Skip to Content

As the U.S. Retreats, Iran Fills the Void

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Amir Taheri

Convinced that the Obama administration is preparing to retreat from the Middle East, Iran's Khomeinist regime is intensifying its goal of regional domination. It has targeted six close allies of the U.S.: Egypt, Lebanon, Bahrain, Morocco, Kuwait and Jordan, all of which are experiencing economic and/or political crises. Iranian strategists believe that Egypt is heading for a major crisis once President Hosni Mubarak, 81, departs from the political scene. He has failed to impose his eldest son Gamal as successor, while the military-security establishment, which traditionally chooses the president, is divided. Iran's official Islamic News Agency has been conducting a campaign on that theme for months. This has triggered a counter-campaign against Iran by the Egyptian media.Last month, Egypt announced it had crushed a major Iranian plot and arrested 68 people. According to Egyptian media, four are members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Tehran's principal vehicle for exporting its revolution. Seven were Palestinians linked to the radical Islamist movement Hamas; one was a Lebanese identified as "a political agent from Hezbollah" by the Egyptian Interior Ministry. Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah, claimed these men were shipping arms to Hamas in Gaza.The arrests reportedly took place last December, during a crackdown against groups trying to convert Egyptians to Shiism. The Egyptian Interior Ministry claims this proselytizing has been going on for years. Thirty years ago, Egyptian Shiites numbered a few hundred. Various estimates put the number now at close to a million, but they are said to practice taqiyah (dissimulation), to hide their new faith. But in its campaign for regional hegemony, Tehran expects Lebanon as its first prize. Iran is spending massive amounts of cash on June's general election. It supports a coalition led by Hezbollah, and including the Christian ex-general Michel Aoun. Lebanon, now in the column of pro-U.S. countries, would shift to the pro-Iran column. In Bahrain, Tehran hopes to see its allies sweep to power through mass demonstrations and terrorist operations. Bahrain's ruling clan has arrested scores of pro-Iran militants but appears more vulnerable than ever. King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa has contacted Arab heads of states to appeal for "urgent support in the face of naked threats," according to the Bahraini media. The threats became sensationally public in March. In a speech at Masshad, Iran's principal "holy city," Ali Akbar Nateq-Nuri, a senior aide to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, described Bahrain as "part of Iran." Morocco used the ensuing uproar as an excuse to severe diplomatic relations with Tehran. The rupture came after months of tension during which Moroccan security dismantled a network of pro-Iran militants allegedly plotting violent operations. Iran-controlled groups have also been uncovered in Kuwait and Jordan. According to Kuwaiti media, more than 1,000 alleged Iranian agents were arrested and shipped back home last winter. According to the Tehran media, Kuwait is believed vulnerable because of chronic parliamentary disputes that have led to governmental paralysis. As for Jordan, Iranian strategists believe the kingdom, where Palestinians are two-thirds of the population, is a colonial creation and should disappear from the map -- opening the way for a single state covering the whole of Palestine. Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have both described the division of Palestine as "a crime and a tragedy." Arab states are especially concerned because Tehran has succeeded in transcending sectarian and ideological divides to create a coalition that includes Sunni movements such as Hamas, the Islamic Jihad, sections of the Muslim Brotherhood, and even Marxist-Leninist and other leftist outfits that share Iran's anti-Americanism. Information published by Egyptian and other Arab intelligence services, and reported in the Egyptian and other Arab media, reveal a sophisticated Iranian strategy operating at various levels. The outer circle consists of a number of commercial companies, banks and businesses active in various fields and employing thousands of locals in each targeted country. In Egypt, for example, police have uncovered more than 30 such Iranian "front" companies, according to the pan-Arab daily newspaper Asharq Alawsat. In Syria and Lebanon, the numbers reportedly run into hundreds. In the next circle, Iranian-financed charities offer a range of social and medical services and scholarships that governments often fail to provide. Another circle consists of "cultural" centers often called Ahl e Beit (People of the House) supervised by the offices of the supreme leader. These centers offer language classes in Persian, English and Arabic, Islamic theology, Koranic commentaries, and traditional philosophy -- alongside courses in information technology, media studies, photography and filmmaking. Wherever possible, the fourth circle is represented by branches of Hezbollah operating openly. Where that's not possible, clandestine organizations do the job, either alone or in conjunction with Sunni radical groups. The Khomeinist public diplomacy network includes a half-dozen satellite television and radio networks in several languages, more than 100 newspapers and magazines, a dozen publishing houses, and thousands of Web sites and blogs controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The network controls thousands of mosques throughout the region where preachers from Iran, or trained by Iranians, disseminate the Khomeinist revolutionary message. Tehran has also created a vast network of non-Shiite fellow travelers within the region's political and cultural elites. These politicians and intellectuals may be hostile to Khomeinism on ideological grounds -- but they regard it as a powerful ally in a common struggle against the American "Great Satan." Khomeinist propaganda is trying to portray Iran as a rising "superpower" in the making while the United States is presented as the "sunset" power. The message is simple: The Americans are going, and we are coming. Tehran plays a patient game. Wherever possible, it is determined to pursue its goals through open political means, including elections. With pro-American and other democratic groups disheartened by the perceived weakness of the Obama administration, Tehran hopes its allies will win all the elections planned for this year in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. "There is this perception that the new U.S. administration is not interested in the democratization strategy," a senior Lebanese political leader told me. That perception only grows as President Obama calls for an "exit strategy" from Afghanistan and Iraq. Power abhors a vacuum, which the Islamic Republic of Iran is only too happy to fill. FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Amir Taheri writes for the New York Post. His latest book, The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution, is due out next month. Feedback editorialdirector@familysecuritymatters.org.
0
Your rating: None

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

humanevents.com/article.php?i

humanevents.com/article.php?id=31742

Two Weeks Left in Pakistan
by Robert Maginnis
05/06/2009

Last week, General David Petraeus (commander of Americas Central Command, which covers all U.S. forces in the Middle East and south Asia), reportedly said Pakistan may be just two weeks from falling to Islamic extremists. Theres not much the U.S. can do to prevent that fall, and the implications for Pakistan, Central Asia, and the entire world could be catastrophic.

Petraeus statement is based on current operations -- the stuff reported in the press -- and secret signal and human intelligence which expose the enemys true plans. Those secrets coupled with a disastrous set of circumstances apparently convinced Petraeus the Taliban intends to quickly consume Pakistan.

The Telegraph, a British paper, reports Petraeus said that the Pakistanis have run out of excuses for failing to take on the Taliban. He is reported to have urged action to destroy the Taliban in the next two weeks before the U.S. decides its next course of action.

Petraeus pessimism is understandable. Pakistans government has shown weakness when dealing with the Taliban, a radical Islamist enemy allied with al-Queda. Pakistan naively surrendered land for Taliban promises of peace that were quickly broken. Now, the insurgents are methodically transforming Pakistan into an Islamic camp. The extremists are closing on the capital and promise to continue their march until all Pakistan falls.

Pakistans military has been slow to counter the Talibans advance. Rather, it keeps most forces along the border with India. Besides, the army has performed poorly against the Taliban in part because it lacks counterinsurgency skills and equipment but also because it lacks the will to fight its own citizens.

Petraeus is also aware that Pakistan has reached a tipping point because of economic and social realities which have created an opening for the Taliban.

Its economy is in free fall, which fuels discontent. Inflation is double digit and jobs are scarce. Pakistanis, according to surveys, say things are getting worse, which bolsters the extremists leverage.

The Taliban know only that when the government is unable to deliver services, and when there is unhappiness among the general population because food prices have gone up tremendously, gasoline is not available, electricity shortages are rampant, that it is much easier to convince the people that the Taliban have the solution rather than the government, said Shuja Nawaz, a director with the Washington-based Atlantic Council.

Pakistan has hundreds of thousands of internally displaced people who fled before the advancing Taliban. These people form temporary camps which drain government resources and create massive discontent which plays into the Talibans hands.

Pakistan is also home to more than 12,000 madrassas -- Islamic schools -- which for more than 20 years have fed and housed hundreds of thousands of children while pushing a militant brand of Islam. Madrassas offer no instruction beyond the memorizing of the Koran, creating a widening pool of young minds that are sympathetic to militancy.

Police in Punjab, Pakistans largest province, say more than two-thirds of suicide bombers had attended madrassas. Thats why Ibn Abduh Rehman, who directs the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, warned We are at the beginning of a great storm that is about to sweep the country.

Pakistan is a bomb, the fuse is burning and as Petraeus has said, time is short.

Pakistan is the center of gravity for the global war on terror. It harbors al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders, provides safe haven for terrorist training camps and is the staging ground for terrorist operations across the globe. Its also a snake-pit ripe for extremist recruiting.

Imagine how bad things could become if that 170 million person country were run by extremists. It would be worse than the pre-2001 Afghanistan -- a country run by strict Sharia (Islamic) law, a training ground for hundreds of thousands of jihadists, home for laboratories for mass murder weapons and a country that comes equipped with a relatively modern military armed with nuclear tipped missiles.

Everyone should be concerned about Pakistans 60-100 atomic weapons and their ballistic and cruise missile arsenals. The Pakistani military assures the Obama administration the nukes are secure. But the Pakistanis have never shown the U.S. where and how the weapons are secured even though America gave Islamabad more than $100 million to create a secure arsenal.

We have every reason to question their assurances. The same Pakistani agency that created the Taliban now controls the atomic weapons. The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistans intelligence service, created the Taliban with American help in the 1980s to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, but the ISI continues to supply and employ Taliban services. Why should America trust the ISI, especially if its Frankenstein takes over the government?

The Taliban have also announced their terrorist intentions. Taliban commanders promise to welcome and support al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and other militants aiming to oust Americans from Afghanistan. Imagine what al-Qaeda could do with a country like Pakistan which has a large Indian Ocean coastline -- think Somalia with nukes.

Americas war in Afghanistan will suffer a serious set-back with extremists in Islamabad. We depend on Pakistans Karachi port and two main supply routes through that country to sustain operations in Afghanistan. A Taliban-run government would immediately sever those routes.

So what can the U.S. do to prevent Pakistan from being taken over and then what should we do should that happen?

Theres very little the U.S. can do to vaccinate Pakistan from the extremists. American leaders have already prodded Islamabad to fight back, and our promised economic and military aid will take months to begin arriving and may not be enough even then.

Our diplomats could appeal to India, Pakistans arch enemy, to withdraw forces from their common border. That would take pressure off Pakistan, providing them the freedom to shift some of their 250,000 forces now on the Indian border to the counterinsurgency fight.

But the best short term solution would be a military coup that replaces Pakistans weak government, declares martial law and quickly redeploys the army against the Taliban. Even that solution may be too late if the army doesnt vigorously take charge.

The Obama administration must prepare for the worst -- Pakistan falls into extremist hands.

Our first priority must be securing Pakistans atomic weapons. We should develop plans with and without Pakistans ISI and military to move all atomic weapons out of that country to a secure location like Kandahar, Afghanistans military air field. This risky operation depends on whether the ISI and or the military cooperate, which is far from assured.

We must find new resupply routes to Afghanistan. Our options are either look to the north accepting Russias pre-conditions and or turn to Iran which will demand a steep diplomatic cost as well. Unfortunately, we lack the aircraft to sustain our forces in land-locked Afghanistan.

With extremists running Islamabad, the Afghan war would expand to include Pakistan and quite likely morph into a broader regional war that includes India. Its doubtful the U.S. and NATO will commit more forces to a Central Asian region-wide war. This could become justification to quit Afghanistan and bring our forces home and accept the consequences, such an atomic missile armed al-Qaeda.

Obama promised Afghanistan would be his first priority. The current crisis in Pakistan gives him the opportunity to act upon that promise.


xxxx Americans have screwed

xxxx Americans have screwed it for all. If only they never trained OBL or helped ISI create the devil's army Taliban... The evil Russia, China too do not care and keep funding Iran, Pakistan etc.

Now India is screwed big time if Pakistan falls to extremists. India has no option but to enter full scale war with Pakistan, unlike America which can with draw and go back and hope that the huge distance between militant Pakistan and America with sea inbetween will prevent more terrorist attacks.


#2. continuum1; Just look at

#2. continuum1;

Just look at the whole picture! The( Mostly Christian) US is kicking the Islamic Porkystany ass to commit suicide by forcing the Islamic Porkystany to attack and kill their brethren real Islamic Taliban.


#3 I do not see Americans

#3 I do not see Americans kicking any ass. What I see is they are throwing more money at these Islamists...

If this does NOT succeed, which I think will happen as Pakistani army is full of people who share Taliban ideals, America will withdraw from Afghanistan and let India do the dirty work for them. Guess what...many innocent Indians are going to die cleaning America's mess or India is going to become Islamic and America is going to face more problems... Things turn bad for everybody because Amerca f%%^&ed up in the beginning.


continuum wrote: #3 I do not

continuum wrote:

#3 I do not see Americans kicking any ass. What I see is they are throwing more money at these Islamists…

Agree.


Communism and communists are

Communism and communists are as bad as islam. America screwed up when it left Afganistan to Pakistan as a "condom". After 9/11 finally they know their true enemy. Obama may seek an exit strategy but there is none. Its either islam or the kufar. America won't be safe just by abandoning Afghanistan, 9/11 happened precisely due to their abandonment. If they provide a safe sanctuary to the terrorist they risk another 9/11. Don't be so pessimist after Jimmy Carter we saw Regan, maybe we will see one more after Obama in 2012.


Quite right, A-comment, let

Quite right, A-comment, let us not be too pessimistic.

I remember Carters years, 1976-1980, well. It seemed that Communism went from strength to strength, when the Sovjets invaded Afghanistan in 1979. In a sense the West "lost Iran", in 1979, as an ally, after which it became a mortal enemy.

But then it turned out that the Afghan operation was something the Internally weak Soviet Union could not afford. After Reagans pressure it collapsed. Now Iran is facing huge financial difficulties too, due to low oil prices, and if Solar Energy becomes ever more reality, the oil-well dries up completely, so to speak.

So, who knows?


Why the USA is even in

Why the USA is even in Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place is beyond me. They should just let the Afghanis and Iraqis kill each other and start dealing with China and Russia.