Leaving Islam: Mark Gabriel, an Azhar Professor, tells his story (Videos)
Submitted by Administrator on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 06:45
Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF versionWhen any decent human being discovers the truth about Islam, he/she just leaves that evil cult. Mark Gabriel was an Azhar professor who went that path. here is his story from his own mouth
Submitted by Ibn Kammuna (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 17:06.
Hey Porky, How you doing brother. I hope well
Listen, you are sadly mistaken. Christianity is a good religion, wether you like it or not. You don't see Christian Jihadis running around and killing people on a daily basis. In fact, Jesus was a pacifist to the core.
Also, I think you try to be rude on purpose, so people comment on what you said. Using words like "Christian dog" is not nice brother. It only shows you hate Chrsitians just because they are Christians. Why? Mother Teresa was a Chrsitian, and what a great and wonderful person she was. You may not like Chrsitians, but they are wonderful people. I had many good experiences with Christians. Look what Dr. Mark Gabriel above is doing; exposing the truth about Islam. Is this a bad thing to do? I hope to meet in person Mark Gabriel one day and congratulate him on his life and on his leaving that evil cult. Mark Gabriel did so much so far to tell about Islam. What did you do brother porky? I hope that one day you'll see the light.
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 18:31.
Those who propagate the myth that Teresa is good, is actually evil and/or ignorant.
The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud.
By Christopher Hitchens
slate.com/id/2090083/
MT was not a friend of the poor. She was a friend of poverty. She said that suffering was a gift from God. She spent her life opposing the only known cure for poverty, which is the empowerment of women and the emancipation of them from a livestock version of compulsory reproduction. And she was a friend to the worst of the rich, taking misappropriated money from the atrocious Duvalier family in Haiti (whose rule she praised in return) and from Charles Keating of the Lincoln Savings and Loan. Where did that money, and all the other donations, go? The primitive hospice in Calcutta was as run down when she died as it always had been—she preferred California clinics when she got sick herself—and her order always refused to publish any audit. But we have her own claim that she opened 500 convents in more than a hundred countries, all bearing the name of her own order. Excuse me, but this is modesty and humility?
The rich world has a poor conscience, and many people liked to alleviate their own unease by sending money to a woman who seemed like an activist for "the poorest of the poor." People do not like to admit that they have been gulled or conned, so a vested interest in the myth was permitted to arise, and a lazy media never bothered to ask any follow-up questions. Many volunteers who went to Calcutta came back abruptly disillusioned by the stern ideology and poverty-loving practice of the "Missionaries of Charity," but they had no audience for their story. George Orwell's admonition in his essay on Gandhi—that saints should always be presumed guilty until proved innocent—was drowned in a Niagara of soft-hearted, soft-headed, and uninquiring propaganda.
One of the curses of India, as of other poor countries, is the quack medicine man, who fleeces the sufferer by promises of miraculous healing. Sunday was a great day for these parasites, who saw their crummy methods endorsed by his holiness and given a more or less free ride in the international press. Forgotten were the elementary rules of logic, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. More than that, we witnessed the elevation and consecration of extreme dogmatism, blinkered faith, and the cult of a mediocre human personality. Many more people are poor and sick because of the life of MT: Even more will be poor and sick if her example is followed. She was a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud, and a church that officially protects those who violate the innocent has given us another clear sign of where it truly stands on moral and ethical questions.
Submitted by indiafirst (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 18:40.
i think any religion thats progressive can be called good in contemporary context. islam was retrogressive and its getting even worse. it is a fact that the white/christian world has progressed, their societies are well organized and all inclusive. this is why people from all over the world flock to US, England, Australia etc. We hardly see anyone adopt an asian country, even when economics today are in their favour.
Submitted by indiafirst (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 19:07.
the last video is beautiful where he talks about the pastor who converted to islam..and where he says that the converted pastor lives in the same country founded on biblical principles
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 22:24.
If mother theresa was enemy of the poor then what about the Gandhi
he was approve of most heinious cate sytem because he was hindu Inside
thats why Ambedkar once said he is the biggest enemy of untouchables.
Not very long after returning for good from South Africa, Gandhi had proposed to reduce the castes to the four varnas, while nonetheless maintaining inherited vocations:
[1] 1920: "I believe that caste has saved Hinduism from disintegration. But like every other institution it has suffered from excrescences. I consider the four divisions alone to be fundamental, natural and essential. The innumerable sub-castes are sometimes a convenience, often a hindrance. The sooner there is fusion, the better....
"One of my correspondents suggests that we should abolish the caste [system] but adopt the class system of Europe - meaning thereby, I suppose, that the idea of heredity in caste should be rejected. I am inclined to think that the law of heredity is an eternal law and any attempt to alter that law must lead us, as it has before led [others], to utter confusion.... If Hindus believe, as they must believe, in reincarnation [and] transmigration, they must know that Nature will, without any possibility of mistake, adjust the balance by degrading a Brahmin, if he misbehaves himself, by reincarnating him in a lower division, and translating one who lives the life of a Brahmin in his present incarnation to Brahminhood in his next. (C, XIX, 83f)
[2] 1920: "The beauty of the caste system is that it does not base itself upon distinctions of wealth-possessions. Money, as history has proved, is the greatest disruptive force in the world.... Caste is but an extension of the principle of the family. Both are governed by blood and heredity. Western scientists are busy trying to prove that heredity is an illusion and that milieu is everything. The... experience of many lands goes against the conclusions of these scientists; but even accepting their doctrine of milieu, it is easy to prove that milieu can be conserved and developed more through caste than through class.... As we all know, change comes very slowly in social life, and thus, as a matter of fact, caste has allowed new groupings to suit the changes in lives. But these changes are [as] quiet and easy as a change in the shape of the clouds. It is difficult to imagine a better harmonious human adjustment.
"Caste does not connote superiority or inferiority. It simply recognizes different outlooks and corresponding modes of life. But it is no use denying the fact that a sort of hierarchy has been evolved in the caste system, but it cannot be called the creation of the Brahmins. When all castes accept a common [religious] goal of life, a hierarchy is inevitable, because all castes cannot realize the ideal in equal degree." (C, XIX, 174ff)
[3] 1921-22: "I believe that if Hindu society has been able to stand, it is because it is founded on the caste system.... A community which can create the caste system must be said to possess unique power of organization....
"To destroy the caste system and adopt the Western European social system means that Hindus must give up the principle of hereditary occupation which is the soul of the caste system. [The] hereditary principle is an eternal principle. To change it is to create disorder.... It will be a chaos if every day a Brahmin is to be changed into a Shudra and a Shudra is to be changed into a Brahmin. The caste system is a natural order of society.... I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the caste system." (A, IX, 275f)
Submitted by Marie (not verified) on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 23:31.
What kind of University prohibits it's students from asking questions? An Islamic University. Therefore it is not another University, but just another place to brainwash people.
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 00:10.
@matrix
I do think Gandhi is Gand Hi NOT because his idea of "caste system" was evil as you yourself have quoted in post 7 as follows...
Caste does not connote superiority or inferiority. It simply recognizes different outlooks and corresponding modes of life.
I oppose Gandhi because of his muslim appeasement, asking Hindu girls to spread their legs for rapist muslims... Only immoral cowards will ask such things from victims...
However does that change anything about that teresa being a con?
Submitted by Halalpork786 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 05:00.
Hi brother Kammuna . This forum was missing your presence.
Nice of you to react to my Silly comment. Only this time for a wrong reason: I understand calling a Dog a Christian or calling a Pig a Muslim can be considered Rude as those animals never try to convert fellow animal to increase their (gang) numbers. Animals are very Honest , Innocent and natural unlike the believing followers of the two Evil Cults ( Christianity and Islam).
Dogs and pigs are very useful creatures , where as Christianity and Islam since their inception have caused great harms to mankind and the mother earth also. Not just in the past even now those are evil harmful political agendas.
Talking about Mother Teresa ? Tell us what good she did to India except converting some poor , innocent orphaned kids to Evil Christianity( that too Catholic) in the guise of social service?? Or are you impressed by her Nobel prize? Which was also won by an Islamic terrorist Arafat.
Miss Teresa missed her womanhood by joining the Catholic Church as a Nun. She had no first hand experience of being a Mother. I wonder why she is called a Mother?
Submitted by socratese (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 06:21.
Why divert the topic mother Theresa.she has done self less service to all religious people.I think only She was true follower of Jesus love to all humans.Mother love is the best pure in this world.God love is also similar to mother love and may even be higher.Jesus love can be taken as gods love and mothers love.Mother Theresa just followed Jesus and has not asked any one to convert to Christianity in return of her service.Present day Christianity is very liberal and not dangerous.For that matter all religions are relatively better than mad and dangerous islam.Islam is based on fear of punishment in pseudo hell and lure of animalsitic paradise where one will get job of male prostitute to houries.
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 10:12.
its nothing but resident hindus coming out of Rss madrasas freaking out whenever they hear somthing remotely similar to christian.
I just wonder why the moderator still allow a guy like halal cow , he as far I can see
uses the most abusive language on this board to continue post here.Or is he the moderator him self?
so what would mother theresa should say to the poor women in need of food or ,medicine, instead of providing her with this basic needs .
you must empower yourself !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 10:35.
Caste does not connote superiority or inferiority. It simply recognizes different outlooks and corresponding modes of life.
utter stupidity , everything about caste is superiority and inferiority.you dont need to become a rocket scientist to figure it out.its common sense.
you are associated with menial jobs because you are born in to caste.
Gandhi was utterly stupid on this.Remember this guy was thrown out train for he was a black in South Africa by white men, Yet after coming back from SA he wrote this gibberish .Gandhi in his consious always believed that humans are born into different classes, and the root of this way of thinking was Hinduism.
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 17:11.
its nothing but resident hindus coming out of Rss madrasas freaking out whenever they hear somthing remotely similar to christian.
and where did you come out from, some christian madrassa or is it from one of those christian terrorist organizations like NLFT, etc.?
utter stupidity , everything about caste is superiority and inferiority.you dont need to become a rocket scientist to figure it out.its common sense. you are associated with menial jobs because you are born in to caste.
You are one ignorant christian fool. Varna system of Vedas does NOT say one is superior or inferior. Superiority or inferiority is based on character. How the society practices this is irrelevant and NOT the original purpose of this system.
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 17:19.
Why divert the topic mother Theresa.she has done self less service to all religious people.
Right... that is why she accepted money from criminals and built more convents.... real self-less service indeed... Have you taken a look at those Calcutta hospitals? They look like gutter.... I wonder what she did with all that money... Self-less service indeed..
Only christian fools can keep repeating lies blindly...
I think only She was true follower of Jesus love to all humans.Mother love is the best pure in this world.
Indeed ... true follower of jesus indeed... She was such a true follower that she had to run to California hospitals when she was sick while teaching all the sick people in her hospital in Calcutta suffer with lack of basic necessities.
These people do not even have proper toilet facilities. They have to pee and go in front of anybody... Do you christians have any brains to see that this woman is a con who took all that money in the name of serving poor and probably gave it to vatican bank and convents while the poor people in Calcutta do not get anything?
I guess not as it is disadvantage to christian bigots to peddle their false religion...
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 17:21.
This woman teresa taught those suffering in her hospitals that "suffering is a gift" and thus ensured the poor people experience poverty. She did not even provide these people with basic toilet facilities... Do xian fools read this?
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 20:53.
See I am not interested in convincing any bigoted fasist hindu about anything .I just write for the other readers.the very purpose of hindu varna segregating people ,
playing verbal gymnastics wont help it otherwise
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 21:03.
the fanatics especially coming staaight out of RSS schools lies about varna to make it look like a good system.
The four varnas of the Vedic system are the brahmanas (brahmins), kshatriyas, vaishyas, and shudras. According to this system, brahmanas were required to cultivate predominantly sattvic attributes and have minimal rajasic or tamasic qualities. Kshatriyas were required to have greater rajasic qualities albeit tempered by some sattvic qualities, vaishyas would have more tamasic and rajasic qualities but still sattvic qualities, while shudras were allowed to have predominantly tamasic and rajasic qualities. A person's varna was generally determined by the varna of his father and mother. The boys of the Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaisyha varnas were identified as such from a very early age by whom? and underwent an initiation ceremony, the upanayana, to confirm their varna status. They are often referred to as "twice born" because of this initiation into spiritual life, specifically, with the study of the Vedas. Thus, from a very early age, the children of the twice-born varnas are identified and trained to take up their religiously prescribed duties.
People are born into varnas you got no control of it if someones father is low caste ,the he is also caste .so he supposed take up certain kind of jobs only.
I bet if it wasnt for the british India would have been backward than the most backword islamic country.
1,They united 3000 thousand or so backword hindu nations after defeating muslims
2 give it a legl system(indian Penal code and indian Civil laws)
3 abolished hindu evil practices like sati and other superstitions
4 give it moden Education(english and science)
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 21:06.
The hindu fanatic and founder of RSS Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar was a racist . See his own words
"To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the semitic Races — the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by."[1]
Submitted by Matrix (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 21:08.
His formulations of Hindutva Fascism are so blatant that even his followers, the RSS combine, is running for cover and claiming that this book, “We or our Nationhood defined”, portraying a naked hatred for minorities and eulogies for the likes of Hitler was not written by him. They avoid owning these ideas. But one knows that he penned this book. In an affidavit submitted to the charity commissioner, Rajendra Singh, a later Sarsanghchalak pleaded, "With a view to give a scientific base to propagate the idea India being historically from time immemorial a Hindu nation-the late Shri M.S. Golwalkar had written a book entitled 'We or Our Nationhood defined', which was published in 1938."[7] J.A. Curran in his classic study, RSS: Militant Hinduism in India Politics - A study of RSS: points out "The genuine ideology of Sangh is based upon principles formulated by its founder, Dr. Hedgewar.[8] These principles have been consolidated and amplified by the present leader (i.e. Golwalkar) in a small book called "We or our nationhood defined". It is a basic primer in the indoctrination of Sangh volunteers…[9] Since its quotations have been brought to the notice of people, RSS publishing houses have stopped republishing this book. What does Golwalkar say in this book?
Submitted by A0000Z (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 21:27.
Hi Mat@rix; Cartoons like you need not worry about the topic(smile) You can always find your copy/paste comments. Do the rev.Fats and MomySups at your Christian Madrasa teach you how to stick to the topic?
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 23:04.
@Matrix,
In other words you do not have anything to defend against the christian con woman teresa who fooled many people of their money. LOL...
See I am not interested in convincing any bigoted fasist hindu about anything .I just write for the other readers.the very purpose of hindu varna segregating people , playing verbal gymnastics wont help it otherwise
So anybody who says stuff you do not agree with must be from RSS... Did you learn that from your christian church from one of those pedophile priests? As I already said, whatever people practice need NOT necessarily be what the religion teaches... Nobody can deny there are problems with Hindu society in terms of this caste system practice.. However this does NOT mean this is what religion preaches.
The four varnas of the Vedic system are the brahmanas (brahmins), kshatriyas, vaishyas, and shudras. According to this system, brahmanas were required to cultivate predominantly sattvic attributes and have minimal rajasic or tamasic qualities.
This is true for any Varna. All are requires to develop satvic (good) qualities...
Kshatriyas were required to have greater rajasic qualities albeit tempered by some sattvic qualities,
This should be the nonsense you learn from your christian churches I guess. Nobody has complete control over developing these qualities, alhough one can strive for goodness.
What Hindu scriptures state is that Brahmin is he who has more satvika (good) qualities compared to Kshatriya or others. Now tell me how can a good person consider exploiting others. Superiority or inferiority is based on qualities. It is NOT some automatic status a brahmin relative receives. If a Brahmin behaves like a rotten scoundrel, he is not considered a brahmin, he is called a shudra or brahma bandhu (relative f a Brahmin). He looses his adhiikara (right) to perform Vedic studies, rituals etc. This is the orthodox position.
vaishyas would have more tamasic and rajasic qualities but still sattvic qualities, while shudras were allowed to have predominantly tamasic and rajasic qualities.
Hos is it possible to allow somebody to have more tamasic or rajasic or satvika qualities? You are talking as though some body of human beings controls these things. This is rather stupid statement you make without understanding anything.
Does your xian madrassa teach such nonsense?
A persons varna was generally determined by the varna of his father and mother.
NOT true... This is ONE among many factors. The same scripture also talks about Vratyas, those relatives of Brahmins or Kshatriyas etc. who have fallen and lost their rights to conduct vedic sacrifices because of their bad conduct which may include from minor offenses such as drinking to anything major like murder.
As for your question on superiority or inferiority is concerned, it is purely by character and conduct alone. A Shudra who is following scriptural mandate is much superior to vile Brahmin relative and is treated on par with other Brahmins who follow good conduct.
If one shows the symptoms of being a brahmana, kshatriya, vaisya or sudra, as described above (nishkama karma , doing one's duty without self interetsts), even if he has appeared in a different class, he should be accepted according to those symptoms of classification.Bhagavatam 7.11.35
Submitted by continuum1 (not verified) on Sat, 05/09/2009 - 23:11.
The hindu fanatic and founder of RSS Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar was a racist . See his own words
Just as Gandhi does not define Hinduism, neither does Savarkar. People born of that age were influenced by British and European racism. None of these define what Hinduism stands for and they are wrong. I have no problem agreeing to this.
However let us see how many of you christians even acknowledge teresa is a con woman who stole other people's money in the name of serving poor, that catholic church is an organization that still cheats billions of people all over the world by hiding their pedophiles, murderers and crooks.
Submitted by Kaalan (not verified) on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 09:47.
Dear Matrix,
I write below the essence of varnasramadharma.
People everywhere were/are divided into four 'varnas' or 'castes' (brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya and sudra) based on the 'guna' or quality born of prakrti (nature) - satvam, rajas & tamas- found in individuals.
Brahmana means one who know Brahman (God). This is possible through studying scriptures (Vedas, Vedantas, Upanishads and sastras) and living accordingly.
Those dominated by rajo-guna are considered as ksatriyas and those who have all three gundas more or less in equal measure are considered as vaisyas and finally those dominated by tamo-guna are considered as sudras.
And the measure of these gunas vary in individuals at various times, climes and places. In other words, a person considered as brahmana today may not have predominance of satva-guna tomorrow thereby changing his status from brahmana to that caste appropriate to the gunas predominant in him at that particular time and a sudra today may acquire more of satvia guna tomorrow and so on.
To substantiate the above, let us see what the scholar who translated Bhagavad-Gita and Bhagavatam with elaborate purport from Sanskrit to English, His Divine Grace Shri Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada, founder of ISKON, writes about caste (www.krishna.com)
Brahmana is a title, a position, like that of a High Court judge. The son of a High Court judge cannot automatically become the judge of a High Court. He has to acquire the necessary qualifications to become a High Court judge. Similarly, the son of a brahmana has to acquire the qualitieis required to become a brahmana; if not, he is not to be considered a brahmana. It is the same with all other castes.
In other words, caste of a person is determined based on his thoughts and consequent words and actions, not by birth.
The caste system being practiced in India at present is not in accordance with the scriptures; it is against the spirit of Sanatana Dharma scriptures.
Submitted by Kaalan (not verified) on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 10:15.
Matrix,
With regard to your wring 'Hindu fanatic' let me explain it, as follows:
An Islamic fanatic is one who tries to conquer for Allah all non-muslims through jihad of all kinds including lying, looting, raping and killing.
A Christian fanatic is one who tries to harvest 'souls' of non-christians using any method on behalf of Father, Son & Holy Spirit.
A Hindu fanatic is one who renounces everything including family, friends and wealth and goes to worship God. This is the ultimate a Hindu should do or lead life of a Yogi?
Submitted by A0000Z (not verified) on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:33.
Hi #31. Kaalan;
You are asking difficult questions to a cretin Christian, don't forget that their knowledge is limited to Bible ( that too Old/New Testicles) just as the Muslim cretins' knowledge is limited to Qu-Rand ( the book of prostitution).
They may tell you what they Believe only as they have no real knowledge or exprience of their faith.
Submitted by kubala (not verified) on Mon, 05/11/2009 - 14:59.
Vienna,11-05-2009
I am not in agreement with religion hoppers like
grass hoppers.Forgive me I let no one posess me.
I do not approve some one hit Mother Theresa
or some one else.Human performance speaks
for itself.It does not help cursing Gandhi as well.
I hope individuals show maturity and integrity.
kb
Submitted by lea (not verified) on Tue, 06/23/2009 - 14:44.
Islam is my religion. yesterday, now, n forever.
what ever you believe is...coz theres only one God in this universe.
we don't need to hate each others..lets put our hands together, coz we all the same human that God create..theres no different between us..:)
Muslims..Christians..Buddha..no matter what u believe, as long as u feel that good for u, so keep on it. Only God have right to judge us, just do what u feel its true.
God see us all from above, n He knows what we are..inside..and outside.
Submitted by Raisin Head (not verified) on Wed, 07/15/2009 - 08:36.
Lea we wish we could respect all religions. Islam wants to kill all of us and if not make us pay to live. Muslims can feel good, not us. I am not any religion so I must submit to Islam or die. Apparently you didnt read your god's laws. I did and since allah is the evil devil of the Bible, I prefer to allow god to kill him.
Submitted by Moooo (not verified) on Wed, 07/15/2009 - 08:58.
"Muslims..Christians..Buddha..no matter what u believe, as long as u feel that good for u, so keep on it. Only God have right to judge us, just do what u feel its true."
Go check your religion first before acting like a humanist.
Christians: people of the book - must be converted and if refused, killed or become dhimmi,
Buddha : don't have any god at all - must be killed, for not believing allah the sadist,
Hindu (you forgot or you didn't mention it because....): polytheist, must be converted or die.
Judaism(you forgot or you didn't mention it because....): disobidience race according to allah, must be converted and if refused, killed or become dhimmi.
ETC.
Submitted by R_not (not verified) on Wed, 07/15/2009 - 09:44.
lea, considering that islam does not teach respect for others of other religions - I think that you are being very disingenuous in your statement to us. Muhammed showed no respect for unbelievers, or even Muslims not fighting for 'Allah's Cause', or supporting those who do so with their wealth. He called them hypocrites.
So, how can we respect a 'religion' like that?!
And that isn't the all of the lack of respect Muhammed showed to others. He showed no respect for women. He showed no respect for matrimony - he lusted after his stepson's wife and then said that 'Allah said it was ok' (I paraphrase) for him to take the wife as his own.
I get my most trusted information from former Muslims such as the one in the videos from this article.
Faithfreedom.org echoes the voice of ex-Muslims who want to stop the spread of Islam, expose its violent nature, and help Muslims to understand it and leave it. We believe in the oneness of humanity and oppose Islam for inciting hatred against non Muslims. Muhammad instructed his follower to conquer the world by the sword and to rule it with terror. We are determined to not let that happen.
""Out of the frying pan, into
""Out of the frying pan, into the fire""
Is the the right term which can be used for the ---- Azhar professor
Mark Gabriel was an Azhar professor who has converted to Christianity.
There is not much difference between the two killing Cults called Islam and Christianity.
Can any Christian dog or Islamic Pig dispute the above fact?
Hey Porky, How you doing
Hey Porky, How you doing brother. I hope well
Listen, you are sadly mistaken. Christianity is a good religion, wether you like it or not. You don't see Christian Jihadis running around and killing people on a daily basis. In fact, Jesus was a pacifist to the core.
Also, I think you try to be rude on purpose, so people comment on what you said. Using words like "Christian dog" is not nice brother. It only shows you hate Chrsitians just because they are Christians. Why? Mother Teresa was a Chrsitian, and what a great and wonderful person she was. You may not like Chrsitians, but they are wonderful people. I had many good experiences with Christians. Look what Dr. Mark Gabriel above is doing; exposing the truth about Islam. Is this a bad thing to do? I hope to meet in person Mark Gabriel one day and congratulate him on his life and on his leaving that evil cult. Mark Gabriel did so much so far to tell about Islam. What did you do brother porky? I hope that one day you'll see the light.
The fraud Teresa by
The fraud Teresa by Christopher Hitchens....
youtube.com/watch?v=9WQ0i3nCx60
youtube.com/watch?v=iKkcDgeYBdk
youtube.com/watch?v=qGuzFUeDDgY
Those who propagate the myth
Those who propagate the myth that Teresa is good, is actually evil and/or ignorant.
The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud.
By Christopher Hitchens
slate.com/id/2090083/
MT was not a friend of the poor. She was a friend of poverty. She said that suffering was a gift from God. She spent her life opposing the only known cure for poverty, which is the empowerment of women and the emancipation of them from a livestock version of compulsory reproduction. And she was a friend to the worst of the rich, taking misappropriated money from the atrocious Duvalier family in Haiti (whose rule she praised in return) and from Charles Keating of the Lincoln Savings and Loan. Where did that money, and all the other donations, go? The primitive hospice in Calcutta was as run down when she died as it always had been—she preferred California clinics when she got sick herself—and her order always refused to publish any audit. But we have her own claim that she opened 500 convents in more than a hundred countries, all bearing the name of her own order. Excuse me, but this is modesty and humility?
The rich world has a poor conscience, and many people liked to alleviate their own unease by sending money to a woman who seemed like an activist for "the poorest of the poor." People do not like to admit that they have been gulled or conned, so a vested interest in the myth was permitted to arise, and a lazy media never bothered to ask any follow-up questions. Many volunteers who went to Calcutta came back abruptly disillusioned by the stern ideology and poverty-loving practice of the "Missionaries of Charity," but they had no audience for their story. George Orwell's admonition in his essay on Gandhi—that saints should always be presumed guilty until proved innocent—was drowned in a Niagara of soft-hearted, soft-headed, and uninquiring propaganda.
One of the curses of India, as of other poor countries, is the quack medicine man, who fleeces the sufferer by promises of miraculous healing. Sunday was a great day for these parasites, who saw their crummy methods endorsed by his holiness and given a more or less free ride in the international press. Forgotten were the elementary rules of logic, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. More than that, we witnessed the elevation and consecration of extreme dogmatism, blinkered faith, and the cult of a mediocre human personality. Many more people are poor and sick because of the life of MT: Even more will be poor and sick if her example is followed. She was a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud, and a church that officially protects those who violate the innocent has given us another clear sign of where it truly stands on moral and ethical questions.
i think any religion thats
i think any religion thats progressive can be called good in contemporary context. islam was retrogressive and its getting even worse. it is a fact that the white/christian world has progressed, their societies are well organized and all inclusive. this is why people from all over the world flock to US, England, Australia etc. We hardly see anyone adopt an asian country, even when economics today are in their favour.
the last video is beautiful
the last video is beautiful where he talks about the pastor who converted to islam..and where he says that the converted pastor lives in the same country founded on biblical principles
If mother theresa was enemy
If mother theresa was enemy of the poor then what about the Gandhi
he was approve of most heinious cate sytem because he was hindu Inside
thats why Ambedkar once said he is the biggest enemy of untouchables.
Not very long after returning for good from South Africa, Gandhi had proposed to reduce the castes to the four varnas, while nonetheless maintaining inherited vocations:
[1] 1920: "I believe that caste has saved Hinduism from disintegration. But like every other institution it has suffered from excrescences. I consider the four divisions alone to be fundamental, natural and essential. The innumerable sub-castes are sometimes a convenience, often a hindrance. The sooner there is fusion, the better....
"One of my correspondents suggests that we should abolish the caste [system] but adopt the class system of Europe - meaning thereby, I suppose, that the idea of heredity in caste should be rejected. I am inclined to think that the law of heredity is an eternal law and any attempt to alter that law must lead us, as it has before led [others], to utter confusion.... If Hindus believe, as they must believe, in reincarnation [and] transmigration, they must know that Nature will, without any possibility of mistake, adjust the balance by degrading a Brahmin, if he misbehaves himself, by reincarnating him in a lower division, and translating one who lives the life of a Brahmin in his present incarnation to Brahminhood in his next. (C, XIX, 83f)
[2] 1920: "The beauty of the caste system is that it does not base itself upon distinctions of wealth-possessions. Money, as history has proved, is the greatest disruptive force in the world.... Caste is but an extension of the principle of the family. Both are governed by blood and heredity. Western scientists are busy trying to prove that heredity is an illusion and that milieu is everything. The... experience of many lands goes against the conclusions of these scientists; but even accepting their doctrine of milieu, it is easy to prove that milieu can be conserved and developed more through caste than through class.... As we all know, change comes very slowly in social life, and thus, as a matter of fact, caste has allowed new groupings to suit the changes in lives. But these changes are [as] quiet and easy as a change in the shape of the clouds. It is difficult to imagine a better harmonious human adjustment.
"Caste does not connote superiority or inferiority. It simply recognizes different outlooks and corresponding modes of life. But it is no use denying the fact that a sort of hierarchy has been evolved in the caste system, but it cannot be called the creation of the Brahmins. When all castes accept a common [religious] goal of life, a hierarchy is inevitable, because all castes cannot realize the ideal in equal degree." (C, XIX, 174ff)
[3] 1921-22: "I believe that if Hindu society has been able to stand, it is because it is founded on the caste system.... A community which can create the caste system must be said to possess unique power of organization....
"To destroy the caste system and adopt the Western European social system means that Hindus must give up the principle of hereditary occupation which is the soul of the caste system. [The] hereditary principle is an eternal principle. To change it is to create disorder.... It will be a chaos if every day a Brahmin is to be changed into a Shudra and a Shudra is to be changed into a Brahmin. The caste system is a natural order of society.... I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the caste system." (A, IX, 275f)
What you think Gandhi a
What you think Gandhi a stupid fundamentalist?
What kind of University
What kind of University prohibits it's students from asking questions? An Islamic University. Therefore it is not another University, but just another place to brainwash people.
@matrix I do think Gandhi is
@matrix
I do think Gandhi is Gand Hi NOT because his idea of "caste system" was evil as you yourself have quoted in post 7 as follows...
I oppose Gandhi because of his muslim appeasement, asking Hindu girls to spread their legs for rapist muslims... Only immoral cowards will ask such things from victims...
However does that change anything about that teresa being a con?
Marvellous!
Marvellous!
Hi brother Kammuna . This
Hi brother Kammuna . This forum was missing your presence.
Nice of you to react to my Silly comment. Only this time for a wrong reason: I understand calling a Dog a Christian or calling a Pig a Muslim can be considered Rude as those animals never try to convert fellow animal to increase their (gang) numbers. Animals are very Honest , Innocent and natural unlike the believing followers of the two Evil Cults ( Christianity and Islam).
Dogs and pigs are very useful creatures , where as Christianity and Islam since their inception have caused great harms to mankind and the mother earth also. Not just in the past even now those are evil harmful political agendas.
Talking about Mother Teresa ? Tell us what good she did to India except converting some poor , innocent orphaned kids to Evil Christianity( that too Catholic) in the guise of social service?? Or are you impressed by her Nobel prize? Which was also won by an Islamic terrorist Arafat.
Miss Teresa missed her womanhood by joining the Catholic Church as a Nun. She had no first hand experience of being a Mother. I wonder why she is called a Mother?
Why divert the topic mother
Why divert the topic mother Theresa.she has done self less service to all religious people.I think only She was true follower of Jesus love to all humans.Mother love is the best pure in this world.God love is also similar to mother love and may even be higher.Jesus love can be taken as gods love and mothers love.Mother Theresa just followed Jesus and has not asked any one to convert to Christianity in return of her service.Present day Christianity is very liberal and not dangerous.For that matter all religions are relatively better than mad and dangerous islam.Islam is based on fear of punishment in pseudo hell and lure of animalsitic paradise where one will get job of male prostitute to houries.
its nothing but resident
its nothing but resident hindus coming out of Rss madrasas freaking out whenever they hear somthing remotely similar to christian.
I just wonder why the moderator still allow a guy like halal cow , he as far I can see
uses the most abusive language on this board to continue post here.Or is he the moderator him self?
so what would mother theresa should say to the poor women in need of food or ,medicine, instead of providing her with this basic needs .
you must empower yourself !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Caste does not connote
Caste does not connote superiority or inferiority. It simply recognizes different outlooks and corresponding modes of life.
utter stupidity , everything about caste is superiority and inferiority.you dont need to become a rocket scientist to figure it out.its common sense.
you are associated with menial jobs because you are born in to caste.
Gandhi was utterly stupid on this.Remember this guy was thrown out train for he was a black in South Africa by white men, Yet after coming back from SA he wrote this gibberish .Gandhi in his consious always believed that humans are born into different classes, and the root of this way of thinking was Hinduism.
Read this book to get a grip on gandhi
http://www.amazon.com/Gandhi-Divinity-G-B-Singh/dp/1573929980/ref=sr_1_1...
Gandhi was a class consious person through out his life.
its nothing but resident
and where did you come out from, some christian madrassa or is it from one of those christian terrorist organizations like NLFT, etc.?
You are one ignorant christian fool. Varna system of Vedas does NOT say one is superior or inferior. Superiority or inferiority is based on character. How the society practices this is irrelevant and NOT the original purpose of this system.
Why divert the topic mother
Right... that is why she accepted money from criminals and built more convents.... real self-less service indeed... Have you taken a look at those Calcutta hospitals? They look like gutter.... I wonder what she did with all that money... Self-less service indeed..
Only christian fools can keep repeating lies blindly...
Indeed ... true follower of jesus indeed... She was such a true follower that she had to run to California hospitals when she was sick while teaching all the sick people in her hospital in Calcutta suffer with lack of basic necessities.
These people do not even have proper toilet facilities. They have to pee and go in front of anybody... Do you christians have any brains to see that this woman is a con who took all that money in the name of serving poor and probably gave it to vatican bank and convents while the poor people in Calcutta do not get anything?
I guess not as it is disadvantage to christian bigots to peddle their false religion...
This woman teresa taught
This woman teresa taught those suffering in her hospitals that "suffering is a gift" and thus ensured the poor people experience poverty. She did not even provide these people with basic toilet facilities... Do xian fools read this?
See I am not interested in
See I am not interested in convincing any bigoted fasist hindu about anything .I just write for the other readers.the very purpose of hindu varna segregating people ,
playing verbal gymnastics wont help it otherwise
See this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2dCFTuvhPo&feature=PlayList&p=EBF4F40F75...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1CY48_Tmho
the fanatics especially
the fanatics especially coming staaight out of RSS schools lies about varna to make it look like a good system.
The four varnas of the Vedic system are the brahmanas (brahmins), kshatriyas, vaishyas, and shudras. According to this system, brahmanas were required to cultivate predominantly sattvic attributes and have minimal rajasic or tamasic qualities. Kshatriyas were required to have greater rajasic qualities albeit tempered by some sattvic qualities, vaishyas would have more tamasic and rajasic qualities but still sattvic qualities, while shudras were allowed to have predominantly tamasic and rajasic qualities. A person's varna was generally determined by the varna of his father and mother. The boys of the Brahmin, Kshatriya and Vaisyha varnas were identified as such from a very early age by whom? and underwent an initiation ceremony, the upanayana, to confirm their varna status. They are often referred to as "twice born" because of this initiation into spiritual life, specifically, with the study of the Vedas. Thus, from a very early age, the children of the twice-born varnas are identified and trained to take up their religiously prescribed duties.
People are born into varnas you got no control of it if someones father is low caste ,the he is also caste .so he supposed take up certain kind of jobs only.
I bet if it wasnt for the british India would have been backward than the most backword islamic country.
1,They united 3000 thousand or so backword hindu nations after defeating muslims
2 give it a legl system(indian Penal code and indian Civil laws)
3 abolished hindu evil practices like sati and other superstitions
4 give it moden Education(english and science)
The hindu fanatic and founder
The hindu fanatic and founder of RSS Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar was a racist . See his own words
"To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the semitic Races — the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by."[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhav_Sadashiv_Golwalkar
Now FFi is full of his followers, what an irony.
His formulations of Hindutva
His formulations of Hindutva Fascism are so blatant that even his followers, the RSS combine, is running for cover and claiming that this book, “We or our Nationhood defined”, portraying a naked hatred for minorities and eulogies for the likes of Hitler was not written by him. They avoid owning these ideas. But one knows that he penned this book. In an affidavit submitted to the charity commissioner, Rajendra Singh, a later Sarsanghchalak pleaded, "With a view to give a scientific base to propagate the idea India being historically from time immemorial a Hindu nation-the late Shri M.S. Golwalkar had written a book entitled 'We or Our Nationhood defined', which was published in 1938."[7] J.A. Curran in his classic study, RSS: Militant Hinduism in India Politics - A study of RSS: points out "The genuine ideology of Sangh is based upon principles formulated by its founder, Dr. Hedgewar.[8] These principles have been consolidated and amplified by the present leader (i.e. Golwalkar) in a small book called "We or our nationhood defined". It is a basic primer in the indoctrination of Sangh volunteers…[9] Since its quotations have been brought to the notice of people, RSS publishing houses have stopped republishing this book. What does Golwalkar say in this book?
http://www.outlookindia.com/rants.asp?date=09/07/2006&type=normal&pn=5
I dont want to go off topic,
I dont want to go off topic, Iwas just replying to hindu fanatics who took every chance to bash christians and always go off topic
Hi Mat@rix; Cartoons like you
Hi Mat@rix; Cartoons like you need not worry about the topic(smile) You can always find your copy/paste comments. Do the rev.Fats and MomySups at your Christian Madrasa teach you how to stick to the topic?
look objectively !!!!!!
look objectively !!!!!!
@Matrix, In other words you
@Matrix,
In other words you do not have anything to defend against the christian con woman teresa who fooled many people of their money. LOL...
So anybody who says stuff you do not agree with must be from RSS... Did you learn that from your christian church from one of those pedophile priests? As I already said, whatever people practice need NOT necessarily be what the religion teaches... Nobody can deny there are problems with Hindu society in terms of this caste system practice.. However this does NOT mean this is what religion preaches.
This is true for any Varna. All are requires to develop satvic (good) qualities...
This should be the nonsense you learn from your christian churches I guess. Nobody has complete control over developing these qualities, alhough one can strive for goodness.
What Hindu scriptures state is that Brahmin is he who has more satvika (good) qualities compared to Kshatriya or others. Now tell me how can a good person consider exploiting others. Superiority or inferiority is based on qualities. It is NOT some automatic status a brahmin relative receives. If a Brahmin behaves like a rotten scoundrel, he is not considered a brahmin, he is called a shudra or brahma bandhu (relative f a Brahmin). He looses his adhiikara (right) to perform Vedic studies, rituals etc. This is the orthodox position.
Hos is it possible to allow somebody to have more tamasic or rajasic or satvika qualities? You are talking as though some body of human beings controls these things. This is rather stupid statement you make without understanding anything.
Does your xian madrassa teach such nonsense?
NOT true... This is ONE among many factors. The same scripture also talks about Vratyas, those relatives of Brahmins or Kshatriyas etc. who have fallen and lost their rights to conduct vedic sacrifices because of their bad conduct which may include from minor offenses such as drinking to anything major like murder.
As for your question on superiority or inferiority is concerned, it is purely by character and conduct alone. A Shudra who is following scriptural mandate is much superior to vile Brahmin relative and is treated on par with other Brahmins who follow good conduct.
If one shows the symptoms of being a brahmana, kshatriya, vaisya or sudra, as described above (nishkama karma , doing one's duty without self interetsts), even if he has appeared in a different class, he should be accepted according to those symptoms of classification.Bhagavatam 7.11.35
The hindu fanatic and founder
Just as Gandhi does not define Hinduism, neither does Savarkar. People born of that age were influenced by British and European racism. None of these define what Hinduism stands for and they are wrong. I have no problem agreeing to this.
However let us see how many of you christians even acknowledge teresa is a con woman who stole other people's money in the name of serving poor, that catholic church is an organization that still cheats billions of people all over the world by hiding their pedophiles, murderers and crooks.
look objectively !!!!!! Now
Now we have to learn objectivity from christian bigots...
# 26. continuum1; Matrix kid
# 26. continuum1; Matrix kid has not read, what she/he has copy/pasted from some Christian site & that is called Christian Objectivity.
So all your explanations about "--tamasic or rajasic or satvika qualities?---" are well beyond this cretin Christian's comprehension.
That proves how these two evil Cults (Christianity and Islam ) make a Zombie of a human being.
Converting from Islam to Christianity amounts to " Changing the label of the bottle " while the contains remains the same.
Dear Matrix, I write below
Dear Matrix,
I write below the essence of varnasramadharma.
People everywhere were/are divided into four 'varnas' or 'castes' (brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya and sudra) based on the 'guna' or quality born of prakrti (nature) - satvam, rajas & tamas- found in individuals.
Brahmana means one who know Brahman (God). This is possible through studying scriptures (Vedas, Vedantas, Upanishads and sastras) and living accordingly.
Those dominated by rajo-guna are considered as ksatriyas and those who have all three gundas more or less in equal measure are considered as vaisyas and finally those dominated by tamo-guna are considered as sudras.
And the measure of these gunas vary in individuals at various times, climes and places. In other words, a person considered as brahmana today may not have predominance of satva-guna tomorrow thereby changing his status from brahmana to that caste appropriate to the gunas predominant in him at that particular time and a sudra today may acquire more of satvia guna tomorrow and so on.
To substantiate the above, let us see what the scholar who translated Bhagavad-Gita and Bhagavatam with elaborate purport from Sanskrit to English, His Divine Grace Shri Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada, founder of ISKON, writes about caste (www.krishna.com)
Brahmana is a title, a position, like that of a High Court judge. The son of a High Court judge cannot automatically become the judge of a High Court. He has to acquire the necessary qualifications to become a High Court judge. Similarly, the son of a brahmana has to acquire the qualitieis required to become a brahmana; if not, he is not to be considered a brahmana. It is the same with all other castes.
In other words, caste of a person is determined based on his thoughts and consequent words and actions, not by birth.
The caste system being practiced in India at present is not in accordance with the scriptures; it is against the spirit of Sanatana Dharma scriptures.
Matrix, With regard to your
Matrix,
With regard to your wring 'Hindu fanatic' let me explain it, as follows:
An Islamic fanatic is one who tries to conquer for Allah all non-muslims through jihad of all kinds including lying, looting, raping and killing.
A Christian fanatic is one who tries to harvest 'souls' of non-christians using any method on behalf of Father, Son & Holy Spirit.
A Hindu fanatic is one who renounces everything including family, friends and wealth and goes to worship God. This is the ultimate a Hindu should do or lead life of a Yogi?
Do you know about yoga and yogi?
Hi #31. Kaalan; You are
Hi #31. Kaalan;
You are asking difficult questions to a cretin Christian, don't forget that their knowledge is limited to Bible ( that too Old/New Testicles) just as the Muslim cretins' knowledge is limited to Qu-Rand ( the book of prostitution).
They may tell you what they Believe only as they have no real knowledge or exprience of their faith.
Vienna,11-05-2009 I am not in
Vienna,11-05-2009
I am not in agreement with religion hoppers like
grass hoppers.Forgive me I let no one posess me.
I do not approve some one hit Mother Theresa
or some one else.Human performance speaks
for itself.It does not help cursing Gandhi as well.
I hope individuals show maturity and integrity.
kb
Islam is my religion.
Islam is my religion. yesterday, now, n forever.
what ever you believe is...coz theres only one God in this universe.
we don't need to hate each others..lets put our hands together, coz we all the same human that God create..theres no different between us..:)
Muslims..Christians..Buddha..no matter what u believe, as long as u feel that good for u, so keep on it. Only God have right to judge us, just do what u feel its true.
God see us all from above, n He knows what we are..inside..and outside.
Lets respect all religions..
Peace..:)
Lea we wish we could respect
Lea we wish we could respect all religions. Islam wants to kill all of us and if not make us pay to live. Muslims can feel good, not us. I am not any religion so I must submit to Islam or die. Apparently you didnt read your god's laws. I did and since allah is the evil devil of the Bible, I prefer to allow god to kill him.
"Muslims..Christians..Buddha.
"Muslims..Christians..Buddha..no matter what u believe, as long as u feel that good for u, so keep on it. Only God have right to judge us, just do what u feel its true."
Go check your religion first before acting like a humanist.
Christians: people of the book - must be converted and if refused, killed or become dhimmi,
Buddha : don't have any god at all - must be killed, for not believing allah the sadist,
Hindu (you forgot or you didn't mention it because....): polytheist, must be converted or die.
Judaism(you forgot or you didn't mention it because....): disobidience race according to allah, must be converted and if refused, killed or become dhimmi.
ETC.
lea, considering that islam
lea, considering that islam does not teach respect for others of other religions - I think that you are being very disingenuous in your statement to us. Muhammed showed no respect for unbelievers, or even Muslims not fighting for 'Allah's Cause', or supporting those who do so with their wealth. He called them hypocrites.
So, how can we respect a 'religion' like that?!
And that isn't the all of the lack of respect Muhammed showed to others. He showed no respect for women. He showed no respect for matrimony - he lusted after his stepson's wife and then said that 'Allah said it was ok' (I paraphrase) for him to take the wife as his own.
I get my most trusted information from former Muslims such as the one in the videos from this article.