Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF version
Hadithul-ifk, meaning ‘the untruthful talk’, is the name given to the rumours that circulated in the city of Medina upon the return of the Muslims’ Army after defeating the tribe of Bani Al Mustalk. The Muslims’ army won an easy victory over the Jewish tribe and returned fully laden with slaves and other war booties. However, a last minute hitch turned what should have been a big day into one of the most embarrassing days in Mohammed’s life. What could be more embarrassing to a man than returning home and discovering that his wife was out with another man? You can imagine how Mohammed felt when he watched, along with the other residents of Medina, his favourite wife entering the city with a young man!
Whatever happened between Aysha and Safwan on that day had demoralised Mohammed, dented his integrity and divided the Islamic community. Indeed, the Muslims’ divide over what happened between Aysha and Safwan continues to our time. Some of the bitter wars between the conflicting Muslim groups, with the loss of tens of thousands of lives, can be traced back to that infamous day. This article discusses those stressful events, which are well documented in all the reputed sira books, and presents the picture as seen from a non Islamic point of view. This article tries to explains the otherwise unexplainable delay in the ‘revelations’ when it was most urgently needed.
The Story
It was customary for Mohammed to take one of his wives with him whenever he launches a
‘ghazwa’, or a raid, which was his understanding of picnics. Mohammed enjoyed those ghazwas so much that he used to launch several of them every year. In the sixth year after hijra, Mohammed picked Aysha to accompany him in his campaign against the Jewish tribe of Bani Al Mustalak. The campaign was a remarkable success; most of the tribe’s men were killed and their wives and children were taken as slaves. Among the captives was Juwayreya, the beautiful wife of the tribe’s chief. The Islamic history sources focus on Juwyreya’s class and splendour and claim that she was one of the most beautiful women in Arabia. She was not only glamorous but also an eloquent woman who was brought up as a princess. Aysha openly admitted that she hated Juwayreya from the first sight just because of her stunning magnificence. Aysha also admitted her jealousy from that female captive because, knowing her husband, she was sure that he also would be stunned by her exceptional beauty. Aysha couldn’t be more right; Juwayreya was immediately promoted by Mohammed from the slave status to become his wife.
According to Aysha, as the army had an overnight stop on the way back to Medina, she felt the need to go outside the camp to answer the call of nature. Her return to the camp was delayed because she had to search for a necklace that had dropped while still there. When Aysha came back to the camp she found that the army had already left the site, so she stayed in her place with the hope that Mohammed would miss her and returns for her rescue. As it turned out, Mohammed did not come back to rescue her and did not even notice her absence until his arrival to medina.
Aysha was soon spotted by Safwan Ibn Al Muattal, who approached her and offered her to ride his camel. Sawan was one of the muhajirun, or Mohammed’s companions who emigrated from Mecca, and was travelling on his own behind the army. Safwan and Aysha made their way to Medina where Mohammed and his companions were waiting (1,2).
According to Ibn Hisham, that was the story as told by Aysha. It implies that she spent more time in that desert ‘loo’ than the time it took the army to prepare to move and actually leave the place and completely disappear from sight. It also implies that she did not hear or sense the movement of an army of seven hundreds men, with their women, horses, camels, captives and slaves. The story also implies that Aysha was left behind without being missed at all by Mohammed. The young and spoiled Aysha was not used to that level of inattention from her husband, who was probably too occupied with Juwayreya.
The sight of Aysha and Safwan entering the city of Medina was a remarkable oddity considering the situation and the prevailing culture. The incident set off people to talk although the couple denied any wrong doing. Ibn Abi Saloul, the leader of Al Khazraj tribe, was one of the few Arabs in Medina who opposed Mohammed and rejected his presence in the city. Ibn Abi Saloul watched with disbelief as Aysha entered the city with a stranger and openly expressed his doubts that the couple couldn’t spend such a long time together without engaging in some sexual activity. Ibn Abi Salul’s dirty thoughts were in fact in line with Mohammed’s own teachings; it was Mohammed who stated in an authentic hadith that “
whenever a man and a woman are alone, the Satan is their third”. Ibn Abi Saloul expressed openly what many people were saying in private.
Tension between Ansar and Muhajirun
The timing of the scandal couldn’t have been worse because the relation between the muhajerun (Mohammed and his Meccan companions) and the ansar (residents of Yathrib) was going through a difficult phase. According to Ibn Hisham, after the Al Mustalak campaign was over, a clash broke out between a Muslim from Yathrib and one of Omar’s aids (from the muhajirun). The disagreement between the two spread quickly and involved a large number of Muslims from both sides. Ibn Abi Saloul was outraged when he knew about the clash and threatened to review the presence of the muhajirun in his city.
Naturally, the residents of Medina expected Aysha’s case to be resolved immediately because they believed Mohammed had a direct contact with the ‘all knowing’ Allah. Some
urgent revelations were necessary but never happened. The lack of revelations was interpreted as a sign that Aysha was guilty and fuelled the suspicions about her fidelity. Even leading Muslim figures like Ali, the third Caliph, and Hassan Ibn Thabit, his poet, were drawn into the spreading gossip in Medina. Mohammed himself must have had his suspicions as well because he neglected Aysha, who was ill and living with her parents, for nearly a month. Mohammed’s silence and poor handling of the situation did not help; he appeared confused and indecisive in a most sensitive matter.
After a month of social torture, the divine silence was broken and Gabriel came down with the news that Aysha was innocent and those who thought otherwise were guilty :
Q.24: 11. Those who brought forward the lie are a body among yourselves: think it not to be an evil to you; On the contrary it is good for you: to every man among them of the sin that he earned, and to him who took on himself the lead among them, will be a penalty grievous.
The verse condemned the people who interpreted the divine silence as a sign that Aysha was guilty and described them as liars and sinful. Allah meant Ibn Abi Salul, but He couldn’t say it openly for fear of upsetting the Khazraj! By revealing this verse, Mohammed accidentally contradicted his own teachings. It was him who asserted in an authentic hadith that ‘
whenever a man and a woman are alone, the Satan joins them as their third’.
Those people who doubted Aysha’s innocence did so because of Mohammed’s own teachings. They expected a verse to clear her name but that didn’t happen, which they understood as a sign against her. How would they know that Allah intended to reveal that verse after a month?
As usual, Muslims apply the civilized logic and principles only when they happen to be on the receiving end, which explains their unusual cautious handling of this incident. It appeared as if the Muslims suddenly believed in the civilized principle that people are innocent until proved otherwise, which contradicts Mohammed’s own teachings. Mohammed taught his followers that Satan arranges for men and women to have sex whenever they happen to be alone. Mohammed’s followers apply his teachings in all countries ruled by sharia, like Saudi Arabia, with frightening cruelty. Saudi Arabia is renowned of countless stories about the awful consequences of incidents involving women travelling alone or with ‘
non- muhram’ (men who are not close relatives). In his book
‘Karen in Saudi Arabia’, Sami Al Rabbaa gives some chilling accounts of such barbaric practices (3).
Why a month?
Mohammed was not new to troubled times; he was an experienced ‘prophet’ and knew well how to get out of any trouble by revealing a suitable verse. However, he appeared to be totally helpless in the face of those rumours; the best he could do was to wait. Mohammed’s nightmare was the thought of Aysha showing signs of pregnancy because that would implicate her and would discredit him should that happen after ‘revealing’ the required verse. A pregnant Aysha would mean an unfaithful wife because Mohammed did not sleep with her since his marriage with Juwayreya. After arriving to Yathrib, Aysha became ill and went to live with her parents to look after her; Mohammed hardly spoke to her during that month. Also, it doesn’t escape notice that Aysha never became pregnant from Mohammed after many years of marriage; therefore, a pregnancy at that particular time would be highly suspicious.
Aysha’s fidelity, an obvious personal concern to Mohammed, was an issue he could have managed had it remained a personal matter. However, the situation became too complex as the news spread throughout the city. Still, all that complexity would be trivial to what could have happened if he revealed a verse that soon proved to be wrong.
To Mohammed’s relief, Aysha did get her menstruation and pregnancy was ruled out as was the prospect of Mohammed’s favourite wife being officially named and shamed. Mohammed was relieved from a heavy burden and immediately revealed that long awaited verse.
Was Aysha Unfaithful to Mohammed
It was no secret that Mohammed loved Aysha more than any of his other wives including Juwayreya, his new beautiful pride. Mohammed probably considered Juwayreya as a good fun when he needed that kind of fun, but Aysha was his true love. Mohammed’s other wives recognized Mohammed’s fondness towards Aysha. When Mohammed decided to divorce Sawda, because she got too old, Sawda begged him to keep her and offered to give her night share of Mohammed to Aysha. That incentive worked well, and Mohammed kept Sawda without having to sleep with her.
Aysha was intelligent, confident and extra sensitive to anything that poses a threat to her prominence. Once, she had no hesitation to plot for the unfair divorce of a new pride which Mohammed was about to add to his harem. As a result of Aysha’s evil advice, the new pride muttered something like
‘I seek refuge with Allah from you’ as a part of the foreplay on her wedding night. As a result, Mohammed divorced the naive pride immediately while Aysha emerged unscathed.
When Mohammed brought his son to show him to Aysha, her response was that ‘the baby did not look like Mohammed’, hinting at the possibility that Maria had the baby from another man. On another occasion, when Aysha noticed that the Quran always agreed with Mohammed’s desires, she remarked to Mohammed: ‘I see that Allah is too quick to answer your desires’. No one else could make such remarks without fearing punishment except Aysha.
We may never know, with cerainity, what actually happened between Aysha and Safwan. Was it by accident that Safwan was travelling on his own behind the army, or was it all planned? Some scholars propose that Safwan was travelling behind in order to collect the army’s leftovers, but there is no historical evidence to support that claim. Was it possible for the wife of the perfect human to contemplate having an affair? The answer is yes, because there were many reasons for Aysha to consider having an affair.
Aysha was a spoiled teen ager who was aware of Mohammed’s obsession in her. She enjoyed her privileges as a favourite wife of Mohammd and guarded her eminence with jealousy. Aysha must have been deeply offended, during Al Mustalak campaign, by the fact that Mohammed’s attention was turned away from her in favour of Juwayreya, the woman she openly admitted to have hated. From her track record, Aysha was certainly that kind of woman who could respond in kind.
It is also natural to assume that Aysha, as well as Mohammed’s other wives, were all sexually deprived; simply there were too many of them for one old man. The Islamic claim that Mohammed’s sexual potency (4) equalled that of forty men is, of course, an Islamic lie and meaningless to non Muslims. Mohammed’s apparent lust to women did not necessarily mean an increased potency; underneath, there could be some kind of sexual dysfunction. As to Aysha, she was a young girl who opened her eyes to find herself abused by a man older than her father. She had no experience and didn’t know what a normal sexual relation looked like. Aysha was condemned to have only that abnormal relation with that old man who prohibited her from getting married after his death. Mohammed’s (divine) orders to his followers not to marry his wives could be an indication that he wanted to conceal something about his sexuality. By never marrying after him, his wives wouldn’t divulge any of his sexual secrets.
Mohammed asked his followers to learn
half of their religion from Aysha. Indeed, Aysha narrated more hadiths than any of the other wives. Most of those hadiths narrated by Aysha described the intimate relations between a man and his wife; the kind of things we would normally label ‘for adults only’. To pre-empt any criticism to this rather embarrassing observation, Muslims are taught that there is no shyness in religion
(la haya fid din). According to Mohammed, those embarrassing hadiths comprised half of the religion!
One of those hadiths narrated by Aysha described Mohammed’s ‘etiquette’ in fondling a menstruating wife and praised his ability to control his ejaculation. At the end of the hadith, Aysha remarked “and who of you can control himself better than the messenger of Allah, PBUH”(5)
How did she know? Was she comparing him to Safwan?
References:
1) Ibn Sa’ad, Al Tabakat Al Kubra, vol.8(Arabic)
2) Ibn Hisham, sira al nabaweyya(Arabic)
3) Dr. Sami Alrabaa, Karen in Saudi Arabia
4) Sahih al Bukhari, chapter of washing, Narrated by Anas.(Arabic)
5)
Al Lulu wa Al Marjan fima ittaffaqa alihi al shaikhan: Muslim and Bukhari, hadith No.168; 173(Arabic)
"" How did she know? Was she
"" How did she know? Was she comparing him to Safwan? ""
Answer is who knows better then the woman ' Who is who: I mean who is whose child ' ?????
Well Muslimahs are not women and Muslims are no Man. Am I correct???
Jesus was different his mother is a Virgin. Ha Ha Ha ha
The real question is that how
The real question is that how was she capable to cope with Holy Rod when she was less then 9 years. That incident had mad her fond of bigger rods and Sufyaan had a king-sized rod as she watched her rod when he was peeing
Holy Mary, the Mariyam also
Holy Mary, the Mariyam also ate pipe of a Roman soldier.
How can a muslim remain
How can a muslim remain muslim after knowing koran and hadiths?
Islam is disgusting.
Islam is a disgusting
Islam is a disgusting religion not even for the pigs.
She was riding his CAMEL
She was riding his CAMEL alright.
Ayisha was a good rider and
Ayisha was a good rider and she learnt the art of riding very early on from the old horse!
Reading all that is written
Reading all that is written in the hoy sh1t book qrand if moslems remain moslems, then they are either dumb asses or criminals or not human beings.
Ayesha was actually giving an open invitation to fellows to show if they can control better than the old camel mohammad!
Ahh that's interesting that
Ahh that's interesting that mo chappy waited for the ayseha's monthly blood to show up, before he vomited out the pimp's verses!
Two things were at stake.Mo's reputation and ayesha's fidleity. Ayesha must have really had a good time with young dik that old mo donkey could not deliver! Ayesha the umm al momeen had one last chance to enjoy the dik and then decided to go back to the old dik by next morning.Makes a good bollywood story.There is sex, action, emotion, drama. The triangle of love, deceit, hate the triangle of abuse, revenge and sex, the triangle of basic instinct, floppy dik and sifdik! One woman and two men! wow the list is endless.
Sorry to strike a dissenting
Sorry to strike a dissenting voice here, but (despite the fun to be had from the prurience, the cuckolding of old Mo, etc) I have come to the conclusion that Ayesha and Safwan most likely did NOT "enjoy" each other.
Allow me to explain.
1. Ayesha:
Given Mo's violence I would think that Ayesha would be worried about the punishment that Mo would hand out if she committed adultery, even before it got to the stoning to death part.
Also assuming that Ayesha had any true belief in 'Allah' and Mohammed, then (notwithstanding her behaviour elsewhere) would she not have been terrified of an ayat being 'sent down' from Allah to condemn her to hell and its extreme tortures for all eternity for having dared to cuckold him?
Aisha (being a 'favourite' of Mo) may already have heard the fate of "Abu Lahab" (See K111) who is condemned to hell along with his wife for opposing Mo, how much worse would Aisha's case have been had she cuckolded him?
So I conclude that Ayesha would not have been all that willing to cuckold Mohammed because she would have feared dreadful punishment both in this world and the next.
2. Safwan.
My second point about Ayesha is also relevant to Safwan. He too would fear an ayat from Allah condemning him to a personal hell for defiling the prophet's wife.
Safwan (like Aisha) may already have heard the fate of "Abu Lahab" so how much worse would Safwan's case have been had he cuckolded Mo and despoiled Aisha?
Safwan might have thought he could not have been convicted of adultery (no 4 male witnesses to his "defilement") and so would have escaped the punishment of stoning , but could he take the risk of 'all-seeing Allah' 'sending down' an ayat just for Safwan on this issue!.
Thus I think any dalliance unlikely because I don't see him escaping the fear of retribution that the all-seeing Allah would inflict on him in both this world and the next if he had cuckolded Mo.
Thus I conclude (admittedly on the basis of a set of assumptions) that, even if the temptation had been there, the fear of stoning and worse reprisal lasting all eternity would have stayed their hands (and other body parts).
----
However, this incident highlights some factors about Mo.
As the article states, it is odd that the Allah who is "...quick to answer your desires" (in Aisha's words) waited until after her menses before sending a revelation to clear Aisha's name.
Why the suspicion? Why did Mo trust neither his favourite wife or a loyal companion to keep their hands etc off each other if they were out of sight? What was it in Mo's own experience that led to this attitude?
It is known that Mo was a dreadful womaniser and rapist in his later years, with a special dispensation from Allah to allow him as many wives as he wanted along with unlimited sex-slaves etc. (K33:50)
He was scarcely able to see another man's wife without wanting sex with her (K33:37)
Therefore is it not likely that he felt that this was the "normal" behaviour of any man - and the Hadith "‘whenever a man and a woman are alone, then Satan joins them as their third" quoted above supports this.
Hence he would be deeply suspicious of Aisha and Safwan.
It is also stated that Aisha became ill after her putative dalliance with Safwan.
How much worse this must have made it for Mo! Was this morning sickness? Was she pregnant, was he cuckolded?
Her illness must have doubled and quadrupled his suspicions to agonising levels.
Old Mo had to wait the month, of course.
If he had declared Aisha innocent at once and then nine months later she'd given birth, Mohammed would have been in great difficulty since, due to Aisha's illness and separation from him, he could not have been the father and consequently allah/Mohammed would be liars. Once this happened, Mo knew all his revelations would be called into doubt - especially after the "satanic verses" incident and he would have run the risk of going from prophet to loser.
If, on the other hand, a 'revelation' had been 'sent down' condemning both (as it would have had to) Aisha and Safwan at once , then setting aside any political and/or religious considerations, Mo would have been forced to kill his young, nubile and energetic wife, which I doubt he would want to - for several reasons.
Given Mo's over-weaning desires he cannot be certain that fear of Allah will stay Aisha's and Safwan's "hands", so he waits in an agony of apprehension to see if Aisha is pregnant.
Then, after a nail-biting month of tension, her menses come, - she's not pregnant.
Okay, this isn't proof of innocence, but there is no proof of guilt either, what a relief!
Despite his suspicions he has his excuse to keep her alive and in his bed (and perhaps even more willing to please since he has 'saved' her. "Oh what favours to perform..."?)
Now (whatever his private doubts) Mo can proclaim that this gossip is a lie. And so Allah sends down K24:11-20.
So cunning old Mo gets off the hook (again!) - and with a double win:
1. Aisha is now deeply in his debt (he could have had her stoned for adultery had Allah 'revealed' it).
2. The Umma is chastised for not having enough "belief" to instantly dismiss as 'wrong' anything said against the Prophet, his harem or other Muslims. (This lesson of these ayat seems to have been well learned given how so many Muslims react to any criticism of Islam, Moslem behaviour etc!)
Hmm.Ayesha did not have it
Hmm.Ayesha did not have it off with younger dik, a conclusion based on pure assumption and nothing more nothing less.Assumptions do not make facts. At best they make hypothesis.
I am sure arabs were quite well aware of the coitus interruptus to prevent pregnancy and the old mo had actually prohibited this act of azl. I am sure Ayesha was in the know how of these things even allowing for age.
Ayesha would have known that the old dik was really a nut case and she was able to rebel against the old floppy dik with out repurcussion.She would have known the floppy dik was making up things.SHe would certainly have guessed rightly that this allah trick is all humbug.If that's an assumption( for the sake of arguement) then she would have had a go with saifwan or what ever his name is and came home next day.
She must have known about the old diks' lies well and so the foll mohammad could not do any thing but wait for te blood to show!
Even if the two young bloods did not have a deep and penetrating session, nothing would have prevented a heavy petting session! All in all old mo was a loser at that point and ayesha made sure that old mo also knows. This my assumption.
Its sad that blood showed and islam survived to continue bloodshed even today
Dear Jonc who knows, you may
Dear Jonc
who knows, you may be right. I still wonder about her hadith saying that no one could control himself like Muhammad. How can show know that if she did not have knowledge of how other men managed to control or not control themselves? My view is that she had some other "experiences" on a sexual level. Whether this was with Safwan or another man or men is a different matter. This young woman definitely had some side action. Thats my own view
Let me know what you think dear. Thanks
jonc you said Ayesha feared
jonc you said Ayesha feared Allah. But suppose Ayesha knew Allah did not exist and Muhammed made him up. There is a verse in the Hadith where Ayesha states Allah has no problem fulfilling Muhammed's wishes. Ayesha might have known it was Muhammed who Allah and knowing how Mo adored her took advantage of this and had some affairs on the side.
Proudkaffir: I quite agree. I
Proudkaffir:
I quite agree. I did say my post was based on assumptions. So too is the article.
Coitus interruptus is far from fool-proof and has a failure rate of ~14%, ie pregnancy is about 1/6 as likely as with no contraception at all. Would Mo risk everything on the throw of a dice?
Ibn Kummana:
Fair point, however I take that as just "pious fraud". After all old Mo was "the best of men" as it were, so of course he would have more control than anyone else. After all, there can be NO aspect in which any other man can exceed Mohammed! (ROFL)
Marie:
Good point, but in this case Safwan would have had to have had similar beliefs to Ayesha.
If we start postulating that numbers of his "companions" knew he was a fraud, it makes the continuance of Islam after Mo's death hard(er) to explain.
---
To be frank, I think that either Mumin Saleh's , my or another exposition could be correct. Either way, Mo had a very 'bad time' over this event and it must have done his credibility some damage - temporarily at least.
In truth we can never know. How can we re-construct the events ~1350 years after the event?
Any attempt can only be speculative and based on a given set of assumptions. Mine and Mumin's just happen to differ. And I felt like a bit of fun, truth to tell.
I think that there are also other possibilities based on Safwan being a "true gentleman" (well, he MIGHT have been!) and Ayesha being either playful or petulant and things going wrong for her - Mo not noticing her absence and leaving her behind.
jonc: Good point, but in
jonc:
Good point, but in this case Safwan would have had to have had similar beliefs to Ayesha.
If we start postulating that numbers of his “companions” knew he was a fraud, it makes the continuance of Islam after Mo’s death hard(er) to explain.
I say:
Most of his companions were raiders. Most likely it was greed that helped Islam continue on. After Mo's death his companions continued to conquer countries and benefiting from the bounty they acquired.
Comment deleted. It is not in
Comment deleted. It is not in English so that everyone can understand.
Safwan surely fu===ked her
Safwan surely fu===ked her because still young man though staunch Muslims masterbating on her name.
Joko, your name is
Joko, your name is indonesian, go to indonesian version of FFI if you can't speak english.