for example the war with Iraq would have never happened. Islam is a religion of peace (islamalways.com) and indeed they the wrong doers plan and plot and remember that ALLAH is the best of all planners.