Skip to Content

Obama the Fool

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Early in his speech in Cairo BHO mentioned “centuries of co-existence and cooperation.” When and where? For 1400 years, Islam has waged jihad against all civilizations including Western Civilization. The history of Islam from Arabia was followed by the rapid conquest of North Africa and invasion and conquest of Spain, and a thrust into France that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took half a millennium of reconquest to expel Islam from Western Europe.

 

O mentions “tensions fed by colonialism; a Cold War where Muslims were treated as proxies; change brought by modernity and globalization which led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to…Islam.”  BHO lists ways the West has mistreated Islam. Not a word about the jihad doctrine, not a word about Islamic supremism and the imperative to make war against and subjugate non-Muslims. Not a word about the culture of hatred and contempt for non-Muslims that existed long before the spread of American culture.

 

O says, “Violent extremists….have bred more fear and mistrust.” The idea that jihadists are a small minority is universally accepted dogma. However, all Muslims are commanded by the Quran to be jihadists. Sura 47: Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve (during wartime) seize them by their necks, until once you have subdued them

then tie them up as prisoners, either in order to release them later on, or else to ask for ransom, until war lays down her burdens.

 

Also, the attacks of September 11, 2001 and continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has American and Western countries viewing Islam as hostile to their existence. It is also Islamic texts and teachings that inspired these attacks that also fuel these perceptions.

 

O says, “The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco…in the signing of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796.” A very clever half truth. The treaty was drawn up in an attempt to put an end to raids on American shipping by Barbary Coast pirates. Tripoli was a Muslim stronghold used as a base of operations for the pirates who habitually preyed upon our shipping and enslavement of our seamen. Piracy, kidnapping and enslavement of our seamen remained a problem despite the Treaty of 1796. Also, Tripoli demanded increased tribute payment in 1801. Thomas Jefferson did not like paying tribute and was the first president to use force against them. He refused to increase tribute and Tripoli declared war on the United States. Jefferson had the Navy blockade Tripoli from 1803-1805. A Marine contingent captured the city of Derna and the Pasha of Tripoli signed a Treaty promising to extract no more tribute. It was not until Madison’s presidency that hostilities finally stopped when he declared war on Algeria.

 

BHO: “I seek a new beginning between America and Muslims…based on mutual respect; based on principles of justice;…tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”

 

These are concepts imbedded in Western Civilization and not always shared with other cultures and O should know this. How clever is this man? A Muslim will never respect a non-Muslim for the Quran tells him that Muslims are the best of people and to subjugate all non-Muslims. A non-Muslim has no standing in court against a Muslim-so much for equal justice under the law. Muslims can marry up to four wives, and can marry pre-pubescent girls. Men are commanded to beat an unruly wife according to the Quran. A son inherits twice as much as a daughter. Such is justice and tolerance in Islam.

 

In the world of Islam, all non-Muslims are treated as second-class citizens. They must not set foot in a mosque. They cannot build a church or repair any old one. They must not make noise when they assemble. They cannot bear arms. Just to give you an idea about how Islam treats its dhimmi citizens, roughly 270 million souls have been killed as a result of 1400 years of jihad and Muslim rule. So much for the dignity of the human being.

 

O: “…change cannot happen overnight.” Why is it America’s responsibility to dispel mistrust that Muslims feel for the West? It is not mistrust we must address with the Muslim world but how we can keep them from taking over our country. Islam is engaged in a stealth jihad to subvert the government of this country by any and all means possible and to turn it into a Muslim country. They have a plan for taking over America just as they have a plan for taking over Europe-and look at Europe now. It is ready to topple to Islam within another 10 years or sooner. When Americans realize that we are at war with Islam, then we can begin an intelligent defense of our way of life.

 

O says: “…my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims.” He avoids saying his father was a Muslim, which would open him to charges of apostasy. And the penalty for denying the faith of Islam is death. Of course, this may not matter. With a friend like him as president of the USA he is of more value to them alive.

 

O says that Thomas Jefferson kept a “Holy” Quran in his personal library. This is a smooth and smarmy half truth.  Did Jefferson study Islam? Only to know the treachery therein. See the comments about the Treaty of Tripoli. Also Jefferson when Ambassador to France in 1786 met the Ambassador Abdrahaman of Tripoli to iron out relations. Jefferson repeatedly stated that we were not at war with Tripoli and Abdrahaman corrected him.  He stated that Sura 47 of the Quran clearly states that America was at war with Tripoli. So Jefferson consulted his Quran to understand how we were at war with Tripoli. Islam is at war with all non-Muslim nations, then and now.

 

O says: …I consider it my responsibility as POTUS to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam…” If these exist, why is it his responsibility? What about Jews? Hindus? Blacks? Southerners? If only Islam, Why? On what Basis? By what justification?

 

O says: “America is not a stereotype of a self-interested empire.” Why did he not take the opportunity to say how we extend a helping hand to our defeated enemies. What about the billions we have spent on Islamic societies.

 

O says there are seven million Muslims in America. Why would he enlarge the truth. There are probably less than two million. He says we can live in peace and security, get an education and work with dignity. No mention here of the Islamic supremacist agenda that would deny the right of non-Muslims to live with dignity.

 

O: “When innocents in Bosnia and Darfun are slaughtered…” O pandering to Muslims as he picks two places where he believes the chief victims are Muslims.

 

O says: “…however, history has…been a record of…tribes subjugating one another…” This has been done so under the divine imperative to make non-Muslims “feel themselves subdued.” (Quran 9:24)

 

O says: “…any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.” Islam’s goal in America is to eliminate and destroy Western Civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Does this count as an attempt to elevate “one nation or group of people over another?”

 

O: “America is not and never will be at war with Islam.” “…we reject the killing of innocent men, women and children.” To say that America will never be at war with Islam is a grave error. Can he predict the future? The definition of “innocent is a Western Christian concept that does not have the same meaning in Islam. Only Muslims can be innocent but non-Muslims in the “house of war” are never innocent.

 

O in talking about extremists in Afghanistan talks about Islam and America combining to fight them and quotes the Quran, “…whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he killed all mankind…..” His reference is to Quran 5:32. 5:33 doesn’t convey the beautiful spirit (more O sleight of hand), mandating crucifixion or amputation for those who fight against Allah and Muhammad.

 

O says: “ Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism-it is an important part of promoting peace.” No mention of the imperative within Islamic text and teachings to subjugate Infidels.

 

O states that, “The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.” Why will this happen now? On what basis does O think or hope it will?

 

O compares the Jewish Holocaust with the Gaza Strips refugees is unconscionable. I am ashamed for his speech and apologize to all Jews. The Gaza Strip refugees suffer daily humiliations all while lobbing countless missiles into Israel. Israel must defend its people. A culture of hatred and violence makes Israel’s actions quite necessary. O, Americans are not interested in “Palestinian” aspirations. We all are interested in helping and strengthening Israel-the only democracy in the Middle East.

 

O’s two state solution will not curb the jihad attacks against Israel.  He says “Palestinians” must abandon violence. He then segues into how black America suffered under slavery. To compare “Palestinians” with black Americans is unconscionable. For the comparison to hold, black Americans must have been launching daily rocket attacks against white civilians and blowing themselves up at segregated lunch counters during crowded lunch hours.

 

O says: “…”Palestinians” [must] focus on what they can build.” They have been asked to build for years and have never heeded the call. Israelis gave them $14 million for greenhouses during the Gaza turnover. They turned them into weapons smuggling tunnels.

 

O is seeking a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. Would he give up ours and expect the world to follow? Then he says Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power!!! Here is a country that has enough oil to power itself for a millennium. Here is a country that would wipe Israel off the map if they had nuclear weapons. Is this man a fool?

 

O talks of democracy. “No system of government….should be imposed upon one nation by another.” Does this include Sharia? O does not understand that in Islam there is a very different meaning of “justice” and “freedom.” Or maybe he misunderstands like a fox.

 

O discusses religious freedom. “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba…” O yea who has not read history is doomed to repeat it. But America does not want to go down the hole with you O. When Islam was master over Spain, all non believers were killed or made slaves. The ‘people of the book” (Christians and Jews) were allowed, if they did not convert, to pay tax and practice their religion. They could not build new churches or repair the old ones.  O knows that the laws of dhimmitude gives his claim of a “proud tradition of tolerance” the same hollow ring as stories of prominent American blacks from the slavery and Jim Crow era’s.

Fredrick Douglass and Booker T. Washington were great men but their accomplishments not only do not erase or controvert the oppression of their people, but render them all the more poignant and haunting.  Whatever the Christians and Jews of Al-Andalus accomplished, they were still dhimmis. The rights and privileges they had were not out of any sense of the dignity of all people before God, or the equality of all before the law, but at the sufferance of their Muslim overlords.

 

“People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind, heart, and soul.” –Obama

 

“If anyone changes his religion, kill him.” Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.

 

O discusses women’s rights. How will O overcome a culture with teachings like this:

            O  The Quran likens a woman to a field, to be used by a man as he wills (2:223)

            O  A woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s. (2:282)

            O  A man can have up to four wives and sex with a slave girl. (4:3)

            O  A son’s inheritance is twice the size of that of a daughter. (4:11)

            O  Husbands are to beat disobedient wives. (4:34)

            O  Allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls. (65:4)

The dignity, equality and freedom within Islam is breathtaking is it not?

 

O preposterously suggests that our immoral pop culture causes the pious, modest Muslims to engage in jihad against America. Jihad theorist Sayyid Qutb was scandalized by dancing at a church social in Greely, Colorado in 1948. Eight centuries before Qutb a recurring feature of Muslim polemic was against the sexual immorality of the “Franks.”

 

O proposes billions in taxes by offering Islam:

            O  Expanded exchange program for their students.

            O  Muslim student internships.

            O  Online education and networks.

            O  New corps of business volunteers.

            O  Summit on Entrepreneurship.

            O  Fund supporting technological development in Muslim countries.

            O  Transfer ideas to marketplace to create jobs.

            O  Open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, Middle East & SE Asia.

            O  Appoint new science envoys to develop new sources of energy, create green

                  jobs, digitize records, clean water and grow new crops.

O  Partner with OIC to eradicate polio.

O  Partner with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.

 

O, Americans are not ready to partner with Muslims in such a massive and expensive manner. What will be the returns for this massive effort? Islam still wants to subjugate Infidel Americans. The new Congress with sensible individuals will nip this in the bud before it even gets to the hatching stage.

 

DMN, you cannot just run the unvarnished half truths in a speech like O’s. Please give us some intelligent commentary.

 

 

Kenyon J. Hull

 

Many thanks to Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch for his thoughts.

0
Your rating: None

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is a well known fact that

It is a well known fact that in countries where higher percentage of intellectuals exist, it is prone to have Leftists. For example, two Indian states Kerala and Bengal-- where literacy rate is high-- have commies in great numbers. Likewise, there are many leftists in the USA. They are the actual traitors to any nation. Usually, Leftist leaders are coward by nature and fear for their lives. There is a sense of fear in them. Therefore, in a democratic society they support a voilent group (eg Islam) to save their lives and kith and kin. Pitting one class against the other (Marxist theory) is just a blind theory they adopt to achieve their selfish desire. Obama to me a perfect leftist.


Sorry Sir, Obama is not the

Sorry Sir, Obama is not the fool, Americans are, for electing him. He is just a pious muslim doing his job of taquiya


I second a_comment, its not

I second a_comment, its not Obama who is the fool, rather he is the one was able to fool millions. Consequently it is the Americans who are the fools.

It is common knowlege that the average American is perhaps more naive than perhaps a Pakistani, in terms of understanding global politics.
An ordinary villager from Kohat in Pakistan, and from Sri Nagar in Indian kashmir would be more politically aware than you average American.

Kudos America you have proved you stupidity yet again, all the best!


Hi JAH You are copy pasting

Hi JAH

You are copy pasting irrelevant messages. I removed what you posted and invite you to discuss the articles using your own words (no copy pastes)

If you do not adhere to this rule, which is commonsense, I am afraid, I will have to remvove your privilege of posting in this forum.


Ibrahim, you are right. I

Ibrahim, you are right. I live in North America and can see that the avarage person in the street is very ignorant when it comes to politics. You can see their ignorance reflected in the programs they watch on TV. The majority here is very shallow. I do no longer have a TV becasue I found there is nothing I would want to watch so why waste my money. I miss nature shows. But I compensate by searching on Youtube what I like to watch. There is a lot of good stuff on Youtube if you know what you want. The media here is the culprit. They are the real fifth colummns for the western civilization.


Ah, i saw the news. The

Ah, i saw the news. The egyptian college student shouting to obama "he's our man...he's our man...". Americans, beware!!!


Do you see JAH, how bad it

Do you see JAH, how bad it hurts when you are not allowed to have your say. The same is the condition of those millions of hapless Dhimmies who live under Islam law and don;t have any say whatsoever.


JAH can say whatever he

JAH can say whatever he likes. He just can’t act as troll. In Islamic countries dissidents will be put to death. There is no comparison.


# 7. JAH Says; ""My post was

# 7. JAH Says;
""My post was a response to some of the Qur’anic verses that have been quoted in this article to mislead the readers.""

How can you say that was your post? Most of your posts are " just copy/paste materials only" I doubt if a Madrasa educated Muslim like you can ever be able to compose a single decent sentence on your own ( in any language)?? Well ignorance, illiteracy are supposed to be Sunnah of pedo. Mo. Am I correct?

No reader here on this site is ever misled as far as the Qu'rand is concerned. The Islamic book of prostitution is very simple( like any fairytale book) and have no depth and nothing complicated about it , which can be misinterpreted. Qu'rand is a vile book to be believed by brain-dead Zombies like you, blind believers of evil Islam. Most of all Qu'rand is a bad copy of Bible's old testicle.


JAH That is not the point,

JAH

That is not the point, all of the so called holy books are fairy tales which include the Gita, the Bible, the Torah, Zend Avestha, etc. However why does only the Quran inspire Muslims to kill infildels in todays date? That is the real question.
ofcourse you would say that Muslims are avenging themselves for the crap they are being given. However can you tell me how Muslims in Bangladesh are being given crap for which they are killing the Hindus there? Why are the Muslims in Pakistan killing and raping Hindu and Christian gilrs and forcibly converting them?

Even if we accept your analogy that Muslims are being victimised in some places, can you then tell me that how does the vitimization of Muslims justify the victimization of Non-Muslims in far off places like Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq.

You are full of hate JAH and that hate has blinded you badly. Try to think about it, you might come up with some answers!


A recent pattern is that when

A recent pattern is that when a non muslim becomes a muslim, his eys become stony, a ugly beard comes up, some even dye there beards, there outlook changes, immediately they start hating Israel, america and other free countries etc.
Its true apart from muslims doing crime(rape, loot, murder) for religion approx 80 % , other non muslims also do crime approx 20 % because but the reasons are like poverty, sickness and materalistic gains.
Also the most tolerant muslims are those who are illiterate and are muslims only by name, hardly visit mosques, have hardly read quran.

General muslim now tentendency is not to debate but attack. Muslims will shamelessy use guns, bombs, but will despise technoloigies which do good to society.
Just like a virus mutates and try to be drug resistant, muslims are selectively taking all those technologies which are developed by non-muslims based on whims and fancy. Now they like nuclear bomb as maximum death they can cause.
But birth control strict no no??
In all civil society polygamy has been banned, but muslims still stick to these.
In medieval period and also till 19th century, others like chinese, japanese, Indians, Europeans etc used to have more than one legal wife, but they accepted one wife rule. But Muslims?????
Where ever muslim kings have been there they kept concubines, still in dubai , arabia etc they have concubines.


jah, you think muslims are

jah, you think muslims are not converting forcefully ??

try reading lajja novel by taslim,

in muslim countries like bangladesh,paki and so on, you cant get to higher post of govt/college, no matter how much qualified you are, unless you are a muslim.

and you cant say this stuff about india, bcos we had sikh prime minister, muslim president ruling 80% hindus...

where on earth where there have been religious communal riots like hindu-muslim hindu-sikh, other than in india, can you find that????

hindus have fought with muslims and to little extent with sikhs, but they still made muslim and sikh at same time to rule them....

doesnt that say something in your mind, or has your dear allah blocked all the free space in mind to think about it????

and please dont reply with that hindus are weak to allow such thing to happen...


hey ibro bro, how are you? my

hey ibro bro, how are you? my earlier username was allahmeralauda but they deleted it..... i hope ibnkamina still post regularly...

btw, americans(us/canada) are not fool, just thing is unlike aussies or upto some extents with brits, they dont care much about world around... all they care is 8 hour job from mon-fri with top $$$....once tehy get it....they will like the president who provides them with that security..... they dont care mostly about what they will do next fortnight, leave aside wondering about global politics...


# 11. JAH Says: June 6th,

# 11. JAH Says:
June 6th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

@A0000Z,

""""Ashram educated Hindutwa zombies like you with cow-dung filled brain are not worthy of the Holy Qur’an. Your holy books are Kama sutra, Vedas, Ramayana, Manusmriti, etc. that are filled up with incest, rape, vulgarity, obscenity, slavery, caste system, untouchability, widow burning, bride burning, dowry burning, war, genocide, and what not.-------------"""

That's what I wanted to prove. When it comes to writing some thing on your own ; all muslim pigs puke like you. Ha Ha ha ha ( copy/pasting is easy ,isn't it?)

Except some vulgar profanities , you have nothing original to say. Your Qu'rand is full of such vulgarities only.
Talking about " Kama sutra, Vedas, Ramayana, Manusmriti, etc."? I doubt if your mentor Mullahs like Jerk off zakir Naik has ever read those Sanskrit scriptures? Just read those enlightening scriptures and you will sh!t upon your Qu'rand.
I don't know if you can convert to Hinduism ? But no doubt you will become a normal human being , for sure. Read those good sriptures and become a human , why remain a Muslim Pig as you are right now????


Hi JAH, Your reasoning is

Hi JAH,

Your reasoning is like this

--- Two wrongs make a right. ----

If you can find some news articles and twisted references about Hinduism and Christianity, that proves that Islam is right for all its wrong doings.

--- That barking makes better speech. -----

If you bark howl and shout, then your words will be correct over others.

It's not only your problem. It's pretty much how people are raised in Islamic world. I had Muslim friends when I was growing up in India. My Muslim friends will be like any other kid while walking back home from school until they see a chameleon. As soon as they see one they will turn nuts and run with stones to kill the chameleon. Does this story ring a bell?

This website has nothing to offer you if you are trying to say how good is Islam. In fact the objective of this website is just the opposite. Please go and read the mission statement. It's your choice if you want to waste your time.


Mr. Obama is a product of his

Mr. Obama is a product of his upbringing.
From birth to age 6 he was taught Socialism/Communism
From age 6-20 it was Islam
From 20-no he was taught the cult of Jeremiah Wright
Today he is all of them

Why did he quickly say I am a CHRISTIAN and quickly went to saying the Quran, Bible and Torah says this or that.

People hear what they want to hear.
If people enjoy killing they join a killing group, pedophilia u join NAMBLA or a polygamist group and marry chilren. When the girls get too old they divoce her and marry aNOTHER CHILD. Islam. Those who enjoy lying, pretending to be a Christian to get over, remain in Islam.


@A0000Z, Jungle beasts do

@A0000Z,

Jungle beasts do not understand loving, kind, logical, rational, knowledgeable, and civilized human language. It should now be clear to you. HaHaHaHa...


@Jah Nature is god. And if

@Jah

Nature is god. And if we don't take care of it, it will bite us in the ass in the end. Why not worship an animal? You take the environment for granted and it is key to our survival. Humans aren't almighty. Once WE were monkeys! But, you only think about now, you only think about your little town, your little god, your economy, your culture, your little, insignificant existence. You've put yourself inside a prison. The funniest part is that you're too limited to ever get out. Please don't breed.

In Ashram, there is no education system. People just do medication and read about random indian philosophy [which you will not understand]. Hindus study @ school, college, university, IIT , IIM and other modern education based system. There is no any 'Ashram' education system in India.

On the contrary, there are 34,000 registered [non registered should be greater in number according to Saba Naqvi Voumic] Madrasa education system alone.

Kamasutra, Ayurveda are invented and were written by hindus but not hindu religious scripture. There are no mention of godly miracle in kama sutra and ayurveda. In Ayurveda only cow urine was prescribed only once [repeated: only once] as an ingredient to a medicine for diabetes. If a christian writen medical book, it is written that people should drink own piss to keep off some disease, will you say Christian religion prescribe human piss drinking? Then why drag what Shusrut [writter of ayurveda] wrote in his medical book into religious boundary of Hinduism.

This post was only to show you how ignorant you are and your lack of proper modern education reflects in your posts.


#20 Are you a jungle beast.

#20 Are you a jungle beast. haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa


# 20. JAH ; you are right :

# 20. JAH ;
you are right : inhuman Muslims don't understand Human language. Love, logic, knowledge etc have no meaning as far as the Muslim pigs are concerned.
It seems you have started getting some human traits as you have been visiting this FFI site for a long time.

I must tell you some thing ; Jungle beasts are far better beings than the Muslim pigs like your mentor Jerk off Zakir Naik. Ha ha ha ha ---

Don't make it a habit to lick what ever the Jerk off Zakir Naik is Jerking off from Qu'rand.( or from his Dirty di----k-) Have a nice wiping of your lip. HaaaaHahaha---


JAH seems like a waste of

JAH seems like a waste of time. He simply does not operate on the same intellectual wavelength as anyone here, so please understand that we will have little success talking any sense into him. His mind has been irrecoverably warped by Islam and the filthy trash known as Qur'an.

You only need to read any post by JAH to comprehend what a fool this person is and to be entertained at how he will next embarrass himself. It is a real tragedy when a person has been a Muslim for so long, they become a walking, talking nutcase who can only babble about fairy tales and garbage involving Allah, Mohammad, and other equally boring junk that no normal SANE person even cares about. So please disregard JAH and his mental illness called Islam. He is beyond help.


Ibrahim and Ali Sina, I

Ibrahim and Ali Sina,

I agree with the gist of what you are saying. it is sometimes exasperating how little people in Holland are interested in politics, real deep talk, and when they do talk deep, how ignorant they are. The media I think are just balanced enough. But I will take the rule of 51 % of the people over any other political system, no matter how dumb people look or how wise a leader and his advisers in a dictatorship look. It is my firm choice.

Geert Wilders won big in the European election. The socialist party lost big. To me the Socialist leader, Wouter Bos, alongside some leaders of other parties are on the whole much better, more positive, broader than Wilders, who is narrowmindedly nationalistic, kicking against others-type. Some of his voters have views I don't like at all, like bringing back the guilder instead of the Euro!

But I still voted for him in protest against these good politicians and their parties for constantly protecting the Muslims against most criticism, painting it as discriminatory, without even listening, thinking only nationally, not globally. Wilders has said that he is against Islam, not Muslims, but they always react so inadequate in my view. This makes me angry and I voted a protestvote. As soon as the other parties come with reasonable reactions to Islam, taking a global view, I can vote for them again. And they did say they wondered why Wilders won and that they had to a lot of strategic thinking to do. I also suspect quite a few Dutch read websites like this.

Also Wilders acts as a very good "bad cop" because now I hear of Muslims who are praising the other politicians, being the "good cops", allowing them influence over them. Which would have been inconceivable before 2001, in my recollection. Then there was Janmaat, extreme right, he was convicted of racism or something, saying about the same things Wilders and many others say now. We need "bad cops" like you and Wilders!


When the most powerful man on

When the most powerful man on earth makes a policy statement, you can be sure it was back by intensive intellectual consideration. Islam survived to date because of lack of social challenges. So by encouraging and bringing Islam in to the folds of other social systems, its fate will be sealed, as Islam can not be reform and is incompatible, as such it will surely wither out. And their will be no cry for Jihad or of injustice to hide its numerous lapses or incompatible nature once it is in the open. In my view the American President has set the ball rolling and its actual effect will be seen sooner than later, probably before Islam is thrown in to the garbage of history.


ibrahim wrote: It is common

ibrahim wrote:

It is common knowlege that the average American is perhaps more naive than perhaps a Pakistani, in terms of understanding global politics.
An ordinary villager from Kohat in Pakistan, and from Sri Nagar in Indian kashmir would be more politically aware than you average American.

Kudos America you have proved you stupidity yet again, all the best!

This stupid American agrees with you.


"O mentions “tensions fed by

"O mentions “tensions fed by colonialism; a Cold War where Muslims were treated as proxies; change brought by modernity and globalization which led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to…Islam.” BHO lists ways the West has mistreated Islam. Not a word about the jihad doctrine, not a word about Islamic supremism and the imperative to make war against and subjugate non-Muslims. Not a word about the culture of hatred and contempt for non-Muslims that existed long before the spread of American culture."

Typical leftist bullsh*t, which is the west is to blame for Islamic terrorism.

O says: “…my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims.” He avoids saying his father was a Muslim, which would open him to charges of apostasy. And the penalty for denying the faith of Islam is death. Of course, this may not matter. With a friend like him as president of the USA he is of more value to them alive.

Hey this guy only brings up his religious background when it is convenient for him.

As for the rest of this article, Obama is a nightmare.


Average western/ american

Average western/ american enjoys there life and are least bother about anything. Initially when Buddhist Japanese, Chinese, Mexican came they faced no problem. But with the coming of the Muslims, the dynamics changed As the number of muslims increase, the problem increase. Muslims listen, read and understands everything in a twisted fashion. Very few muslims are voracious reader. In muslim countries hardly you will find libraries. The few are there its only in cities and also filled with muslim lies. Some muslim writers in islam wanted them to think but they were persecuted or ignored. They never sees positive things of others but only the negative. If the muslims could have developed quest for knowledge, women equality and birth control then the earth will be a good place.


It was not just America that

It was not just America that joined the Obama fan club but the rest of the world .Beleive me it was trully sickening .And the suggestion that this phoney had somekind of slave heritage really took the cake . Likening himself to somekind of latter day Abe Lincoln was to piss on Lincoln,s grave .
He is a snake in the American henhouse and a snake in the henhouse of the rest of the world that values freedom against islamic tyranny .Hitler was not a German citezen and neither was Joe Stalin a Russian citezen .Obama is an impostor that has everthing but the interests of the free world at heart .
Everytime Israel gives an inch the muslims take a mile .So it will be with the free world .


I think people should stop

I think people should stop talking the misnomer that Islam is fastest growing religion. Infact its "fastest breeding religion", "fastest hated religion", "fastest religion to loose intellectuals", "fastest poor making religion", "religion with maximum and growing women subjugation", "fastest criminal/rapists/terrorists providing religion".


demsci i walked in the inner

demsci
i walked in the inner harbour national park today, met some european enjoying champange, typical, nice, happy looking people, and two happend to be from holland study in here, and i asked him about the geert wilders, and he says ""GEERT WILDERS IS FOLL"..., hay?, why was that? and he says "cause he is talking bad about people culture", and i asked "you know anything about their culture?", and he said "no, i never go there". so i tell him about this site, and on the way out i see him talking to his friend, hope they learn this site, and become aware and spread it, otherwise their next generation wouldn't be so lucky to enjoy alcohol drink in public, and hopefully welcoming sign not written assalam alikum when they get to schiphol

i understand their ignorant, maybe they had enough with previous war, so they try to live peacefully and be nice with people, as i said before, they may think muslim is just like another friendly gay movement campaign that don't pose any threat, but they didn't know,

if muslim really seriouse about reform, they can start with throwing out those muslim dress code, to make people look same, religion are individual, if they want to look different, dont blame people for treat them with discrimination.

after all, what about the honor killing order for unbeliver, why don't they do it now, like covering up women body?, the only thing i can think of is they SAVE THE BEST FOR LAST, that is, killing remainning that wouldn't submit when they become 75% domination


pathfinder 32, I agree with

pathfinder 32, I agree with you, 40 years back the world population was approximated at 4 billion with Islam projected with about 1billion members (25%), today the world population is put at app. 7 billion, Islam is projected at 1.2 to 1.5 billion people(21.5%), so I wonder were the phrase the fastest growing religion came from.


#34 from lying muslims to

#34 from lying muslims to look good. Most muslims in America are criminals and immigrants from the holy islamic world. Infidels allow them to come and do well, but yet they still hate us. Evil from allah the DEVIL sura 3:54


IbnSahr, what can I say,

IbnSahr, what can I say, about those Dutch people calling Geert Wilders a fool, because of denigrating somebody else's culture? It is so widespread. I am not a journalist, do not know everything, I am just reading and watching TV. I only have my own opinion.

Dutch people + politicians tend to look national, not global. Then they see # 1 million people that are either Islamic or of Islamic descent. These people often behave very nice and many Dutch want to protect them when Islam is criticized by Geert Wilders. They don't see his distinction between Islam and Muslims, as Ali Sina, we here at FFI do. Also, while they know that Islam has 1.5 billion adherents, they do not consider that the 1 million in Holland in big part are NOT loyal to Holland but to this Ummah. And because of disinterest, they are often so ignorant about Islam and Muslims's actions. I prefer to see Islam and the followers of the other faiths in a global perspective.

On 4th june, in European elections, Geert Wilders' Freedom party won big! 17 % of the votes. Nationally his party is second after Christian Democrats now, of course not in parliament, but virtually. In my region, the Rhine-Delta, his party is the first party. And in my humble vision it is a triumph of people waking up.

You know, maybe the Socialist leader, the Liberal leaders, Christian-Democrat leaders + other politicians are in a lot of ways better than Geert Wilders + his allies, BUT.

BUT I strongly suspect the Dutch people are becoming ever more wary of Islam + intention of Muslims. Maybe Moroccan young criminals were some sort of trigger. What angers me about those mainstream politicians, so excellent, warm people at times, is that they keep denying the Islamic problem, keep defending Muslims as if there only was hate towards them, without even listening to the arguments people like Geert Wilders, Ali Sina + many others have.

But now, the other politicians are forced to reconsider, because many of them otherwise face disastrous losses both in municipal elections in 2010 and national elections in 2011.


yaeh its good news from

yaeh its good news from european, lot of people swing to the right.
but still lot of young people coudln't care less about their own future, they born in these sort of time of multiculture, while the old ones start noticing the community start to go backward compare to the ones they used to have.
yes i heard too they start to turn to religious party, even though its a bit too late. otherwise they can put a bit more control on immigration, even its hard because bordered by land, i think geneva convention is a bit obsolete, world facing different problem now, but i wish best luck for european.


#36 If those infidels had to

#36 If those infidels had to live under Islam, they would say, "what happened".
Those nice Muslims they once knew will turn on them and when the infidels ask why the Muslims will just say so nicely, "well you knew I was a Muslim".
Infidels should have read about Islam and Muslims. Islam would just be another ideology without Muslims carrying out the "will of Allah". and his prophet muhammad. Allah is the DEVIL sura 3:54.


[...] is the original:  Obama

[...] is the original:  Obama the Fool | Faith Freedom International This entry is filed under Hindu. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 [...]


"30. pathfinder Says: June

"30. pathfinder Says:
June 7th, 2009 at 12:18 am

Average western/ american enjoys there life and are least bother about anything. Initially when Buddhist Japanese, Chinese, Mexican came they faced no problem."

No pathfinder. We discriminated against most immigrant groups. The Chinese were often humiliated and had their long hair cut by ignorant Westerners. After Pearl, we incarcerated third generation Japanese in camps. The Irish were horribly treated and usually could not find jobs. WWII Mexican American servicemen were denied service in restaurants while in uniform.

Be aware of history so as to not repeat it.


И как это автору не влом

И как это автору не влом столько времени на написание статей тратить, мы конечно очень благодарны, но вот я на такой альтруизм не способен :)